INSIDE LINE

2006 Sport Coupe Shootout: BMW M Coupe vs. Porsche Cayman S

Media Player

  • 2006 Porsche Cayman S Picture

    2006 Porsche Cayman S Picture

    We found the Cayman S an absolute joy to drive on both the racetrack and street. Part of that is due to the $1,990 optional dual-mode PASM suspension ¿ a worthwhile investment. | September 29, 2009

Comparison

2006 Sport Coupe Shootout: BMW M Coupe vs. Porsche Cayman S

The hardest choice will be deciding which one not to buy

    0 Ratings
    Let's face it: The 2006 BMW M Coupe and 2006 Porsche Cayman S are about as close to rear-drive hatchback heaven as it gets. They're exotic enough to capture our collective imagination, and yet they're not so exotic as to be priced out of reach of enthusiasts. They're the kind of cars their manufacturers use to promote themselves. In a larger sense, coupes like the Z4-based M Coupe and Boxster-based Cayman S project an attitude that their drivers care about driving. Even people who wouldn't consider themselves car lovers will look at these cars with admiration. Also, your neighbors will immediately recognize you as the "car guy" on the block when they spot one in your garage. Frankly, this is the kind of comparison test Inside Line loves to produce. There is no better way to spend a week or two than to oblige our test equipment, photographers and readers in the name of automotive journalism.

    Orthogonal meets organic
    If those black-turtleneck-clad folks at the Bauhaus were to have designed a car, the BMW M Coupe would be it. There is no doubt that a man had a lofty idea about this car's intended effect. The mark of the designer is all over it, and to some, that's a good thing. Watching the orange sunset dance and melt over the M Coupe's planar surfaces, creases and arcs had us thinking that this wasn't the first time the car had been exposed to a cascade of waning light.

    Originally, I abhorred the Z4's self-reverent and obviously (over-)designed bodywork. But looking at the M Coupe in the last few hours of a day, with its gracefully integrated roofline and M-spec skirting, I began to appreciate it — and value how precisely the body panels are attached. If the hood, for instance, were 3mm misaligned, the two lines that create an intersection of four surfaces would be disrupted and the whole design effort would be lost. It's this subtle but exhaustive "designery" that grows on us. The more we look at the M Coupe, the more that is revealed. It's not graceful, but it is an intriguing piece of manmade industrial design.

    In stark contrast to the BMW's cerebral design is the Porsche's corporeal inspiration. Perhaps it's because the Porsche "bathtub" shape has been around for decades, and thus it's so familiar. Or maybe it's because the Cayman's curves are so gentle, organic and sensuous that it simply looks so right, so appealing. You don't need a design degree to appreciate it. The Cayman is immediately attractive and effortlessly so. It invites you to run your hand over it the way you would a white-marble Michelangelo figure, and feel every nuance of headlamp, roof and hips. We're certain as much midnight oil was burned in the design studios in Stuttgart as in Munich, but the final result is unforced and equally effective, if not more so.

    Powerful competition
    On with the business at hand: The reason you're reading this is to see which one we'd recommend to a person shopping in this segment. For the moment, we'll pretend that the $8,700 base-price gap doesn't matter. Later we'll also address the larger $16,260 as-tested chasm.

    The basics are these: The M Coupe brings 330 silken-straight-6 horsepower to bear on a 3292-pound two-door BMW hatchback. That rounds out to 10 pounds of car to propel with each pony. Do the same math for the Cayman S hatch, and you'll discover a 10.5 pound/hp ratio for the lighter (3106 pounds) Porsche, with its snarling 295-hp horizontally opposed, or "flat" six.

    Both engines are far more powerful and tractable than their respective 3.2- and 3.4-liter displacements would suggest. No turbos or superchargers are used, and there's no V8 variant offered either. Both feature slick six-speed manual gearboxes and impressive brakes plus robust, sporting tires to make it all worth a damn. These are light and agile sports cars in the purest sense. A drag race comes down to who gets the launch right. A canyon dash will be a test of either driver mettle or stability control systems.

    At the outset, this looked like it would be a close one. When we looked at the scorecard, however, even the price discrepancy couldn't protect the BMW from the Porsche's coup de grâce. Simply put, the Cayman S is a more capable, adaptable and livable sport coupe.

    The manufacturers provided Edmunds these vehicles for the purposes of evaluation.

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Featured Specs

    • 295-hp flat-6
    • Six-speed manual
    • 20 mpg city/28 mpg highway

    What Works

    Midengine placement, dual-mode suspension option, unflappable brakes.

    What Needs Work

    Climate and audio system layout, options list is (no joke) 166 items long.

    Speed Read

    Featured Specs

    • 330-hp inline-6
    • Six-speed manual
    • Four-year/50,000-mile free scheduled maintenance

    What Works

    Silken-six engine, avant-garde styling, relative price advantage.

    What Needs Work

    Suspension is harsh and unforgiving, car is prone to both under- and oversteer, $1,000 gas-guzzler tax.

    Tags

    Specs and Performance

    Vehicle
    MakePorsche
    ModelCayman S
    Model year2006
    Style2dr Coupe (3.4L 6cyl 6M)
    Base MSRP$59,695
    As-tested MSRP$70,505
    Drive typeRear-wheel drive
    Transmission type6-speed manual
    Engine typeFlat-6
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)3.4L (3387cc)
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)295@6250
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)251@4400
    Brakes, frontFront ventilated disc - rear ventilated disc
    Steering typePower steering, variable ratio
    Suspension, frontIndependent, MacPherson Struts, coil springs and stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent, MacPherson struts, coil springs, trailing links, lateral links and stabilizer bar
    Tire size, front235/35ZR19 87Y
    Tire size, rear265/35ZR19 94Y
    Tire brandMichelin
    Tire modelPilot Sport 2
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)2954 mfr (3106 as tested)
    Fuel typePremium unleaded
    Fuel tank capacity (gal)19.6
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)20 City 28 Highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)18.9
    Conditions for Testing
    Temperature (°F)74.9
    Elevation (ft.)1121
    Wind (mph, direction)1.5
    Performance
    0 - 30 (sec.)1.8
    0 - 45 (sec.)3.2
    0 - 60 (sec.)5
    0 - 75 (sec.)7.2
    1/4 mile (sec. @ mph)13.3 @ 104.4
    30 - 0 (ft.)25
    60 - 0 (ft.)105
    Braking ratingExcellent
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft (mph)72.1
    Skid pad, 200 ft diameter (lateral g)0.94
    Handling ratingExcellent
    Sound level @ idle (db)53.4
    Sound level @ full throttle (db)84.7
    Sound level @ 70 mph cruise (db)74.8
    Acceleration commentsPSM off and 5000-5500 stage: The Cayman produces excessive axle hop if you let the clutch out too quickly. The best launch was with some slip (not a lot) to keep the revs up while letting the tires spin. The shifter is happy to be thrown as quickly as is possible. Quarter-mile mark is passed in 4th gear.
    Braking commentsWow, these brakes just keep getting better with each successive run. From the first to the sixth and final stop from 60 mph, the Cayman S shrunk the distance from 112 feet to 105 feet. Its "worst" run was still 5 feet shorter than the BMW M Coupe's best by 5 feet. The Cayman S has an aggressive initial bite and remains flat and steady throughout the stop. Excellent brakes, and there's even an upgraded package available which this car did not have.
    Handling commentsWith PSM off and entering at well over 75 mph, the Cayman S devours the slalom with the kind of intuitive precision found only in a midengine car. Even that disruptive hop at cone 3 (which threw the M Coupe off line) was a nonevent in the Cayman S. The steering felt a little slower than the M Coupe, but I'd attribute that to a more neutral chassis that isn't a breath away from oversteer like the BMW is. On the skid pad, the Cayman S's steering remains light and communicative at any speed. No doubt the midengine-derived balance contributes to this easy neutrality as well as its ability to dance the car on the cusp of understeer and oversteer all the way around the circle with the throttle.
    Specifications
    Length (in.)172.1 in.
    Width (in.)70.9 in.
    Height (in.)51.4 in.
    Wheelbase (in.)95.1 in.
    Legroom, front (in.)42.0 in.
    Legroom, rear (in.)N/A
    Headroom, front (in.)38.0 in.
    Headroom, rear (in.)N/A
    Seating capacity2
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)14.1 cubic feet (4.9 Fr + 9.2 Rr)
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)14.1 cubic feet
    Warranty Information
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain4 years/50,000 miles
    Corrosion10 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance4 years/50,000 miles
    Scheduled maintenanceNot available
    Safety Information
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard dual front
    Head airbagsStandard front
    Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsElectronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    Rollover protectionNot Available
    Emergency assistance systemNot Available
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot Tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot Tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Specs and Performance

    Vehicle
    MakeBMW
    ModelM Coupe
    Model year2006
    Style2dr Hatchback (3.2L 6cyl 6M)
    Base MSRP$50,995
    As-tested MSRP$54,245
    Drive typeRear-wheel drive
    Transmission type6-speed Manual
    Engine typeInline-6
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)3.2L (3246cc)
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)330 @ 7900
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)262 @ 4900
    Brakes, frontFront ventilated disc - rear ventilated disc
    Steering typeSpeed-proportional power steering
    Suspension, frontIndependent, MacPherson struts, coil springs and stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent, multillink, coil springs and stabilizer bar
    Tire size, front225/45ZR18
    Tire size, rear255/40ZR18
    Tire brandContinental
    Tire modelContiSportContact
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3230 mfr (3292 as tested)
    Fuel typePremium unleaded
    Fuel tank capacity (gal)14.5
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)16 City 24 Highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)16.6
    Conditions for Testing
    Temperature (°F)74.9
    Elevation (ft.)1121
    Wind (mph, direction)1.5
    Performance
    0 - 30 (sec.)1.7
    0 - 45 (sec.)3.2
    0 - 60 (sec.)4.9
    0 - 75 (sec.)7.2
    1/4 mile (sec. @ mph)13.3 @ 105.3
    30 - 0 (ft.)28
    60 - 0 (ft.)117
    Braking ratingExcellent
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft (mph)68.5
    Skid pad, 200 ft diameter (lateral g)0.85
    Handling ratingExcellent
    Sound level @ idle (db)50.1
    Sound level @ full throttle (db)83.2
    Sound level @ 70 mph cruise (db)71.1
    Acceleration commentsDSC off and 4000 rpm for staging. Half a clutch dump to get the tires spinning and modulate the throttle to maintain revs at 4000 rpm. When wheel speed matches engine speed, that's when the clutch is fully engaged. First-to-2nd gearchange had to be slowed due to preexisting 2nd-gear synchro abuse. The 2-3 got a chirp and quarter-mile is achieved in 3rd. I liked the soft rev limiter that hints at the approaching redline.
    Braking commentsI knew warm brakes would be an asset, and the third stop was, indeed, the best at 117 feet. Six feet separate best from worst stops from 60 mph over five runs. There isn't much "jump-in" on the initial hit of the pedal at 60 mph, but once the ABS and brake assist realize what's happening, it stopped dramatically.
    Handling commentsWith DSC off and entering at about 72 mph, I discovered a nasty hop midcourse in the slalom test that I'd never felt in any other car. This dip at cone 3 really upsets the M Coupe's chassis and causes the rear to become unweighted and apt to oversteer dramatically. The quick steering makes recovery possible, but by then cone 4 arrives and it's too late to follow the best line. For the best run, I had to predict and prepare for the oversteer and attack the rest of the course. On the skid pad, the M Coupe exhibits rather resolute understeer all the way around. This is remarkable considering how likely oversteer is everywhere else.
    Specifications
    Length (in.)161.9 in
    Width (in.)70.1 in
    Height (in.)50.7 in
    Wheelbase (in.)98.3 in
    Legroom, front (in.)42.0 in
    Legroom, rear (in.)N/A
    Headroom, front (in.)37.3 in
    Headroom, rear (in.)N/A
    Seating capacity2
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)14.5 cubic feet
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)N/A
    Warranty Information
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain4 years/50,000 miles
    Corrosion12 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance4 years/50,000 miles
    Scheduled maintenance4 years/50,000 miles
    Safety Information
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard dual front
    Head airbagsNot available
    Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsBrake assist, electronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    Rollover protectionNot available
    Emergency assistance systemOptional
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot Tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot Tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement