INSIDE LINE

Comparison Test: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart vs. 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX

Media Player

  • 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart Track Video

    Watch the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart Track Video on Edmunds’ Inside Line | September 25, 2009

3 Videos , 32 Photos | See more photos in this gallery »

Comparison

Comparison Test: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart vs. 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX

Improved WRX Forces a Rematch With Mitsu's Ralliart

    0 Ratings

    Stuff the 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX into a corner, and you know it deserves a rematch with the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart.

    It's no less refined than the 2008 WRX, but it goes in without paralyzing understeer and doesn't keel over as soon as you load the outside tires. Provoke it and you'll get some attitude. When you're back on the throttle hard at the exit, there's no rush to grab 3rd gear. Rescued from last year's rev-starved funk, the 2.5-liter boxer-4 engine wants to see its 6,500-rpm redline again.

    Most important, the 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX isn't trying so hard to distance you from the drive. It rewards your efforts in the cockpit — one of the things that made the previous-generation WRX so likable.

    Probably this is also why the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart is so involving to drive. Introduced last summer, this Lancer Ralliart is the long-awaited head-on challenge to the WRX dynasty and it kicked the 2008 WRX while it was down. Even compared to the 2009 WRX, Mitsubishi's Ralliart is a flashier package. It has mechanical limited-slip differentials both front and rear, a very neat automated dual-clutch gearbox, Recaro seats and the schnoz of a tiger shark. Evo Jr. has a nice stiff chassis, too.

    If the homely gray Subaru has any shot at winning here, it will have to do more with less.

    How Much?
    A relatively low $28,160 price tag is a good start for our 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX sedan.

    This figure includes our test car's Premium package ($2,500), which provides passable but unbranded audio, a sunroof, foglights and heated seats and mirrors. It's really too much money for a not very useful kit, so we'd cheap out here. Notably, the WRX sedan costs $500 less than the hatchback. Take a long look at our tester's tail and you'll understand why.

    Mitsubishi's Lancer Ralliart undercuts the Premium package-equipped WRX sedan with a $27,185 base price — but only if you don't mind sitting high on pedestrian GTS seats.

    To smoosh your glutes into Recaros, you'll have to spend another $2,750 for an option group that also includes HID headlights, hearty Rockford Fosgate sound, a CD changer and satellite radio. Add $150 for Rotor Glow paint, and this 2009 Lancer Ralliart lands at $30,065.

    The Money's in the Drivetrains
    So the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart costs $1,900 more, but remember that it comes with what amounts to an automatic transmission. Mitsu's six-speed Twin-Clutch Sequential Sportshift Transmission (TC-SST) is flexible enough to handle both commuter traffic and back-road work with minimal compromise.

    And whether you use the paddles or cede all control to the computer, the Ralliart's dual-clutch gearbox is invariably smoother and more expedient with gearchanges than you are when working the WRX's conventional five-speed manual.

    Both cars have permanent all-wheel drive as standard, but the Lancer Ralliart goes higher-tech here as well, borrowing from the Evolution IX its Active Center Differential (ACD) hardware, which features driver-selectable pavement, gravel and snow settings. Subaru offers a similar clutch-type limited-slip differential on the STI, but the 2009 WRX has a less costly viscous-coupling unit.

    These Numbers Matter
    Getting Evo-grade hardware in a Lancer Ralliart is cool. But when your budget is limited (and it is, or else you'd be reading some Evo vs. STI test), whatever car you buy should be putting up numbers that justify its go-faster extras.

    Accordingly, we're weighting our instrumented testing results a hefty 30 percent in this comparison.

    In acceleration testing, this approach favors the WRX. The 2008 model was already quicker than the Lancer Ralliart. With the Subie's turbocharged, 2.5-liter horizontally opposed four-cylinder making 265 horsepower at 6,000 rpm and 244 pound-feet of torque at 4,000 rpm in 2009, the gap widens.

    It's Really This Quick?
    The 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX is quicker than you can fully appreciate from the driver seat. The car doesn't like to be launched hard, and although the shifter is smoother through the gates than other Subies we've sampled, it's still notchy.

    You get used to it. Especially when you realize your car hits 60 mph in 5.2 seconds (5.0 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip). The WRX also runs a sub-14 quarter-mile — 13.7 seconds at 98.7 mph.

    Some suggest that the 2009 WRX will out-drag an STI, but the quickest STI we've tested ran a 4.5-second 0-60 time and a 13.3-second quarter at 100.3 mph. Still, there's no denying that the Everyman's 'Rex has moved closer to the STI.

    And, says our resident Evo expert, Engineering Editor Jason Kavanagh, that's no bad thing: "The 2009 WRX is going to make the Evo better."

    Harder Launch for the Ralliart
    Since the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart lacks launch control, we brake-torque it and manage a few runs before the twin-clutch box delivers the fateful "slow down" message and decouples its clutches until everything cools off.

    Our footwork shaves almost a second off the Ralliart's times, but it still runs a half-second behind the WRX with a 5.8-second 0-60 time (5.5 seconds with 1 foot of rollout) and a 14.2-second quarter-mile at 94.9 mph.

    Evo Jr.'s turbocharged, 2.0-liter inline-4 develops 253 lb-ft of torque at 3,000 rpm — enough to get the Ralliart sideways if you want. But 237 hp at 6,000 rpm doesn't go that far in a 3,500-pound car.

    On public roads, the 2009 Lancer Ralliart feels a touch sluggish off the line, and it's weaker through the midrange than the WRX. Drive it hard, though, and the dual-clutch transmission largely masks these vulnerabilities by delivering rapid-fire shifts.

    Tires Revive the WRX
    Once we get a taste of the 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX's newfound speed and renewed appetite for cornering, we don't want to stop driving it on Malibu roads like Piuma and Yerba Buena.

    Our feelings are backed up by hard data from the test track, as the 2009 WRX averages 68.5 mph through the slalom and 0.87g on the skid pad — both good numbers for this class. Still, this isn't quite a night-and-day improvement through the cones, as even with its soggier suspension setup, the 2008 WRX ran a respectable 67.7 mph. We suspect the 2009 WRX is benefiting most from its superior tires. Instead of last year's 205/50R17 Bridgestone Potenza RE92 all-season rubber, the '09 Subie wears wider, stickier 225/45R17 Dunlop SP Sport 01 summer tires.

    How good are these Dunlops? The 2009 Subaru WRX stops from 60 mph in 107 feet. Last year's car had the same brakes but stopped in 121 feet. Our long-term STI stopped in 109 feet.

    Tires Ruin the Ralliart
    Driven on the same roads, the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart corners with less body roll than Subaru's WRX. Its steering is also better weighted and richer in feedback. And with all those limited-slip differentials helping to adjust its cornering attitude, we expect to get on the throttle earlier and harder.

    But we can't, because the Lancer Ralliart wears 215/45R18 Yokohama Advan A10s, which are optimistically classified as summer tires. These Yokohamas push so severely that all you can do is slow way down for tight corners and squeeze back on the gas, anticipating a tail-out exit. It's a terrible waste of Evo IX kit.

    At the track, the Ralliart goes through the slalom at 65.6 mph. That's 3 mph slower than the WRX — an eternity in our world. The Mitsu manages only 0.80g on the skid pad.

    Braking is the bigger worry on public roads. More than once we find ourselves hurtling down a hill into a tight turn and really hoping the tires will eventually dig in to slow the car down. Through it all, brake pedal feel is solid and reassuring, so our brain is telling us the Lancer should have stopped 10 feet ago.

    During testing, the 2009 Lancer Ralliart stops from 60 mph in 127 feet on the first run. All subsequent stops are in the 130s.

    We Take a Time Out
    We're sure a stickier set of tires is all the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart needs.

    But we don't want to speculate. Conveniently, our friends at Mitsubishi have a set of 215/45R18 93Y Bridgestone Potenza RE050As they're willing to swap onto the Lancer Ralliart. These are the same tires the Mazdaspeed 3 wears. New ones go for $215 apiece on Tire Rack.

    So we run our braking and handling tests again. (Take note, Subie fans: These test results do not count toward the final score.) It turns out these RE050As are very worn, so we don't see much improvement on the skid pad with a performance of 0.82g, but the difference in the slalom is huge, as the Ralliart now goes through at 69.3 mph.

    "The Bridgestones give the Ralliart a far more neutral cornering attitude," Chief Road Test Editor Chris Walton says. "Turn-in is far more trustworthy, and when the tires let go at the limit, they do so in unison, so the car drifts as a whole rather than one end or the other."

    The Lancer Ralliart's 60-mph-to-zero braking distance improves to 120 feet. Hard brake pads and/or non-ideal ABS tuning are likely why we're not seeing a more dramatic drop.

    But there's more to better tires than better numbers. During a quick run up Glendora Mountain Road, the 2009 Lancer Ralliart on RE050As stops more predictably and emboldens us to try faster cornering speeds. It's no Evo, but Junior is more fun now.

    WRX Wins by 4.9 Points
    Although it doesn't turn into a corner like an old-gen WRX, the 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX is the better of these two sport compacts. It doesn't matter that the 2009 WRX lacks fancy differentials and a twin-clutch gearbox. It's quicker, lighter and cheaper than the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart.

    Still, had our instrumented tests with the Lancer Ralliart on RE050As counted, the Subie's lead would narrow to 1.8 points. Factor in the higher evaluation scores a Ralliart with stickier rubber would likely get and the Mitsu might squeeze out a victory. The fact that tires matter so much says a lot about this rivalry. In spite of their different hardware, the 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX and 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart are so closely matched that it doesn't take much to tip the scales.

    There's also a lot of emotion that we can't measure. Although the 2009 WRX is the winner here, we can't agree on which one feels better on our favorite roads.

    This happens when we test Evos and STIs, too. The 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart and 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX might be lesser heroes, but they want to be driven just as hard. If that's your thing, neither one's going to let you down.

    The manufacturers provided Edmunds these vehicles for the purposes of evaluation.

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    MakeSubaru
    ModelImpreza
    Model year2009
    StyleWRX 4dr Sedan AWD w/Premium Package (2.5L 4cyl Turbo 5M)
    Base MSRP$28,160
    As-tested MSRP$28,160
    Options on test vehicleNone
    Drive typeAll-wheel drive
    Transmission type5-speed manual
    Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)I = 3.166, II = 1.882, III = 1.296, IV = 0.972, V = 0.738, R = 3.333, Final Drive = 3.90
    Engine typeTurbocharged horizontally-opposed four-cylinder
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2457cc (150cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, 4 valves per cylinder, variable intake valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)8.4:1
    Redline (rpm)6,500
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)265 @ 6,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)244 @ 4,000
    Brakes, front11.6-inch ventilated disc with two-piston floating caliper
    Brakes, rear11.3-inch solid disc with single-piston floating caliper
    Steering typeEngine speed-sensitive, hydraulic-assist rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)15.0:1
    Suspension, frontIndependent, MacPherson struts, coil springs, and stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent double wishbone, coil springs, stabilizer bar
    Tire size, front225/45R17 91W
    Tire size, rear225/45R17 91W
    Tire brandDunlop
    Tire modelSP Sport 01
    Tire typeSummer
    Wheel size17-by-7.0-inch front and rear
    Wheel materialAluminum alloy
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,229
    Curb weight, as-tested (lbs.)3,232
    Weight distribution, F/R (%)57/43
    Fuel typePremium unleaded (required)
    Fuel tank capacity (gal)16.9
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)18 City / 25 Highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)18.4
    Conditions for Testing
    Temperature (°F)61.9
    Elevation (ft.)1121
    Wind (mph, direction)7 mph from the southwest
    Performance
    0 - 30 (sec.)1.9
    0 - 45 (sec.)3.5
    0 - 60 (sec.)5.2
    0 - 75 (sec.)7.9
    1/4 mile (sec. @ mph)13.7 @ 98.7
    0-60 with 1-ft rollout (sec.)5
    30 - 0 (ft.)27
    60 - 0 (ft.)107
    Braking ratingExcellent
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft (mph)68.5
    Skid pad, 200 ft diameter (lateral g)0.87
    Handling ratingExcellent
    Sound level @ idle (db)46
    Sound level @ full throttle (db)77
    Sound level @ 70 mph cruise (db)67.5
    Acceleration commentsIt has been years since we've enjoyed an aggressive launch with at least some wheelspin from a WRX, and this year is no different. The best launch was a bit of a bogger with an aggressive clutch drop, but it didn't feel good. Attempts at slipping the clutch were not rewarded. Shifter feels far more positive and smoother than before, and power delivery feels broader.
    Braking commentsDespite a little wiggle in the rear of the car, brakes felt powerful and trustworthy. No ABS flutter and little evidence of fade. Pedal feel, though, was a little mushy -- otherwise, excellent brakes.
    Handling commentsSlalom: Mediocre turn-in and slightly "doughy" feel to the steering is obviously due to long-travel suspension, but there's plenty of compliance and grip, too. Though not as sharp as it could be, there's an ability to rotate off-throttle and leap for the exit on-throttle with the front tires grabbing/pulling the nose where it's pointed. Whatever "it" was, Subaru put "it" back this time around.
    Specifications
    Length (in.)180
    Width (in.)68.5
    Height (in.)58.1
    Wheelbase (in.)103.1
    Front Track (in.)58.9
    Rear Track (in.)59.3
    Turning circle (ft)35.4
    Legroom, front (in.)43.5
    Legroom, rear (in.)33.5
    Headroom, front (in.)39.3
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.5
    Shoulder room, front (in.)54.8
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)53.2
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)11.3
    Warranty Information
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years / 36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years / 60,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years / Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance3 years / 36,000 miles
    Scheduled maintenanceNot available
    Safety Information
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard dual front
    Head airbagsStandard front and rear
    Knee airbagsNot available
    Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsBraking assist, electronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    Rollover protectionNot available
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemTire-pressure monitoring
    Emergency assistance systemNot available
    NHTSA crash test, driver5 stars
    NHTSA crash test, passenger5 stars
    NHTSA crash test, side front5 stars
    NHTSA crash test, side rear4 stars
    NHTSA rollover resistance4 stars
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    MakeMitsubishi
    ModelLancer
    Model year2009
    StyleRalliart 4dr Sedan AWD (2.0L 4cyl Turbo 6AM)
    Base MSRP$27,185
    As-tested MSRP$30,065
    Options on test vehicleRecaro Sport Package ($2,750 -- includes Recaro front seats, HID headlights, Rockford-Fosgate sound, in-dash CD changer and Sirius Satellite Radio), Premium Paint Charge ($150).
    Drive typeAll-wheel drive
    Transmission type6-speed dual-clutch automated manual
    Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)I = 3.655, II = 2.368, III = 1.754, IV = 1.322, V = 0.983, VI = 0.731, R = 4.011, Final Drive = 4.062
    Engine typeTurbocharged inline-4
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1,998cc (122cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, 4 valves per cylinder, variable intake and exhaust valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)9
    Redline (rpm)6,500
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)237 @ 6,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)253 @ 3,000
    Brakes, front11.6-inch ventilated disc with two-piston floating caliper
    Brakes, rear11.9-inch solid disc with single-piston floating caliper
    Steering typeSpeed-sensitive, hydraulic-assist rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)15.2:1
    Suspension, frontIndependent, MacPherson struts, coil springs, and stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent, multilink, coil springs, semi-trailing arms, and stabilizer bar
    Tire size, frontP215/45R18 89W
    Tire size, rearP215/45R18 89W
    Tire brandYokohama
    Tire modelAdvan A10
    Tire typeSummer
    Wheel size18 X 7.5 front and rear
    Wheel materialAluminum alloy
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,462
    Curb weight, as-tested (lbs.)3,508
    Weight distribution, F/R (%)60/40
    Fuel typePremium unleaded (recommended)
    Fuel tank capacity (gal)14.5
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)17 City / 25 Highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)18.4
    Conditions for Testing
    Temperature (°F)62.3
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Wind (mph, direction)4.0 from the south
    Performance
    0 - 30 (sec.)2.1
    0 - 45 (sec.)3.6
    0 - 60 (sec.)5.8
    0 - 75 (sec.)8.7
    1/4 mile (sec. @ mph)14.2 @ 94.9
    0-60 with 1-ft rollout (sec.)5.5
    30 - 0 (ft.)31
    60 - 0 (ft.)127
    Braking ratingAverage
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft (mph)65.6
    Skid pad, 200 ft diameter (lateral g)0.8
    Handling ratingGood
    Sound level @ idle (db)47.1
    Sound level @ full throttle (db)75.7
    Sound level @ 70 mph cruise (db)69.4
    Acceleration commentsUnlike our previous Ralliart test, we whacked both the brake and the throttle pedals, and the results were dramatically faster (and more abusive). Doing so provides a decent launch, and the transmission's Sport Drive mode takes care of the rest with quick, crisp shifts at redline. Too many brake-torque launches will cause the clutches to overheat and triggers a "Slow Down" on the display and simultaneously decouple the clutch.
    Braking commentsWhile pedal feel is excellent, offering good feedback and resistance, there is simply not enough tire grip to slow the car. No bite, no ABS pulse, no slowing when you stand on the pedal. I'd almost give this a "Poor" rating had it not been for the excellent pedal feel.
    Handling commentsSlalom: There's only one way to make a fast pass here, and the choreography that's required is difficult to repeat: Enter with "maintenance throttle," wait for understeer to set in by the 4th-5th cone, then lift to rotate, then go to wide-open throttle to regain control at the exit. Steering feels great, but the throttle response lags and the tires give up way before the chassis does. Skid pad: Easy to find the tires' limits here with screaming understeer on the limit. The Ralliart is reluctant to tuck the nose in when the throttle is closed, too.
    Specifications
    Length (in.)180
    Width (in.)69.4
    Height (in.)58.7
    Wheelbase (in.)103.7
    Front Track (in.)60.2
    Rear Track (in.)60.2
    Turning circle (ft)32.8
    Legroom, front (in.)42.2
    Legroom, rear (in.)36.1
    Headroom, front (in.)39.6
    Headroom, rear (in.)36.9
    Shoulder room, front (in.)54.7
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)54.3
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)10
    Warranty Information
    Bumper-to-bumper5 years / 60,000 miles
    Powertrain10 years / 100,000 miles
    Corrosion7 years / 100,000 miles
    Roadside assistance5 years / Unlimited miles
    Scheduled maintenanceNot available
    Safety Information
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard dual front
    Head airbagsStandard front and rear
    Knee airbagsDriver only
    Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsElectronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    Rollover protectionNot available
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemTire-pressure monitoring
    Emergency assistance systemNot available
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement