INSIDE LINE

Full Test: 2007 Saturn Aura XE

Media Player

  • 2007 Saturn Aura Picture

    2007 Saturn Aura Picture

    2007 Saturn Aura | November 05, 2009

Road Test

Full Test: 2007 Saturn Aura XE

Saturn adds some calorific value to an already heated segment

    3 Ratings
    With a void left by the L300 sedan, which saw the axe in 2005, Saturn needs a strong player in the competitive midsize sedan segment in order to justify its existence. It needs the new 2007 Saturn Aura to be a Mr. Wolfe.

    As the hitman cleanup guy portrayed by Harvey Kietel in Pulp Fiction, Winston Wolfe solved problems. He had an uncanny knack for knowing what to focus on, and more importantly what to ignore, in order to get his thugs out of any jam.

    Although the Saturn Aura wasn't created by a curt-talking, sharp-dressed night owl with a penchant for lurid slip angles, it is GM's most convincing salvo yet fired into the midsize sedan brawl. Consider it ready to tangle with the Ford Fusion, Honda Accord, Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry and Volkswagen Passat.

    We're gonna be like three little Fonzies here
    The front-wheel-drive Aura is the latest offspring from GM's "global midsize architecture." Formerly known as Epsilon, this platform has spawned the Chevy Malibu, Pontiac G6 and Saab 9-3. We've not been blown away by those players, but the Aura nevertheless manages to stand out from its mates despite a healthy dose of shared DNA.

    For starters, the Aura's sheet metal is crisp, with well-executed proportions, a taut stance and...is that a hint of Audi flavor in the doors? It's a clean style that belies the entry fee: Entry-level Aura XE models start at $20,595 with destination, with spiffier XR versions starting at $4 grand more.

    You won't find a four-cylinder engine or a manual gearbox in any Aura — all XE models are equipped with a pushrod 3.5-liter V6 producing 224 horsepower and 220 pound-feet of torque mated to a four-speed automatic transmission. Steel 17-inch wheels are standard, and alloy 17s are a $400 option. XR models receive a DOHC 3.6-liter V6 and six-speed auto, better rubber on 18-inch alloys, uprated suspension underpinnings and more equipment.

    That's 30 minutes away. I'll be there in 10.
    As is common with many GM offerings, Saturn's approach is to offer a V6 in its entry-level variants at the same price as competitors' four-cylinder models. Logic of this sort assumes that buyers in this segment are more interested in acceleration and V6 bragging rights than fuel economy, an assumption we're not convinced works in today's more fuel price-sensitive economy. Especially as it pertains to a base model.

    Our XE tester, shod with P225/50/17 Hankook Optimo tires on the optional alloys, reached 60 mph in 8.4 seconds and tripped the quarter-mile lights in 16.3 seconds at 88.4 mph. It won't set any land speed records, but the Aura's performance will dust similarly priced four-cylinder Accords and Camrys.

    You'll pay for this straight-line potential at the pump. Over 653 miles, our Aura XE tester, rated at 20/29 mpg city/highway, averaged 18.7 mpg in mixed driving. Compare this to a base Camry at 24/33 and a base Accord at 24/34 and the case for the Aura's thirstier, albeit gruntier, V6 in a base car falters. Fuel misers will want to wait for the hybrid Aura debuting later in 2007.

    Judging by the transmission's reluctance to downshift from high gear, GM is already trying to squeeze as much fuel economy out of the XE's pushrod V6 as possible. The four-speed transmission is not the best match for the relatively low-revving base V6, and the pairing isn't exactly a paragon of powertrain refinement.

    At the very least, GM should finally put the four-speed auto out to pasture. We've driven the uplevel Aura XR quite a bit, and its 3.6-liter DOHC V6 and six-speed auto lay the smack down on the XE's powertrain in every conceivable way. OK, OK: The XR sips no less fuel than the XE and commands a price premium. But it's in XR guise that the Aura really glows. We'd put its V6 up against that of any manufacturer in smoothness, powerband flexibility and sound quality. It's really a treat.

    I want that trophy, so dance good
    Shunning the numb electric assist of its Pontiac G6 brother, the Aura's more conventional hydraulic steering is well-weighted and linear. In our testing, the Aura circled the skid pad at 0.80g and hustled through the slalom at a respectable 64 mph, prompting our test driver to note: "A darned big surprise."

    We wish we could say the same for the stoppers. Braking the 3542-pound Aura to a standstill from 60 mph required a longish 147 feet, nearly 20 feet longer than the last Sonata we tested.

    Compared to a 2007 Camry we had on hand during the Aura's stay, the Aura exhibited better control of body motions without unduly compromising ride quality. In fact, the Aura's well-considered ride/handling compromise is one of its strong points, and that's even before taking into account the even better uplevel XR variant. Without the benefit of doing a full-on comparison test, we venture that — gruff powertrain aside — the Aura XE provides a driving experience that ranks up there with the front-runners of the class.

    This is a tasty burger
    Interior refinement, a much touted focus of the Aura's development, delivers the goods in many areas. Attractive soft-touch materials adorn the dash and the tops of the door panels, and the simple and effective cockpit layout is a breath of fresh air. Standard cloth seats provide very good comfort, and reddish-orange mood lighting adds a touch of class. There are a few too many high-gloss surfaces inside, though, including distractingly reflective chrome accents and shiny fake lacquered wood. Equally glossy silver plastic is available if faux wood's not your bag, baby.

    Overall, the interior scores its biggest win in the NVH category, with wind and road noise isolation of cars costing much more. At a cruise, passing trucks register barely a whoosh inside, and high double-digit speeds are accompanied only by a mild A-pillar wind rustle. The pushrod V6 does get raucous at full throttle, however, registering 76.2 dB on our noise meter, and it doesn't sing the sonorous song of the 3.6-liter V6 found in the higher-zoot XR model.

    Rear-seat accommodations are commendably spacious, thanks to the long 112-inch wheelbase. In addition to cleaning up the aerodynamics, the Aura's high rear deck lid helps to provide larger trunk space than the Camry or Accord, but not the Sonata.

    Let's get down to brass tacks, gentlemen
    It's not all sweetness and light, though. Quite literally — Saturn's fancy new LED instrument cluster was flakey on our test car, at times refusing to display any of the gauges until several minutes after startup. More attention to detail in the cabin would go a long way, too. For example, the ragged headliner edge in the rear and castanet-clackity PRNDL lever dimmed the Aura's aura and the corporate parts-bin steering wheel is on the large side.

    So, now that the Aura is in the mix among affordable midsize sedans, would Mr. Wolfe approve? In the departing words to his hapless halfwits after he saved their bacon, Winston posed a prediction: "It's...your future. I see...a cab ride."

    Sorry, Winston, but that's where you got it wrong. The Aura may not rock the midsize sedan segment at its core, but the Aura's moves, stately lines, much improved interior and low entry price make it worthy of strong consideration.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Road Test

    Stereo Evaluation

    System Score: 7.0

    Components: Our Aura XE came standard with a six-speaker stereo that includes a single-CD player that can also play MP3 CDs. An auxiliary jack for connecting a hand-held MP3 player is also included and the unit is XM-ready. Our test vehicle was also outfitted with the $375 preferred package that includes features like a power driver seat and power mirrors but also adds steering-wheel-mounted audio controls. An upgraded audio system with extra speakers, a subwoofer and rear-seat audio is available as an option for an extra $725.

    Performance: Considering our car did not come with the upgraded audio package, the sound is better than expected. You have to crank the bass and treble to get decent sound, but it does offer a pleasant listening experience for the most part.

    Deep bass is prominent but not well controlled — that optional subwoofer would certainly help. Sound clarity is just OK and separation, especially at higher volumes, is somewhat lacking. On the other hand, front pillar-mounted tweeters help the highs cut through nicely.

    A minor quibble is that the steering-wheel-mounted audio controls, while helpful, are on the small side.

    Best Feature: Auxiliary jack for connecting MP3 players.

    Worst Feature: Lack of sound separation.

    Conclusion: For a base stereo, this one sounds fairly good and has enough desirable features to make it somewhat special in a $21,000 car. Audiophiles better get the Advanced Audio Package with the subwoofer. — Brian Moody

    Road Test

    Second Opinions

    Edmunds.com Editor in Chief Karl Brauer Says:
    I've been consistently underwhelmed by Saturns ever since sitting in one at the L.A. auto show in 1993. So I approached the new Aura with great anticipation (and a little trepidation). It's clearly the best Saturn ever produced, with attractive exterior and interior styling. However, interior material quality remains hit-or-miss and rear-seat leg support is sacrificed by a too low/too shallow seat bottom. I do like the soft, amber mood lighting that cascades down from the roof and around the door handles.

    In terms of driving dynamics, the car is far better than either the Malibu Maxx or the G6 with which it shares a platform. The steering is precise and has better feel than the Malibu, but it's also a tad heavy. Suspension tuning works well to control body roll without sacrificing ride quality. And, despite being the less powerful (224 hp) 3.5-liter engine and four-speed (versus the larger engine's six-speed) transmission, our Aura test car moved out with authority. The tranny picks gears quickly and effectively, and the engine provides a broad range of usable torque.

    Combine the Aura's overall package with the trademark Saturn buying experience and the division looks to have its best shot yet at becoming the "import fighter" brand GM envisioned 15 years ago.

    Senior Content Editor Erin Riches says:
    There's no question that the Saturn Aura is better than all of the current-generation Malibus I've driven. Its steering is properly weighted, its front seats are well shaped and supportive, and its amber-lit cabin has some personality. But for an all-new model arriving in the midsize sedan class for 2007, the Aura feels mediocre and forgettable.

    Compared to the import-brand leaders, the Saturn exhibits a subtle crudeness I find annoying. High on the list is its choppy freeway ride, which I'm guessing has something to do with its low-profile 17-inch tires. While cruising along in mild discomfort, my fingers are wrapped around our XE tester's rough plastic steering wheel. I can't find a comfortable foot position, either, because the brake pedal is too high and the gas pedal is in the extreme upper right-hand corner of the footwell. When I want to put the transmission in the lower "I" gear, I have to look down at the console because there's no gear display in the instrument cluster. And although the cloth upholstery isn't bad, far too many of the cabin materials are low-quality — worst of all is the vinyl door trim with fake stitching, which looks like it came out of a Barbie car.

    Of course there are some things I like about the Aura. Its soundtrack isn't the greatest, but the base V6 does offer good low-end and midrange response. And the Aura handles competently, even though the 17s don't offer much of a payoff in grip. Overall, this is a decent car, but at the budget end of the family car class, I'd rather have a Ford Fusion or Hyundai Sonata.

    Road Test

    Consumer Commentary

    "I drove the base Aura with very few options today. I've been driving a 2001 Passat 1.8T manual shift. I was amazed how nice the Aura is.... Like many car guys, I'd come to not think much of Saturn. I did miss the lack of a manual shift a little bit, but overall, I was extremely impressed. The car seemed absolutely of quality — very, very solid. For the most part, I found the interior materials very satisfying; but then, many luxury cars seem overtrimmed for my taste. The side windows are oddly narrow, with a very low roof. Getting back in my VW for the ride home, this seemed the most noticeable difference. A base car is less than $21,000.... This seems like an excellent value. In no way did I feel like I was in a miserly car, the way one might feel in a Focus, for example. I could heartily recommend this car to anyone — here's a car a car guy can love!" — merckx, September 15, 2006

    "I drove both [XE and XR]. I was actually more impressed with the XE as a value proposition. I expected the XR to be quick, and it was. But the XE felt very good as well and I think it represents a great value if not loaded with add-on options. One note: The XE is not available with stability control that comes standard on the XR. To me it's not a big deal, but that might be a consideration for you." — 1997montez34, September 11, 2006

    "I've always had hopes for Saturn and GM. In 1986 I worked at Spring Hill for the construction management company overseeing the work as the soil was being excavated down to the limestone base, drilled and shot to form a level pad onto which the plant was built. Saturn was the first GM plant I worked on, and have been in auto plants assisting retooling efforts ever since. That doesn't make me an expert on autos any more than standing in a garage makes me a car. But Saturn was my first auto plant. I've seen the hundreds of millions of dollars it takes to change over an auto plant, usually gutting an existing plant before installing new equipment. The plant production workers were on leave and still getting paid, which is one reason we hurried every chance we got. Parts suppliers such as those furnishing instrument panels, door panels, seats and consoles, etc. are being squeezed to drop their prices. Some vendors are brought into the picture as the product is being designed and work with the major manufacturers. The pressure to cut costs is enormous. Under those conditions, I can see why interiors, which have been a longtime weak spot for GM, have been an easy place to cut costs, until now. I saw the Aura at the Cleveland auto show earlier this year and thought this is a step in the right direction. But only the first step. I'm not immediately in the market to replace my '97 528i, but feel there are many new products heading for market in the next few years that just might make import fans (such as myself) also include the old-time domestic makers on their consideration list. I intend to keep an eye on the Aura and possibly take one for a spin this year." — stan1911, September 10, 2006

    Sort By:

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Featured Specs

    • 224-hp 3.5-liter V6
    • 64-mph slalom
    • 112-inch wheelbase

    What Works

    Cabin isolation, solid chassis, discreet style with an attractive sticker.

    What Needs Work

    Fuel economy, outclassed transmission, can't get a stick.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2007
    MakeSaturn
    ModelAura
    StyleXE 4dr Sedan (3.5L 6cyl 4A)
    Base MSRP$20,595
    As-tested MSRP$21,370
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeFront-wheel drive
    Engine typeV6
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)3490cc (213 cu-in)
    Valvetrainoverhead valve
    Compression ratio (x:1)9.8
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)224 hp @ 5800 rpm
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)220 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
    Transmission typeAutomatic
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontMacPherson strut
    Suspension, rearMultilink
    Steering typePower steering
    Turning circle (ft.)40.4
    Tire brandHankook
    Tire modelOptimo H725A all-season
    Tire typeall season
    Tire size, frontP225/50R17
    Tire size, rearP225/50R17
    Wheel materialsteel
    Brakes, frontFront ventilated disc - Rear disc
    Brakes, reardisc
    Track Test Results
    0-45 mph (sec.)5.3
    0-60 mph (sec.)8.4
    0-75 mph (sec.)12.2
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)16.3 @ 88.4
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)35
    60-0 mph (ft.)147
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)64
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.8
    Sound level @ idle (dB)46.2
    @ Full throttle (dB)76.2
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)66.5
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsI don't know why there's a "Trac Off" button because there's no chance of wheelspin. There seems to be a rev limiter in Drive (and all forward gears) that limits brake and gas. Fairly raucous, but in a better way than the GM 3800.
    Braking ratingNot Available
    Braking commentsLots of pedal kickback and tire squeal while stopping. I could feel the slow-reacting ABS hunt for traction.
    Handling ratingNot Available
    Handling commentsDespite my predictions, the Aura has decent grip and balance on the skid pad. Tires howl but don't scream. This Aura is a darned big surprise in the slalom. Lots of grip, decent steering weight, but lots of delay and gain in the chassis at each cone. Learn it, and all is fine -- as well as the lift-throttle oversteer.
    Testing Conditions
    Elevation (ft.)1121
    Temperature (°F)68
    Wind (mph, direction)2.9
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)20 City 29 Highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)18.7
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)16
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3542
    Length (in.)190.9
    Width (in.)70.3
    Height (in.)57.6
    Wheelbase (in.)112.3
    Track, front (in.)59.9
    Track, rear (in.)60.3
    Legroom, front (in.)42.2
    Legroom, rear (in.)37.6
    Headroom, front (in.)39.4
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.4
    Shoulder room, front (in.)55.9
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)54.0
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)14.9
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)Not Available
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years/100,000 miles
    Corrosion6 years/100,000 miles
    Roadside assistance5 years/100,000 miles
    Free scheduled maintenanceNot Available
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsDual front
    Head airbagsFront and rear
    Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsElectronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlTraction control
    Stability controlNot Available
    Rollover protectionNot Available
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemtire pressure monitoring
    Emergency assistance systemNot Available
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot Tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot Tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement