INSIDE LINE

2010 Suzuki Kizashi SLS Full Test

Media Player

  • 2010 Suzuki Kizashi Picture

    2010 Suzuki Kizashi Picture

    Suzuki spent four years developing its own midsize sedan from the ground up. Meet the 2010 Suzuki Kizashi. | October 15, 2009

Road Test

2010 Suzuki Kizashi SLS Full Test

Suzuki Finally Gets Serious

    13 Ratings

    Word doesn't travel fast when you're a small-time player, but the 2010 Suzuki Kizashi has been a labor of love some four years in the making. It is by far the most important car Suzuki has ever launched in the United States.

    Although compact cars rule most parts of the world, midsize sedans will make or break you in the U.S. market. So when the 2010 Suzuki Kizashi goes on sale in December, the American outpost of Suzuki has an opportunity to reinvent itself from scratch. The company has never had a presence in the midsize sedan class. That is, unless you count the short-lived Verona, a rebadged sedan from the Korean market.

    Maybe you don't want to take the 2010 Suzuki Kizashi seriously, either. (Oh, that name.) So you'll just have to go for a drive in one. And make sure it's a back road with some tight corners. Do this for an hour and you get the feeling that Suzuki's chassis development engineers get real joy out of driving and they've tuned a midsize sedan for those of us who feel the same.

    It's Homegrown
    Concept versions of the Suzuki Kizashi were said to have a General Motors-sourced 3.6-liter V6. This gave some of us the impression that the whole car would borrow GM platform architecture, much like the current Suzuki XL7. But this is not the case.

    Instead, the 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is an entirely homegrown design. Its basic architecture is front-wheel drive, although an all-wheel-drive version with a clutch-pack-type center differential is optional. And while the Kizashi is coming to the United States first, it will eventually be a world car. So Suzuki has had to make it a little smaller than a biggie-size Accord or Camry.

    The Kizashi stretches 183.1 inches nose to tail and rides on a 106.3-inch wheelbase with a track of 61.6 inches. It's close in size to the Acura TSX and the 2005-'09 Subaru Legacy.

    Grip, not understeer, is the prevailing sensation, thanks to some inspired suspension tuning.

    Like the TSX, the Kizashi uses a 2.4-liter inline-4 engine. This engine has twin balance shafts and features variable intake valve timing. It's rated at 185 horsepower at 6,500 rpm and 170 pound-feet of torque at 4,000 rpm with the standard six-speed manual gearbox. With the optional continuously variable transmission (CVT), power maxes out at 180 hp at 6,000 rpm. You can only get AWD with the CVT, which also has shift paddles for its simulated manual mode.

    Obviously, the Acura TSX and Subaru Legacy 2.5GT offer more horsepower, but the Kizashi easily tops the non-turbocharged Legacy's 170-hp rating. And among all four-cylinder midsize sedans, only the Accord EX (190 hp), and Volkswagen Jetta Wolfsburg and Passat (200 hp) beat it in the power department.

    Suzuki plans to undercut the prices of most potential rivals anyway. The base 2010 Suzuki Kizashi S should come in below $20,000, and our high-line SLS with a six-speed manual transmission should cost about $25,500 (there are SE and GTS trim levels between these two). Expect to spend $27,500 on an AWD Kizashi with the CVT.

    Doesn't Drive Like a $25K Car
    Why mention the TSX and Legacy GT if the 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is so cheap? Well, it just so happens the Kizashi feels a lot like those cars, specifically the smaller 2004-'08 TSX and 2005-'09 Legacy that we liked so much.

    In developing the 2010 Kizashi, says Gene Brown, vice president of marketing and public relations for American Suzuki, "we wanted to build world-class sport sedan at a price the average person can afford."

    Of course, you'll never find a true sport sedan in the form of a front-wheel-drive midsize car with a $25K price tag, but the Kizashi offers a level of entertainment that has been refined out of most other midsize sedans. Like the older TSXs and Legacys, it feels relatively lightweight, agile and honest in communicating its intentions.

    You're not supposed to be put off by the body roll through tight turns. Rather, this is your cue to push harder, because it's then that the Kizashi really digs in. Grip, not understeer, is the prevailing sensation here, thanks to some inspired suspension tuning and an above-average set of all-season tires — P235/45R18 94V Dunlop SP Sport 7000s. The electric-assisted steering is a little shy on feedback, but it weights up so usefully off-center that you scarcely notice it's electric. Stability control can be fully disengaged, and our Kizashi SLS test car slaloms at 64.8 mph and manages 0.88g on the skid pad.

    Brake pedal feel is a tad abrupt at tip-in, but the brakes have ample power and resist fade well — exactly what you want if you're going to play around back roads. Our test car's best 60-mph-to-0 stop is 122 feet.

    What really makes all of the 2010 Suzuki Kizashi's cornering capability a neat trick, though, is the midsize sedan's composure on the highway. Even with 18s, our Kizashi SLS never rides harshly. Road noise isn't a problem, either.

    Engine's Just OK
    We can't muster quite the same enthusiasm for the Kizashi's 2.4-liter engine, but it's perfectly adequate for everyday driving. Low and midrange torque take priority here, and the upshot is that it's easy to get going in low-speed traffic and take full advantage of passing zones on back roads.

    What we don't love is the engine's demeanor at high rpm. Power begins to drop off before the 6,600-rpm redline, and the 2.4-liter is not the smoothest or the freest-revving engine in this class. Rather, it's just average, and this stands out because the rest of the drive is far above average.

    As today's manual gearboxes go, though, the Kizashi's six-speed is pretty good. Clutch engagement is a bit vague, but the long-throw shifter moves through the gates with precision. Heel-and-toe downshifts come easily if you want them.

    This combination is good for an 8.3-second 0-60-mph time (8.0 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip) at our testing facility. The quarter-mile goes by in 16.0 seconds at 86.6 mph. For comparison, a current-generation Acura TSX with an inline-4 (201 hp, 172 lb-ft) and equipped with a six-speed manual runs the quarter-mile in 15.6 seconds at 89.8 mph. Most other non-premium four-cylinder sedans are a second slower than the Kizashi, save for the 2.0T-equipped VWs and the Accord EX.

    There's more in store for the Suzuki Kizashi in the engine department. We're not holding our breath on a turbocharged version of the 2.4-liter, but Suzuki is already a testing a V6 AWD version, which does, in fact, have the GM-sourced 3.6-liter V6 from the XL7 along with a six-speed automatic transmission.

    Snug but Well-Trimmed Cabin
    Cost considerations evidently didn't allow for serious sport seats in the 2010 Suzuki Kizashi, but the cabin is otherwise driver-friendly. The seating position is neither too high nor too low, and the three-spoke steering wheel offers both telescope adjustment and a comfortable grip.

    Most controls are easy to find, and though the audio display in our pre-production Kizashi SLS isn't the most state-of-the-art, Suzuki is working to source an upgraded head unit for production models that will allow more characters to be displayed. Keyless start and a USB port are standard on all Kizashis, and GTS and SLS models get a Rockford Fosgate audio system and streaming Bluetooth capability.

    Suzuki will offer an upgradeable Garmin navigation system for the Kizashi, but this time the screen is larger and built into the dash. The $1,300 price tag for navigation includes a back-up camera and real-time traffic updates.

    The only thing that gives us pause is the somewhat snug rear-seat headroom and legroom, but that's merely a consequence of this being a world car. If you're way over 6 feet, don't get in the back of a Suzuki Kizashi.

    Save Your Jokes
    On the whole, it's pretty amazing how much Suzuki gets right with the Kizashi. This midsize sedan handles well, rides well and accelerates respectably. It's also attractive in an unconventional way and has all the features you'd expect in a mainstream car.

    The only obstacles standing in the way of the 2010 Suzuki Kizashi's success are its funny name and Suzuki's scant dealership network in the U.S. (Actually the latter really isn't funny at all, as dealers are few and far between even in import-friendly Southern California.)

    But for those willing to track down a 2010 Suzuki Kizashi, this is a chance to own a right-size sedan that drives like the TSX and Legacy once did. If the Kizashi can find some buyers, it could change the fortunes of a small-time Japanese player that until now hasn't had the right kind of four-wheeled product for America.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    bepperb says:

    10:13 AM, 10/28/2009

    another car in the segment that has: aluminum pistons with low tensile force rings, forged connecting rods, forged crankshaft, timing CHAIN (not a belt), balance shafts, hydraulic valve lifters AND coil-over ignition. There are none.


    Every Toyota AR or Honda K series engine has everything listed except the Hydraulic valve lifters, but both have fully rollerized valvetrains which IMO is better with the exception of possibly needing adjustment.  The GEMA engine (Hyundai, Mitsubishi, Mopar) also has everything you've listed except the lifters but still bucket style cam actuation.  Trust you?  You don't seem to know what you're talking about.

    Agreed with 1487, it probably won't sell in record numbers out the gate, just because it's too different from a Camry/Accord and performance buyers will probably look past a 4cyl family sedan.

    malik14 says:

    03:17 PM, 10/25/2009

    Style: 7.5
    Performance: 8.5
    Value: 8
    Overall: 24 out of 30

    mtaylor3 says:

    03:07 PM, 10/23/2009

    From what I've seen and read about this car, it seems it is what the last generation of Mazda6 should have been! I bought an 09 Mazda6, but this car makes me think seriously about a swap! Nothing really wrong with the Mazda, but it isn't as much fun to drive as I would have hoped...it's simply too big. I think Suzuki knows what America needs (responsibly sized, efficient, and fun to drive). The trick will be to convince Americans that what they want can be the same as what they need. Good luck, Suzuki...I'll be at the dealer when this thing goes on sale.

    8str8rollin says:

    03:18 AM, 10/23/2009

    That's a really nice looking car! I had seen the concept car at an autoshow already. It was a real looker... very flashy and sleek, but maybe a bit too outlandish for an actual production model. Suzuki did a great job at toning it down while at the same time still leaving alot of the design elements intact. This car will age really well.

    One thing that this article didn't mention though is all the engineering that went into this car. There is nothing else like the Kizashi in this catagory of car on the road today!
    For starters show me another car in the segment that has: aluminum pistons with low tensile force rings, forged connecting rods, forged crankshaft, timing CHAIN (not a belt), balance shafts, hydraulic valve lifters AND coil-over ignition. There are none.

    If you don't know what all that means, trust me, it means this car will be a great performer and is better engineered than anything in its catagory and price level. The prices are going to start around 19k, and go up to 25k for a totally loaded version complete with AWD! To get anything even close to this car you will have to spend ATLEAST 10k to 20K more that you will with Kizashi.

    Suzuki tends to put it's money where you can't see it, unlike other brands that sell a fancy interior on a dinosaur chassis. Multi-link fully independent suspension too, no lame-o semi-trailing arms or torsion beams to be found on this car.
    Combine all those features w/ the AWD option and there's plenty to differentiate this car from Honda's, Toyota's, VW's and Subaru's, etc.

    veryhrm says:

    02:00 AM, 10/21/2009

    Why is the AWD only available w/ the auto (cvt)?   Audi does the same thing w/ their A3 TDI  in the US.  Annoying.    It's not like they don't have the parts...    

    It would be interesting if they did a wagon (w/ AWD and manual).   It could be some competition for the Legacy / Outback  with the same features but 2/3rds the price.

    In the meantime... i'm actually thinking of getting an SX4.  

    foxtrot685 says:

    09:02 PM, 10/19/2009

    i dont see this car taking sales from camy or accord shoppers... i do see it getting looks from potential jetta buyers and tsx buyers for some reason in my head. if its as good as they say it is i wouldnt even look at jetta...

    marvinlee1 says:

    07:24 AM, 10/18/2009

    I have the 2004 Suzuki Verona, which was the top-of-the-line Suzuki sedan that year.  The car has been reliable and is pleasant to drive.  But the depreciation is astoundingly high, as I found out this week upon shopping for a new car.   The best bet for Suzuki may be to install a vigorous V6 in the Kizashi and promote it as an affordable high performance auto.

    clarkma5 says:

    11:33 AM, 10/16/2009

    I fear it won't sell either.  Honestly, I think the public perception is that Suzuki is actually a Korean brand, or is at least Korean-level, and despite how good Hyundai is doing these days I still hear "oh, I'll never buy Korean".  That same sort of attitude will, sadly, make this car a struggle for Suzuki, but I hope they market it well and it finds its niche.

    337 says:

    10:52 AM, 10/16/2009

    @1487: Estimated mileage is to the right of the story.  An estimated 20/29 mpg won't snag much attention...

    flicmod says:

    06:44 AM, 10/16/2009

    Both the XL-7 and Grand Vitara can run well into the $20K's. And people still buy them. American's like adding options, and if enough people are convinced to head over to the Suzuki dealer, then they'll most likely opt for higher trim levels.

    Also, lest we forget that all Suzuki's come standard with Nav now. That's a huge pro for those option-loving American's.

    About the dealer network: I see little reason to believe that Suzuki will have a hard time marketing these things and selling them. A great example of a previous Suzuki success is the SX4. They're selling like hotcakes (for a Suzuki) and they're dirt cheap. Even if most people here opt for the base model S version, I doubt Suzuki will have too big of a problem serving those customers wants. A bigger problem I see would be keeping up with demand for them.

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2010 Suzuki Kizashi SLS

    Base Price:

    $25,375 (est.)

    Price as Tested:

    $25,500 (est.)

    Engine:

    2.4-liter inline-4

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed manual

    Power:

    185 hp @ 6,500 rpm

    0-60 mph:

    8.3 seconds

    Fuel Mileage:

    EPA 20 mpg city/29 mpg highway (est.)

    What Works (pros):

    Impressive grip through corners; composed ride quality; quiet, top-quality cabin; ergonomically correct driving position.

    What Needs Work (cons):

    Adventurous name is off-putting; backseat is snug; engine runs out of steam.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    MakeSuzuki
    ModelKizashi
    Model year2010
    StyleSLS 4dr Sedan
    Base MSRP$25,375 (est.)
    As-tested MSRP$25,500 (est.)
    Options on test vehicleFloor Mats ($125)
    Drive typeFront-wheel drive
    Transmission typeSix-speed manual
    Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)I = 3.615, II = 2.047, III = 1.379, IV = 1.029, V = 0.837, VI = 0.707, Final Drive = 4.117
    Engine typeInline-4
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2,393cc (146 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum
    ValvetrainDouble overhead camshafts, four valves per cylinder, variable intake valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.0:1
    Redline (rpm)6,600
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)185 @ 6,500
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)170 @ 4,000
    Brakes, front11.8-by-1-inch ventilated disc with two-piston sliding caliper
    Brakes, rear10.9-by-0.5-inch solid disc with single-piston sliding caliper
    Steering typeElectric-assist power rack-and-pinion steering
    Suspension, frontIndependent, MacPherson struts, coil springs and stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent, multilink, coil springs and stabilizer bar
    Tire size, frontP235/45R18 94V
    Tire size, rearP235/45R18 94V
    Tire brandDunlop
    Tire modelSP Sport 7000 A/S
    Tire typeAll-season
    Wheel size18-by-8 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialAluminum alloy
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,241
    Curb weight, as-tested (lbs.)3,308
    Weight distribution, F/R (%)59.3/40.7
    Fuel type87 octane
    Fuel tank capacity (gal)16.6
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)20 mpg city/29 mpg highway (est.)
    Edmunds observed (mpg)N/A
    Conditions for Testing
    Temperature (°F)90.9
    Humidity19%
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Wind (mph, direction)2.9 mph head/cross
    Performance
    0 - 30 (sec.)2.8
    0 - 45 (sec.)5.2
    0 - 60 (sec.)8.3
    0 - 75 (sec.)12.3
    1/4 mile (sec. @ mph)16.0 @ 86.6
    0-60 with 1-ft rollout (sec.)8.0
    30 - 0 (ft.)30
    60 - 0 (ft.)122
    Braking ratingGood
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft (mph)64.8 (63.6 stability control on)
    Skid pad, 200 ft diameter (lateral g)0.88 (0.87 stability control on)
    Handling ratingVery Good
    Sound level @ idle (db)40.1
    Sound level @ full throttle (db)79.2
    Sound level @ 70 mph cruise (db)67.4
    Acceleration commentsLaunches in a traditional front-wheel-drive way with generous wheelspin up to about 30 mph. Shift action is long but light and precise. Clutch pedal could stand a more positive engagement feel. Engine feels as if torque is the priority rather than horsepower, as it lies down a bit near redline.
    Braking commentsBrakes engage a little abruptly (little idle stroke) but are otherwise intuitive. On full-ABS stops there's some forward pitch, but it feels well-damped. Good fade resistance and pedal never went soft. Little to no ABS hum or vibration.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: Mild understeer while the rear of the car begins to slide slightly. Excellent balance and steering feels a little disconnected but loads up well. With stability control on, the brakes attempt to eliminate understeer first; then the throttle begins closing -- but it works quite well. Slalom: With stability control off, the chassis requires some time to transfer weight, but when it does, the car rotates usefully. It takes a few passes to learn to predict this, but it works. Plus, there's so much mechanical grip despite the body roll. Clever tuning overall with grip and compliance. With stability control on, it snubs the oversteer to make it more compliant.
    Specifications
    Length (in.)183.1
    Width (in.)71.7
    Height (in.)58.3
    Wheelbase (in.)106.3
    Front Track (in.)61.6
    Rear Track (in.)61.6
    Legroom, front (in.)41.7
    Legroom, rear (in.)35.6
    Headroom, front (in.)39.3
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.0
    Shoulder room, front (in.)55.5
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)54.6
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)13.3
    Warranty Information
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles (battery: 2 years/24,000 miles)
    Powertrain7 years/100,000 miles (transferable)
    Corrosion5 years/unlimited mileage
    Roadside assistance3 years/36,000 miles
    Scheduled maintenanceNot available
    Safety Information
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard front and rear
    Head airbagsStandard front and rear
    Knee airbagsNot available
    Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsElectronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    Rollover protectionNot available
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemStandard
    Emergency assistance systemNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot tested
    IIHS OffsetNot tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement