INSIDE LINE

Full Test: 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS

Media Player

  • 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS Road Test Video

    Watch the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS Road Test Video on Edmunds’ Inside Line | September 25, 2009

1 Video , 19 Photos | See more photos in this gallery »

Road Test

Full Test: 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS

Lots of trick features, but no horses

    1 Rating
    The new Mitsubishi Evo is on the way, and everyone who has seen the Concept-X showcar knows it. The ongoing Evo buzz has made us pretty eager to get into the new 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS.

    With our first drive of the Lancer GTS, we already found out that this is a radically different Lancer than ever before. For one thing, it's got a CVT (continuously variable transmission), technology that we're seeing on a growing number of cars in this segment.

    It shows us that cars in this class are trying to deliver performance, not just gas-sipping value.

    Say Goodbye to Cheap and Cheerful
    The 2008 Lancer does a good job of making you forget the strange, oddly proportioned little cars that have worn the nameplate for the last couple of decades. It's been stretched in every dimension, with a 1.4-inch-longer wheelbase, another 2.3 inches in width and 4.0 inches of height, and it adds up to 94.8 cubic feet of passenger volume.

    This platform doesn't have a very sexy heritage, as it was developed by DaimlerChrysler to furnish a building block for a lot of different vehicles, from the Dodge Caliber to the Mitsubishi Outlander. But it brings 56 percent more torsional rigidity than before, as well as 50 percent more bending rigidity, and this gives the Lancer GTS a substantial, almost German feeling of substance.

    The Lancer GTS features special bodywork, foglights, sport seats, a front strut-tower brace and an aggressive suspension calibration with 215/45R18 tires. It's a Lancer made for guys who care about driving.

    Same-Day Acceleration
    The only thing that hasn't grown larger is the Lancer's engine. The former iron-block 2.0-liter 4G63 inline-4 has given way to an aluminum-block 2.0-liter 4B11. The new 2.0-liter inline-4 produces 152 horsepower, a lot of power from so little displacement. And thanks to Mitsubishi's variable valve timing for both the intake and exhaust cams, there's a broad torque curve that starts at about 2,000 rpm with 135 pound-feet and then plateaus a short time later with 146 lb-ft at 4,250 rpm.

    But pulling around as much as 400 pounds extra compared to the former Lancer pretty well erases the engine's output advantage. While we weren't expecting trails of fire from the all-new 2.0-liter inline-4, we were hoping for better than the 9.0 seconds it takes to reach 60 mph, only a tenth or so quicker than the 120-hp 2006 Lancer managed.

    In comparison, the $21,290, 197-hp Honda Civic Si sedan with its six-speed manual transmission reaches 60 mph in just 7.1 seconds. The $19,400, 177-hp Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V does the job in 6.7 seconds.

    Meanwhile, the Lancer GTS will get smoked by almost any 2-ton V6 crossover and even a few minivans. And the droning engine note sounds more janitorial than sporty.

    Continuously Vexing Transmission (CVT)
    We partly blame this GTS's sluggish performance on its CVT transmission. While a five-speed manual continues to be available (and we recommend it for this car), the traditional four-speed automatic has been replaced with the CVT. It allows you to shift among six ratios with steering-wheel-mounted paddles. Mitsubishi says the CVT offers a wider range of ratios than the outgoing four-speed automatic, thus increasing both performance and economy.

    Instead of varying engine speed and shifting gears to suit, the CVT can maintain a predetermined engine speed and continuously vary the transmission ratios for the desired vehicle speed. And the combination of the 152-hp four-cylinder and CVT does outperform the 120-hp four-cylinder with four-speed automatic with both quicker acceleration and better fuel economy.

    Driving a car is an even more variable endeavor than either of these two continuously variably optimized situations, however, and the GTS's CVT has a hard time figuring out which one you want. Even with what Mitsubishi calls Intelligent and Innovative Vehicle Electronic Control System (INVECS III), a program that learns the driver's behavior pattern over time, too little power always arrives too late.

    In due course, we noted the system responded more quickly if we downshifted when we wanted more speed, and so we did — all the time. Since we noticed the engine reached redline quicker in Manual mode (at 45 mph instead of 75 mph in "Drive"), we left it there until the top of 1st gear, then switched over to Drive to complete the rest of the quarter-mile, cutting a second from our time in Drive-only mode.

    The CVT gives you a kind of elasticity in performance like a conventional automatic transmission, and it's more responsive and more fuel-efficient. But you wouldn't exactly call it responsive compared to a manual transmission, and you have to continuously keep tugging at the shift paddles to achieve any speed. And that kind of diminishes the whole point of a CVT, doesn't it?

    Got Its Feet on the Ground
    The GTS's handling is above average for its class, especially considering its base price of $18,490. It has just about a perfect compromise between performance handling and daily ride comfort.

    Although the new engine sits farther forward in the chassis than before, our only dynamic demerit arose because the ordinary all-season tires heated up and gave up long before the rest of the package did. The rock-solid chassis is very good at isolating the passengers from the outside, even with the standard 215/45R18 tires.

    Before the front tires relinquished grip during skid-pad testing, we recorded an admirable average lateral acceleration of 0.86g (plus 0.89g in one direction). The rear tires wilted first in our slalom, yet we were pleased with the Lancer's thoroughly entertaining performance of 65.5 mph.

    We'd prefer a bit more communication through the steering wheel, though.

    The GTS's four-wheel disc brakes apparently come right from the 3,800-pound Outlander SUV, so stopping the 3,100-pound Lancer unsurprisingly proves to be a fade-free experience that inspires confidence, and it comes to a halt in 118 feet from 60 mph, just shy of a rating of "Excellent."

    Going Upmarket With Smart Styling
    On the outside, the Lancer has a genuine international flavor, and we find hints of Acura, Audi, Volvo and even a little Alfa Romeo in the rear view. It has a look that sets it apart from the omnipresent Honda Civic, stodgy new Nissan Sentra and uninspired Toyota Corolla.

    The 2008 Lancer also goes upmarket with a selection of standard features once regarded as luxury items. For the added cost of a typical power moonroof, our test car came equipped with the $1,500 P2 Sun and Sound package, which includes a high-end 650-watt Rockford Fosgate sound system (see Stereo Evaluation), Sirius Satellite Radio (free for the first six months), six-CD/MP3 in-dash head unit, an aux-input jack, plus the moonroof.

    An additional $2,000 for the P3 Navigation and Technology package nets the 30-gigabyte hard-drive-based navi system, which also provides for digital audio uploading to the music server (it's totally useful), a 7-inch touchscreen, and a wide array of trip-related functions.

    The Promise of Power To Come
    At a grand total of just $22,615, our loaded-up Lancer GTS presents somewhat of a dilemma. Once regarded as a marginalized, low-cost, second- or third-choice cheap-and-cheerful compact, the Lancer now measures up to first-class status in many ways.

    Now if Mitsubishi would just ladle a generous portion of motivational tempo on top of its nimble GTS chassis, it would really have something. Fortunately we've learned that's exactly the plan.

    Within a year, there will be three more Lancer variants. First there will be a front-wheel-drive model with a 2.4-liter inline-4 dubbed either Lancer GST or Lancer Ralliart. Then there will be the all-wheel-drive Evolution X (perhaps with as much as 320 hp). And finally something between the two that will be positioned against the 2008 Subaru Impreza WRX, which we believe will be an all-wheel-drive Lancer GSX with an inline-4 boosted to 250 hp with a light-pressure turbo.

    Once this horseless carriage gets some motivation, the Lancer should be our kind of car.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Featured Specs

    • 152-horsepower inline-4 engine
    • Continuously variable transmission
    • 18-inch wheels

    What Works

    Solid structure, above-average handling, excellent optional audio package, amazing value.

    What Needs Work

    Don't bother with the CVT — it saps what little zest the new 2.0-liter engine offers; touchscreen interface — volume knob, please.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    MakeMitsubishi
    ModelLancer
    Model year2008
    StyleGTS 4dr Sedan (2.0L 4cyl CVT)
    Base MSRP$19,115
    As-tested MSRP$22,615
    Drive typeFront-wheel drive
    Transmission typeContinuously variable automatic
    Engine typeInline-4
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1998cc (122 cu-in)
    Valvetraindouble overhead camshaft, variable intake/exhaust timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.0
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)152 @ 6,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)146 @ 4,250
    Brakes, frontFront ventilated disc - rear disc
    Brakes, reardisc
    Steering typeHydraulic-assist power steering
    Suspension, frontIndependent, MacPherson struts, coil springs, and stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent, multilink, coil springs, and stabilizer bar
    Tire size, frontP215/45R18 89V
    Tire size, rearP215/45R18 89V
    Tire brandDunlop
    Tire modelSP Sport 5000M (M+S)
    Tire typeall season
    Wheel materialalloy
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,109 mfr (3,126 as tested)
    Curb weight, as-tested (lbs.)3126
    Fuel typeRegular unleaded
    Fuel tank capacity (gal)15.3
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)22 City / 29 Highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)24 combined (28 best / 18 worst)
    Conditions for Testing
    Temperature (°F)65.3
    Elevation (ft.)1121
    Wind (mph, direction)1
    Performance
    0 - 30 (sec.)3.4
    0 - 45 (sec.)5.9
    0 - 60 (sec.)9.1
    0 - 75 (sec.)13.5
    1/4 mile (sec. @ mph)16.9 @ 83.8
    30 - 0 (ft.)28
    60 - 0 (ft.)118
    Braking ratingGood
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft (mph)65.5
    Skid pad, 200 ft diameter (lateral g)0.86
    Handling ratingGood
    Sound level @ idle (db)43.3
    Sound level @ full throttle (db)78.6
    Sound level @ 70 mph cruise (db)67.2
    Acceleration commentsWe learned to manipulate the CVT to extract what little power the engine offers by first engaging the manual mode until the engine reached redline (at about 45 mph), then popped it over into "Drive" to take advantage of the CVT's ability to maintain near-redline for the remainder of the acceleration run. This is because the CVT's manual mode uses more advantageous gearing (from a standstill) than Drive does. Left in Drive, the engine doesn't reach redline until almost 75 mph, and all acceleration times increase by at least one second across the board. We "gamed" it in a way most people never would. This engine revs smoothly, but sounds positively horrible and all the racket comes through the firewall.
    Braking commentsThe ABS makes a noticeable buzz, but the pedal stays firm and the body motions are well controlled. Virtually no brake fade even after five consecutive stops from 60 mph.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: Initially, the GTS exhibits good cornering balance, but as the front tires heat up, it begins to drift into relentless understeer. Slalom: On the other hand, in the slalom, as the rear tires heat up, the car begins to oversteer. Combined, these two traits reveal how fundamentally well-balanced the car is. Better (not all-season) tires would help a bunch here. There's quite a lot of suspension travel, but it's controlled reasonably well to soak up irregularities in the pavement. The steering is neither too quick nor too slow, but lacks tactile communication/feedback.
    Specifications
    Length (in.)180.0
    Width (in.)69.4
    Height (in.)58.7
    Wheelbase (in.)103.7
    Front Track (in.)60.2
    Rear Track (in.)60.2
    Turning circle (ft)32.8
    Legroom, front (in.)42.2
    Legroom, rear (in.)36.1
    Headroom, front (in.)38.5
    Headroom, rear (in.)36.9
    Shoulder room, front (in.)54.7
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)54.3
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)11.6
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)Rear seats do fold down, but volume is not specified.
    Warranty Information
    Bumper-to-bumper5 years/60,000 miles
    Powertrain10 years/100,000 miles
    Corrosion7 years/100,000 miles
    Roadside assistance5 years/Unlimited miles
    Scheduled maintenanceNot available
    Safety Information
    Front airbagsStandard dual front, driver's knee
    Side airbagsStandard dual front
    Head airbagsStandard front and rear
    Knee airbagsdriver only
    Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsElectronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlNot available
    Stability controlNot available
    Rollover protectionNot available
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemtire pressure monitoring
    Emergency assistance systemNot available
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement