INSIDE LINE

Full Test: 2004 Pontiac GTO

Road Test

Full Test: 2004 Pontiac GTO

A Goat in Soul, if Not Body

    1 Rating
    Two American automotive icons set the world afire when they debuted around 1964, went through some questionable stages and recently have emerged better than ever. Can you name them? We're sure you'll agree that the Ford Mustang is one. Who could forget the Pinto-based Mustang II? Hopefully, we all can — not exactly a high point in that car's history. But the powerful, retro-styled 2005 model is anxiously awaited by many pony car fans. And the other icon? That would be the Pontiac GTO. When introduced as a high-performance version of Pontiac's Tempest, the GTO won American enthusiasts over with its combination of good looks, manageable size and pavement-scorching V8 power. The GTO was the first muscle car, a midsize car sporting a big car's engine (in this case a 389 V8), a firmed-up suspension and visual tweaks such as hood scoops, fancy wheels and chrome dual exhaust outlets. Competition, bearing names like Roadrunner, Charger, 442, SS396 and Torino Cobra quickly sprouted in rival showrooms like so many dandelions on a springtime lawn.

    The GTO, like other muscle cars, eventually fell victim to ever-tightening emissions regulations and horsepower dropped as quickly after 1970 as it had risen in years before. By 1974, the sacred GTO moniker was reduced to being affixed to Pontiac's Ventura, a clone of the Chevrolet Nova. That "Goat's" source of motivation was a 350 (5.7-liter) V8 that put out an admittedly respectable-for-the-day 200 horsepower. Still, this didn't come close to packing the punch of an old 389 with Tri-Power (triple two-barrel carburetion) that could scare the daylights out of an unprepared passenger.

    After 1974, there was no more GTO and all us car guys with 93 octane running through our veins never thought we'd see another one (at least not one worthy of that hallowed badge) ever again. Well, here it is 30 years after that dark time (and on what would be the GTO's 40th birthday) and we're road testing a Pontiac GTO. And we're glad to say that, for the most part, this is a worthy descendent of the old Goat.

    Scoping out the new GTO, you may think that Pontiac's using the body stampings from Volvo's recently departed C70 coupe. The general shape, and in particular the roof pillars, side windows and character lines are so similar, it's uncanny. But no, it has no Swedish ties. It is, however nearly a full-blooded Australian. Essentially, the new GTO is a rebadged Holden Monaro.

    We're sure many of you are thinking, "Hold on a minute, what the heck is a Holden?" Well, mates, we don't blame you a bloody bit for not knowing — even most car enthusiasts wouldn't have a clue. Holden is a General Motors division in Australia, and the Monaro is the division's modern-day muscle car. When Pontiac decided to bring back the GTO, it could've done a lot worse than choosing this Aussie relative, which happens to be powered by a Corvette V8 that drives the rear wheels.

    Although resembling a handsome European luxury coupe isn't necessarily a bad thing, many have expressed disappointment with the GTO's style. Those expecting twin scoops and a tach on the hood and old-school Rally wheels at the corners voiced comments to that effect, the most common being: "It doesn't look like a GTO should." Of course, since it's been over three decades since the last "real" GTO rolled off the line, what the modern-day successor should look like is anyone's guess. Also a mystery is the use of two third brake lights, one on the rear shelf and one built into the rear spoiler. This aesthetic faux pas makes it look as if the rear spoiler is a dealer-installed option, but it is actually standard equipment.

    When it came to the cockpit, opinions were more unified. Displaying a combination of high-quality trim, attractive but not gaudy style and fine build quality, the interior was given high praise all 'round. A pair of genuine well-shaped buckets in back offers nearly as much comfort and support as the first-class chairs up front. A button on the outboard side of the front seat will power it (albeit slowly) forward to let a passenger in or out the back. Although we were generally impressed with the cabin, there was a smattering of complaints. The doors are heavy, something that will make Firebird owners feel at home, no doubt. Even the glovebox door shares this trait and if your passenger doesn't watch it she may end up getting a whack to the knee that'll make her feel like Nancy Kerrigan after that infamous incident involving Tonya Harding. "Why? Why? Why did they make the glovebox door so heavy?"

    One eagle-eyed staffer noticed that the metallic trim was comprised of both plain and tinted aluminum, a needless expense that had us scratching our collective heads. And a glaring turquoise-colored "MPH" indicator is constantly illuminated in the face of the speedometer. It seems to be there to point out the obvious and remind the driver that, yep, those numbers represent speed in miles per hour. This may seem like a petty gripe, but the retina-searing display doesn't dim when you lower the instrument lighting. Additionally, the power windows' "one-touch down" feature is overly sensitive, as they would almost always "express down" when the button was pressed lightly. This is a problem we've experienced in other GM vehicles, notably their trucks and big SUVs, and although it's not a big deal (just quickly hit the button again to stop the window's motion), it's still annoying.

    OK, enough about power windows already. This car is all about the power under the hood. With 350 horsepower and 365 pound-feet of torque, the 5.7-liter, "LS1" powerhouse runs through either a four-speed automatic (which our test car had) or six-speed manual gearbox and on to a 3.46-to-1 limited-slip rear end. Traction control is standard and a welcome feature for those who have to drive in inclement weather. Seventeen-inch, five-spoke wheels wear 245/45 BFGoodrich performance tires and even when the traction control was switched off, they did a great job launching the GTO off the line. Forget about trying to put down this new breed by comparing its performance to its ancestors ("Back in my day, my stock GTO ran low 13-second quarters on bias-ply tires!" Yeah, right, and when I used to walk to school, it was uphill both ways.in the snow!). Blasting from zero to 60 in just 5.5 seconds and blitzing the quarter-mile in 14 ticks flat means a 2004 GTO will simply embarrass nearly any old Goat you could name.

    When we discovered that we were getting an automatic car, we were at first a little bummed. We car nuts tend to love shifting gears ourselves, but we found it hard to criticize the performance of the GTO's automatic tranny. GM automatics tend to be among the best in the world, and this one upheld that lofty reputation. Upshifts occur smoothly and with barely a pause in acceleration when you've got your toes in the carpet, and downshifts happen with the snap and precision of a military salute. And with such a broad spread of power, the four perfectly spaced gears are plenty. Kinda makes us wonder why certain high-end German carmakers think they need six or even seven speeds in their automatics. Still, an automanual setup would be nice, and it's ironic that it isn't offered in light of the fact that Pontiac actually presented this feature back in the 1960s. Anyone remember the old Hurst Dual Gate (also called "his and hers") gear selector that allowed ratchet-style manual shifting of one's GTO? Or are we just showing our age?

    When it comes to hauling down all that mass (we're talking 3,700 pounds), the antilock four-wheel disc brakes are just as capable of arresting the GTO as the LS1 is at flinging it down the road. Anytime you can stop from 60 mph in under 122 feet, that's pretty darn good, and the GTO pulled down a best of 121.1 feet. Doubly impressive is the fact that this was the third out of three back-to-back panic stops, which indicates that the easily modulated brakes obviously had no problems with fading under hard use.

    Scanning over the chassis specs, the '04 GTO looks great on paper: four-wheel independent suspension, variable-assist power steering and those sticky tires promise a good time for twisty road traveling. On the street, we appreciated the luxury carlike ride quality, and when pushed a bit, the GTO seemed to handle predictably and respectably, despite a fair amount of body roll. But when driven more aggressively, the car felt heavy and the steering felt a little slow and numb. Running through the slalom at our test track cemented these impressions. Honestly, we expected a firmer ride and sharper handling. This is nothing that a little suspension tuning (such as stiffer shocks and springs) and parts bin scavenging (a quicker steering box) can't cure. We think that Pontiac should offer an optional sport package and for old time's sake call it the Judge option. We can almost see the commercial now: "Here comes da Judge, and it's ready to set any road straight."

    With a list price of around $33 grand, some folks think, "That's a lot of money for a Pontiac." Their mindset tends to be that the new Goat is a replacement for the Trans Am (which in a way, it is) and until they actually see the car, figure that it has mediocre interior materials, some cheesy design elements and a solid rear axle (as opposed to a more sophisticated independent rear end). The reality is that the '04 GTO is well built, boasts excellent fit-and-finish, has a world-class powertrain along with an Indy rear end and comes loaded with the exception of a sunroof and a navigation system. In fact, the only option is the six-speed manual transmission (at $695), though we would like to see Pontiac offer those other two features mentioned above. If you want to shop around for other true four-seaters that can run with this Pontiac, you'll be visiting BMW and Mercedes-Benz showrooms and be looking at $50,000-plus window stickers.

    So is this transplanted Aussie a Pontiac GTO? No, not if the chief criterion is that it be born in the U.S.A. — though it is a product of the General. But definitely yes in the sense that it's a midsize Poncho with a tire-smokin' V8 that can show its taillights to most anything else on four wheels.

    Road Test

    Stereo Evaluation

    System Score: 7.0

    Components: The GTO comes with a Blaupunkt (a name we haven't seen in ages) sound system powered by a 200-watt amplifier. Drivers are mounted in the doors and quarter panels, and there is a pair of tweeters up front and a pair of woofers behind the rear seats.

    The head unit includes a six-disc CD changer but does not offer a cassette deck. The volume knob is on the right (a clue to this car's real origin?) and there are the usual 12 FM/6 AM presets. The head unit provides the expected bass, treble, balance and fader adjustments, as well as five preset equalizer settings ("Rock," "Pop," "Jazz," "Classical" and "Vocal"). There is no traditional tuning knob, which we feel is unfortunate as we find it easier to quickly access and set stations with a knob rather than a fussy rocker switch.

    There are also steering wheel-mounted controls for volume, preset stations, mode and CD track. At first, using the wheel buttons involves some guessing, as they are similarly (but generously) sized and have no differing textures on them, but after getting some miles under your belt, they are easily memorized and utilized. In addition to the display being mounted a little low on the center stack, it gets cluttered and hard to read at a glance when a CD is being played, as it shows "CD," "CD IN" and six ellipses that represent discs (with the one that's playing highlighted). This is a bit of overkill as one of these three indicators would be sufficient.

    Performance: Back in its 1980s heyday, Blaupunkt was a revered name in the auto sound biz. Many high-dollar European luxury cars used Blaupunkt, but now it's a rare sight, and we can see (or should we say hear) why.

    Although it wasn't exactly muddy, the bass output could've been tighter, and we would've liked more distinct separation, especially when complex arrangements were being played on the CD changer. On the upside, the sound didn't distort when the volume was cranked up and those who like to feel their bass will appreciate the efforts of the twin subwoofers.

    Best Feature: Steering wheel controls.

    Worst Feature: Ergonomics of head unit.

    Conclusion: Blaupunkt used to be a big name in car audio, but in the intervening 20 years has been eclipsed by companies such as Bose and Harman Kardon. If this system is one of the company's best efforts, we can see why. — John DiPietro

    Road Test

    Second Opinions

    Editor in Chief Karl Brauer says:
    The return of a classic American nameplate is always cause for celebration. I've actually been pleased with GM's ability to resist using the GTO moniker for the past 30 years. The company could have easily stuck it on a Pontiac version of some weak front-wheel-drive platform during the '80s or '90s (à la Dodge Charger) but it didn't, preserving the nameplate's equity in the process. Now we get a 2004 Pontiac GTO, but it's really just a rebadged Holden from Australia. Is it a bad car? No, I actually like the new GTO's performance and interior design, though its high weight, slow steering and soft suspension are a bit disappointing. The exterior styling isn't particularly compelling, as it has no connection to the classic muscle car's. While it's popular to bash car companies for being "too retro," I do like the attitude BMW took with the new Mini, which is that this car isn't retro, it's what an original Mini would look like had it been redesigned at the usual five-to-seven-year intervals starting in 1959. The same could be said of the New Beetle, and that's exactly what has happened with the Porsche 911. The new GTO can't make that claim, and that's where it loses me. It doesn't have to look like a 1964 GTO with 21st century design cues, but it should have some sort of connection with the classic American time period known as the muscle car era. It doesn't, which makes it seem like just a Corvette-powered Aussie car to me.

    Road Test Editor Erin Riches says:
    Where performance is concerned, the GTO has the basics covered. Even with 3,700 pounds to haul around, the LS1 V8 is an absolute beast — stuffing the driver back into the seat under wide-open throttle. Although the engine delivers a satisfying rumble upon acceleration, it settles into the background at a cruise. A well-tuned suspension complements the big V8, making the GTO into an entertaining back-roads ride. The steering is a letdown, though, as it's unremarkable for its weighting, response and road feel. The unrefined traction control system is a minor annoyance; when slippage occurs at low speeds, you can feel the accelerator pedal pushing back against your foot as the system cuts the throttle. This is disconcerting, and I ended up switching it off. GM's more versatile StabiliTrak system would have been a better choice for a $31K car.

    Inside the cockpit, the GTO has the best seats in the GM lineup — they're extremely supportive with generous lateral bolstering to hold you in during cornering. The telescoping steering wheel enabled me to find a comfortable position quickly, while a large footwell should give taller drivers plenty of room. The handsome stitching on the leather upholstery gives the coupe an upscale feel that's alien to other GM products, while deep red-faced gauges assert its Pontiac identity. Unfortunately, all of the illumination in the car is bright green — it's easy to read but aren't Pontiacs supposed to have red lighting?

    Driving the GTO made me wish that GM would draw upon its Holden division for more of its U.S. market cars, as the Australian crew obviously has a handle on cabin design and fit-and-finish. Stuff the Corvette's V8 under the hood and it's hard to go wrong. As much as I liked the car, though, its so-so steering and bland exterior keep it from being the definitive choice in its class. And then there's the issue of price. It's not too hard to swallow for what you actually get, but for a car wearing the historical GTO name, it's steep — and should assure continued demand for used Trans Ams.

    Road Test

    Consumer Commentary

    "(I've been) waiting over 30 years for a 'real' GTO, the wait has indeed been worth it. No Pontiac in recent memory gives more bang for the buck. Fun, fast, comfortable; all of the pluses of my old T/A with none of the vices. I love the great engine note! That trip computer is a little bizarre and a little more trunk room would be cool." — ScottieDogFLA, March 2, 2004

    "About all I can say is this car is awesome. Mega power and so comfortable. I love everything about this car. The Mustang Cobra SVT may be a tad faster but when you sit in a GTO and then get into a Mustang there is no comparison. The Mustang feels like a cheap econo rocket. Bring on the judge!" — Depdoug, March 2, 2004

    "A trim midsize coupe, this car features the LS1 5.7-liter engine, packing 350 horsepower driving the rear wheels (as a proper sport coupe should). The GTO sports one of the most attractive interiors ever in a GM car. GREAT performance; lots of power and tight handling. Fit and finish is excellent. Terrific controls — small yet so logical! Nicest-looking rear end of any Pontiac in recent memory. On the downside, the car has a tiny trunk (due to the placement of the fuel tank), and getting into the rear seat should be a lot easier." — DrSBSNYDER, Feb. 25, 2004

    Sort By:

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Featured Specs

    • 350-horse V8 and choice of automatic or six-speed manual,
    • 0-to-60 in just 5.5 seconds…
    • and the quarter in 14 flat

    What Works

    Potent performance, strong brakes, great exhaust note, fine build quality, comfy seating for all.

    What Needs Work

    Doesn't look like a GTO "should," handling should be sharper, can't get a sunroof or navigation system.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement