INSIDE LINE

2012 Volvo S60 T6 R-Design First Drive

Media Player

  • 2012 Volvo S60 T6 R-Design Picture

    2012 Volvo S60 T6 R-Design Picture

    Volvo gets serious about performance with the 2012 Volvo S60 T6 R-Design. | August 23, 2011

Road Test

2012 Volvo S60 T6 R-Design First Drive

Naughty by Nurture

    40 Ratings

    If we're testing a car's ABS threshold and stability-control system effectiveness during a First Drive, it usually means we're doing something wrong. Not this time, however, because our hosts invited us to "Go as fast as you feel comfortable" in a 2012 Volvo S60 T6 R-Design. We should also report that we were on a racetrack Volvo rented for the exercise.

    Thunderhill Raceway Park is a fast, undulating, deceptively technical track that rewards precision and poise as much as it punishes brakes and tires. Besides the blind corners that lurk atop manmade and natural hills, the 3-mile 15-turn track features fast sweepers, off-camber corners, and a front straight that measures nearly a half-mile. Combined, this track proved to be an excellent lab to demonstrate where the nearly superb 2012 S60 T6 R-Design diverges from the merely admirable 2011 S60 T6.

    Starting Line
    The most obvious difference between the 2012 Volvo S60 T6 and S60 T6 R-Design (let's just call it "T6 R") is in the turbocharged 3.0-liter engine's tuning. While an 8 percent horsepower and 9 percent torque increase don't seem like much of an upgrade, it's how and where those increases manifest themselves that matters. Volvo partnered with Polestar, a Swedish racing and performance parts company, to increase both air and fuel flow to the combustion chambers. They also remapped the ECU to advance spark timing. The result is an impressive 325 horsepower without the aid of premium fuel — something most cars in the class require.

    Where the standard T6's smooth-revving inline-6 engine feels sometimes elastic, the T6 R's engine feels immediate and linear. The midrange punch in the T6 R (courtesy 354 pound-feet of torque at 3,000 rpm) is prodigious, and despite the very same gear ratios in the also-shared six-speed automatic transmission, the T6 R's power delivery better suits engine speed in each of those gears — especially 3rd, which we used most on the track.

    There's enough snort for 100-plus mph on that long, long front straight and T6 R will run up to its electronically limited 130 mph with just a little more real estate. Volvo says the car is 0.3 second quicker to 60 mph than the T6, which means it should hit that milestone between 5.4 and 5.6 seconds (depending on rollout), but Volvo also reports it will achieve the same EPA fuel economy as a standard T6: 18 city/26 highway/21 combined. We'll see about all this when we get one for a full test shortly.

    Turn One
    You won't find the T6's driver-selectable Four-C Active Chassis option among those that are available on the 2012 Volvo S60 T6 R. Instead, Volvo went old school and lowered the T6 R with 15mm-shorter springs (that are also 15 percent firmer), fitted monotube dampers, a front strut-tower brace and much firmer bushings all around. Steering remains the same, which means electric-assisted power rack-and-pinion with three distinct, driver-selectable levels of effort — we like "medium." Steering response is indeed sharper without being nervous, and the car tracks beautifully and resolutely around Thunderhill's on- and off-camber corners.

    We brush the brakes to make sure we aren't remembered as 'that guy' at a track event.

    All these chassis upgrades don't so much make the car feel stiff-legged or raw, but come across as a refined system that allows it to keep all four driven wheels in contact with the pavement. The Haldex-sourced all-wheel-drive system utilizes a viscous center differential plus two electronically controlled differentials in the front and rear, which are overseen by a sophisticated algorithm.

    Even after we were taught the unpublished disable-protocol for the car's otherwise nondefeat dynamic stability/traction control (DTSC) system, we were hard-pressed to make it put a wheel off line. Only when the 3,900-pounder was purposely driven too deep into corners did it begin to understeer mildly — a usual malady for relatively heavy, all-wheel-drive cars. But after using the time-honored lift-to-rotate, whack-to-go AWD technique, one of the Volvo-hired ride-along instructors remarked, "You've driven an all-wheel-drive car before, huh?"

    "Sure have. And we're glad this one works like it should."

    Turn Two
    Now we're midcorner with the transmission in Sport (automatic) mode and begin to roll on the throttle, but the gear selection is one too high. "Hmm, mental note: Try manual shifting on the next corner." A few moments later, we go for the shift paddle on the steering wheel and discover... there isn't one. Well, that seems like an oversight — especially on an R-Design S60.

    Sure, the manual gate is available on the console shifter; however, it's oriented forward for upshifts and rearward for downshifts. And as with the standard T6, the transmission programming doesn't include matched-rev downshifts. Bummer. We're driving a street car on a racetrack, but even a Chevrolet Suburban offers matched-rev downshifts these days and the hardly sporty Kia Optima SX Turbo has shift paddles.

    Laps Three and Four
    By now, we've put one "recce" lap in to learn the track and one to familiarize ourselves with the all-wheel drive and manual shifting requirements, and now it's time to put it all together for a couple scorchers. The engine revs so freely that it seems like it should spin beyond the 6,500-rpm redline as we approach the end of the straight. We wish it was even louder, though. Hard on the brakes and pulling for a downshift, we detect a little bit of a shudder. The brake pedal is still firm, yet effectiveness has diminished slightly. Still, we're having fun and press on anyway.

    Over the 100-foot mound of earth that is Turn 5, down the backside and the tires are still clinging to the pavement. Flat(ish) through 6, 7 and 8 before we forget where the blind-line for Turn 9 is. We brush the brakes to make sure we aren't remembered as "that guy" at a track event and continue flat out all the way down to Turn 10 before going back to the brakes again. This time, though, there's serious vibration in the pedal and even less effectiveness. We use the rest of the lap to cool the brakes and opt out of another hot lap.

    We pull into the pits and the unmistakable odor of hot pads wafts into the cabin. We're directed to the assemblage of identical T6 Rs parked beneath an infield canopy and find most of the other cars with similarly hot brakes. The R's vented rotors, measuring 12.4 inches up front and 11.9 inches in the rear, are the same size as those on the standard T6. They are also smaller than a BMW 335i's rotors (13.7 inches front, 13.2 inches rear). And they're not up to more than a couple laps on a fast racetrack. The car is sent out again with another driver when they cool down.

    Finish Line
    Not all First Drives are held on a racetrack (we wish they were), and we applaud Volvo for having the confidence in the 2012 S60 T6 R-Design (and us) to do so. We'll give the brakes a Mulligan because a track, especially Thunderhill, is really hard on them.

    Regardless, we learn plenty about the S60 T6 R. It's got a great engine that irons out any previous flat spots in the rev range. The all-wheel drive behaves intelligently and proactively without waiting to lose traction before doing something. The steering is light and precise through its meaty wheel and the Continental ContiSportContact3 tires provide more grip than a Volvo has ever experienced. We like this car a whole lot.

    The scenic two-hour drive from the track in an identical 2012 Volvo S60 T6 R was far more representative of the sort of demands it will face in the real world. There were cattle crossings, potholes, seams in the pavement in the middle of corners and choppy freeways. From beginning to end, we never thought the ride, brakes or steering were anything other than supple, substantial and spot-on.

    Volvo is quick to point out that the 2012 S60 T6 R-Design (at $43,375) isn't intended to take on a Mercedes-Benz C63 or BMW M3. Rather, it should be considered a competitor to an Audi S4 with the sport rear differential (at $50,675) or BMW 335i xDrive with the M Sport package (at $48,675). Viewed in this light, each is not quite an all-out top-dog sport sedan, but all represent a significant force-fed, all-wheel-drive step above their base versions. Fair enough.

    It looks as if Volvo just lined up a sport sedan comparison test for us. Do you suppose they could rent that track for us, too?

    Edmunds attended a manufacturer-sponsored event, to which selected members of the press were invited, to facilitate this report.

    Sort By:

    myob says:

    01:12 PM, 08/31/2011

    >


    Uh, I think he's referring to the AUDI S4.   I had to chuckle at that one.

    kingon says:

    10:37 AM, 08/29/2011

    it is high performance and beautiful well.  if you interest your R-Design will try good.

    shaymasdaddy06 says:

    07:10 PM, 08/28/2011

    Based on this review, I test drove S60 T6 R-Design this weekend and it is an impressive ride!!  The acceleration pins you back in your seat especially using the manual-shift mode (yes, no paddle shifters in a big omission for this car...Volvo, pls correct that immediately!!!).  The handling was excellent with a smooth ride in comparison to the 2012 Acura TL SH-AWD Tech I drove the previous weekend.  Just to clarify, the TL's handling is excellent as well but the ride quality is not as smooth even with the 18" wheels and all season tires.  And regarding the brakes on the R-Design, they were just fine providing short, confident stops.  Since I don't take my car to the track,  the brake comments above are valid, but should be of little concern during everyday driving.  Some may ask why compare these two when there is a 12 inch difference in length (182 vs. 194)???.....well it took Acura 12 inches to have a 3 inch advantage in rear leg room.....the other 9 inches could be considered waste and provides little benefit.  At 5'11", my legs were fine in the back seat of the R-Design.  They are both weigh in at about 3900 lbs and are nicely equiped from 44K - 48K.  Also, the trunk space is virtually the same (12 cu. ft. vs. 12.5 cu. ft.) except the S60  R-Design does have the fold down split rear seats vs. the pass thru only in the TL SH-AWD.  Being a Honda/Acura fan, I am very impressed with the S60 R-Design.  I also like the 5 year warranty with 3 years of free maintenance from Volvo.  For those of us who need an 'escape' to and from work/daily errands, both cars are excellent choices.  As this point, the S60 R-Design just passed the TL SH-AWD to the top spot on my short list.  

    rwatson says:

    02:45 AM, 08/28/2011

    sherief says:

    11:50 AM, 08/25/2011

    "the lack of a manual transmission means I'd skip right over this in favor of the S4, every time."


    Excuse me? You must be talking about a previous (Much previous) year model. I see nothing manual from Volvo other than the C30, wich looks like a Japanese acid trip gone bad.

    But I'm with you on the need for 3 pedals.

    Oh, you're welcome to post a link for this magical 3-pedal S40, cause I sure can use one too.

    mau19 says:

    08:49 PM, 08/27/2011

    Anybody that says Volvo sucks, sucks more than the car. Like @bestjinjo said anybody who talks bad about Volvo's has either never owned one or never been in one. Lucky me I have never been in an accident on any car and never wish to, however, my grandparents have one and I rode it to LA and back. Note: I live two hours away! and I have to say it was the most comfortable, quiet, exciting, safe, and let's not forget quick! (for a 5 cylinder that is!) I have been in a 2005 Ferrari 360 Spider, and while it does not compare, it was pretty amazing. Those who say Volvos' design is boring, let me tell you something; Volvo has on of the cleanest and most beautiful designs of any car manufacturer out there, and while I deeply appreciate Mercedes-Benz and BMW, at least Volvo tries to be it's self and not a cheaply made Rolls-Royce! My respect for Volvo and all other Swedish cars who are sadly very unappreciated.

    bestjinjo says:

    02:54 PM, 08/27/2011

    proxima,

    Most people who talk negatively about a Volvo have probably never driven one or been in 1 in an accident. I have. While I appreciate Audis, Mercedes and BMWs, I still acknowledge that Volvo makes great cars. Certainly, the best seats, audio and safety for its price. It might not be as fun to drive as a 335is, but that's not the point. I think it's an amazing package overall.  Volvos cost a LOT more in Canada too. It's interesting that in the US people think of it as a sub-premium brand.....I wonder if they've ever even owned a Volvo?

    nycstickdriver says:

    06:46 PM, 08/26/2011

    wth where is the 3rd pedal!

    300zxguy says:

    03:22 PM, 08/26/2011

    agree with those who find the dash design lacking. That center portion with the screen and vent looks terrible and doesn't blend well at all with the floating center stack with its wide horizontal vent.  Also, the other 3 vents have a bright outline, but the one next to the screen doesn't.  It looks haphazard.  +1 to the guy who said the gauges look like owl eyes, I have this complaint about all recent Volvo gauge clusters.  I prefer to see full needles and stick a display in between if you have to have one.

    proxima says:

    09:46 AM, 08/26/2011

    Wow...so many "experts" here bashing on this ride. 325 hp, all wheel drive, 0-60 in 5.5 seconds.  Excellent safety ( yes, I do owe my life to my 740 volvo a few years back, it was totaled by a drunk driver, he had severe back and neck injuries, I got a small cut that didn't even need a stitch) and great driving dynamics.  Volvos interiors have always been a case of less is more. They have the best seats in the business, not only for safety but for comfort as well.  Don't like the styling? Don't buy it.  Yes the brakes should be brembos but, in everyday driving these should be just fine.  

    mrmrf says:

    08:11 AM, 08/26/2011

    What happened to the Brembos from the previous generation S60 R?  I'd think, with only moderate pricing increase, Volvo could throw on some beefy brakes - aftermarket would be overkill for this kind of car and cost far more than what Volvo could likely charge.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2012 Volvo S60 T6 R-Design

    Base Price:

    $43,375

    Engine:

    3.0-liter turbocharged inline-6

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed automatic

    Power:

    325 hp @ 5,400 rpm

    EPA Rating:

    18 city/26 highway/21 combined

    On Sale:

    Now

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2012 Volvo S60 T6 R-Design 4dr Sedan AWD (3.0L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
    Vehicle TypeAWD 4dr 5-passenger Sedan
    Estimated MSRP$43,375
    Assembly locationGhent, Belgium
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front-engine, all-wheel drive
    Engine typeTurbocharged, port-injected, inline-6, gasoline
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2,953/180
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder
    Compression ratio (x:1)9.3
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)325 @ 5,400
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)354 @ 3,000
    Fuel type87-octane acceptable + 91-octane for best performance
    Transmission typeSix-speed automatic with console shifter and Sport/Manual modes
    Transmission ratios (x:1)1st = 4.15; 2nd = 2.37; 3rd = 1.56; 4th = 1.16; 5th = 0.86; 6th = 0.69
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)3.33
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent MacPherson struts, coil springs, monotube dampers, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent multilink, coil springs, monotube dampers, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeElectric-assist, speed-proportional, rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)15.0
    Turning circle (ft.)39.0
    Tire make and modelContinental ContiSportContact3
    Tire typeAsymmetrical summer, high-performance
    Tire size235/40R18 (95W)
    Wheel size18-by-8 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialAlloy
    Brakes, front12.4-inch one-piece ventilated cast-iron discs, single-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rear11.9-inch one-piece ventilated cast-iron discs, single-piston sliding calipers
    Track Test Results
    0-60 mph, mfr. claim (sec.)5.5
    Fuel Consumption
    Fuel economy, mfr. est. (mpg)18 city/26 highway/21 combined
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)17.8
    Audio and Advanced Technology
    Stereo descriptionAM/FM/CD, HD Radio, AUX and USB inputs, MP3 capability, 160-watt amplifier, 8 speakers; Optional: AM/FM/XMSiriusCD/DVD-video player, HD Radio, AUX and USB inputs, MP3 capability, Dolby Pro-Logic II® Surround Sound, 650-watt amplifier, 12 premium speakers, MultiEQ XT by Audyssey
    iPod/digital media compatibilityStandard iPod via USB jack
    Satellite radioStandard XMSirius (6 months free subscription)
    Bluetooth phone connectivityStandard with audio streaming
    Navigation systemOptional with traffic 7-inch display screen (measured diagonally)
    Smart entry/StartOptional
    Parking aidsOptional parking sonar front and rear back-up camera
    Blind-spot detectionOptional
    Adaptive cruise controlOptional
    Lane-departure monitoringOptional departure warning
    Collision warning/avoidanceStandard
    Night VisionNot available
    Driver coaching displayStandard
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,877
    Length (in.)182.2
    Width (in.)73.4
    Height (in.)58.4
    Wheelbase (in.)109.3
    Track, front (in.)62.1
    Track, rear (in.)62.0
    Legroom, front (in.)41.9
    Legroom, rear (in.)33.5
    Headroom, front (in.)38.3
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.4
    Shoulder room, front (in.)57.0
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)55.2
    Seating capacity5
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)12.0
    Tow capacity, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,300
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper5 years/60,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years/60,000 miles
    Corrosion10 years/100,000 miles
    Roadside assistance5 years/Unlimited miles
    Free scheduled maintenance5 years/50,000 miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement