Remember the raw, visceral, ball-breaking Subaru Impreza WRX STI? The STI that was an honest challenge for Mitsubishi's Lancer Evolution?
The STI that was both fast and engaging to drive? The STI that took textbook track drivers — all straight braking and late turn-in — and dirtied them up with ditch hooks, Scandinavian flicks and handbrake turns? Remember that car? Well, then you probably won't like this.
It's been emasculated.
And by emasculated we mean made slower. You see, with the 2011 Subaru WRX STI, Subaru promised a car that would distinctly separate itself from the base WRX. And now the gap has officially closed.
Uh Oh
When we last tested Subaru's WRX STI back in 2009, it hit 60 mph in 5.2 seconds and snorted through the quarter-mile in 13.5 seconds at 101.8 mph. In this test, conducted in ideal conditions and with the same driver behind the wheel, the 2011 STI hit 60 in 5.5 seconds and whimpered through the quarter-mile in 13.8 seconds at 97.4 mph.
Confounding the problem further, the 2011 Subaru WRX STI uses the same engine rated at the same power as the earlier car, its gear ratios and final-drive ratio are the same and it isn't significantly heavier. What's more, this performance is actually slower in the quarter-mile than the 2011 WRX we tested in September.
What's the Same
There are no real powertrain changes to discuss. Under the hood is the same 2.5-liter turbocharged flat four-cylinder engine that's powered the car since its inception. Yes, there have been modest changes to its power, torque and redline along the way, but there's nothing new to say about the powertrain for 2011 (at least that Subaru will admit).
It's rated at 305 horsepower and 290 pound-feet of torque and it's backed by the same six-speed manual transmission, which, in case you forgot, feeds power to all four wheels.
Subaru's Driver Controlled Center Differential, which utilizes both a mechanical (planetary gear-type) differential and an electronically controlled clutch to distribute torque, is still present. So are helical front and Torsen rear limited-slip differentials.
Every STI is also fitted with the utterly infuriating SI-Drive, Subaru's means of tweaking throttle response to suit its driver's needs. The system, however, provides barely adequate response even in its most eager setting (Sport Sharp), which must be engaged every time the ignition key is cycled.
What's Different
We once had a wise college professor who shared this idea with us: "A difference, to be a difference, has to make a difference." He was right.
Subaru of America, for its part, offers no explanation for these results.
Accordingly, we're not sure Subaru's changes to the 2011 Subaru WRX STI make a difference. After our first drive of the car in Colorado last summer we wrote that the suspension changes are "subtle but effective." Truth is, however, that the changes only truly register in certain situations and they don't show a significant improvement in our instrumented testing.
Still, underneath, they are substantial. Replacing the previously rubberized rear mount on both front lower control arms is a heim joint (pillow-ball mount if you're Japanese), which reduces deflection at this pivot. This, claims Subaru, increases steering control at high load. Stiffer bushings supporting the rear subframe are also new. Ride height is lowered by 10mm, spring rates are up 15.6 percent in the front and 53 percent in the rear and antiroll bars on both ends are thicker.
It's a comprehensive redo that should register a more significant change. The same Dunlop SP Sport 600 tires sized 245/4018 are fitted to lighter (4.4 pounds per corner) BBS forged wheels.
The Experience
As with most all-wheel drivers, 1st gear is gone too fast to make any useful observation. In 2nd gear, however, acceleration feels suspiciously off pace and by the time 3rd arrives there's a distinct sense that all the horses haven't shown up to the party.
Handling is a mixed bag. We can appreciate the impressive ride/handling balance Subaru has achieved, as the increase in spring rates hasn't translated into a proportional increase in ride frequency. And there are undeniably instances where fewer steering corrections are needed to hold a line, which is likely a product of the heim-jointed lower control arm. But, honestly, the differences as a whole are small enough that only those intimately familiar with the current STI will notice.
Still, we found the car capable — even at its lower ride height — of tackling rough roads (including gravel) without so much as a wimper. Blast sideways through a washboard-riddled turn and the STI's chassis doesn't even breathe hard. Our test car also endured repeated powertrain-abusing launches as we attempted to match previous test numbers.
The Numbers
The history of WRX STI tests performed in the last three years at Inside Line is a narrative of diminished performance. Our first full test of the current-generation STI proved the car capable of outpacing the car it replaced.
But then things began to change. Our long-term STI, which lived with us for more than a year, accelerated quicker at the end of its loan than it had at the beginning (the best numbers from its two tests are below). That car was 0.3 second quicker to 60 mph and 0.3 second quicker in the quarter-mile than this 2011 model.
Perhaps most telling is the fact that over the course of these three STI tests we witnessed trap speed drop by exactly 5 mph in cars that differed in weight by only 57 pounds. The only legitimate explanation for this reduced performance is a loss of power.
2011 STI sedan (3,408 pounds) |
2008 long-term STI (3,372 pounds) |
2008 STI Full Test (3,351 pounds) |
2011 WRX sedan (3,185 pounds) |
|
| 0-60 | 5.5 |
5.2 |
N/A |
5.3 |
| 0-60 with rollout | 5.3 |
5.0 |
4.8 |
5.1 |
| Quarter-mile time @ speed | 13.8 @ 97.4 |
13.5 @ 101.8 |
13.3 @ 102.4 |
13.8 @ 98.2 |
| 60-0 mph (ft) | 112 |
109 |
106 |
114 |
| Slalom 6 x 100 ft (mph) | 70.3 |
69.7 |
72.0 |
68.8 |
| Skid pad, 200-ft diameter (lateral g) | 0.89 |
0.90 |
0.90 |
0.90 |
Performance in our standardized handling tests didn't improve despite the numerous suspension changes. Lateral acceleration actually decreased from previous STI tests (0.90g vs. 0.89g) and slalom speed fell somewhere in the middle of the other STIs at 70.3 mph.
At 112 feet, the 2011 Subaru WRX STI also required longer to stop than any other (current-generation) STI we've tested.
The Official Word
Subaru of America (SOA), for its part, offers no explanation for these results. In a statement issued after receiving our test results it says, "the numbers are within a few tenths of previous tests; we will investigate this matter."
And when asked about the motivation to buy an STI in light of the WRX's strikingly similar performance, SOA offered the following:
"The motivation to purchase an STI is to experience true rally car performance in a street-legal sports car. While similar in styling, the WRX STI and WRX share just a few minor suspension pieces under the skin. The WRX STI delivers a race-bred transmission, driver-adjustable differentials and Subaru SI-Drive, to name just a few. It provides a unique blend of power, grip and handling in a vehicle that delivers daily driver versatility."
We're told Fuji Heavy Industries, Subaru's parent company, is conducting its own tests to verify our results.
The Take-Away
Our tester — outfitted with the Limited package (leather and a moonroof) and navigation system — rang up a total of $39,870 including destination fees. That's $8,150 more than a similarly equipped WRX Limited.
At the end of the day the 2011 Subaru WRX STI is still a capable car. There's a genuine sense of control when driving it hard, it rips out of slow corners with enough authority to detach your retinas and the fact that it can now be had as a sedan only adds to its appeal.
Equally as important, it's still fun — an engaging driving tool that's at home on most any surface. There's lots of car here. But the question remains: Why is it less car here than before?
The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.
Add A Comment »
2010ms3 says:
10:24 PM, 03/08/2012
Kaboom, ringlands. That is all I have to say about the STI.
mistahcat says:
02:15 PM, 09/18/2011
I'm in a 2011 STI sedan. Just 1 very important comment. Everything they say about acceleration, I agree with. BUT, If you look at the dyno, there's a weird inexplicable dip in there. Get a tune with a tactrix cable or cobb AP, and of course you're not comparing to others in stock form anymore, but you have your explanation and simple fix to the GR-slow. Post-tune driving home, I almost accidentally ripped myself off of an onramp entrance because I didn't realize the difference would be that vast. I think the 2011s just come "balls-sold-separately". Balls-in.... VERY different. :)
05and11 says:
01:53 PM, 04/26/2011
Having owned an 05 for 7 years that at the most recent mod level could get 0-60 in 4.08 seconds, and driving the '11 on a strip with a calibrated G-Timer, laser meter, and vbox, getting 0-60 in 4.72 seconds, and 1/4 in 13.21 AVERAGE, I REALLY wonder WTF the test team was on the day they tested this '11 STI. I have run consistent times under 5 seconds 0-60 as tested by a laser meter.
I am highly disappointed that this review even exists.
Question: WAS SI Drive set for Intelligent, with TC on, and the DCCD set to AUTO(+)? Because if so, you are costing yourselves .8 seconds of acceleration!!
Try Sport sharp, DCCD Manual all rear, and TCS OFF! You will be amazed at what knowing how to operate this vehicle can net for you.
Sorry, but I do have to say that the street start from 30-60 is nowhere near the same as the 05. Possibly due to the bigger turbo, but my 05 could hang with a C5 Z06 when stock, and the new mustang after modding, whereas my 11 could not. But that's ok, the 05 is for the kill, and the 11 is for the long haul.
Enjoy.
evolix says:
12:59 PM, 11/30/2010
I think people who are up in arms over the $39k price are a bit miss lead by the head line that should read 2011 Subaru Impreza STI Limited tested which is the top of the line range model for the STI and starts at around almost $38k. Common, you can cruze on over to the Subaru site and see for yourself an entry level STI starts at around $33k.
crazymofo1 says:
12:29 PM, 11/17/2010
On paper it definitely feels as though the STI is over priced and the WRX would be the wiser choice. To those who feel that way, you have to go and try out both of these cars to truly feel the difference. After you drive it a couple blocks you can tell the STI feels like a completely different car.
With that said, I would like to know if the VDC was off when this test was done or did they play around with the DCCD settings to get the best performance out of it
pbp2011 says:
07:05 PM, 11/13/2010
Just traded a base model 2010 WRX HB in on a 2011 STI HB. Before getting the STI, I already expected the STI to probably not be any faster or maybe even a tad bit slower than my WRX. I knew the STI was heavier and the powertrain (diffs) would "absorb" more power.
Still breaking in the STI, but, so far, my WRX with the SPT exhaust seemed to pull stronger off the bottom. STI seems to be tuned to perform at a higher RPM level. Once I get past the break in period, I will be able to do some testing.
With limited driving time, so far, the STI feels way more planted than my WRX. Cornering grip and composure is way better than my stock suspended WRX. Also, the 6 speed gearbox and clutch feel more robust and perform better compared to my WRX (had the SPT shortshifter). While my WRX was fun to drive, the STI takes the fun factor to another level. No regrets parting with the WRX.
velocity_x says:
07:07 PM, 11/10/2010
Would really like to see dyno results for the car used in the instrumented testing.
Also, was the car run on a race track to get an idea of of how the claimed suspension improvements play out in terms of improved or worsened lap times compared to the previous model?
power6 says:
08:26 PM, 11/09/2010
Oops hit post too soon, wish we could edit posts here:
"In the Boxster and Cayman, the Boxer engine allows for TWO trunks; which other car has this ?
Virtullay all other mid-engined designs have FAR less utility/practicality"
Hmmm most mid engine cars have front and rear storage. Also I am pretty sure the cubes under the hatch in a 'Vette are more than both trunks in a Boxster.
What most mid engine vehicles also have, is engine access from the top so you don't need to drop the powertrain for service.
"the Boxer engine allows for lower placement which in turns helps the polar moment of inertia"
Ahh you are definitely not a VAG engineer.
"Why do you think or refer to Subaru as an "economy" car brand, but BMW is a "luxury" brand?.....I hope it's not because they tell you so in their marketing"
Marketing maybe? Hmm not much understanding of basic brand identity. Plus you'd never insult a potential customer.
Hmmm are you a janitor or something?
power6 says:
08:14 PM, 11/09/2010
@judah777
"working for Volkswagen Automotive Group educates me just fine; what's your day job?"
Oh dude get outta here with that. Why don't you go puff your chest elsewhere ha. You know if you have to tell people how smart you are...
If you are so smart and in love with the opposed motor why don't you get your employer to raise that 100hp wasserboxer from the ashes.
The flat motor does have its downsides, the complex passages require die casting the block in most cases which is admittedly becoming less of a cost problem. Two heads, twice the cams, , twice the exhaust manifolds, and complex cam drive add weight and complexity compared to an inline 4. It is harder to make an adequately strong block. Look at the Evo vs. STI aftermarket, 4G63 or 4B11 the Evo can make some big power on the stock block and rotating assembly, while the Subaru EJ257 needs some serious beefing up.
But you knew that, because you are the expert from VW. You already know everything, nothing more to learn huh? Must be boring days for you...
grockpilot says:
04:07 PM, 11/09/2010
from an artistic standpoint, props to tryin to make it more interesting and fast paced with quick cuts and interesting shots (like Top Gear on a budget). Keep it up!