INSIDE LINE

2011 Scion tC Full Test and Video

Media Player

  • 2011 Scion tC Road Test Video

    Automotive editor James Riswick gives his take on the 2011 Scion tC. | August 25, 2010

1 Video , 24 Photos | See more photos in this gallery »

Road Test

2011 Scion tC Full Test and Video

It's Improved; You Just Might Not Notice

    49 Ratings

    When it was introduced in 2004, our take on the 2005 Scion tC was simple. We thought it was a cool little car with excellent driving dynamics at a stellar price, a perfect combination to attract young, first-time buyers who never gave a second look at Toyota's more mainstream models.

    Time marches on, however, and until the yet-to-be-released 2011 iQ urban commuter blooms, there's a bunch of stale fruit on the Scion family tree, and that includes this 2011 Scion tC.

    Sure, the second-generation 2011 Scion tC received a wide array of significant improvements, all of which improve the car's acceleration, braking, handling, fuel-efficiency and safety. It's just that with all those new pieces, we expected it to drive like a completely different machine and it doesn't.

    Improved Engine and Transmission
    Among the upgrades on the 2011 Scion tC is a larger, more powerful and yet more efficient engine. Besides a host of friction-reducing measures, the long-stroke 2.5-liter engine features variable-length intake runners, variable valve timing on both intake and exhaust sides, and clever (intake charge) tumble control to promote cleaner, faster combustion.

    All that technology helps to produce up to 180 horsepower and a stout 173 pound-feet of torque. It sounds more powerful, too, thanks to a slightly more aggressive intake/exhaust hum. Unless you're particularly annoyed by such things, it's actually a pretty subtle and tasteful accent.

    We were experiencing the car's ability to learn and it must've reckoned we're a pretty sporty bunch.

    Our test car featured the new six-speed automatic transmission, a significant step up from the previous four-speed. Unlike some other recent gears-o-plenty automatics, this one actually feels responsive to even minor driver inputs and offers some appropriately aggressive automatic downshifts under even moderate braking. Toyota says we were experiencing the car's ability to learn a driver's habits and adapt accordingly. The car must've reckoned we're a pretty sporty bunch.

    We appreciate this kind of tuning because it avoids the usual cursing that so often accompanies either a request to squirt into an adjacent lane, or conversely, the expectation of some engine braking to slow slightly for moderate traffic or a slight descent. Rarely do you find such refinement in this segment.

    Oddly, if you want to command your own shifts, there are no paddles/buttons on the steering wheel. Instead, there is a new +/- manual gate on the console shifter that's ironically slow to respond to prodding — and sadly does not offer matched-rev downshifts. Can't win 'em all.

    As we've grown to expect, this sort of sporty, responsive transmission tuning usually gets sacrificed to eke out even a fractional improvement in fuel economy. Seems it wasn't the case with the 2011 Scion tC. While official EPA fuel economy figures have yet to be released, Toyota says the six-speed auto tC should earn 26 mpg in the "combined" rating, and we backed that up with our own 24 mpg average over 275 miles of mixed driving. That's good; not great economy, but still a 3-mpg improvement over the model it replaces.

    Improved Performance
    At the test track, we likewise confirmed Toyota's estimate for acceleration. Without a 1-foot rollout, our 2011 tC ran to 60 mph in exactly 8 seconds on the way to a 16-second, 87-mph quarter-mile pass. Again, a good performance, and only a fraction of a second slower than the front-runners in the sport compact club. Upshifts at the 6,250-rpm redline are smooth, but our socks are still steadfastly on.

    When we stand on the moderately firm brake pedal at 60 mph, the tC's new, larger disc brakes do a good job of stopping in the car in just 118 feet. And they do so without a bit of wander, minimal dive and barely measurable fade characteristics. The new ABS emergency brake assist also performs well, exhibiting none of the humming or buzzing we've witnessed in other cars.

    Rounding the skid pad at 0.84g, the 2011 Scion tC would appear to have made some improvements in its chassis tuning and hardware. The new, larger tires/wheels plus the 1.3-inch-wider front and 2.1-inch-wider rear track have paid off, as anything above 0.80g is considered quite good in this segment. We learned a few more things, however, running through the slalom.

    The first-gen tC was not equipped with electronic stability control (ESC) and was notorious for lift-throttle oversteer — a particularly bad habit if you're barreling down a mountain road and arrive at an unexpectedly tight turn. The not-so-good news is the 2011 tC also gets loose at the rear when you jump out of the throttle, but now with its higher grip levels it means it does so at an even higher rate of speed.

    The good news is that ESC (and traction control) is now standard equipment, and ESC can only be shut off from a dead stop and after holding the defeat button for a good long time. There's not much of a need to, though. There's little to gain by removing the safety net, and the tC corners plenty fast as it is.

    Sure, we recorded our best slalom passes at 64.4 mph with ESC off , but it was a handful. Left on, the tC ran the same course at 63.6 mph and it was easy.

    Driving down the highway, the first thing a reasonably attentive driver would notice is how well the 2011 Scion tC damps the rough stuff. It's especially surprising given the car's P225/45R18 tires mounted on 18-inch aluminum wheels. With few exceptions, the 2011 tC retains very comfortable ride characteristics.

    The new electric-assist power steering, however, has a very narrow (almost nonexistent) on-center dead spot with little resistance even at highway speeds. The result is that we found ourselves chasing the car down an arrow-straight freeway with nearly continual steering input. Maybe it was just the way the Toyo Proxes A20 tires tracked the grooves in our local highways, or maybe we just like to drive in a very straight line. Either way, it was annoying.

    Improved Interior
    The tC's entire dashboard, instrument panel and center stack are also new, but unless you remember the previous car, you would scarcely think so. The design is what we'd call traditional, with big HVAC knobs and logical placement of other controls. The standard 160-watt Pioneer audio system and its eight speakers sound better than most cars at this price point and the innovative head unit is only slightly challenging to learn.

    Access to the rear seats has been made easier now that the front seats feature release levers so both seats slide forward in one, easy motion. Passenger space in back is reasonable by coupe standards save the head-knocking rear glass typical of fastback designs.

    And Yet, Nothing Ventured...
    While Toyota obviously went to all the trouble and expense of adding significant "newness" to its five-year-old Scion, it should've worked harder to resurrect the thing that made the original tC so appealing.

    Rather than carving out another new niche with tC version 2.0, what we got is more like a version 1.2 software update that brings it up to current standards. There are obvious upgrades over the previous model, but there's not much in the innovation department, certainly nothing that will make any of its competitors cringe.

    If this were just another Toyota, we wouldn't think twice about it. But this is Scion. It's supposed to do things differently, and the 2011 Scion tC doesn't.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Sort By:

    toyota420xp says:

    11:48 PM, 02/03/2011

    i like it. its funky different and in vermont very rare. has the sporty style and power i need and would like. im going from a 95 escort to an 87 subaru to a 87 toyota truck to a 99 camry to an 09 corolla. so yes i will feel the power. the car is nicely laid out. ive never owned a 2 door and those are rare and cool. think about it this way. you can have this car or a corolla s for about the same price. what would u choose and in this price range the only options are kia forte(i hear its nice but kia still scares me) civic coupe and the tc. the tc is more radical than the civic and cheaper when you think of the features.

    isend2c says:

    10:22 PM, 12/19/2010

    I've never been in a car that I felt was built worse than this, and that includes a 1990 Jeep Comanche, 1996 Toyota Corrola and a 2001 Kia Optima.  I could push the center console as much as I can the rear bumper of a Corvette.  The plastics were thin and brittle.

    Edmunds.com, please, I trust you guys as a source for cars more than anybody else.  This was a shocking disappointment for me to learn that you neglected to mention this in your review at all.

    scion76 says:

    01:48 PM, 10/25/2010

    BTW JD Powers, although nice, is basically garbage. It depends on Surveys. Not everyone gets these surveys, or even retruns them. Consumer Reports is basically the same thing, and They actually test the products. And scion has been a best pick/highly recommended in long term reliability.
    Hyundai Genesis V6 engine gets better economy? Well Duh. The 3.5L Toytoa V6 is 270HP and 250lbs of tq. and gets 31 highway, on a Camry. Guess what! that's to be expected, based on power to weight ratio. But it's also more expensive, based on vehicle and not to mention more costly on insurance. You want 50 mpg on a 4 cyl, buy a Prius!
    Again witht he Cobalt? The base Cobalt manual, with the 2.2L VVT ecotech engine gets 37 on the highway, with a car that with about 2700 lbs! A bigger engine, with a heavier weight car is going to be proportionately lower. People want to make the tC lighter? I'd prefer more weight on the Cobalt. The tC feels better planted! And, again I could care less with JD Powers ratings. Chevy had recalled over a million cars, including the Cobalt, regarding Power Steering issues. Scion tC never had a safety recall due to anykind of failure. 1 TSB for the wind deflector, reinforce with laminate just in case. (I never had a problem). Early models had to have a side airbag sensor over sensitivity adjustment. Neither of which are "safety" recalls. This is just a fraction compared to how many Cobalts were recalled. (There's not even a million Scions on the road.) A comprably equipped 2010 2LT manual Cobalt with ABS, A/C, 16" alloy rims, Moon roof, leather steering wheel with audio controls, and usb equipped radio is $19,990 compared to a 2010 manual Scion tC with floor mats at $17,991, with all the same features standard, 17" rims, PANORAMIC roof standard, knee airbag & better quality, more rear leg room with reclining rear seats, and a smoother, quieter engine & interior all standard!!! What, 37mpg vrs 27mpg on the highway? Well that $2,000 price difference makes up for the difference in economy. Resale value? Tc was among the top 10 on KBB, where the Cobalt never was. AND, for 2010 Toyota and Lexus are KBB's Best Brand for resale value! I"m not saying Scion is the best car ever made. But, for the value, for young buyers, it's a great, possibly the best choice.
    Looks? the New tC looks geat. But THAT'S MY OPINION. Style is subjective. I know people who hate the look and an equal amount, if not more, that love it. If you're over the age of 32, dictating looks and style, you have no idea what these kids are looking for. I'm 34 myself. And I sure as hell DON'T know it all!

    scion76 says:

    12:50 PM, 10/25/2010

    Wow a lot of negative and a few possitive comments. 1st off...Although not a stellar review about the tC, it's still a possitive. The car is marketed towards younger buyers who will get the stuff they want in a decent, well priced car. Sorry the Cobalt does NOT look like a "great" car. It is not more efficient or cheaper, unless you look at the base Cobalt. Plus it has a cheap, crappy interior. If you compare cars in the SAME! kind of class, 2 door smallish "coupe," it is less expenssive, with more value. Fiesta, Fit? small b class segment, not in same running. Soul? hah I don't think so. plus it's an xB competitor. Juke? Is a crossover. Different design. Plus will need high test, becausse of turbo. Will cost more in maintenance in long run. Forte? I drove the SX Koup and the 2011 tC at the same time. the Koupe has a cheap interior, and hands for crap! Genesis or Mustang? again different segment. Also much more expensive, comparitively. Too expensive, especially for young buyers. The 2011 tC A little too Plain looking for you? well it IS meant to be "pimped out" if you feel the need to.
    Cars.com ripped it? it's preference. All reviews are based on certain preferences, and never 100% unbiased. There are things I don't like about the interior. But, at the same time, there are far more that I DO like. Sure some of it is start, but then people get to have fun with dash kits, and custom interiors. An inexpensive upgrade for most people. I'm with Ed124c and Bodyblue. You who are quick to comment without even sitting in the car have no right to think you're opinions even qualify. I'm NOT saying buy Scion it's be all and end all. I work for a dealership, and sell Scions. I drive a 2005 tC. I've invested about $2000 in options, over the past 6 years, and have been very happy! No I'm not ripping on my competitors because they're competitors. I believe in my product, especially AFTER I have sat in, drove, researched and compared overall numbers.

    darthbimmer says:

    02:02 PM, 09/04/2010

    My wife and I were shopping for a small, commute-worthy car when the tC was first coming out. We put it on the list because Toyota's marketing made it seem like it might be a sleeper econo-sport coupe. But then we drove one. It had dull looks, sluggish acceleration, and flaccid handling. It was basically a 90s Chevy POS compact with a Toyota badge on it. And no, Toyota's overall quality reputation (which may or may not apply to this specfic vehicle) was not enough to rescue it. We dropped it off our list quickly. Now this new generation is out and it seems to be even less desirable.

    ne1butu2 says:

    07:23 PM, 08/30/2010

    I'm not sure what the heck is wrong with Toyota. Everything they touch turns sour lately.

    rlyon says:

    02:44 PM, 08/30/2010

    They killed the only nice car Scion had. Fail.

    alex38 says:

    05:38 AM, 08/30/2010

    i still can't get past the 80's antenna.  Who's idea at Toyota was this?  Some might think it is cool but I see it as Toyota not wanting to fork over an extra $20 to have it integrated into the glass.
    Not a good look for 2010 imo

    colorado1974 says:

    02:39 PM, 08/29/2010

    The back end looks like something my dog left in the yard last night.  Time to get the shovel.

    jrine3 says:

    02:55 PM, 08/28/2010

    The front end of this car looks just like my 1999 Toyota Corolla's.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2011 Scion tC Automatic

    Base Price:

    $19,995

    Price as Tested:

    $20,053 (est.)

    Engine:

    2.5-liter inline-4

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed automatic

    Power:

    180 hp @ 6,000

    0-60 mph:

    8.0 seconds

    Fuel Mileage:

    23 city/31 highway/26 combined (estimates)

    What Works (pros):

    Comfortable ride, ample rear-seat room, solid standard audio system.

    What Needs Work (cons):

    Generic exterior styling, dated interior design.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2011 Scion tC (2.5L 4cyl 6A)
    Vehicle TypeFWD 2dr 5-passenger Hatchback
    Base MSRP$19,995
    Options on test vehicleCement Paint, EF Rear Bumper Applique ($58 est. -- includes clear polyurethane film with UV-resistant top coat)
    As-tested MSRP$20,053 (est.)
    Assembly locationTsutsumi, Japan
    North American parts content (%)0
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front-engine, front-wheel drive
    Engine typeNaturally aspirated, port-injected gasoline inline-4
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2,494cc (152 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder, variable intake + exhaust-valve timing and lift
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.4
    Redline, indicated (rpm)6,250
    Fuel cutoff/rev limiter (rpm)N/A
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)180 @ 6,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)173 @ 4,100
    Fuel type87-octane recommended
    Transmission typeSix-speed automatic with console shifter with manual-shift gate
    Transmission ratios (x:1)1st = 3.300; 2nd = 1.900; 3rd = 1.420; 4th = 1.000; 5th = 0.713; 6th = 0.608
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)3.815
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent MacPherson struts, coil springs, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent double-wishbone, coil springs, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeElectric-assist, speed-proportional, rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)14.8
    Turning circle (ft.)37.4
    Tire make and modelToyo Proxes A20
    Tire typeAll-season (33 psi cold front; 30 psi cold rear)
    Tire sizeP225/45R18 91W
    Wheel size18-by-7.5 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialCast aluminum
    Brakes, front11.7-inch one-piece ventilated steel discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rear11-inch one-piece solid steel discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)2.9
    0-45 mph (sec.)5.2
    0-60 mph (sec.)8.0
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)7.7
    0-75 mph (sec.)11.9
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)16.0 @ 86.9
    0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.)3.1
    0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.)5.4
    0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.)8.3
    0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)7.9
    0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.)12.3
    1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph)16.2 @ 85.8
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)31
    60-0 mph (ft.)118
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)64.4
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON63.6
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.84
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON0.86
    Sound level @ idle (dB)43.2
    @ Full throttle (dB)74.7
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)68.8
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)2,100
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsWith traction control engaged, the tC pauses/stumbles off the line. Shutting off the traction control, the tC has enough torque and good enough tires to leave with some authority, but it cannot sustain it. Unremarkable acceleration from 2nd gear on up. Loud-ish intake/exhaust, quick/smooth upshifts, and we found it went slightly quicker when we allowed it to auto-upshift in the manual-shift gate. Sporty, just not a sports car.
    Braking commentsReasonably flat and controlled, little ABS noise/vibration, medium-firm pedal.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: With ESC off, the tC goes into a terminal understeer state where there's nothing for a driver to do about it. With ESC on, the car applies individual brakes to tuck the nose in and point it around the circle with slightly better results. Steering offered little-to-no useful information and felt like a spring. Slalom: With the tC's historical propensity for lift-throttle oversteer still intact, it's no wonder that ESC is now standard (and can only be defeated at a standstill by holding the button for 5 (?) seconds. Good thing because what starts out feeling sporty and competently controlled quickly devolves into a tricky situation where the rear can snap loose -- just as it did before. Leaving the now-standard ESC on is a good idea and only slows down the ultimate speed slightly. Least intrusive/most effective Toyota ESC we've tested.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date8/10/2010
    Test locationAuto Club Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)70.5
    Relative humidity (%)57.5
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)28.8
    Wind (mph, direction)1.0, crosswind
    Odometer (mi.)902
    Fuel used for test87-octane gasoline
    As-tested tire pressures, f/r (psi)33/30
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)23 city/31 highway/ 26 combined (est.)
    Edmunds observed (mpg)24 worst/24 best/24 average (276 miles)
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)14.5
    Driving range (mi.)449.5
    Audio and Advanced Technology
    Stereo descriptionPioneer 160-watt AM/FM/CD head unit plus 140W two-channel amplifier and eight speakers
    iPod/digital media compatibilityStandard iPod via USB jack
    Satellite radioOptional
    Hard-drive music storage capacity (Gb)Not available
    Rear seat video and entertainmentNot available
    Bluetooth phone connectivityOptional
    Navigation systemOptional DVD
    Telematics (OnStar, etc.)Not available
    Smart entry/StartNot available
    Parking aidsNot available
    Blind-spot detectionNot available
    Adaptive cruise controlNot available
    Lane-departure monitoringNot available
    Collision warning/avoidanceNot available
    Night VisionNot available
    Driver coaching displayStandard: instantaneous/average mpg, Eco lamp on I.P.
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,102
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)3,124
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)64/36
    Length (in.)174.0
    Width (in.)70.7
    Height (in.)55.7
    Wheelbase (in.)106.3
    Track, front (in.)60.6
    Track, rear (in.)61.4
    Legroom, front (in.)41.8
    Legroom, rear (in.)34.6
    Headroom, front (in.)37.7
    Headroom, rear (in.)36.4
    Shoulder room, front (in.)55.4
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)52.1
    Seating capacity5
    Step-in height, measured (in.)14.5
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)34.5
    Cargo loading height, measured (in.)28.9
    Ground clearance (in.)6.3
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years/60,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistanceNot available
    Free scheduled maintenance5,000-mile and 10,000-mile intervals only
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement