INSIDE LINE

2011 Volvo S60 T6 AWD First Drive

Media Player

  • 2011 Volvo S60 T6 AWD Picture

    2011 Volvo S60 T6 AWD Picture

    At last, a Volvo with charisma. | June 02, 2010

Road Test

2011 Volvo S60 T6 AWD First Drive

At Last, a Volvo With Charisma

    36 Ratings

    It can't be easy being Volvo right now. By the time the 2011 Volvo S60 reaches the U.S. this summer, Volvo might be Chinese, Swedish, American or none of the above. This car could be a final fling for Ford, a brave new dawn for the Chinese Geely or the last gasp of a Swedish giant.

    But whoever wins the paternity suit will look to the S60 as the car to reestablish Volvo as a genuine, premium alternative to the German Big Three. Quirky and emotive, the S60 is targeted squarely at the Audi A4, BMW 3 Series and Mercedes C-Class.

    In Europe, the 2011 Volvo S60 will be offered with a broad range of engines, but only the Volvo S60 T6 AWD will be crossing the pond. Equipped with a turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-6 and all-wheel drive, it will battle the BMW 335i for a piece of the market.

    It's a lot to ask. Volvo is already in a fight for its life, and now it finds itself going up against the automotive equivalent of Floyd Mayweather Jr.

    European, Not German
    The 2011 Volvo S60 had a rather strange conception. Designed in an interregnum between Peter Horbury's first and second stints at the helm as Volvo's design director, the S60 actually was penned by Steve Mattin, the British designer responsible for the original Mercedes A-Class and the pre-face-lift version of the current-generation Mercedes SL.

    Horbury was busy running Ford's North American design team at the time, but returned to Volvo after Mattin left last summer. This game of musical chairs has left the S60 in a strange position. It is supposed to establish a new design vocabulary for the brand, but some of those cues might be garbled as Horbury reasserts his authority and his own mastery of Volvo's style language.

    The 2011 Volvo S60 clearly takes its inspiration from the current Horbury-designed S60, yet it is much more flamboyant. The headlights are now cut extravagantly into the hood and the Volvo-signature chamfered shoulder line is less pronounced. The taut, coupelike roofline featured on the original S60 has also been exaggerated. And while the car is clearly a sedan, its rear perspective makes you think of a fastback coupe.

    As we drove the roads of Portugal, the T6 displayed agility not previously available to S60 drivers.

    Whether all this glamour runs counter to the traditional principles of simple, restrained Swedish design is a matter of conjecture, but at least the S60 clearly is distinctive. Like Jaguar, Volvo has come to the conclusion that it needs to present a positive, unusual alternative to the default German marques. It needs to offer, as the company executives remind us, "a reason to buy."

    Volvo has also set aside its corporate strategy of offering models sized to slot in between the cars of its competition (something Audi used to do as well) and instead takes on competing models with a direct matchup in every dimension. All future cars will be sized to match the class norm, and the S60 makes its statement with an overall length of 182.2 inches versus 178.2 inches for the 3 Series.

    Come Home to Sweden
    If the outside is extrovert, the cabin is familiar Volvo fair. The now-traditional Volvo floating centerstack is present and correct, but this time it's angled slightly toward the driver to emphasize the 2011 Volvo S60's dynamic ambitions. An armada of buttons is then mounted in the center of this stack, surrounded by four rotary knobs that control the cabin temperature and the infotainment screen that's mounted high in the dash. It's ergonomically suspect — downright baffling, to be fair — but at least it's different and the quality is good.

    Volvo reckons that the new S60 has 1.2 inches more rear legroom than the old model, but while this dimension makes the S60 competitive with its class rivals (at last!), the rear accommodation is still not what you'd call generous. Those in the front have a much better time. The driving position is excellent and the leather-wrapped front seats prove supremely comfortable on the highway, although keen drivers might wish for a more lateral support if they start to enjoy the S60's newfound dynamic prowess.

    Scandinavian Road Work
    Volvo is quick to claim the 2011 S60 as the most dynamically gifted car it has ever produced. "We've crossed into territory where we've never been before," says Stefan Sällqvist, the engineer in charge of chassis development. While the suspension configuration remains the same, with struts in front and a multilink setup in the rear, everything has been thoroughly upgraded, including a stiffer front subframe, firmer bushings and strut mounts and stronger damper rods.

    A Volvo that aspires to serious road manners is an intriguing development, but also one that has caused some concern at Volvo's headquarters in Gothenburg, as the executives are hedging their bets. In the U.S. the "Dynamic" chassis calibration will be standard, but a "Touring" calibration will be a no-cost option for those interested in more comfort. In addition, the car will be available in a "Four C" version that features three-mode active dampers.

    Transverse Engine, All-Wheel Drive
    Equipped with a twin-scroll turbocharger, Volvo's 2,953cc inline-6 still can be found sitting transversely under the hood of the S60, but subtle modifications designed to reduce internal friction have increased peak power to 300 horsepower at 5,600 rpm and peak torque to 325 pound-feet at 2,100-4,200 rpm. Volvo's six-speed Geartronic automatic transmission is standard equipment and every S60 brought to America will feature Volvo's all-wheel drive.

    This is a fine engine that offers easily accessible torque and a surprisingly strident exhaust note. It is genuinely rapid and the Aisin-built automatic Geartronic does a decent job of exploiting its potential. There are standard and sport modes and you can select gears sequentially using the gearshifter. There are no shift paddles on the steering wheel, though; perhaps Volvo thinks its customers aren't quite ready for such a level of sportiness. Volvo claims acceleration to 100 km/h (62 mph) in 6.5 seconds and a top speed of 155 mph, plus a reduction in fuel consumption compared to the previous S60.

    Volvo's engineers have put a lot of work into improving the steering response, which was a big failing of the old car. The combination of a 100 percent improvement in the structural rigidity of the chassis and a steering ratio that's 10 percent faster makes a big difference. As we drove the roads of Portugal, where we were introduced to the car, the T6 displayed a level of agility and precision not previously available to S60 drivers.

    We're not talking BMW levels of chassis poise and driver engagement, yet we'd warn drivers of the Audi A4 to not be smug. The fourth-generation Haldex all-wheel-drive system with its electrically triggered center differential responds quickly to variations in traction, while the rear electronic limited-slip differential can split the drive to the rear wheels to reduce understeer during hard cornering. The 2011 Volvo S60 T6 AWD feels like an all-wheel-drive car rather than a front-driver with a bit of extra help, and some miles in the European-spec front-wheel-drive S60 confirmed our impression.

    This newfound control also benefits the ride quality, at least in the performance chassis of the S60 T6 that we drove. The float of old has been replaced by greater control, but it's by no means uncomfortably stiff, even on the cobbled streets of our test route. The ride is certainly no firmer than an A4 or a 3 Series, so perhaps the comfort setup is meant to keep previous Volvo owners in the family.

    The People Who Brought You the 3-Point Seatbelt
    A new Volvo wouldn't be complete without a newfangled safety gadget, so the S60 incorporates a pedestrian-detection system that supplements the vehicle-avoidance system introduced to the U.S. by the 2010 Volvo XC60. A camera mounted in front of the rearview mirror automatically detects pedestrians in the road ahead, warns the driver and then automatically applies full braking power if you fail to respond. Volvo claims that the system can avoid a collision completely at speeds up to 35 km/h (22 mph). Above that, it limits the impact speed, reducing the risk of fatalities.

    The new system joins others that warn you if you're falling asleep, straying out of your lane or are about to total the car in front. There's certainly no shortage of beeps or flashing lights, and while some might find all this unnecessarily nannying, they can be switched off at least.

    The Price of Success
    The 2011 Volvo S60 T6 AWD will cost from $38,550, which is a significant leap over the $31,000 starting price of the old model. Its predecessor, though, offered just 208 hp as well as less standard equipment.

    The exact parameters of Volvo's ownership might still be in doubt, but out of an adversity has come a surprisingly accomplished car. The S60 is a well-judged attempt to add some emotive appeal without compromising Volvo's core values. Any owner of a BMW 335i is unlikely to look at this car with lust, but those Audi A4 and Mercedes C-Class shoppers have another option to consider. Quirky but capable, the new S60 puts Volvo back in the game.

    Edmunds attended a manufacturer-sponsored event, to which selected members of the press were invited, to facilitate this report.

    Sort By:

    dwightex says:

    12:24 PM, 03/21/2011

    Had the 2002 s60R, loved it, no problems for 72000 miles. NOw looking at the s60 T5 or T6, don't think that the t6 is worth the extra $4300 (after rebte differential) Car is 400 # heavier so only shaves about .6 seconds in 0-60. Just sold a 2007 328 with 265 hp. This car feels much more balanced and quicker on takeoff (Torque??)

    germancarguy says:

    02:52 PM, 06/12/2010

    I never understood Volvo's sizing scheme for its cars. I was under the impression that Swedish people were pretty tall yet their cars remain on the small side. Compared to every other manufactures small, mid, and large sedans the Volvo's are always smaller in every dimension. The worst part is that they are also priced on the same level as those other sedans.

    At 182.2 inches long the S60 is about 10 inches shorter than any other of todays mid sized sedan offerings. Further, a VW Jetta is 3 inches shorter yet has more leg room and a larger trunk than this new S60 does.

    Comparing their Largest sedan offering the S80 to the competition we find it being about the same size as others Mid sized offerings even though Volvo prices the S80 like a large sedan.

    At 191 inches long it is about 3 inches longer than a VW Passat. Yet the Passat has a whopping 2.7 inches more rear leg room than does the S80.

    Volvos sizing and pricing strategy makes no sense. Combine that with poor interior dimension design and you are looking at some of the most expensive-smallest cars in America.

    At least you could say they had some style and Swedish quirkiness going for them. Now that they are owned by a Chinese company (essentially the Chinese government) I am not sure what they have to offer other than untested new owners. Now that is quirky but not in a good way.

    alpine6speed says:

    03:50 PM, 06/07/2010

    one more thing Doug. I though of another car I would take over this. Its a 4 door AWD turbo is quicker and looks 10000000 times better. The car is the ford taurus SHO. Other than the badge I dont know why anyone would buy this car over the SHO. The interior is actually nicer in the SHO also.

    alpine6speed says:

    10:56 AM, 06/07/2010

    doug I have test driven volvos and every other car I mentioned numerous times. I actually have a BMW 3 series with amanual transmission and sport package. While expensive and a little smaller than this car it trumps it in every catergory espically on the handling side of it. The steering on the VOLVO is by BIGGEST complaint. It is so light that there is zero fun driving it. The R models are fun but a 335i is a much better car for a sports sedan. I have driven these cars at traning for both BMW, Audi, and Subaru so I more farmiliar then the average consumer as I am in sales for a living and have driven 3 gemerations of volvos as well. I have customers who have had volvos before BMWs and who have them at the same time and I usually hear the same thing. Dynamically the BMW is a much better car (espically the handling) and the quality is also is no match compared to a BMW. BMW does not even have the best quality interiors  Audi actually does and I will admit that all day. What I wont admit is that the Volvo even comes close to most of the other cars in the class. The worst car in the class is either the Volvo or the Saab but it does not really matter because the world will be a better place when we lose both of them.

    If you want to know what most people think of volvos go look at a 3 year old used volvo and see how awfull the depeciation is. In fact it might be the worst but I think the Saab is actually worse. The older Volvo and espically the wagons (Pre Ford) were great cars that ran forver. I have heard the volovos have been pretty good with relililty and Im sure BMW and Volvo are close in this catergory but then again it depends on the sourse. Lastly this car in my opinion is awfull looking, not as bad as the TL but aufull none the less. Why does volvo tout this as a drivers car and then only offer an automatic? This sums up what volvo is, big talkers with nothing to back up what they say. If these were such good cars they would not have to GIVE THEM AWAY with stupid rebates and low financing forever and still not sell them. Look at the sales figures and you dont have to say anything else to know where Volvo stands.

    jstandefer says:

    11:34 PM, 06/05/2010

    An update on my troublesome S60: I have taken care of the problems by trading it on a 2010 Mazda3 hatchback, Grand Touring with a 6-spd manual and all the options. For under $26k MSRP, it's such a good value with navigation, HIDs that steer into turns, rain-sensing wipers, 10-speaker Bose surround system, leather, moonroof, perimeter key, memory power driver's seat, etc... especially since I paid invoice minus holdback. With the 0% financing, it was just too good to pass up. It now joins my other half's 2-week old 2010 Mazdaspeed3 in the driveway. We strayed away with the Volvos, but now we're back to an all-Mazda family ('91 RX-7 Convertible project car also in the driveway). Needless to say, I also got the loyaly rebate!

    ne1butu2 says:

    09:44 PM, 06/05/2010

    Love the car. Just don't trust the new owners.  I'll pass for now.

    kernals12 says:

    02:09 PM, 06/05/2010

    sportyaccordy,
    there are so many things wrong with your statement:
    1. The Infiniti M45 had 325 hp
    2. Where'd you get 15 seconds 0-60, or is that the 1/4 mile time
    3. You said that a 9 second difference was close
    4. If 15 seconds is the Infiniti's 1/4 mile time why'd you put down the Volvo's 0-60 time

    I don't know what you've been smoking but i do know you need to quit

    sportyaccordy says:

    09:20 PM, 06/04/2010

    300HP, AWD, 0-60 in 6.5 seconds? This is almost as bad as that 345 HP mid 15 second Infiniti M45... NO THANKS

    jstandefer says:

    06:48 PM, 06/04/2010

    justinlink: Thanks for the advice on the S60. Unfortunately, until the drive axles wear to the point where the car is no longer drivable, the problem is considered a nuisance, like a rattle or squeak. I have a case if I get to that point before the warranty period is up.

    As for the S60 R, we didn't keep that one around long enough to be really troublesome. In the first 8 months, it blew two tires in small potholes on the highway, each time damaging a wheel. The Pirelli P Zero Nero's weren't cheap to replace and those R-specific 18" Pegasus wheels are expensive. The big concern was the AWD system... eventually we would have gotten to the point where the tires were worn enough that we would have to replace all of them if just one needed replacement. The 4C suspension never felt right... Comfort was too floaty, Sport was too soft for performance but too stiff for comfort, and Advanced was much too stiff for anything but a smooth track. Fuel mileage was dismal at best. The leather was also wearing extremely fast (color rubbing off and very bad wrinkling despite frequent conditioning; there's probably a reason why metallic leather is very uncommon), so we decided to cut our losses after a year (it was replaced with a Miata). Don't ask about the depreciation... Volvos drop like a rock (mine has lost 60% in three years), but the R was shockingly bad.

    doug1370 says:

    03:04 PM, 06/04/2010

    alpine6speed:
    I'm wondering which car you are driving now and have you ever test drive a volvo?

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2011 Volvo S60 T6

    Base Price:

    $38,550

    Engine:

    Turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-6

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed automatic

    Power:

    300 hp @ 5,600 rpm; 324 lb-ft of torque @ 2,100-4,200 rpm

    EPA Rating:

    On Sale:

    Summer 2010

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2011 Volvo S60 T6 4dr Sedan AWD (3.0L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
    Vehicle TypeSedan - all wheel drive-passenger 5
    Estimated MSRP$38,550
    Assembly locationGhent, Belgium
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front-engine, all-wheel drive
    Engine typeTurbocharged, port-injected, inline-6, gasoline
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2,953cc (180cu-in)
    Block/head materialaluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, 4 valves/cylinder
    Compression ratio (x:1)9.3
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)300 @ 6500
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)325 @ 2100
    Fuel typepremium unleaded (recommended)
    Transmission type6-speed automatic with console shifter
    Transmission ratios (x:1)I=4.148; II-2.370; III=1.556; IV=1.155; V=0.859; VI=0686: Reverse=3.394
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)2.682
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent MacPherson struts, coil springs, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent multilink, coil springs, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeHydraulic-assist, variable-ratio, rack-and-pinion steering
    Turning circle (ft.)39.0
    Tire typeall season front and rear
    Wheel size18-by-8.0 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialCast aluminum
    Brakes, front13.2-in one-piece ventilated cast-iron discs
    Brakes, rear11.9-in one-piece ventilated cast-iron discs
    Fuel Consumption
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)17.8
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,901
    Length (in.)182.2
    Width (in.)73.4
    Height (in.)58.4
    Wheelbase (in.)109.3
    Track, front (in.)62.1
    Track, rear (in.)62.0
    Legroom, front (in.)41.9
    Legroom, rear (in.)33.5
    Headroom, front (in.)38.3
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.4
    Shoulder room, front (in.)57.0
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)55.2
    Seating capacity5
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)13.7
    Tow capacity, mfr. claim (lbs.)3300
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper5 year(s) / 60,000 miles
    Powertrain5 year(s) / 60,000 miles
    Corrosion12 year(s) / Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance5 year(s) / Unlimited miles
    Free scheduled maintenance5 year(s) / 60,000 miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement