INSIDE LINE

2011 Nissan Juke Full Test

Media Player

  • 2011 Nissan Juke Picture

    2011 Nissan Juke Picture

    The 2011 Nissan Juke is a cheeky little toadstool. | August 23, 2010

Road Test

2011 Nissan Juke Full Test

Books, Covers and the Judgment Thereof

    48 Ratings

    Resist the temptation to make digs about the 2011 Nissan Juke's sheet metal. Be better than that. Rise above. C'mon, you can do it. Styling is subjective, after all.

    Remember that member of the opposite sex you knew in high school, the one your mother wanted you to date? You know, the one with "a great personality?" That's the Nissan Juke.

    Oh well.

    Unusual Looks
    From the Group B-esque headlights to its comically swollen wheel arches and taillights that could have been pilfered from a 370Z, the 2011 Nissan Juke throws together a bizarre mishmash of styling cues. You keep staring at the thing trying to get your head around it, but the Juke is defiantly head-wraparound-proof. It's funky. It's ugly. It's funkly.

    It's smaller than you think, too. Photos suggest that the Juke is a beefy sport-ute about the size of a Kia Borrego or a Toyota Land Cruiser. Nope. It's a pint-size thing that rides on the same platform as the Nissan Cube and Versa.

    But the Juke has a whole lot more personality than those cars, and we mean that in the best way possible. Those flamboyant visuals aren't all bluster — the Juke delivers a fun-to-drive exponent beyond its plebeian roots.

    Unusual Dynamics
    Its chassis is coiled tight and changes direction as if it was fed a steady diet of British B-roads during its development. The 2011 Nissan Juke is far more Mini than it is Scion xB.

    Yes, this puckerfish has genuine handling poise. Even in lowly front-wheel-drive guise, which forgoes the fully independent rear end of AWD variants for a simple twist beam, the Juke is sharp, nimble and willing to let you extract every iota of grip from the chassis.

    Even the stability control cooperates in the fun, as it is surprisingly liberal in letting you play with the car's handling balance using the throttle. Heck, this Juke is more playful than a Volkswagen GTI.

    The Juke ought to have the world's most annoying power delivery. And yet its powertrain combination works.

    As for ride quality, this frog's legs are firm enough to remind you of their ability to spring to and fro, but don't kick their occupants tiresomely. The steering — electrically assisted, and obviously so — could be better. It's precise, but there isn't much feel to it and the weighting is artificial especially when it's attempting to mitigate torque steer. There's also no telescoping action. Pshaw.

    The Juke's slalom performance at the test track of 66.2 mph is substantial. In fact, it's far quicker through the cones than the last Mazda 3 we tested and nips at the heels of a Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8. Not bad for a vehicle riding on 215/55R17 all-season tires, eh? It clung to our skid pad with 0.83g of grip, exhibiting the same communicative nature we observed on the road. Braking from 60 mph consumed a class-appropriate 123 feet.

    Unusual Powertrain
    Our tester, a bare-bones entry-level "S" trim level with no options, comes equipped with a 1.6-liter turbocharged and direct-injected four-cylinder that pumps out 188 horsepower and 177 pound-feet of torque. In this, the least expensive 2011 Nissan Juke you can buy, there's a standard continuously variable transmission (CVT) rather than the customary manual gearbox. Odd, yes? Yes. But if you've seen the sheet metal, you know this is par for the course.

    The idea of pairing a turbo engine to a CVT is like looping a rubber band to a Lycra stocking — by all rights, the Juke ought to have the world's most stretch-tastically annoying power delivery. And yet in the Juke, the combination works. Boost comes up pretty quickly and the CVT is responsive enough that the little amphibian squirts around town in a natural manner. It's not especially buzzy-sounding. You can catch the engine off-boost at very low revs, but once under way the midrange punch moves the Juke's 2,931 pounds around with authority. Premium fuel, however, is required.

    As with many CVT-equipped cars, the Juke's acceleration is deceptively effective when you plant your foot to the carpet since the revs simply climb and hold near redline. Our tester clicked off 60 mph in 7.3 seconds (7.0 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip) on its way to a quarter-mile of 15.5 seconds at 89.9 mph.

    This is a respectable performance, but to be fair it involved a bit of juggling between the automatic and manual modes of the CVT. In auto mode, revs climb slower than in Manual mode, which hurts the launch. However, a bit farther down the track, auto mode's ability to operate the engine precisely at peak power gives it an acceleration advantage over the pseudo-shifting manual mode. Thus, the best acceleration resulted from launching in manual mode and then switching to auto once the revs reached the deep end of the tachometer.

    The Anti-Box
    Functionally, the 2011 Nissan Juke works pretty well. Visibility through the upright windshield is excellent and there's a sense of ample space in the front thanks to the tall roof. The backseat folds flat, usefully extending the high-bustle rear end's cargo volume. Your 6-foot friend won't be thrilled to ride back there for a long haul, but he's lucky you didn't make him walk instead.

    Silver accents spruce up the dark cabin, which thankfully exhibits more styling restraint than the exterior. The steering wheel's nicely contoured grips suggest it was plucked intact from a 370Z, though the vinyl covering proves otherwise. Cabin controls in this base Juke are straightforward, with a simple three-knob HVAC interface and sizable radio buttons.

    Automakers use CVTs as a fuel economy play, and the Juke's EPA fuel economy of 27 city/32 highway mpg is a solid showing. Don't place too much stock in the 21.5 mpg we observed in our Juke tester, as our drive time was relatively short and we spent much of it at — ahem — wide throttle openings.

    Unusual
    As tested, our Nissan Juke stickers at a hair under $20 grand with destination, slotting neatly between the more affordable Suzuki SX4 and turbocharged Mini Cooper Clubman. It's a lot closer in spirit to the latter than the former, and while the Mini is a modern interpretation of a classic, the Juke hoes a row of its own. The Juke is not a color-by-numbers kind of car. It's an experiment. We're grateful that automakers are still willing to experiment.

    The 2011 Nissan Juke may be hard to look at, but it's easy to like.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Sort By:

    fitforfood says:

    12:03 PM, 03/17/2011

    did you seriously say "Heck, this Juke is more playful than a Volkswagen GTI." I stopped reading your article after that - utter rubbish.

    rayzor says:

    11:43 PM, 01/29/2011

    Holy crap! Or in this case Holy Joke! Who designed this pile of dung! Seriously...Even the photo smells!!
    Nissan, please fire the designer responsible for this disaster...better yet, fire the idiot who approved this dung for production!!!!

    jbui says:

    07:29 PM, 11/07/2010

    Took delivery of my SL Juke last week.  Love it!! It is so much fun to drive and most people who see it love the design, it looks better in real life.

    jukevsgolf says:

    08:51 PM, 10/11/2010

    I am SO TORN with this car!  I've been a Nissan fan since I was 16 (I'm 27 now) and have had a Sentra and now I have an Xterra.  I love the Xterra but I'm having a hard time justifying $60/week in gas when I just drive to work and back.  I'm looking for a smaller car thats around $20K that actually fun to drive and has some pick up.  I've test driven the Toyota Corolla which lacked power, the Scion tC which has NO head room (I'm 6ft tall), and headed over to the VW Lot.  The only think I've liked was the VW Golf, but it's lacking some options on the inside (the TDI version is outta my price range).  I then test drove the Juke, and loved it but here are my concerns - it's new technology so I'm concerned about reliability.  Also, it's a brand new design and I'm thinking the resale value in a few years might not be optimal!  I need some help deciding - what's your insight???

    THANKS

    ford_flexer says:

    01:21 PM, 09/26/2010

    I hate this thing it's hideous.

    afty says:

    10:26 AM, 09/21/2010

    I kind of like this thing*.  I'm not convinced it wouldn't work better as a normal hatchback, but I also don't find the styling that objectionable.  At least it's interesting, as opposed to the incredibly boring Versa and Sentra.  I'm impressed with the powertrain and would love to see it in a small, sporty car.

    *Full disclosure: My first car was an NX2000.

    bronsideline says:

    01:31 PM, 08/25/2010

    almost as fast as a civic si, this thing has potential.

    andy999 says:

    10:13 AM, 08/25/2010

    @wikiwiki, . . . My understanding is, that Nissan is testing a brand new car to replace the Versa.  Supposedly, it is still in question as to whether or not the "Versa" name will be used, or if the new replacement will receive a completely different name.  Pictures of the test vehicles in masking, would lead most persons to believe that the styling of this new car has been enhanced considerably when compared to the previous Versa, and may even be just slightly larger in size.  Look for a Versa replacement fairly soon . . .      

    andy999 says:

    08:52 AM, 08/25/2010

    Using the name "Juke" may have worked better for a car company back in the 1950's or 1960's, but I am just not certain about this catching on (with any popularity) in 2010 and upward!!!  

    andy999 says:

    08:49 AM, 08/25/2010

    The name Nissan "Juke" is certainly almost as creative as the bodywork design, but I am curious, as to what "Juke" actually describes (or how that name came about).  How great would it have been, to be sitting in on the Nissan Exec meeting where that name was chosen, and to have heard the conversation leading up to that choice!!!  I would guess, that the name "Juke" was suppose to have a similar meaning as it does in the term "Juke-Box", but I am curious as to how quickly, or if at all, that particular name will catch on.  The term "Juke" on its own, really isn't a popular term in mainstream conversation, and may seem a little odd for some persons.  If the average person has to stop and think about what the name represents, rather than instantly being familiar, maybe the name itself isn't a great one for marketing a major product (of any type).  Time will tell . . .      

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested (Year Make Model):

    2011 Nissan Juke

    Base Price:

    $18,960

    Price as Tested:

    $19,710

    Engine:

    1.6-liter turbocharged inline-4

    Gearbox:

    Continuously variable transmission

    Power:

    188 horsepower

    0-60 mph:

    7.3 seconds

    Fuel Mileage:

    21.5 mpg (observed)

    What Works (pros):

    Weird styling, a ball to throw through a series of corners, affordable.

    What Needs Work (cons):

    Weird styling, needs a telescoping wheel.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2011 Nissan Juke 4dr SUV FWD S (1.6L 4cyl Turbo CVT)
    Vehicle TypeFWD 4dr 5-passenger SUV
    Base MSRP$18,960
    Options on test vehicleNone
    As-tested MSRP$19,710
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front-engine, front-wheel drive
    Engine typeTurbocharged, direct-injected gasoline inline-4
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1,599cc (98 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder, variable intake + exhaust-valve timing
    Redline, indicated (rpm)6,500
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)188
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)177
    Fuel typePremium unleaded (recommended)
    Transmission typePulley-regulated continuously variable transmission with console shifter with Sport mode
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent MacPherson struts, coil springs, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearNon-independent twist-beam axle, coil springs, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeElectric-assist speed-proportional rack-and-pinion power steering
    Tire make and modelGoodyear Eagle RS-A
    Tire typeAll-season front and rear
    Tire sizeP215/55R17 98V
    Wheel size17-by-7 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialCast aluminum
    Brakes, frontOne-piece ventilated cast-iron discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rearOne-piece solid cast-iron discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)2.9
    0-45 mph (sec.)4.9
    0-60 mph (sec.)7.3
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)7.0
    0-75 mph (sec.)10.7
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)15.5 @ 89.9
    0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.)2.9
    0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.)5.2
    0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.)7.6
    0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)7.3
    0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.)11.1
    1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph)15.7 @ 89.7
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)32
    60-0 mph (ft.)123
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)66.2
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON61.3
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.83
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON0.82
    Sound level @ idle (dB)42.2
    @ Full throttle (dB)76.6
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)70.9
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)2,900
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsWith traction control on and the transmission in Drive, the CVT seems to take its time reaching redline. In Manual mode, the rpm ramps up much quicker (6,000 by 40 mph rather than 60 mph) but the faux "shifts" eliminate most of the advantage gained. Best run was in Manual mode until redline, and then switching back to Drive for the remainder of the run. A little noisy, but not like it's going to throw a con-rod through the hood; sporty overall.
    Braking commentsMedium-effort pedal, some initial wander to the right, but otherwise an average experience. Adequate fade resistance.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: With ESC stability control off, the Juke responds to throttle modulation, altering course and balancing between understeer and mild oversteer. Well tuned. With ESC on, the car pulls down the throttle to mitigate understeer. Steering feel is slightly springy and comfortably weighted. Slalom: With ESC off, the Juke is really, shockingly, rewardingly willing to be chucked between the cones. Easy to place next to a cone, then lift gas to rotate, then back on-throttle...repeat. This sort of dexterity is usually found in a Mazda 3 or Mini Cooper. With ESC on, only slight corrections are made and control is quickly returned to the driver. Excellent ESC!
    Testing Conditions
    Test date8/3/2010
    Test locationCalifornia Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)81.3
    Relative humidity (%)33.3
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)28.8
    Wind (mph, direction)3.6 head/crosswind
    Odometer (mi.)1274
    Fuel used for test91-octane gasoline
    As-tested tire pressures, f/r (psi)36/36
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)27 city/32 highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)21.5
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,157
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)2,931
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)63.6/36.4
    Length (in.)162.4
    Width (in.)69.5
    Height (in.)61.8
    Wheelbase (in.)99.6
    Track, front (in.)60.0
    Track, rear (in.)59.2
    Legroom, front (in.)42.1
    Legroom, rear (in.)32.1
    Headroom, front (in.)38.6
    Headroom, rear (in.)36.7
    Shoulder room, front (in.)53.6
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)51.4
    Seating capacity5
    Step-in height, measured (in.)16.9
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years/60,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance3 years/36,000 miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement