INSIDE LINE

Automakers Embrace Tough New 54.5-MPG Standard

Media Player

  • Fuel Economy Standards Picture

    Fuel Economy Standards Picture

    President Obama on Friday proposed tough new fuel economy standards that will require a 54.5 mpg corporate average by 2025. | July 29, 2011

News

Automakers Embrace Tough New 54.5-MPG Standard

    12 Ratings
    Just the Facts:
    • In an amazing about-face, major automakers stood shoulder-to-shoulder with President Obama on Friday as he proposed tough new fuel economy standards that will require a 54.5-mpg corporate average by 2025.
    • "Gas prices have just been killing folks at the pump," Obama said. "It (the new standards) means filling up your car every two weeks instead of every week. It will save a typical family more than $8,000 in fuel costs over time."
    • The Washington event had the look of an auto show, with the president standing in front of 10 vehicles, including the 2012 Range Rover Evoque, the 2011 Nissan Leaf, the 2012 Honda Civic Hybrid and the 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ.

    WASHINGTON — In an amazing about-face, major automakers stood shoulder-to-shoulder with President Obama on Friday as he proposed tough new fuel economy standards that will require a 54.5-miles-per-gallon corporate average by 2025, up from the current 27.5 mpg.

    It is the largest increase in mileage requirements since the government began regulating vehicle fuel economy in the 1970s. Just four years ago, the Detroit automakers were so enraged about higher fuel-economy standards that executives camped out in Washington in an attempt to defeat them. Initially, the Obama White House aimed at a more ambitious target of 62 mpg by 2025.

    "Gas prices have just been killing folks at the pump," Obama said. "It (the new standards) means filling up your car every two weeks instead of every week. It will save a typical family more than $8,000 in fuel costs over time."

    The Detroit Three's meek acceptance of the new standards follows a federal bail-out of Chrysler and General Motors at the height of the Great Recession. Without mentioning that specifically, Obama noted that the U.S. auto industry is just emerging from a "difficult time." But it may explain the docility of auto executives in accepting the strict new rules.

    The Washington event had the look of an auto show, with the president standing in front of 10 vehicles, including the 2012 Range Rover Evoque, the 2011 Nissan Leaf, the 2012 Honda Civic Hybrid and the 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ, as a band played stirring John Philip Sousa marching tunes. Also on display were the 2012 Volvo S60 T5, the 2010 Toyota Plug-in Hybrid concept, the 2011 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid, the 2011 Ford F-150 4x4 with EcoBoost, the 2011 Dodge Ram 4x4 SLT and the 2011 Kia Optima Hybrid.

    Obama was flanked during the announcement by a Who's Who in the global auto industry, including GM CEO Dan Akerson, Ford CEO Alan Mulally, Hyundai Motor America CEO John Krafcik, Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne and Jim Lentz, president and chief operating officer of Toyota Motors Sales USA — among other top auto executives.

    "We're up to the task," said Scott Becker, Nissan Americas senior vice president of administration and finance in a corporate statement supporting the Obama plan.

    Other automakers, including GM, Toyota, Chrysler and others, quickly issued statements saying that they supported the plan — at least "in principle."

    "Obviously, there is still a great deal of uncertainty as to how the market will respond and what vehicle technologies consumers will embrace, which is why we are rolling out and testing a range of alternative fuel options," said Toyota in a statement entitled "Toyota Agrees To Ambitious New Fuel Economy Standards."

    The warm-and-fuzzy fuel-economy standards announcement stood in stark contrast to the vitriolic federal debt crisis talks going on in Washington at the same time.

    "This ought to serve as a valuable lesson for leaders in Washington," Obama said. "You are all demonstrating what can happen when people put aside differences. When it comes to tackling the deficit or growing the economy, the American people are demanding the same kind of resolve and spirit of compromise that all these folks on stage have shown."

    The White House issued a statement on Friday saying the new standards will save an estimated 12 billion barrels of oil over the life of the program. The standards will also help the president's goal of reducing oil imports by a third by 2025.

    The announcement was marked by a few light moments, especially as Obama surveyed the line-up of impressive automotive hardware sharing the stage.

    "I'm glad I have a chance to see some of the great cars today," he said. "It's only a matter of time until (13-year-old daughter) Malia gets her learner's permit."

    Obama said he longed for "a model with a top speed of 15 mph and an ejector seat any time boys are in the car."

    Inside Line says: Obama and the automakers appear to be singing from the same hymnal when it comes to the new fuel economy standards — but it still will take about a year until the president's proposal is cast in stone.

    Sort By:

    agentorange says:

    10:26 AM, 08/01/2011

    This bit about saving us money is a crock. Cars that get better gas mileage are already causing several states to find ways to recover the revenue lost in lower gas tax receipts. The motorist is treated as a cash cow by governments all over the world, so don't get any funny ideas about  reducing your personal transport costs. Coming soon, the requirement to report your odometer readings every year and be taxed on the miles you travelled.

    cz_75 says:

    04:12 AM, 08/01/2011

    Gas prices are way too low and we need an even bigger tax on them to ensure people can afford to buy even less and save the fuel by not shopping.  Heck they may as well pay so much that they can no longer afford to pay for gas at all and stay home because their job was eliminated because of a decrease in consumer sales - that will really save fuel.

    eek4ever says:

    10:39 PM, 07/31/2011

    With regards to the last comment, I meant raise fuel taxes considerably.  A federal gas tax exists, but it is way too low.

    eek4ever says:

    10:35 PM, 07/31/2011

    If the Obama administration had any balls, they would have instituted a gas tax. Guide the market into favoring more fuel efficient vehicles and the automakers will follow suit a lot faster than some bogus MPG mandate.  Not to mention the government could use the extra tax revenue right now....

    blackdynamite0 says:

    07:59 PM, 07/31/2011

    The problem with this is "A owner of a 2025 car will save $8200 more on fuel than a owner of a 2010 car"

    With our Federal Reserve tanking our dollar on a daily basis, the car's price will appreciate at a rate that will cancel out that $8200 in 15 years.

    The average price of a car today is $29k
    In 1995?  $19k

    These new measures, technologies, and materials needed to make these targets will only increase the costs of cars, thereby marginalizing the fuel costs savings even more
    BD

    church123 says:

    12:49 PM, 07/31/2011

    Ever wonder why the tire is that big tdiluv?  Tire size and weight are directly proportional to load carrying capacity.  If you want to be able to move a 5000 lbs truck with 1200 lbs of cargo and a 7000 lbs trailer, you need a beefy tire to handle that load.  It needs to have stiff sidewalls and plenty of air capacity (read larger tire) to take the weight without overheating, delaminating or exploding.  You could reduce the weight of a truck by 1000 lbs (about 17% these days), but if you want the same load and towing capacity, you're only going to be reducing the peak load required of the tires by about 8% or less.

    christopher42 says:

    12:43 PM, 07/31/2011

    What so now I ed up by a Bentley Mulsanne that gets a 3 cylinder made out of plastic that gets 56 mpg?

    clerk1892 says:

    11:53 AM, 07/31/2011

    @kingon

    What?

    jpdisarro says:

    09:31 AM, 07/31/2011

    "Outlaw AMG and SRT or penalize them and don't send this country's wealth to Persian Gulf."

    No one is forcing you to buy an SRT Dodge or an AMG MB.  Are you aware that other options are available on the market?  Why do you feel the need to outlaw products that do not suit your needs?

    sportyaccordy says:

    07:51 AM, 07/31/2011

    Customers will save $8500 on fuel costs on a car in 2025. They will just pay $17000 more for a car made out of carbon fiber, magnesium, FRP & balsa wood that can drive itself & protect a family of four crashing into a wall at 150MPH while not wearing their seat belts. Progress!!!!

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Advertisement