INSIDE LINE

Full Test: 2003 Saturn Ion

Road Test

Full Test: 2003 Saturn Ion

Different Doesn't Always Mean Better

    0 Ratings
    Saturn has continually portrayed itself as a "different kind of car company." Initially that meant no-haggle pricing and friendly salespeople, but lately the difference between Saturn and other carmakers has been a conspicuous lack of new or redesigned models.

    Saturn had begun to pick up the pace as of late with the introduction of the Vue sport-utility, a freshened L-Series and now the Ion, a replacement for the aging S-Series, but is this recent push too little too late to save the obnoxiously folksy car company?

    Unlike the early '90s when the original Saturn S-Series sedan debuted, the economy car segment is now awash in numerous excellent sedans. The Ion comes to the table with a class-leading four-cylinder engine, advanced safety equipment and a funky style that won't leave it lost in a crowd. But after our week-long test-drive, the Ion failed to convince us that it's the new standard for the category or that it's the standard in any category for that matter.

    We say this after tooling around town behind the wheel of a Silver Blue Ion 3 with a five-speed automatic transmission. Instead of nonsensical letter combinations to designate the various trim lines, the Ion uses a simple numerical system to define the three available models. The uplevel "3" comes standard with basic amenities like air conditioning; power windows, locks and mirrors; cruise control; and a CD stereo.

    Interior design has never been one of Saturn's strong suits and the Ion doesn't do much to change that perception. A center-mounted instrument cluster attempts to give the Ion a nontraditional look, but it tends to be more of a distraction than a notable improvement. Saturn claims that it allows for a wider range of steering wheel adjustment given the fact that you needn't worry about covering up the gauges, but we would have preferred a traditionally positioned cluster and a steering wheel that telescopes instead of just tilts for optimum comfort.

    And speaking of comfort, the Ion's seats leave much to be desired as well. With virtually no side bolstering of any kind and seat backs that are as flat as the bottom cushion they complement, an uncomfortable backside becomes a reality after as little as an hour in the saddle. A seat height adjuster does allow for the accommodation of a wide range of driver heights, but no matter how comfortable you may be at the start of a trip you're practically guaranteed to be hurting in the end (awful pun fully intended).

    Apart from these misgivings, the Ion's interior design is otherwise inoffensive if not impressive. The climate control system uses a simple three-dial setup and the radio faceplate is easy to reach and well laid out. A tuning knob in place of the tonal adjuster would be a big improvement, but overall the stereo's design and sound quality seemed adequate. Interior storage could be improved as the center console is on the small side and the driver's change drawer is awkwardly placed. We also concluded that the placement of the cupholders directly in front of the gearshift lever is a bad idea as you're apt to knock the tops off your Big Gulps every time you put the car in "Park."

    Since safety is one of Saturn's hallmarks it's no surprise that the Ion features dual-stage airbags for the driver and front passenger along with advanced seatbelts with load limiters and pre-tensioners. An optional head curtain airbag system is a first for this category, providing improved head and neck protection in side-impact collisions. The OnStar communications system is also an available option — another first for the segment.

    Cabin functionality is enhanced through the addition of a flat-folding front passenger seat that allows the Ion to swallow longer items when used in conjunction with the split-folding bench in the rear. The Ion also offers the most trunk space in its class at 14.7 cubic feet. Passenger room is average for the most part, with the Ion boasting best-in-class front headroom but considerably less rear legroom than either the Ford Focus or Toyota Corolla.

    To find an area in which the Ion not only compares favorably but leads the class, you need only glance under the hood. There you'll find the Ion's one and only engine, a 2.2-liter, all-aluminum Ecotec four-cylinder. With 140 horsepower and 145 pound-feet of torque, the Ecotec gives the Ion a considerable edge over its competitors in both horsepower and torque. The Ion is also the only economy sedan to offer a five-speed automatic transmission (a five-speed manual and a CVT automatic are optional).

    Unfortunately, the power advantage of the Ecotec doesn't translate directly into best-in-class numbers at the track. We recorded a 0-to-60 time of 9.9 seconds, a run that would have placed it deep in the pack of our most recent economy sedan comparison test. To its credit, we found the Ecotec engine smooth and willing to rev without delivering the harshness typical of many four-cylinders. Some staffers expressed concern that the Ion didn't seem as lively as some of GM's other economy cars with the same engine, an observation we couldn't explain considering that the Ion's five-speed automatic is designed to extract even better performance from the diminutive power plant.

    Under most conditions, the transmission delivers crisp shifts but we did notice some occasional confusion that resulted in jerky applications of power. Most editors also agreed that Saturn's strange method of gear labeling (letters instead of numbers) is confusing and would be better off with simple number designations.

    Fuel economy over the week averaged 24 mpg, a bit on the low side of its EPA estimates but a typical result of our particular driving styles. We did, however, note that although the five-speed transmission claims to deliver superior fuel economy, the Ion's mileage ratings are identical to the Chevrolet Cavalier, a sedan that uses the same Ecotec engine but couples it with a four-speed automatic instead.

    Most economy cars ride and handle in a manner that is neither sporty nor plush and the Ion is no exception. Rough pavement doesn't do much to upset the body but larger potholes will send a considerable shock through the chassis. The ride quality at highway speeds is commendable but the steering is heavier than it should be and there's not much feel for the road through the wheel.

    More troubling than any minor steering complaints is the Ion's general feeling of frailty. The lack of insulation allows you to hear every crack in the pavement even if the suspension adequately smoothes them out; and although we noticed only a few minor creaks and rattles, the interior trim panels are poorly anchored and of unimpressive quality. While we certainly don't expect the cabin to look or feel like a luxury car for $16K, compared to similarly priced cars in this segment the Ion feels considerably cheaper and less well put together.

    Economy sedans have never been about anything more than basic transportation. While the Ion may offer a few exclusive features and a more expressive exterior design than its competitors, it fails to outshine any of them in the more rudimentary elements of performance, quality and refinement.

    These might be excusable offenses if the Ion cost significantly less, but at $16,395 our Ion 3 test car was no bargain. For that price there are several sedans we would consider first, namely the Nissan Sentra GXE, Ford Focus SE with Zetec and the Toyota Corolla LE. These cars have nearly identical sticker prices yet they offer higher-quality interior materials, more comfortable seats, longer drivetrain warranties and superior levels of refinement.

    There's little doubt that the Ion is a giant leap forward as Saturn's entry-level offering, but in a category that values simplicity, reliability and value above all else the Ion's unique character isn't strong enough to overshadow its notable deficiencies.

    Road Test

    Stereo Evaluation

    System Score: 5.0

    Components: For a car in this price range, we were very disappointed with the stereo inside this vehicle. However, it should be noted that the vehicle we got for our road test had the entry-level stereo offered by Saturn. Consumers can add additional speakers, more power and a six-disc CD changer by choosing option codes on the vehicle menu. Be that as it may, we had to report on the system we tested, and its results were not impressive.

    On the plus side, the head unit in this system was very well designed. Surprise-and-delight features included excellent button spacing, a logical and simple topography and an attractive amber display. The head unit offered both cassette and a single-play CD (remember that you can step up to a changer for several hundred bucks), and all in all the setup in this vehicle rivals anything in its class. There were no steering wheel controls for the stereo in this vehicle.

    Speakers were pretty bare-bones, with a pair of 6.5-inch full-range drivers on the rear deck, plus an identical pair in the front doors. There were no separate tweeters in this system, but again, a step-up option gives you separate tweets and a bigger amp for a few hundred dollars.

    Performance: Not impressive. Other than the fact that this system plays loud enough to blast your eardrums, it's lacking in any kind of quality sound. The whole system sounds reedy, thin and watered-down, as though they started with a good system and removed components until it sounded lousy. Lower frequencies were just fair, highs lacked definition and spaciousness and mids were not nearly as detailed as we've found in other cars in this class.

    Best Feature: Great ergonomics on the head unit.

    Worst Feature: Very poor sound quality.

    Conclusion: If we were judging on sound quality alone, this system would have scored much lower. However, its rating was somewhat elevated by the excellent head unit. If you're interested in buying an Ion but want a more complete system, we suggest looking at the options menu, where you can add a changer, more power and more speakers. — Scott Memmer

    Road Test

    Second Opinions

    Road Test Editor Brian Moody says:
    I'll admit, I had an anti-Saturn bias before the Ion even arrived despite the fact that I sometimes suffer from a pro-GM prejudice (I like the Aurora, so hate me). Although I still stand behind my assertion that the S-Series was one of the most primitive cars known to man, I must say the Ion is a huge improvement. The interior is more spacious, the trunk is actually quite accommodating and exterior styling finally matches Saturn's conservative but funky image.

    The Ecotec engine is civilized to a point — higher revs cause quite a din. Certainly not on par with a Civic or Corolla, the Ion still offers pleasant highway manners. A long road trip in this car would not be the teeth-rattling endurance test it was in the S-Series. Handling is much improved and, dare I say it, the little car has a bit of tossability to it.

    Some interior materials are still subpar; climate control knobs in particular feel flimsy and cheap, but the window and cruise control buttons have a more durable feel. The seats are not terribly comfortable and the rear seat brings a whole new meaning to the term "bench seat" — is that a piece of plywood, or is there at least some stuffing in there?

    With a base price of just under $15,000, the Ion faces stiff competition from the likes of Honda, Toyota and Hyundai. The question is: Will a soft-touch, no-haggle sales experience be enough to get compact shoppers into an Ion regardless of quality? If the past is any indication, the answer is yes.

    Road Test Editor Erin Riches says:
    Three of my college friends swore by SL2s, though I could never share their sentiments as these cars seemed slow, uncomfortable and altogether unappealing alongside my very elderly Toyota. The Ion is about five to seven years late as a replacement for the S-Series, but after driving it, I can say that at least it's not slow. Its Ecotec four provides ample zip when revved up, and our test car's automatic transmission generally came through with timely downshifts. The transmission did, however, have the tendency to hunt when climbing grades, particularly when the accelerator pedal was pegged. The lack of separate 3-2-1 gates exacerbated the problem, as the tranny still shuffled between second and third gear in the "I" gate. Aside from that criticism, the Ion offers a smooth, mostly composed ride and would make a decent commuter car. When it's pushed hard on curvy two-lane roads, the ride gets a bit floaty, but the tires dig in and the small steering wheel offers surprisingly good response and feel.

    Unfortunately, the cabin is poorly designed and outfitted consistent with Saturn tradition. Cheap plastics line most surfaces. And Saturn persists in using seats that are one to two sizes smaller than those of its competitors, such that even moderately sized adults fail to get proper support. The backseat is no better — there are no head restraints, the back cushion hardly comes up high enough to support an adult and footroom under the front seats is tight. Beyond that, the added safety that a center-mounted gauge cluster is supposed to provide is diminished by the absence of a gear indicator for the automatic transmission. And when that gauge bezel can be pulled loose from its moorings with a casual tug, one can't exactly vouch for the Ion's build quality, either.

    For a car with adequate performance and subpar accommodations, buyers will pay a no-haggle price of $16,395, which doesn't include the optional ABS or head curtain airbags. I priced out the Ion's competitors (adding options where necessary to bring them up to our test car's content level) and found four with negotiable MSRPs under $16,000 — the Honda Civic LX with side airbags, Hyundai Elantra GLS, Mazda Protegé LX and Nissan Sentra GXE. All offer driving experiences as good as or better than the Ion's, and all offer roomy, comfortable interiors that are constructed with care. Test-drive these cars before settling on the Saturn.

    Road Test

    Consumer Commentary

    "Let's make this simple, here's what I like about the car: it's quiet, has a tight turning radius, the five-speed automatic it provides is nice, it has a nice suspension and a smooth ride, decent torque, automatic lighting system turns on headlights and dashlights, 16-inch tires with alloy wheels standard, awesome travel package." - Gentrie, Oct. 25, 2002

    "To make a long story short, the ride was nice. The car handled very smoothly with adequate power for its class, without being too noisy. But the car fails miserably on comfort. The cockpit of this 'roomier' Saturn can best be described as claustrophobic. The center console felt like it was digging into my right leg the whole time. It actually felt painful after my three-minute test-drive. I am six feet tall, but even the salesperson, who looked to be about five-foot-eight said he had a problem with it. How could Saturn produce a new model with such an obvious shortcoming? Did anyone look at this thing before it was put on the market?" - Mike25, Nov. 25, 2002

    "With 2,500 miles under my belt including eight-hour trips from Rochester, NY, to Maine and back, I can say that for the money, this is the best vehicle you can buy. At six-foot-four leg- and headroom are a premium and this was the most comfortable out of the 10 I test-drove in its class. Handling, fuel economy and pure aesthetics are all above average in this vehicle." - M. Knolla, Dec. 10, 2002

    Sort By:

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2003
    MakeSaturn
    ModelION
    StyleSedan
    Base MSRP$15,910
    As-tested MSRP$16,595
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeFWD
    Engine typeinline 4
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2.2
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)140 @ 5,800
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)145 @ 4,400
    Transmission typecontinuously variable
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent strut, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearSemi-independent torsion beam, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeelectric power steering
    Tire brandFirestone
    Tire modelFirehawk
    Tire size, frontP205/55R16 89H
    Tire size, rearP205/55R16 89H
    Brakes, frontfront disc / rear drum
    Track Test Results
    0-45 mph (sec.)6.0
    0-60 mph (sec.)9.9
    0-75 mph (sec.)15.0
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)17.38 @ 79.87
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)35.34
    60-0 mph (ft.)136.48
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)60.3
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)35.4
    Sound level @ idle (dB)Lo
    @ Full throttle (dB)74
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)76
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsThe Ecotec engine provides consistent power from idle to redline, and enough torque to generate a bit of wheel spin when the car is floored from a standstill. It's also a fairly refined powerplant with only a slight whine from the engine compartment at higher rpms. Leaving the transmission in "D" results in relaxed upshifts at 6,100 rpm, well short of the indicated 6,500 rpm redline. There is no way to keep the transmission from upshifting, even when it is placed in "I" or "L," which makes one wonder why those shifter gates are provided. However, placing the shifter in "I" did add to the transmission's aggressiveness; it held shifts until around 6,300 rpm and the upshifts felt more positive. It also cut nearly 4/10th of a second off the quarter-mile times, but I still question not giving the driver more control over the transmission.
    Braking ratingGood
    Braking commentsOur test vehicle did not have ABS, but pedal feel, while not stellar, was adequate in providing feedback. This is reflected by the impressive numbers we generated -- impressive, at least, for a non-ABS vehicle. There was also no sign of fade despite repeated maximum braking attempts. More progressive pedal action would help, but overall a solid performance considering this car's price range and lack of braking technology.
    Handling ratingPoor
    Handling commentsThe Ion's steering could best be described as "weird." It has a heft that initially makes it seem responsive and sporty. But after one run through the slalom it was obvious that the heavy steering was just that -- heavy. Feedback was non-existent, meaning the increased effort simply made it take more energy to drive through the slalom. Body roll was typical for a vehicle of this class in front, but poorly controlled in the rear, often allowing the rear end to break loose during quick transitions. The flat front seats didn't provide much lateral support, and the transmission's inability to hold a lower gear meant minimal toque for powering out of the cones. Despite these many issues the Ion still managed a respectable speed through the slalom, but achieving that speed was not fun. — Karl Brauer
    Testing Conditions
    Elevation (ft.)85
    Temperature (°F)71
    Wind (mph, direction)0-1 mph
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)Auto 24/32 Manual /
    Edmunds observed (mpg)24
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)13.5
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)2766
    Length (in.)184.5
    Width (in.)67.2
    Height (in.)57.4
    Wheelbase (in.)103.2
    Legroom, front (in.)42.2
    Legroom, rear (in.)33.3
    Headroom, front (in.)40
    Headroom, rear (in.)37
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)14.7
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)15
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years / 36,000 miles
    Powertrain3 years / 36,000 miles
    Corrosion6 years / 100,000 miles
    Roadside assistance3 years / 36,000 miles
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsNot Available
    Head airbagsNot Available
    Antilock brakesOptional
    Electronic brake enhancementsNot Available
    Traction controlOptional
    Stability controlNot Available
    Rollover protectionNot Available
    Emergency assistance systemOnStar
    NHTSA crash test, driverExcellent
    NHTSA crash test, passengerExcellent
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearAverage
    NHTSA rollover resistanceGood
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement