INSIDE LINE

Mitsubishi Evolution versus Subaru WRX STi

Comparison

Mitsubishi Evolution versus Subaru WRX STi

Introduction

    2 Ratings
    The muscle car wars are heating up again. Only now, we're not talking about midsize American coupes with massive V8 engines and rear-wheel drive. Nope, the asphalt burners of today are all-wheel-drive compact sedans sporting turbocharged and intercooled four-cylinder mills putting out up to 300 horsepower. And they do more than just go fast in a straight line; they turn and stop as well as they go.

    Subaru was the first to bring one of its World Rally Championship-inspired cars to American showrooms with the 227-horsepower Impreza WRX. When word spread that Mitsubishi was going to follow suit by bringing its rally-bred Lancer Evolution (the street version of their WRC car) to the States with even more power than the WRX, the Subie folks cooked up the even hotter WRX STi. With 300 horsepower and trick features like Brembo brakes, an intercooler water sprayer and a driver-controlled center differential, the STi draws a Pavlovian response from many a car buff, including those on our staff. The aforementioned Lancer Evolution sports 271 horsepower and brings similar hardware (intercooler sprayer, big Brembos) to this real-life version of a hero car from a PlayStation racing game. In terms of pricing, the Evo starts at $29,582, the STi starts at $31,545. Both cars are well equipped with a few exceptions; the Evo doesn't come with cruise control and the STi doesn't come with an audio system.

    As is typical of our comparison tests, we lived with these cars for two weeks, driving them on a mix of freeway, curvy two-lane and city roads. We also threw in a lapping session at the Streets of Willow road course so that we could safely explore each car's limits.

    It's hard to call either one of these cars a loser, but in the end we had to choose an outright winner and a not-very-far-behind runner-up. So put down that game controller and check out what it's like to drive the real thing as we compare these compact overachieving powerhouses.

    Comparison

    Second Place - 2004 Subaru WRX STi

    Is this a great time for Japanese carmakers or what? Who would've thought we'd see the day when Subaru would have a car with 300 horsepower? It wasn't that long ago that car enthusiasts lusted after BMW's previous-generation M3 with its 240-horse straight six. Not only does the WRX STi have serious horsepower, it has all-wheel drive to effectively put it to use.

    Fans of The Fast and the Furious should like what they see when they pore over the STi. The big hood scoop (which feeds air to the intercooler) leans forward into the wind, as if drawn by a cartoon artist. And the big wing, like that on the Evo, makes a strong statement from any angle. This year, Subaru got rid of the cute, wide-eyed look of the previous version's headlights, replacing them with somewhat meaner-looking units more in keeping with this car's personality. Oddly enough, foglights, which are standard on the regular WRX, are not available on the STi, though we admit we like the look of the "STi" monogrammed covers that fill the spot where the lights would be. Given this Subie's stance, the proper attitude is 17-inch, 10-spoke BBS wheels shod with sticky Bridgestone Potenza performance tires.

    With racing-style seats and a sporty three-spoke steering wheel with a fat rim, the STi's cockpit won't be mistaken for a standard WRX's. But in spite of their aggressive appearance, the seats didn't hold a few of our drivers (ranging from one at 5 feet 5 inches with a medium frame to another at 6 feet 2 inches with a lean build) as tightly as they anticipated. And although most agreed that the seats were generally accommodating, one editor stated that the seat bottom was too flat and hard and that she became uncomfortable after a half-hour stint behind the wheel. In terms of creature comforts, the cupholders drew fire for their small size, which seemed suited only for soda cans. But we imagine that cupholders won't be all that high on the list of priorities for the potential buyer of this road rocket. Forget about the java; if this car can't wake you up during your morning work commute, then we doubt that a double espresso will.

    After taking care of the more mundane aspects of car criticism, we exploited the STi's capabilities by blasting around the Streets of Willow road course. Of course, this was great fun, but we were doing it purely for the purpose of thorough automotive journalism, right? Well, maybe not purely, but under the harsh spotlight of the racetrack, a car's dynamic strengths and weaknesses come into sharp focus. Taken on its own, the STi is very impressive with its fat power band, excellent steering feedback, commendable handling and forgiving nature. But when driven back-to-back with the Evo, the STi feels heavier (interesting considering that the cars weigh exactly the same), yet not quite as solid. And although its shifter worked fine, the stick didn't move through the gates with the satisfying precision of the Evo's unit.

    Three out of four dentists…I mean drivers, felt that when pushed very hard within the safe environs of the track, the two cars were pretty darn close, but the Evo felt just a little more taut and responsive. The fourth driver preferred the Subie over the Evo, as he felt more comfortable pressing it when compared to the more reactive Mitsubishi. The independent suspension's tuning is expectedly stiff, though not as much as the Evo's, thus yielding a somewhat more compliant ride over the bumps and ruts.

    In the real world, the one where you don't get to drive a car quite that hard, the hyper STi is nearly as easy to live with as a regular Impreza, except for the noticeably stiffer ride. Moving away from lights and dealing with the stop-and-go of the daily grind reveals no awkward lurching and doesn't require mucho revving and clutch slipping. If, however, you choose to dust that smirking 20-something-year-old in the sports job over in the next lane, it won't be a problem. Not many cars could outgun this Subie in a stoplight sprint — with all that usable power, this car is scary quick. Zero to 60 takes just 5.8 seconds and the quarter-mile is unreeled in 14.1 seconds. Amazingly, these times are but one-tenth of a second different from those of the Evo.

    Equally impressive is the STi's braking ability. Stopping from 60 mph consumed only 110 feet of asphalt, basically a world-class effort and, incredibly, a tie with the Mitsu. The big Brembos (sporting four-piston calipers and 12.7-inch rotors up front) are easy to modulate and linear in action.

    Although both cars have virtually identical performance, they use two different powertrain architectures. Whereas the Evo uses a more traditional inline four, the Subaru uses its trademark boxer (or "flat") arrangement that has two pairs of horizontally opposed pistons. With this layout comes a unique growl that sounds more muscular than the Evo's smoother, but less entertaining, voice. As with the Mitsubishi, an intercooled turbocharger helps the Subaru's flat four make V8-like power not to mention a stout 300 pound-feet of torque! With an additional half liter of displacement and nearly 30 more horsepower over the Evo, we expected that the STi would feel stronger, but it didn't. Both cars simply have buckets of power everywhere.

    Another difference is gearbox choice; the STi has a six-speed tranny versus the Evo's five-speeder. Most of us felt that six cogs were excessive with such a torquey motor and that it may be more of a marketing tool than a mechanical one. Although both cars feature all-wheel drive, only the Subie has a driver-adjustable center differential (DCCD). Worked by a thumbwheel on the center console, the DCCD allows the pilot to control the power split between the front and rear axles, for optimum traction in varied conditions.

    The STi may have finished behind the Evo, but it sure was a close fight. All else being virtually equal, the Subie's slightly less communicative chassis and bigger price tag ended up tipping the scale in the Evo's favor.

    Second Opinions:

    Editor in Chief Karl Brauer says:
    Back in 1991 you could buy a Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4 or a Dodge Stealth R/T Twin Turbo for around $31,000. For that price you got a 300-horsepower, all-wheel-drive performance coupe that could pull sub-6-second 0-to-60-mph times. The 3000GT and Stealth models have been left in the automotive history books (largely because their price ballooned to nearly $50,000), but 300-horsepower, all-wheel-drive performance cars that cost around $30,000 still exist. In 2004, they are made by Subaru and (once again) Mitsubishi, only now they have four doors and a usable trunk.

    The WRX STi feels like the more grown-up of the two cars. There's a heft to the steering effort and an overall sense of "meatiness" when running the car around the track. This is good for generating confidence, but bad in that the "fling-ability" of the STi doesn't match the Evolution's. The engine is excellent in terms of usable power, but the transmission's short gear ratios don't allow full exploitation of the 2.5-liter's wide torque band. Instead of simply leaving it in second for much of my lapping sessions, I was forced into third on most of the straightaways. And while the shifter itself was easy to move between gears, I found myself landing in fifth instead of third a few times.

    The hard numbers don't give either car an advantage, so choosing between an STi and Evolution really comes down to personal preference and driving style. The Mitsubishi has the price advantage, but the Subaru's extra gear, additional horsepower and adjustable center differential help justify the car's higher cost (as does the more upscale interior).

    I guess that's the good news here: You can't lose when choosing between these players.

    Road Test Coordinator Kelly Stennick says:
    I've always liked the Subaru Impreza lineup, believing the small all-wheel-drive sedan to be a good value. Whether it's the base Impreza or the more powerful WRX, each new version just gets better (and faster). Just when I was convinced that the WRX was as good as it gets, Subaru finally brought the internationally acclaimed 300-horsepower STi to American shores.

    Driving the STi and Evo back-to-back, I immediately realized why I liked the Subaru better. It was definitely more of a real car to me, with better seats, higher-quality interior materials and more cargo space. Everything I touched from the shifter handle to the climate control buttons seemed to exude better craftsmanship than the Mitsu offered. As an adult living in the real world, with a long commute to work and a baby stroller to load in the trunk, these subtle differences between the Evo and STi make all the difference.

    Never mind just going fast. Both cars can handle getting you anywhere you need to go, and in record time. I had just as much fun in the Evo as I did in the STi, but the STi is a car that could make me consider plunking down my own hard-earned cash at my local dealer.

    Comparison

    First Place - 2003 Mitsubishi Evolution

    Upon learning a few years ago that the Mitsubishi Evolution was coming to our shores, one of our editors was so elated he said he felt like "running through the streets of New York City in my underwear, shouting, 'The Evo is coming! The Evo is coming!'" Should you drive Mitsubishi's Lancer Evolution, you, too, may get infected with such unbridled enthusiasm.

    Like its arch rival, the STi, Mitsubishi's WRC-inspired road burner doesn't exactly blend into the automotive landscape. With its angled headlights, functional hood vent and prominent intercooler visible through the front fascia, the Evolution has plenty of attitude. Of course, like most cars of its type, there is a big wing on the rear deck, though unlike the STi, it's optional — a "low-profile" spoiler is standard. Blistered fenders, clear-lens taillights and six-spoke Enkei alloys fitted with high-performance Yokohama tires round out the Evo's visual statement.

    Recaro and Momo are two names that car enthusiasts should recognize, as they are considered by many to be the top purveyors of performance seats and steering wheels, respectively. And in the Evo, they keep their lofty reputations intact. We're not sure about the blue seat inserts in a red car, but there is no question about the driver seat's ability to hold one comfortably in place while probing the considerable limits of the Mitsu's handling. One thing the Recaros could use is a more user-friendly recline function; instead of pulling up a lever and simply leaning back, one must twist a knob that is stiff and awkwardly located. The stout Momo wheel offers a thick rim and a racy look with its real metal spokes. The rest of the cockpit is more econobox than race car; apart from some faux titanium trim, it's generic in style and materials.

    Although it displaces a mere two liters, the Evo's turbocharged inline four puts out a robust 271 horsepower and 273 pound-feet of torque. As with the STi, the Evo has a functional water sprayer for the intercooler, just in case things get really heated. Those who have already looked at the "vital stats" will see that the Evo is down of power when compared to the STi, having nearly 30 less horses and nearly 30 less lb-ft than the Subie. In real-world testing, however, the difference vanished. When it came to the 0-to-60-mph dash, the Evolution actually beat the STi by a tenth of second, posting a 5.7-second run to the WRX's 5.8. By the end of the quarter-mile, though, the Mitsu was trailing the Subie by a tenth with a time of 14.2 seconds.

    Gearheads may ask, "But don't you have to rev up the Evo a lot more to get to the power?" No, actually, as the Evo feels just as muscle-bound as the STi. Number mongers may also wince when they see that the Evo has "only" a five-speed, as compared to the six cogs of the Subie. Again, numbers don't always paint an accurate picture; the spacing of the Lancer's five gears is spot on, as the Evo required fewer shifts at the track than the STi. And on the street, we appreciated the Evo's more precise shifter that slipped into its gates with military precision. Although the Evolution lacks the STi's driver-adjustable center differential, it really wasn't missed, as the Mitsu's all-wheel-drive system did a great job of effectively channeling the power to the pavement and keeping the car on course.

    Like the STi, the Evolution comes with big Brembo brakes sporting four-piston calipers up front. With vented rotors measuring 12.6 inches up front and 11.8 inches in the rear, these binders stopped on the proverbial dime, and gave nine cents change. The Mitsu tied with the Subie by turning in a 110-foot stopping distance from 60 mph. What's more, the Evo's powerful binders were easily modulated and showed no signs of fade whether hammering through the canyons or executing repeated panic stops at the test track.

    Although all the power makes the Evo a blast in a straight line, there is more to the Evo's repertoire than just blistering acceleration. On the Streets of Willow racetrack, the Evo was in its element, ripping through the tight, twisty road course in an unflappable manner. More impressive than the Evo's outright power and handling is the car's balanced feel when being pushed hard. A few of our more experienced pilots commented on how perfectly dialed in the Mitsu was, and although both of these cars possess formidable capabilities, under the harsh spotlight of the racetrack, the Evo shone just a little brighter due to its tighter, more composed nature. Not surprisingly, when it came to ride quality on the street, the Mitsu lost out to the Subie. While neither one of these go-karts coddles its passengers, the Evo was even more unyielding, prompting one driver to say, "After driving the Evo, my butt could tell you as much about the streets I regularly travel as the civil engineers who designed them. The texture of the pavement was transmitted, virtually unfiltered, to my backside."

    By the time the smell of brake dust had dissipated, we had come to the conclusion that these cars were so closely matched it was almost unfair to have a first and second place. But two factors, slight as they were, put the Evo ahead of the STi — price and the Evo's supremely confident feel behind the wheel.

    Second Opinions:

    Editor in Chief Karl Brauer says:
    The single most amazing thing about the Lancer Evolution is that…well, it's a Lancer Evolution. Anyone who's driven the base model knows that, while it may be a fully capable (and actually quite comfortable) economy car, it doesn't exactly scream performance. In our recent 2003 Economy Sedan Comparison Test, the Lancer finished sixth out of eight competitors largely due to its lack of power.

    But the Lancer is to the Lancer Evolution what Bruce Banner is to the Hulk. And like the Hulk, the Evo isn't the most refined or docile creature you'll encounter. But when it comes to anger management, this car offers more smiles than anything you can buy for less than $35,000. The Mitsu's willing engine and catlike reflexes made circulating the Streets of Willow more fun than watching Martha Stewart's stock value plummet. Feedback through the steering wheel is sublime and, when combined with subtle throttle variances, allowed me to place the Lancer exactly where I wanted it.

    And, as with the more expensive Subaru, the Lancer offers trick hardware like an intercooler sprayer and manual headlight level adjustments (though it doesn't offer an adjustable center differential or six-speed gearbox).

    The Subaru feels like the more serious rally machine in terms of advanced hardware and overall execution, but for pure fun the Evo's the one.

    Road Test Coordinator Kelly Stennick says:
    After listening to the rest of our staff gush for days about how much fun Mitsubishi's new Evo was to drive, I finally got my turn. I barely made it out of the parking garage before I was accosted by an enthusiastic driver at a stoplight. A mid-40ish man pulled up alongside of me in a New Beetle and said, "I've heard about those cars. They're really fast, aren't they?" As if right on cue, the light changed to green and I hit the gas, waving my answer in the rearview mirror. Wow, this is fun, I thought.

    Typically, harsh rides and a lack of amenities and features aren't high on my vehicle wants list, but even spoiled me has to admit that there's something to be said about tooling around town in a car that could blow others' doors off. I especially like the fact that save for the ridiculously sized spoiler, only those looking for the Evolution badge would have any idea of this car's performance capabilities. ("Sleepers" are important when attempting to show off to boys on the freeway.)

    Would I buy this car? Absolutely not, but then, I bet 30-something-year-old women with children aren't exactly the target audience. Would my 21-year-old college quarterback brother buy it? Definitely, even if he had to hand over his throwing arm in trade.

    Comparison

    Conclusion

    Just driving the cars back-to-back told us that this was going to be a tooth-and-nail battle. In fact, not only were the performance figures virtually identical, the scores on the evaluation forms were tied.

    Let us first say that either way, you're ensured of a good time. A tight car with quick responses, whether in terms of acceleration or steering, makes for an involving and enjoyable drive. Yes, with the STi you get more power and that nifty center differential control, but to be honest, we didn't notice the former either in the seat of our pants or on the track, and the latter would probably be an advantage only if you're planning on weekend racing. Although the STi is huge fun, it just isn't as utterly composed as the Evo. And $2,500 will buy a lot of tires and brake pads.

    Comparison

    Consumer Commentary

    2003 Mitsubishi Evolution

    "The Evo is very fun, very fast and handles great. A few mods and it buries STis. Also cheaper than STi. Seats are wonderful, shifter first rate, outstanding brakes. It embarrasses many high-dollar cars, and is very quiet except for the tires. I'd like to see them offer cruise control and a factory boost gauge." — Bluesmaster, June 25, 2003

    "I have owned many sports cars (3rd gen RX-7, Audi quattro TT, BMW etc.) However, I have never ever seen anything like this in stock factory form. Excellent balance which backs up the ultra-performance. Fun to drive, hauls four adults and enough cargo. Do you think you can get a better all-year-around, 4-seater, all-terrain, GT car for little over $31K? I have driven the STi; it is faster but it is not as razor balanced as the Evo. What's the point of going fast if you can't control it? The Recaro seats are great and it looks dynamite in person. Better interior materials would (make this) the perfect car."19psi, July 5, 2003

    2004 Subaru WRX STi

    "(This is the) least expensive Viper-type performance money can buy. Incredibly docile and comfortable in everyday driving conditions but is always ready for sling-shotlike performance. A truly well-engineered automobile that makes driving a ton of fun. I love the quality of the fit and finish and (various) components. My one gripe is that the rear wing always catches your eye when you use the rearview mirror — you think there's another car (there)." — kingsti, July 5, 2003

    "A much better choice for a daily driver than the Evo. The 2.5L power plant was an excellent choice. Excellent build quality and looks. Gold rims are catchy, especially with my metallic black paint with golden fleck. It matches perfectly and looks extra sharp. Really enjoy the 300-hp engine and all-wheel drive. Are these factory tires? They are so STICKY! I would like more room in the trunk and backseat. Recaro seats would be nice, the in-house seats are good, but a car like this (deserves) Recaros." — Kyle Kaiser, June 9, 2003

    Sort By:

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2003
    MakeMitsubishi
    ModelLancer Evolution
    Style4dr Sport Sedan AWD (2.0L 4cyl 5M)
    Base MSRP$29,582 (including destination charge)
    Options on test vehicleCarbon-fiber rear spoiler ($480)
    As-tested MSRP$30,062 (including destination charge)
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeAWD
    Engine typeturbocharged inline four
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2000cc
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)271 @ 6,500 rpm
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)273 @ 3,500 rpm
    Transmission type5-Speed Manual
    Chassis
    Turning circle (ft.)38.7
    Track Test Results
    0-60 mph (sec.)5.7
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)14.2 @ 97.2
    60-0 mph (ft.)109.8
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)N/A
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)18 city/26 highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)19
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)14
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,263
    Length (in.)178.5
    Width (in.)69.7
    Height (in.)57.1
    Wheelbase (in.)103.3
    Legroom, front (in.)43
    Legroom, rear (in.)36.6
    Headroom, front (in.)39.9
    Headroom, rear (in.)36.7
    Shoulder room, front (in.)54.1
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)53.3
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)10.2
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years/60,000 miles
    Corrosion7 years/100,000 miles
    Roadside assistance3 years/36,000 miles
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsNot Available
    Head airbagsNot Available
    Antilock brakesStandard
    Traction controlNot Available
    Stability controlNot Available
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2004
    MakeSubaru
    ModelImpreza
    StyleWRX STi AWD 4dr Sedan w/Gold-Painted Wheels (2.5L 4cyl Turbo 6M)
    Base MSRP$31,545 (including destination charge)
    Options on test vehicleAudio System with 6-disc CD Changer ($1,000 ? estimated)
    As-tested MSRP$32,545 (including destination charge)
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeAWD
    Engine typeturbocharged flat four
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2500cc
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)300 @ 6,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)300 @ 4,000
    Transmission type6-Speed Manual
    Chassis
    Turning circle (ft.)35.4
    Track Test Results
    0-60 mph (sec.)5.8
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)14.1 @ 95.6
    60-0 mph (ft.)109.8
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)N/A
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)18 city/24 highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)16
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)15.9
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,263
    Length (in.)173.8
    Width (in.)68.5
    Height (in.)56.3
    Wheelbase (in.)100
    Legroom, front (in.)42.9
    Legroom, rear (in.)33
    Headroom, front (in.)38.6
    Headroom, rear (in.)36.7
    Shoulder room, front (in.)52.7
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)52.9
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)11
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)11
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years/60,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance3 years/36,000 miles
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard
    Head airbagsNot Available
    Antilock brakesStandard
    Traction controlNot Available
    Stability controlNot Available
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot Tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot Tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement