INSIDE LINE

2012 Volkswagen Passat First Drive

Media Player

  • 2012 Volkswagen Passat Picture

    2012 Volkswagen Passat Picture

    No one will mistake the new Passat for a fashion statement. Then again, that hasn't stopped midsize sedans from selling well in this country before. | May 18, 2011

Road Test

2012 Volkswagen Passat First Drive

The Big American Sedan Is Back

    109 Ratings

    "Whatever you do, don't say 'size matters' during your presentation."

    Those were the words of advice a Volkswagen executive gave to Oliver Stefani, just before he introduced the 2012 Volkswagen Passat at Volkswagen's new plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, where the car will be built.

    The tired joke would have been an easy fallback for Stefani, the vehicle's lead designer, who trained at the Art Center of Design in Pasadena, California. After all, Volkswagen is counting on this Passat's increased size to help it attract more American buyers.

    But after spending several hours behind the wheel on the roads between Nashville and Chattanooga, we think there's another reason Americans might like this sedan — simplicity.

    That's because this Passat is like an old-school American sedan. There are no needless displays, funny shifters or hard-to-read buttons. You want lights? Turn a knob. Need to change the station? Turn a knob. More heat? Turn a knob.

    Nothing is complicated and there's room to stretch out. The materials look good and every piece is solidly assembled. It's like a Crown Vic that's been to finishing school.

    It Is Big, Though
    Thankfully, Stefani avoided the obvious cliché, but he wouldn't have been incorrect. The average midsize sedan in the U.S. is huge compared to its European counterparts, so clearly size does matter. It was one reason why the previous Passat never competed well against the Honda Accord or Toyota Camry.

    This new Passat is much different. While the European Passat is still the same size after its recent refresh, the Passat built in America is bigger in every direction. The wheelbase, the overall length and, of course, the backseat are all bigger than before. It's now within an inch of the Chrysler 300 in terms of rear head-, shoulder and legroom. Even the trunk is up to 15.9 cubic feet. That's bigger than the cargo bays of the Accord, Camry or Chevrolet Malibu.

    There's a bigger selection of engines, too, starting with the 2.5-liter inline five-cylinder we've come to know and tolerate in the Jetta. From there you can upgrade to Volkswagen's 2.0-liter inline four-cylinder diesel or a 3.6-liter V6. All of them offer some form of six-speed automatic, while the two smaller engines are offered with manual gearboxes as well. According to Volkswagen officials, the manual options are meant to reinforce the Passat's credibility as a driver's car. Good enough reason for us.

    An Unlikely Driver's Car
    With its giant footprint and front-wheel-drive layout, the 2012 Volkwagen Passat looks lazy on paper. It's not nearly that bad from behind the wheel, though, thanks to its modest curb weight and precisely tuned suspension.

    At 3,221 pounds with the base engine and optional six-speed automatic, the Passat weighs about the same as a Honda Accord and slightly less than the Ford Fusion and Toyota Camry. With the V6, the Passat is over 100 pounds lighter than a similarly equipped Ford or Honda.

    As well as the Passat handles, it doesn't get much help from under the hood.

    It has sharp steering that's quick to respond off center, so it feels more like its European counterpart than some oversize, American land yacht. We tossed it through some tight canyon turns to see just how far it could be pushed and it felt surprisingly competent. There's the expected understeer as you approach its limits, but it doesn't get in over its head easily. The brakes are solid, too, with a progressive pedal feel that makes them easy to modulate smoothly.

    It's unlikely that any Passat owners will ever push it to the point of understeer, so how it rides on the highway is clearly more important. It's solid there, too, although not quite as battleshiplike as the Phaeton was in its day. The lack of wind noise makes the tire noise a little more noticeable and big potholes will generate loud thumps within the cabin.

    Handles Better Than It Goes
    As well as the Passat handles, it doesn't get much help from under the hood. The standard 2.5-liter, five-cylinder engine generates a respectable 170 horsepower and 177 pound-feet of torque, but it never really feels like it. Volkswagen says it's good for a 0-to-60-mph time of 8.7 seconds. Problem is, that's about a full second slower than most of its competitors.

    The 2.5-liter engine is the same iron-block, five-cylinder Volkswagen has been using for years and it's never been known to make good sounds. Its use in the Passat is most likely a means to a price point as Volkswagen is targeting $20,000 as a base price.

    Being the good German company that it is, Volkswagen is going to push its 2.0-liter TDI as a sensible alternative. With an expected EPA rating on the highway of 43 mpg, the Passat TDI certainly sounds appealing. That is until you try swinging out to pass a semi truck and realize that once its 236 pound feet of torque has peaked there's only 140 horsepower on tap to finish the job.

    And the V6? With 280 hp and 258 lb-ft of torque, it should have plenty of power no matter what you're doing. We never got a chance to find out, though, as there were no V6s on our test-drive. For now, your guess is as good as ours.

    The Top Trim Level is Nice
    In another classic move, all the Passats we drove were top-of-the-line SEL models. That means that all had the "Autumn Nut Burl" interior trim, a 6.5-inch navigation screen and sport seats. Figure this Passat would start around $25K or so with the base engine.

    It's a well-laid-out and good-looking cabin. The wood isn't overly fake-looking and the almost leather seats feel a step above your average vinyl. Both the driver and front passenger seats are eight-way power-adjustable on the SEL while base models get similar adjustments with manual controls. Space up front is generous and the thin A-pillars make for good visibility.

    Most importantly, the Passat's interior design doesn't try too hard. Even in our loaded test cars, the cabin is simple enough to use without ever even glancing at a manual. Dual-zone climate control is standard along with a trip computer that sits in between the big analog gauges. Bluetooth connectivity and auxiliary steering wheel controls are also standard, but the overall button count remains low. There's not much flash, either, unless you consider an analog clock and a little chrome trim ostentatious.

    And the Base Model?
    We never got to see a run-of-the-mill Passat S, the one they'll inevitably advertise for $20,000 when it goes on sale in October. We suspect that its black interior trim is slightly less attractive than the SEL's polished wood and without the navigation system the dashboard will look even less high-tech.

    In some cars, that level of blandness might be a crutch. In the 2012 Volkswagen Passat, it could end up being a badge of honor. As other mainstream cars continue to add endless features that few owners ever use, the Passat's relative simplicity could make it the anti-Accord that American buyers have been waiting for. Oh, and it's big, too; that should help.

    Edmunds attended a manufacturer-sponsored event, to which selected members of the press were invited, to facilitate this report.

    Price and Build Your Own 2012 Volkswagen Passat at Edmunds.com

    Sort By:

    jrecufan says:

    09:08 PM, 10/04/2011

    You know - I saw another article on this car today and had to come to IL and post.  Every time I see this new Passat, I, well, truth be told, I doze off.  Really?  This is it?  Not only does VW now have to fight a perception of reliability issues (I would never ever consider owning one), but they've gone and destroyed the one thing that might have set them (ever so slightly) apart from the competition......styling.

    Thanks VW for reminding my daily in so many ways why I would never buy one of your cars.

    gauchograd99 says:

    10:16 PM, 08/01/2011

    As a former Passat (2000) owner, the fact the engine has gone backwards is really depressing. Personally, they should have just brought back the 2000 body style and it would be better looking than that Honda/Toyota/Ford knockoff. Given the availability of the 2.0T engine (205-255HP depending on where it is being used) and DSG transmission, why not go with the turbo and at least put up a fight with the Sonata/Kia's 276HP 2.0T? Seriously, if you believe the EPA numbers, the Sonata/Optima has almost 100 HP more and has 3 more MPG.

    I think I will stick with my 2.0T 2006 Audi A3 with DSG. The hills around here would cause that poor engine to work itself to death. Sorry VW, you have taken a few steps back.

    steve3752 says:

    06:15 AM, 06/08/2011

    I feel this is a giant step backward for VW.   The 2.5 is old and not competitive.
    The styling is 10 years outdated.  Very disppointing for those loyal to VW.

    They think they will attract more buyers from outside the VW fold.  I dont think so.  They wil lose l the hardcore VW owner with this and wind up with a big loser.

    I have bought a 2007 Passat and 2009 CC.

    Would never buy this.

    lions208487 says:

    04:17 PM, 06/02/2011

    Give me a Kazashi instead, or even a Sonata/ Optima, Focus, Accord, Malibu, and even a Camry before this. It may start at 20 K, but I have never know anyone including myself, that has not had numerous reliability problems from a VW product.

    litewerk says:

    11:28 PM, 06/01/2011

    One thing I've noticed on this site along with other auto enthusiast sites is a tendency for the vast majority to want to downgrade any new model that doesn't meet or exceed the specs and standard equipment of the so-called class leaders.  And, the same if something isn't available as an option.  The way I see it is if something doesn't appeal to you, move on to something that does.  It's almost like everything has to live up to your expectations, and if it doesn't, it's just no good.  And, there's a perception of a need to tell the automakers and anybody that will listen why you are right and they were wrong.

    What I'm leading up to is it seems to me VW recognized that it had gotten too far from it's roots.  What many have appreciated as a premium, near-luxury car from VW was priced such that it was a low volume seller.  Making their cars more affordable is a necessary part of getting back to their roots and being able to compete on price against the key players in the all-important mid-size sedan market.  Simplicity and inoffensive styling are bound to be keys to broader appeal across the American marketplace.  With perhaps a few exceptions, I'd guess few enthusiasts or consumers in general lust after the mid-size sedans.  It's more about practicality and some compromises.  The fact that VW offers a manual transmission on 2 of the three engines is proof to me that they are putting out driver-centric cars rather than mere point-and-steer appliances.

    cub452 says:

    09:26 PM, 06/01/2011

    I cant say im thrilled with the looks or the feel of the new vw's well least the jetta and passat having looked at them both. For one the styling is just too bland and both of them almost like the same minus some small features and the size. The inside is the worst part tho even with the upper trim levels parts of the car feel and look very cheap. No where close to the solid feel you got out of the older model years

    lserve says:

    08:33 PM, 06/01/2011

    Styling is very subjective of course, but I do think they've taken a very different approach than the Korean's for example, who's cars are starting to appear almost over styled.   Same with Audi.  Its simple, clean, not particularly exciting.   If they can solve for the reliability question, they may have something.

    new22003 says:

    07:52 PM, 06/01/2011

    I am just not feeling VW's new styling direction. Seems very plain and low rent.

    fusionboy07 says:

    12:39 PM, 05/30/2011

    I just saw this car downtown Atlanta in a photo shoot.  I must say, volkswagen is trying to make their vehicles look upscale like Audi but I personally think their new design look so blann. The new beetle and Toureg and of course the amazing cc.  The rest of the line up is just a big question mark. (my opinion).  This particular vehicle reminds me of a volvo, and some character lines of an audi.  It screams Granny car.

    contheon says:

    07:22 AM, 05/30/2011

    With the old tech 5 cylinder, it's not going to fly. Bring back the 2.0 Turbo and add the cost difference to the price. Then at least you have a competitor.

    I'm a diesel believer, but unfortunately my state is not. In CT, deisel fuel cost more than premium so the operating cost advantage goes to the oil companies and state

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2012 Volkswagen Passat

    Base Price:

    $20,000 est.

    Engine:

    2.5-liter inline-5

    Gearbox:

    6-Speed Automatic

    Power:

    170 horsepower

    EPA Rating:

    22 city/31 highway (est.)

    On Sale:

    October 2011

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2012 Volkswagen Passat 4dr Sedan (2.5L 5cyl 6AM)
    Vehicle TypeFWD 5-passenger sedan
    Estimated MSRP$20,000
    Assembly locationChattanooga, TN
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front-engine, front-wheel drive
    Engine typeNaturally aspirated, port-injected inline-5, gasoline
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2,480/150
    Block/head materialIron/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder
    Compression ratio (x:1)9.5
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)170 @ 5,700 rpm
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)177 @ 4,250 rpm
    Fuel type87-octane
    Transmission typeSix-speed automatic with console shifter
    Transmission ratios (x:1)I = 4.04, II = 2.37, III = 1.56, IV = 1.16, V = 0.85, VI = 0.67, R = 3.19
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)3.87
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent MacPherson struts, coil springs, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearMultilink
    Steering typeHydraulic-assist, rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)16.4
    Turning circle (ft.)36.4
    Tire typeAll-season
    Tire size215/60R16
    Wheel size16-by-7 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialSteel
    Brakes, frontVentilated disc
    Brakes, rearDisc
    Track Test Results
    0-60 mph, mfr. claim (sec.)8.7
    Fuel Consumption
    Fuel economy, mfr. est. (mpg)22 city/31 highway
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)18.5
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,221
    Length (in.)191.6
    Width (in.)72.2
    Height (in.)58.5
    Wheelbase (in.)110.4
    Track, front (in.)62.1
    Track, rear (in.)61.0
    Legroom, front (in.)42.4
    Legroom, rear (in.)39.1
    Headroom, front (in.)38.3
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.8
    Shoulder room, front (in.)56.9
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)57.0
    Seating capacity5
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)15.9
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement