INSIDE LINE

2012 Opel Astra GTC First Drive

Media Player

  • 2012 Opel Astra GTC Picture

    2012 Opel Astra GTC Picture

    Even if it's not the fastest coupe around, it's certainly a distinctive-looking two-door. | December 27, 2011

Road Test

2012 Opel Astra GTC First Drive

Is This Our Next Buick?

    30 Ratings

    If you want to read about tire smoke, sub-10-second passes and big, bad exhaust noises, move on. This is about the 2012 Opel Astra GTC, a sporty, four-cylinder hatchback that we don't even get here, but probably should.

    It's more than just a standard Astra body stuffed full of more power, a better suspension and funkier seats. Instead, the Astra GTC shares only the door handles, the antenna fin and the mirrors with the stock Astra's five-door body shell.

    It's not a super high-horsepower hot hatch, though, at least not yet, anyway. The Opel Performance Centre (OPC) version fills that role, but it doesn't debut until the 2012 Geneva Auto Show in March. For now, the standard GTC we have here is a more mainstream model. Think Opel's version of the Volkswagen GTI.

    What Do You Get in the 2012 Opel Astra GTC?
    The hottest engine available is a 177-horsepower 1.6-liter turbocharged four-cylinder. It's the obvious choice for enthusiast buyers while more practical-minded drivers will most likely opt for the 2.0-liter turbodiesel which produces 162 hp and 280 pound-feet of torque.

    Picking fights with French, German and Japanese hotshots will need to wait for the OPC version which will come with a 2.0-liter direct-injection engine that delivers 276 hp and 295 lb-ft of torque along with a limited-slip differential.

    Even in its domestic market, Opel's engine technology has long lived in the shadow of the VW Group's mighty lineup of turbo fours, but the GTC's 1.6-liter motor is smooth and quiet when you fire it up and remains that way even when you ask it to give everything it has. Driven at its hardest, it maintains its composure, refuses to fizz with unwanted vibrations, spins freely and even adds a charming exhaust note once you wind your way into its upper reaches.

    Opel insists the GTC is aimed at an entirely different buyer to the Astra.

    It's a flexible little motor, too, with its peak torque arriving at 2,200 rpm and remaining on station until 5,400 rpm — just 100 revs shy of the power peak. That means there's no such thing as a flat spot in the GTC's delivery. It's hard to catch it in the wrong gear and it's happy to lug away at low revs midcorner. It's happier still to be spun hard and gives its best performances when you keep it wound past 4,000 rpm. The only issue with its performance is that the six-speed gearbox isn't even remotely engaging and its 3rd gear is too tall. It's simply not the right match for the eager four-cylinder.

    The diesel might not sprint as hard (it takes 8.8 seconds to hit 62 mph compared to the 1.6's 8.3) but, if anything, it makes for a better real-world companion. It has very little harshness and a huge hit of midrange strength thanks to the 280 lb-ft of torque that comes on from around 1,750 rpm. Add to that a 2,905-pound curb weight and the diesel feels like it's ready to work anywhere, anytime.

    Chassis Is Up to the Task
    It's a sharper handling machine than the donor Astra, with a longer wheelbase, wider tracks at both ends, a lower ride height and GM's HiPerStrut suspension up front. The latter almost halves the kingpin angle and does the same with the kingpin offset compared to the standard Astra's MacPherson strut setup. The result is the effective elimination of torque steer, sharper front-end response and the ability to use up to 20-inch wheels.

    The front suspension is happy with whatever revs you want to throw through it, too, and there is no hint of torque steer, even when you provoke it by poking it so hard with the stick that both front tires scrabble with corner-exit wheelspin. There's no kicking or bucking or twisting in the steering wheel and the GTC would sooner go a touch light to tell you about understeer than try to rip the wheel out of your hands.

    And when it slides — as it does willingly and progressively — it always feels like a very clean, linear kind of slide, even in the wet, and it tucks back in perfectly when you roll off the throttle. The rest of the chassis carries the same composure and, try as you might, it refuses to kick, buck or snap the tail, regardless of what's going on beneath it.

    The extra weight of the diesel engine doesn't seem to hurt the handling much, either. The gas engine might swing in to the turn-in point with a bit more enthusiasm, but the midrange strength of the diesel means it often punches out the other side with more enthusiasm. And, if you get your gear selection wrong, you'll come out of the corner almost as hard in the diesel, where the gasoline engine, by comparison, will labor a bit.

    Fully Loaded
    Opel insists the GTC is aimed at an entirely different buyer to the Astra and, once you start driving the thing, it's easy to understand that they're not just stirring the marketing pot.

    It does feel different. In everything it does. It starts with the seats and the materials and colors they've used in the cabin and it seeps through the rest of the car from there. The cabin and dash design are a bit fussier than you'd find on a Golf. And the shallower windscreen angle means there's a tiny support pillar at the bottom of the A-pillar, though it doesn't seem to hamper the driver's vision.

    The seats are superb, with enormous side bolstering and lumbar support. Other than a big gap between the brake and accelerator pedals, the driving position is excellent and so is vision. The cabin area is large, but has little by way of compartments or securing devices beyond a pair of hook points. Both rear seats fold flat independently, too, and full-size adults can fit comfortably in the rear.

    The 2012 Opel Astra GTC is also loaded with all the latest technology at Opel's disposal. It has traffic sign-recognition, bi-xenon headlights, a front-facing camera, distance-following radar, lane-departure warnings and intelligent light-ranging systems. They sound overbearing but don't intrude much.

    Should We Get It?
    This would be a nice little gadget in the U.S., if anybody in GM can find a badge they'd like to put on it. Pontiac would have made sense at one time, but now it's not so easy.

    Chevrolet has plenty of models already and as nice as the GTC looks and feels, it's no Cadillac. And Buick? Well, that's a definite possibility and rumors suggesting as much have been circulating for months.

    It would certainly make for an appealing two-door alternative to the Verano sedan although it doesn't quite possess enough "Buickness" as an Opel. A level of refinement and comfort would have to be added and that could suck the life right out of the GTC. Then again, maybe Buick will play it smart and furnish just enough luxury to catch the eye of young coupe buyers who don't need something to toss around on the weekend.

    We would prefer to wait and drive the OPC version before we pass judgment. Until then, the 2012 Opel Astra GTC's absence in the U.S. isn't likely to get noticed much.

    Edmunds attended a manufacturer-sponsored event, to which selected members of the press were invited, to facilitate this report.

    Sort By:

    joe_scuba says:

    08:02 AM, 12/30/2011

    In the 80's GM imported Isuzu as Opel now they will import Opel as Buick. Sad

    wikiwiki says:

    01:56 PM, 12/29/2011

    Nice car.  Wish the side windows were larger.  But this is nice.  The Europeans get all the good stuff.  We get Buicks.  Why can't we kill off Buick and just bring in Opel as a US brand of its own?  Leave Buick to the Chinese market.

    hooklyn says:

    10:08 AM, 12/29/2011

    You cannot argue the tires anymore.

    An 18" Summer tire will handle better and grip better than a 17" A/S tire. PERIOD.

    eldaino2 says:

    07:55 AM, 12/29/2011

    @hooklyn: i'm nit picking again, but 17's on a gti are alsos 225', not 215. there is a little less sidewall flex on gti's with 18's, but a lower profile doesnt necessarily mean better handling.  maybe better grip. but we've been over that.


    @brn: i have to agree. even saturns own booklets on the astra at the dealer when i test drove one tried to gloss over the poor equipment included by trying to focus on the art of driving and not being distracted with music, cellphones etc. i usually agree, but when you dont even have an aux jack, there is a problem.

    the engine was nothing special either...quicker than my fit at the time, but coarser and not as fuel efficient as the 1.8 in the honda civic.

    i dont think making a car that drives as well as the astra did is a bad thing...i just think that it cant survive solely on the merit of the driving experience. people want a whole package.

    ne1butu2 says:

    10:40 PM, 12/28/2011

    I don't think that GM's halfhearted attempt to market the Saturn Astra should play into the consideration to bring this car here as a Buick. The Saturn was a good car, but it was imported from Europe, so it was unprofitable. Also it wasn't supported by any marketing at all... even when it was launched, which is unheard of for a new car introduction. Maybe GM didn't allocate any marketing dollars to it because it was sold at a loss to begin with.

    Regardless, this car is hot and there would certainly be interest among 20-35 year olds. Admittedly,  the Buick name would be a real hurdle. So the typical Buick marketing and branding approach that appeals to the 60+ audience would not work. Nor would the color choices of six shades of beige and tan, like they're offering with the bland Verano.

    brn says:

    08:07 PM, 12/28/2011

    Firstwagon, I think it was more than the name that killed the Astra.  At the time, Saturn was the only GM division making it's numbers (even handing out bonuses).  Then again, some argue that Saturn never turned a profit, so who knows.

    If you're correct, it's sad the the label would kill the car.  I'll give the idea some merit, as it's not unusual for brands to sell well, simply because of the brand name.

    firstwagon says:

    07:45 PM, 12/28/2011

    brn

    I think the Astra failed because it was labeled a Saturn.  By the time it arrived Saturn was not cool anymore and most people would just assume it to be an Ion coupe.  That would kill any car, even a good one.

    brn says:

    04:26 PM, 12/28/2011

    Have we forgotten that GM brought the Astra (essentially unchanged) over just a few years ago and it was a sales flop?

    It was a nice car, but we found out the grass wasn't any greener.  For a hatch, it had minimal storage and a tiny opening.  The power for the price was below par.  The MPG was nothing special.  Nice little car, but it had no solid strengths.  Well, enthusiasts at IL said they buy it.  They didn't.

    GM got burned listening to enthusiasts and brought this car over once before.  Why should they do it again?

    300zxguy says:

    03:55 PM, 12/28/2011

    I don't think it makes any sense as a GMC, which is a truck division, but if they reincarnated "Opel by Buick", as with the Opel GT in the 1970s, I think that would be a great idea.  For one, the Opel badge is so much cooler than Buick's, and for Buick haters who like the car but are hung up on Buick being only for oldsters, they can tell their friends (and themselves) that the drive an Opel.  As for fitting in at the Buick dealership, the reverse hockey stick crease in the side of the body and the interior design's strong family resemblance are enough that it would not be a odd duck amongst the others.  Do it, GM!

    ctizzle says:

    09:15 AM, 12/28/2011

    Statistical semantics aside fellas...I DO think that the powers that be over at GM need to bring this here. And WHO says that GMC HAS to produce trucks?!?!?

    They could REALLY shake things up bringing it over as a GMC because

    1. it would instantly pique folks' interest in GMC as in people saying "hey...I forgot GMC even existed as a standalone entity!"

    2. By putting under GMC, it makes the product seem "newer" and "fresher" due to GMC never having a proper non-truck. Would be all new territory for everyone!

    I think since nobody ackknowledges GMC, young folks would be looking at it for the 1st time and have no pre-conceived notions. Just MY 2 cents!

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2012 Opel Astra GTC

    Base Price:

    N/A

    Engine:

    2.0-liter inline-4

    Gearbox:

    6-speed manual

    Power:

    177 hp @ 5,500 rpm

    EPA Rating:

    N/A

    On Sale:

    N/A

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2012 Opel Astra GTC 2dr Sedan (1.6L 4cyl 6M)
    Vehicle TypeFWD 2dr 5-passenger Coupe
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front-engine, front-wheel drive
    Engine typeTurbocharged, port-injected, inline-4, gasoline with auto-stop/start
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1,598/97
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDouble overhead camshaft
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)177 @ 5,500
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)169 @ 2,200
    Fuel type91-octane for best performance
    Transmission type6-speed Manual
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontMacPherson strut
    Suspension, rearTorsion beam
    Steering typeElectric power steering
    Tire typeAll season front and rear
    Wheel materialAlloy
    Brakes, frontVentilated disc
    Brakes, rearVentilated disc
    Track Test Results
    0-60 mph, mfr. claim (sec.)8.3 (0-62 mph)
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)2,905
    Length (in.)175.8
    Width (in.)79.5
    Height (in.)58.3
    Wheelbase (in.)106.1
    Track, front (in.)62.4
    Track, rear (in.)62.5
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement