We owned a 2010 Volkswagen GTI for the last 16 months and it was one of the most polarizing long-term test vehicles we've had in awhile. One early blog entry stirred up controversy between GTI supporters and opponents.
"This VW GTI is some great car," it began. "It's not that it's less than half the price of an M3; it's that it's more than twice as good as an M3.
"I'd argue that the GTI is better than an M3 because it combines the M3-style virtues in a car that is not only affordable but also responsive and nimble. The disappointment we all felt when the BMW 2002 was replaced by the BMW 3 Series had to do with size and weight, and we preferred a nimble, lightweight car.... I'm tired of driving 4,000-pound sedans masquerading as coupes.... For me, the Volkswagen GTI is the kind of M3 I prefer, less like a V8-powered truck and more like the Whispering Bomb. It's a great car."
Why We Bought It
For 2010, the new VW's 200-horsepower 2.0-liter turbo-4 ranked it among the most powerful GTIs to date. Yet each generation of GTI seemed to arrive with a little less edge and a bit more comfort. The latest version followed that trend and we wondered if the GTI we knew so well was finally gone.
The fact that we already had a redesigned 2010 Mazdaspeed 3 in our long-term test fleet would help the comparison. There was a time when the GTI was the car to beat. Now the Mazdaspeed wore those shoes. Would time favor the seasoned, sophisticated VW? Or would its softened edges push us toward the all-or-nothing performance attitude of the Mazda? Only a long-term test would tell.
Durability
We answered one question early on. Volkswagen officially hung up the keys to the GTI we once knew. A nondefeat stability control system and conservative suspension tuning reflected the GTI's transition from a performance-only hatch toward broader acceptance.
A large contingent disagreed with VW's use of the GTI badge for this vehicle. And the discontent in our hallways ranged from mild to extreme. "It's lacking all of the character and personality the earlier generations had. This car is soft, the steering is over-boosted and not informative," chimed one editor. Another added, "Why can't I disable stability control on this sport compact car? Silly. Just silly." Also overheard, "There's too much sound deadening. When you have to funnel engine sound into the cockpit with a tube, you might have gone too far." Not everybody agreed with the hallway banter.
Executive Editor Michael Jordan spoke for the opposition. Jordan wrote, "As before, the GTI is cheap, with a price that we suspect is actually thousands of dollars less than the real cost, as VW uses it to build showroom traffic. As before, the GTI is comfortable, a car spacious and poised enough to help you withstand a cross-country trip. And most important of all, the GTI offers the same, honest high-performance dynamics for which Volkswagen has always been noted. There are guys who wish this car was some raspy Japanese piece for fan boys, all roll stiffness, limited suspension travel and torque steer. But the GTI was never like that before, and it makes more sense to be different than the Mazdaspeed 3 or Subaru Impreza WRX rather than the same."
Inside the cabin our 2010 Volkswagen GTI was accommodating and the build quality was excellent. The front seats were supportive and highly adjustable, though we found the seating position favored the long of leg. The rear seats were also surprisingly comfortable. We did have a few gripes with the interior, though. It could use more storage space for one. The hook for the rear cargo cover broke, too, and we encountered a slight whistle from the B-pillar on the highway at various times.
Routine service on the GTI was easy since there was free maintenance for three years or 36,000 miles. The only qualifier was that we had to take it in at the prescribed intervals of 6K, 10K, 20K and 30K miles. In addition to the usual items, Volkswagen Santa Monica performed two warranty repairs. At the 10,000-mile service it was the YS campaign, a preventative measure securing the driver side footwell vent to keep it from detaching. At the 20,000-mile visit the dealer reflashed the BCM (body control module) to correct a TPMS issue experienced in some 2010 GTIs. Our only out-of-pocket expense was for one new Dunlop SP Sport tire, after the original was damaged irreparably.
Total Body Repair Costs: None
Total Routine Maintenance Costs (over 16 months): None
Additional Maintenance Costs: $274.27 for 1 new tire
Warranty Repairs: BCM update, YS campaign
Non-Warranty Repairs: Replace one tire
Scheduled Dealer Visits: 3
Unscheduled Dealer Visits: None
Days Out of Service: None
Breakdowns Stranding Driver: None
Performance and Fuel Economy
We track-test our long-term cars twice, once at the beginning and once at the end of each test period. The 2010 Volkswagen GTI stuck around longer than the usual 12 months. Since it was around, the VW was subject to a couple of additional tests.
First, let's compare standard instrumented test results. After 24,000 miles acceleration from zero to 60 mph remained unchanged at 6.6 seconds (with 1-foot rollout). The elapsed quarter-mile time was 0.10 second quicker, 14.9 seconds at 95.0 mph. Veteran brakes stopped the GTI from 60 mph in 120 feet, which was 10 feet less than during its first test.
From a dynamic perspective, the GTI was improved slightly in both the slalom (66.7 mph) and around the skid pad (0.90g). Road Test Editor Mike Monticello noted, "The GTI does not have a true ESP off button even though it is labeled as such. It only eliminates traction control. Smoothness is the key to keep ESP from intervening too much. Despite being overly soft, the chassis feels like it would be willing if not for the nanny state."
Extra time with the VW allowed for more tests. We entered the GTI into a front-wheel-drive burnout contest with our long-term Mazdaspeed 3. The GTI lost in yawn-inducing fashion and taught us to stick with RWD burnout contests for the future. Spurred on by our readers, we also put the GTI through an 87-octane-versus-91-octane comparison test on the dyno. To our surprise the cheap sauce reduced peak output by just 4 horsepower and 3 pound-feet of torque. The largest observed difference at any engine speed was 10 hp and 11 lb-ft, still less than expected.
After more than 24,000 miles of testing the 2010 Volkswagen GTI returned respectable fuel economy. We averaged 25 mpg, though the VW proved capable of nearly 34 mpg on long highway cruises. And on such cruises we traveled as far as 391 miles on a single tank. Not too bad for a sport compact.
Best Fuel Economy: 33.6 mpg
Worst Fuel Economy: 16.9 mpg
Average Fuel Economy: 24.7 mpg
Retained Value
We turned into the CarMax driveway with more than 24,000 miles on the odometer of our 2010 Volkswagen GTI. Edmunds' TMV® Calculator valued the VW at $20,934 based on a private-party sale. So when CarMax offered us a competitive $19,000 we accepted.
Just over 16 months ago we purchased our GTI for $25,454. And after an extended test it depreciated 25 percent of its original purchase price. Its main competitor in the long-term fleet, our 2010 Mazdaspeed 3, depreciated 26 percent under similar circumstances.
True Market Value at Service End: $20,934 private party
What It Sold for: $19,000
Depreciation: $6,454 or 25% of original paid price
Final Odometer Reading: 24,315
Summing Up
One year with the VW supported our full test conclusions. Chief Road Test Editor Chris Walton summarized, "For all its just-shy-of-class-leading performance, the GTI is still a very attractive, comfortable and competitive hot hatch. That it is not the hot hatch of the hour only shows a sense of maturity that comes from age and experience."
This was no longer the GTI of old. Volkswagen gradually altered the hatchback to appeal beyond its traditional niche. Along the way VW traded some raw fun for softer edges and refinement. A strong resale value suggests this combination was well-received. To find a private buyer who would pay $19K for our used VW was one thing. When a dealer franchise like CarMax offered that amount, it told us the car was in even more demand than our calculations predicted.
Like it or not, our 2010 Volkswagen GTI took everything we threw its way. No breakdowns. No mechanical issues. No routine maintenance costs. In the end, this is one of the cars we'll miss.
Edmunds purchased this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

Add A Comment »
k55 says:
09:49 PM, 12/17/2011
tonkatoytruck says:
06:12 AM, 08/12/2011
I was shocked to see such terrible reliability from Volkswagon on TrueDelta website. Volkswagon used to be a really reliable vehicle. It is amazing how much people talk and research about power differences and handling performance but seem oblivious to everything else. Honda and Toyota may be dull and boring but no one seems to match their reliability. Hell, even Hyundai's reliability has improved more than Volkswagon.
K55,Stay away from Audi and Volkwagon. The Cooper is not too reliable either. I think you should visit TrueDelta and start over. All the cars you listed are below average in reliability
Well Tonkatoy if I needed another Mom I will call you. I have had an 80 VW Scirocco ,98 Audi A4 2.8 Quattro ,99BMW 3i8 Ti Club Sport,2001 Audi TT Coupe Quattro, 2002 Mini Cooper S , 2006 VW GTI ,2007 Porsche Boxster 2.7. The Scirocco only became a problem after about 65k but great up to then. My Porsche clutch and alternator were problems and fixed under warranty . Thats it. I look forward to another VW GTI in the future as soon as the Mk VII is out. Now.....go back and play nice in the sandbox with your toy truck and your playmates.
k55 says:
09:28 AM, 11/10/2011
I had a 2002 Mini Cooper S , then 2006 MkV GTI and now a 2011 Mini Cooper S..........all stick and which will be the last stickshift car for me. I will eventually go back to a Mk VI ( or Mk VII ) GTI with DSG . I came really really close when buying the 11 Mini and go forward on an 11 GTI instead and now regret it some. No matter , the 06 GTI was fine and looking forward to another eventually. They are quick, well made , and I had no issues on the 06.
Anyone know when a HP /ft/lbs bump will occur on the GTI ? ( no ,not the Golf R) . I would like to see the 200/207 go to 211 /258 like in the current Audi TT ( same engine) .
hooklyn says:
07:50 AM, 10/12/2011
I am on my second GTI in a row. Fro $25k or so I can't think of a better DD on the market. Good gas mileage, good performance, high quality interior, and still draws looks. If someone doesn't make a better car soon (not likely) then I will be forced to buy a 3rd GTI next time around.
As far as reliability, it is spotty. Some have great success (ME) and others don't (few). My 2006 MKV GTI had 75,000 miles and had a few issues. It did however end up having a cylinder head issue at 75k miles but VW helped me out with it.
Now, my MKVI w/ 25k miles has had not one issue requiring dealer/service attention. Free routine maintenance means I can go 36k miles without a single cost to me. I like that. And for someone like me who only keeps cars for say 36-60 months, it is perfect for me as nothing comes close to the overall attributes of this car.
Sure, some are faster (WRX) and some are more luxurious (C30) but NOTHING offers the best mix of all these things. Speed 3 is close second but is barely faster and not nearly as nice inside and gets terrible mileage. And its ugly...
perrito says:
02:17 PM, 08/24/2011
Nice car - too bad you can't have the tack-on Dynaudio and Xenon headlights as stand-alone options now. Deal killer. Don't want leather, don't want sunroof, don't want... thanks VW.
unkownuser says:
09:43 AM, 08/16/2011
A year and a half ago I could have bought any car I wanted.
I looked at the MS3. Didn't care for the clutch action, didn't care for my right knee digging into the center console, and to me it seemed that the slow speed turn radius was too wide. Torque steer was pronounced, but I'm not scared of torque steer. Still, enough to make me pass.
WRX was my choice. But couldn't stand the cheapy interior, and was appalled by the idea that I'd have to buy a brand new set of tires if I wanted to drive it year round here in the snow belt- new car as instant garage queen unless I wanted to shell out yet another $1200+
VW had a terrible rep, but at least I had to consider it. Sat inside. Whoa. Let's take it for a spin. Not too bad. I need a car to get me around and be a little fun, not be a track boy.
Got it APRed. Whoa.
I think this long termer was very good in pointing out the goods and bads. But after a year and a half I have zero warranty issues, no squeaks or creaks, and dealer has been just fine.
I'm not embarassed to have people sit in the interior, and I can drive it around without looking like a high schooler.
The WRX would have been close to $29k outfitted as I wanted it (including anything but summer tires). The one I bought? 2010 new with HID headlights, 6 speed, roof, plaid, and most of all 17" wheels (I hate big wheels), bluetooth, no nav (I hate in-car nav). All seasons. I paid only $24K for it new, and waited for the semi-annual APR special. It stickered at close to $27K. (Too bad the 2011 included too much in a package that was too expensive- I would never have bought a 2011 because of that).
I could find nothing else near 24K that could give me the combination of what this little 2010 GTI model could offer. Count me happy.
colorfulyawn says:
11:17 AM, 08/15/2011
I've come to three distinct conclusions about the current GTI.
First, it's definitely not the car VW started out with. It weighs within a few pounds of a Corvette now, and while some will say that kind of bloat is inevitable, I have to disagree. There's just no good reason for an economy-car chassis to weigh that much, and the comments about insulation and sound deadening seem to back that up. If I wanted an inexpensive car that was Lexus-quiet, I would not be looking at GTIs in the first place. I liked these cars when they were inexpensive, lightweight, relatively low-powered fun. Much less so when they're almost as heavy as the domestic V8-powered pony cars they once were so different from.
Second, just because it's different from what it used to be doesn't mean it's not a good car. Obviously VW has hit on a successful formula with the last few generations of GTIs, because people seem to love them. Most people do seem to want more luxury features, a soft ride, and a quiet interior trimmed in leather, regardless of what kind of car all that stuff is going into. In today's context, the modern GTI offers a pretty attractive package to those people, and there will always be more in that camp than those who want lighter, simpler, more responsive machines.
Third, I don't care how good it is, I still don't want one. I'd rather drive a used, automatic Corolla than a car that can't live up to its sporting pretensions, just like I'd rather eat sprouts than a poorly done pizza. For someone like me, the GTI's driving character is a massive letdown after the sporting promises made by its name and appearance. It just feels like a faster version of a too-soft-and-fat, not particularly economical econobox to me.
gtian says:
11:31 AM, 08/14/2011
About the most fun and practical car I can think of on sale. Have had numerous GTI's over the years and always felt proud to drive them and recommend when possible. Never an issue and the interiors are just about perfect! Wish they cames with 17" wheels as standard.
church123 says:
12:07 AM, 08/14/2011
Oops, beclowned myself with a grammatical error. Lack of edit function _still_ sucks. But the point of the post still stands.
church123 says:
06:08 PM, 08/13/2011
Epic fail to burnoutsaregay for attempting to use a Smoking Tire comparison on an autocross course (with stability control on) to try and prove the GTI is faster than a Camaro SS.
You're extra large size L-shaped forehead sticker will be arriving in the mail within the week.
danwilson1 says:
02:17 PM, 08/13/2011
6aptl: "Historically the only reliably reliable car from germany has been the 3 series, essentially all other german cars are crap."
Wow, this guy really has no clue.