Why We Bought ItHow It DroveInside the CabinSumming UpChanges to the S40 T5 Since 2005Ups and DownsRecalls and Problem HistoryDealer Service ReviewsWhat Consumers SayWhy We Bought ItWith the redesigned S40, Volvo is trying to break from its "boxy" tradition and compete with premier luxury sedans on everything from style to performance. The new S40 is sleek, shapely, attractive and maybe even a little sexy, but certainly not boxy. In fact, anyone not paying close attention could easily take the Volvo S40 T5 for a serious German sport sedan. When we first introduced our long-term S40 we felt that the car would boost Volvo's fortunes in the entry-level luxury sedan segment, and our feelings on that note have not changed. It's luxurious enough to make
VW Jetta buyers aspire for more and it's sporty enough to make
BMW 3 Series buyers question the need to spend the extra bucks. And its style is proof that the Swedes know as much — or more — than the Germans about cutting-edge car design.
Inside, we were also captivated by the S40's unique flat-panel center stack and the car's excellent Dolby Pro Logic II stereo. A base price of about $25,000 sounded great for an entry-level luxury sedan, but our T5 with options had a sticker price closer to $32,000. Still, that's much less than you'd pay for a comparably equipped German sport sedan. But is it a threat to the segment leaders?
How It DroveMost editors liked how the S40 drove and logbook entries regularly said the car had "character," was "well balanced" and had "quicker than expected" reflexes. But for every one positive comment on the car's handling or power there were three or four even more positive comments on the S40's style. Road Test Editor Brian Moody said, "This is a really sharp-looking car. I'm proud to show up at the valet or a friend's house whenever I'm driving the S40. I even catch myself looking back at it as I'm walking away from the parking lot." Content Editor Warren Clarke added, "The S40 has the sort of clean, elegant lines that you typically associate with pricier German metal." And praise for the S40's Mistral Green metallic paint was unanimous: "I love the color and the look of the car. The back end seems a little too bobbed but with the big wheels it's pretty cool-looking, not like the Volvos of old," noted Senior Consumer Advice Editor Phil Reed.
So we're very fond of the S40's looks but some editors felt the car's tight handling wasn't special enough to set it apart. Edmunds Editor in Chief Karl Brauer said, "I do enjoy driving this car. Five years ago this S40 would have been heralded as a serious sport sedan. Now it just feels very confident and composed, but has nothing a
Mazda 6 or
Acura TSX couldn't provide." But that near sport sedan ride sometimes came at a price. Brauer continued, "The ride is firm, bordering on stiff and uncomfortable." Brian Moody noted that on a long trip the car was too much a victim of the local road conditions. "On smooth roads the Volvo is great, almost serene. Its combination of a refined ride and sharp handling are almost BMW-like. But as soon as you hit expansion joints or poorly maintained roads, the fun is all over. The stiff suspension and low-profile tires [Michelin 205/50R17s] conspire to keep the car's overall comfort level somewhat low on a long trip."
Another low point was the counterintuitive throttle. Most editors agree that the T5 version of the S40 has plenty of power, but the manner in which it moves the car is sometimes frustrating. Senior Features Editor Joanne Helperin summed up everyone's thoughts best. "It takes a significant amount of pedal pressure to make the car go, but then it shoots out quickly," she said. "This is an issue for city driving, when the majority of the time you are trying to move along slowly."
Inside the CabinThe S40's interior was another mixed bag of high style and disappointing real-world functionality. Everyone agreed that the interior of the new S40 looks great. Joanne Helperin said, "The controls for everything are very intuitive. The overall design is streamlined and logical, yet not at all spartan. I felt immediately at home."
Managing Editor Donna DeRosa said she liked the "sleek and slim" design of the center stack, while Senior Content Editor Erin Riches added, "Although the ultrathin center stack seemed gimmicky at first, it's actually quite functional, as all the buttons have detents that make them easy to operate while driving." Our editors also liked the comfort of the seats, the quality of the buttons and switches and the optional Dolby Pro Logic stereo.
On the other hand, the logbook was filled with more than a few comments on the overall size and usability of the interior. Phil Reed said, "The S40 doesn't have adequate storage and the compartments in the door are particularly small, almost too small even for our notepad-sized fuel log." Brian Moody said, "This is a wonderful car in many ways and would probably be best suited for those without children. Even with just one kid in the backseat you have to be extremely tolerant as the repeated kicking would try even the patience of a saint." Karl Brauer added, "There's not enough interior storage space." However, Manager of Vehicle Testing Kelly Toepke countered, "The S40's rear seat is a lot bigger than an S60's." And she should know, as a 2000 Volvo S60 is her family's only car.
Summing UpLiving with the redesigned Volvo S40 has been easy for the most part. We like the way the car looks — its "un-boxy" styling is appealing on many levels and we can't say enough good things about our chosen color of Mistral Green. We also like the car's tight handling and the T5's 218-hp turbocharged engine, but found that the S40's fun in corners came at the expense of highway comfort. We didn't always like the feel of the throttle in heavy traffic (when combined with the automatic transmission) but the engine is smooth, powerful and makes the car seem very quick. Although few staffers consider the S40 T5 a true alternative to a car like the BMW 3 Series, it clearly strikes a balance between German sport sedan and affordability.
The interior is attractive and its unique style will appeal to many, but there is precious little storage space for things like cell phones, sunglasses, CDs and extra keys. Even the glovebox was a tight fit for anything other than the owner's manual. Also, depending on the size of your family or rear-seat passengers, the S40's interior overall can feel downright cramped. The rear seat is fine most of the time but put some tall adults in the backseat for a long trip and this car's Achilles' heel becomes obvious.
True Market Value at service end: $23,105
What it sold for: N/A
Depreciation: $8,905 or 27% of original MSRP
Final Odometer Reading: 17,700
Best Fuel Economy: 34 mpg
Worst Fuel Economy: 14 mpg
Average Fuel Economy: 22.3 mpg
Total Body Repair Costs: $2,481.70
Total Routine Maintenance Costs (over 12 months): None
Additional Maintenance Costs: None
Warranty Repairs: 1 (broken key fob)
Non-Warranty Repairs: 2
Scheduled Dealer Visits: 2
Unscheduled Dealer Visits: 2
Days Out of Service: 6 days (for repairs needed after an accident)
Breakdowns Stranding Driver: None
Changes to the Volvo S40 T5 Since 20052006 — The S40 now has revised cupholders. Also, steering-wheel-mounted audio controls are standard on the 2.4i trim, and the six-speed manual transmission on T5 models gains a push-down function to engage reverse. There are also new 16- and 17-inch wheel designs and a new optional air filtration system for the T5.
Ups and DownsUps: A great-looking car with value to boot. If you don't
need the BMW 3 Series' superb performance and impressive badge, the S40 T5's look, power and handling would be an excellent and less expensive substitute.
Downs: Our issues with the Volvo S40 come down to three major gripes: small interior, inconsistent throttle response and sharp sport-sedan handling that comes at the expense of a slightly harsh ride.
The Bottom Line: The perfect car for singles or young couples who want a stylish sedan but don't want to shell out the cash for the "me too" 3 Series.
Recalls and Problem HistoryRecalls: 3 — None.
Problem History
- September 2005 — As the result of a traffic accident, our S40 needed body work to repair a dented left front fender. The total cost was $1,881.
- December 2005 — Our S40 has a key with an integrated remote for the door locks and trunk. The plastic casing developed a crack in the fob, which quickly got worse and eventually led to the car's metal key becoming separated from the casing that contains its remote-lock/unlock device. The dealer replaced the key at no cost.
- April 2006 — The victim of a lane-splitting motorcyclist, our S40's driver-side mirror was knocked off, damaging the outside cover and the mirror itself. The dealer made the mirror operable for the short term, ordered the needed parts and repaired it a few days later at a cost of $600.
Dealer Service Reviews
Santa Monica Volvo
June 2005
As the S40's odometer rolled near the 7,500-mile mark, we scheduled an appointment with Santa Monica Volvo. Our service advisor Tony was courteous and professional. The service included an oil and filter change in addition to the usual checks on wear items like tires and brakes. They also rotated the tires and adjusted the hand brake. This service was covered by Volvo so our out-of-pocket expense was $0. Santa Monica Volvo also gave our car a complimentary cleaning and the car was ready earlier than they initially promised.
December 2005
We took our car in for a cracked key fob. The key was replaced while we waited and the service department was not only fast, but friendly as well.
April 2006
Our Volvo had its driver-side mirror broken off in a minor traffic accident so we promptly made an appointment for the next day. We took it to Santa Monica Volvo, where they immediately installed a working mirror while we waited. However, our local dealer had to order the color-appropriate cover for that mirror, which arrived three days later. The cover was also installed while we waited. Thanks to Santa Monica Volvo's prompt service our S40 had virtually no downtime as a result of our little accident.
What Consumers Say
"This is my first Volvo and it's much more solid than my Saab. This car is a dream on the highway; I can drive long trips and not be uncomfortable or exhausted at the end of the trip. It's also very nimble at highway speeds. The turbo 5-cylinder is slow to start (no surprise) but I have to watch my speed after that. I prefer manual transmission and I really don't like the clutch; the spring needs to be redesigned because it causes me to let it up too fast sometimes." — tkbindpls, March 22, 2006
"This is my first 'new' car purchase and I am completely happy with my choice. It was a toss-up between the Volvo S40 and the Audi A4 and the Volvo won out because I ended up saving about $4,000 over the Audi. Some would say that you can't compare the two, but I feel that I got the better deal. I love my new car and wouldn't trade it for the Audi for any reason. The handling is responsive and pickup in the T5 model is great!" — New Volvo Owner, December 27, 2005
"I have owned my S40 for 5 months now, and I am still completely satisfied with my purchase. It's a great-looking car, fun to drive and I feel very safe knowing it's a Volvo. I also get a lot of compliments on it! I would highly recommend it to anyone in the market for a compact car. I don't like how my hand always seems to hit the windshield wiper handle when I put the key in the ignition. The key fob also is a little flimsy." — Erin, March 11, 2006
Add A Comment »