As of this typing, a large pipe off the coast of Louisiana is erupting millions of gallons of raw oil into the sea and there's pretty much nothing we can do about it. The air over densely populated cities is brown. Unpleasant nations — like Canada — are getting rich off our addiction to petroleum products.
Oil is convenient, cheap and familiar and its continued use in motor vehicles could be as damning as relying on cheap, familiar fast food for daily sustenance.
Clearly it's time for a change. But is an electric car a viable alternative? For anyone? Can we give up our nomadic transportation habits in favor of planned routes and definitive distances? We're not sure.
BMW's not sure either, so it created a test fleet of battery-powered Minis and put them into the hands of private owners. We had our own 2009 Mini E for 12 months and this is our electrifying story. (Sorry, that was shockingly bad.)
Why We Got It
"Once the novelty of a battery-powered car wears off, will we still be fascinated by a two-seat, low-range vehicle that's a cross between a science experiment and a toy?" This was the central question posed in the introduction to our experience with the 2009 Mini E. It was also the very question that divided our staff at the end of the loan period.
It all has to do with the 2009 Mini E's battery pack. As we learned from the Mini E's backgrounder from AC Propulsion: "53 cells connected in parallel constitute a unit, two units connected in series constitute a module [and] 48 modules connected in series constitute the battery; [there are] 5,088 individual cells in total."
So what this bit of product information was trying to tell us is that there's no backseat or trunk space in the Mini E. Well, there's a small shelf that you can't put things on for fear of overheating a few hundred pounds of laptop batteries, and then there's a very small "trunk" area that can hold about a half sheet cake — on its side, of course.
But ignoring that, the 2009 Mini E is a fully operational electric car, and there were not many of these on the road a year ago. Could we drive it every day? Would we constantly run out of juice? Would it ruin our lives to live on an electric leash? The questions were many; the answers were surprisingly obvious.
Durability
"I want one," Managing Editor Donna DeRosa wrote in the Mini E's logbook. "The more time I spend with the Mini E, the more I like it. Besides being able to 'refuel' at home, I like to drive it. It's my own little go-kart with nearly instant peak torque of 162 pound-feet. You can really surprise other drivers with how quickly you can dart out from a red light. Rated at 201 horsepower, it has more gumption than the 172-hp Cooper S."
DeRosa fell in love with the Mini E during her 20-mile commute. She loved the 2009 Mini E's looks, torque and surprisingly calm ride (adding a few hundred pounds of chemistry set to the back of a very light car has a nice smoothing quality on the ride, we discovered).
Director of Vehicle Testing Dan Edmunds, on the other hand, wasn't so convinced, maybe because his commute amounted to 60 miles.
"How the heck can I trust this car?" he wrote. "First, the charger inexplicably kicks off while I'm sleeping and denies me a full battery before a long drive. Second, the range meter is a joke. It's making so many instantaneous recalculations that I can't trust it. None of this is a problem in a world where you can refuel anywhere in five minutes, with coffee and lottery tickets close at hand should they become necessary. Driving the car itself should not feel like a gamble. You should not have to do math in your head to see if the math on the dash is good news or bad news.
"And it seems that getting the advertised range out of any battery-powered car is an exercise in restraint and driving well below the flow of traffic, especially on the freeway. Mini says the E is good for 156 miles in its press materials and on its Web site, but the EPA window sticker lists the range as 100 miles. Meanwhile, we've never achieved more than 80-something miles before getting nervous about plugging in again. I like driving the Mini and all. It's rather fun. It drives like a go-kart and a slot car. But this is no way to live. I am not electric car material."
For the first time ever in a wrap-up of a long-term test car, there's no easy entry in the data field for "Breakdowns Stranding Driver." Normally a car is either broken down and the driver is stranded — or not. And for another first in a wrap-up, we have to admit that yes, the 2009 Mini E did break down, stranding the driver, but it was completely intentional and we had a tow truck waiting in the wings.
The goal was simple: We had had an electric car for a full 12 months and nobody had yet to completely kill the battery. We played it safe for a year; it was time to push the envelope. Dan Edmunds took the wheel, headed east and drove a steady 60 mph until the Mini ran out of juice. A chase truck loomed behind, waiting to pick up where the electricity left off.
By the time the Mini stopped, it had gone 128.9 miles, nearly 30 of which came after the Mini's display read zero miles to empty. We can't say whether this was a case of the car not learning our new driving style or a built-in fail-safe to deal with the inherent limitations of a limited range, but the upshot is that the Mini E worked well enough to keep us safe and off the tow truck for 12 months.
Besides this intentional disruption in service, our 2009 Mini E proved fairly solid. It required two services, one of which took eight days to complete. Both times we were handed rental cars and we weren't charged for either one. And because of the field-trial nature of this particular test, we weren't privy to any of the information the dealer had regarding the eight-day disruption. Our car left the office, was fixed and was then returned. No further explanation.
Total Body Repair Costs: $0
Total Routine Maintenance Costs (over [12] months): $0
Additional Maintenance Costs: $0
Warranty Repairs: 1
Non-Warranty Repairs: 0
Scheduled Dealer Visits: 2
Unscheduled Dealer Visits: 0
Days Out of Service: 9
Breakdowns Stranding Driver: 0
Performance and Fuel Economy
Performance of this ionized pocket rocket is severely hampered by its traction control, which limits performance with an iron fist. And by performance, we mean burnouts. Sure, the traction control system chops the throttle fairly aggressively, but with all of its torque available from what is effectively zero rpm, this car must be just one hack away from being the ultimate torque-steering, front-wheel-drive burnout-contest-winning bad boy. But that would probably negate some of the benefits of electric cars.
Speaking of negating the benefits of electric cars, twice we towed the 2009 Mini E to our test track to see just what it could do when driven with aggression. Initial testing gave us a 0-60 time of 7.7 seconds from a standstill and a quarter-mile time of 15.8 seconds at 87.7 mph. After a year of use, the performance declined insignificantly, with 60 mph coming up in 7.9 seconds and a quarter-mile run of 15.9 seconds at 87.6 mph. Braking showed a significant improvement of 4 feet, as the car stopped in 128 feet in our last test, although a lot of travel in the brake pedal made us concerned about brake fade for this 3,246-pound car.
Handling tests were also limited by the stability control. Our results from slalom testing show the impact of both an active, aggressive stability control system and substantially worn tires. What was a 64.8-mph run when new turned into a 61.9-mph run after 7,000 miles. Noted Senior Editor Josh Jacquot, "Non-defeat stability control means the Mini package's otherwise impressive numbers can't be achieved, which is frustrating." Skid pad numbers remained similar from the first test to the final test at 0.76g.
As far as fuel economy goes, the 2009 Mini E did quite well or very poorly, since it averaged some 0 mpg. Insofar as electricity cost, well, the Mini E traveled 7,683 miles and, using the data from our mandatory Mini-specific battery-charger (there is an SAE-specification charger on the production horizon, which will stop this proprietary nonsense), we spent $25.50 refueling from our office, which was the default charging spot. Only a handful of drivers dared use the 110-volt slow-charge option.
Best Fuel Economy: N/A
Worst Fuel Economy: N/A
Average Fuel Economy: N/A
Longest Range: 128.9 miles
Retained Value
Traditional retained value calculations cannot be applied here, as the 2009 Mini E was only available as a lease for $928.63 per month. At the end of our lease, we were given the opportunity to re-up for another year at a downright reasonable $600 per month — a concession BMW made at the behest of some very vocal (and very pleased) not-quite-owners. Those owners who do decide to follow up and buy in for another year will be the first to get a shot at BMW's next electric car.
True Market Value at service end: N/A
Depreciation: N/A
Final Odometer Reading: 7,683
The Shock Ending
Maybe we're not right for this car. Sure, some of us live in the optimum radius from the office and we could factor in traffic and weather and topography to make the Mini really useful for a wide range of motoring experiences. But not everyone lives at the optimum distance. The 2009 Mini E never gave us range anxiety after the first month or so, but its range limitations did restrict its utility. It was a great second car to have around, but not something we could rely upon to do everything. Which is pretty much what the electric car seems to be about.
We'll leave the summation to a fellow Mini E driver, the lessee of car no. 250, Tom Moloughney: "When I first took possession of my Mini E 11 months ago, I really had no idea what to expect. Would it spend more time getting fixed than on the road? Would it lose power going up long inclines? Would the range decrease as time passed? Would I regret doing this? Well, 11 months and 30,000 miles later I can answer those questions with a big NO."
After 30,000 miles in 11 months — including 50 days out of service to replace the batteries — and he's still excited? That's a ringing endorsement for the viability and promise of electric cars if ever there was one. Just expect to be more like a Boy Scout than a gypsy in your transportation habits — be prepared.
The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.
Add A Comment »
tomm250 says:
09:25 AM, 07/19/2010
As my fellow MINI-E driver keijidosha said the high cost of the monthly payment was definitely an inspiration to drive the car as much as possible. Since I used it as much as I could and had half of my monthly payments waived, my cost per mile was probably the lowest of all the paying private lessees.
I had six of the twelve monthly payments waived so I only paid $5,100 in lease payments since there is no sales tax for electric cars in NJ (can't believe they got that right). This was because my hometown electrical inspector was extraordinarily cautious and wanted lots of clarification on the UL listing and testing before he would approve it. MINI had stated that they would waive the monthly payments for anyone until the wall charger has passed inspection. Then, when my car was in for an extended service visit of almost an entire month, they waived that month's payment also.
So here's what I paid to drive the car 33,001 miles in the first year (I kept it for a 2nd year)
Lease payments: $5,100
Electricity: Approx $1,200 Actually I think it was a bit lower, but I rounded up(paying .11/kwh)
Liability Insurance: $475. BMW covered the comprehensive & collision, we paid the liability.
Total: $6,775
Drove: 33,001 miles
Cost Per Mile: $.20
And yeah, the $25.50 for 7,600 miles is way off guys. If that were true, even the EV haters would consider buying one! Remember the staff would slow-charge the car at home when they took it for a few days. If your office meter showed only $25 in electricity used than you probably only drove the car 800 to 900 miles using office juice and the rest was driven using electricity from the staffs homes. Can I hear reimbursement? I bet Donna spent at least $100....
jdbosmaus says:
05:22 PM, 07/18/2010
++ to what fc_engineer said.
The Mini's intro story says it has a "... battery with a capacity of 35kWh, some 30kWh of which is usable."
Using the maximum range you measured, 126 miles, implies 238 Wh/mi, right in line with fc_engineer's estimate. At $.11/kWh, you actually spent a little over $200. You'll have to tell us whether $.11/kWh is the correct cost for electricity in your area. But it's not off by an order of magnitude, and the teaser on the InsideLine home page ("We drove 7600 miles for $26") is not right.
A gasoline-powered vehicle, assuming 29 mpg (Mini Cooper S) and $3.50/gallon, would run a little over $900 for 7600 miles.
keijidosha says:
02:12 PM, 07/18/2010
Good review. All valid points. The lease price was loaded to encourage a lot of miles driven. Insurance, excess mileage, maintenance, and road assistance are all included. Even two tires flatted with drywall nails. When it came time to renew I voted with my wallet for a second year.
I kept close tabs on my cost of ownership and over the 23,000 miles I drove the first year, it came out to 58¢/mile. Our 06 Dodge Caravan is at 56¢/mi and 04 Nissan Murano is at 63¢/mi, so not bad for an overpriced prototype. It is the car of choice, getting bumped more for seats/cargo space than range.
Re; your differing test track data, I expect you would get close to your original test results if the old software was reinstalled. There were noticeable changes made in the software update done during the 3k mile service.
It will be interesting to watch market demand take its course as electric power trains come available to the public. I'd like to see long term testing of a LEAF and an iMiEV.
Debunker says:
01:31 PM, 07/18/2010
Very first rule of joke-making: It should be at least a little funny, or witty at least. I mean, how else can you tell if a person is serious or not?
ralphhightower says:
07:18 PM, 07/17/2010
Okay, I don't know much about the left coast. But California did have problems with the electric grid when Enron existed and was profiting from California's deregulation.
But it takes something to burn (coal, propane, or "nu-clear") or dump (water) to generate 'lectricy. As a member of the IEEE, I recognize that the grid has problems. Solar flares can cause problems with the electric grid. Lord knows only if someone would detonate a nuclear bomb in outer space. The Electromagnetic Pulse would disable all cars with a computer chip. The only cars that would survive would be those cars that were from the 60's or older. But getting power to the pumps to pump gas would be a problem.
The picture of this link shows the coal stack of the generating plant at Lake Murray, SC: http://twitpic.com/l1g3f/full. It is also an hydroelectric on-demand plant for when "the only thing separating Columbia, SC from hell is a screen door"
With that, I will close out with a parody of an Eric Clapton song, called "Propane" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc1URQgQWNo
rideabike says:
05:31 PM, 07/17/2010
This is so ironic: my Canadian oil & gas wages paid for my wife's new gas Mini, adding to BMW's profits, a small portion of which was funnelled to the R&D department budget developing electric Mini's.
I'm getting a headache thinking about this, I think I'll research the Arizona property I'm going to buy dirt cheap....
dougmare says:
03:12 PM, 07/17/2010
When battery technology matures sufficiently, we auto enthusiasts will have reason to rejoice. Electric cars are not the end of the world as long as we can prevent Big Brother from interfering with our ability to drive them in any way we see fit. The potential acceleration performance from a vehicle with four in-hub electric motors is limited solely by the traction the tires can provide. Realistically it will be years, probably many, before we can smile at the thought of an electric car as our main mode of daily transportation. Never mind the eco-weenies who get a chubby at the 'economy' or imaginary 'green' nature of the electric car. We enthusiasts have something to look forward to, once a suitable battery or fuel cell is available. Until then...I'll take a Miata, a Mustang, or even a Messerschmitt bubble car for the freedom to drive as far as I want to while getting my kicks behind the wheel...the Mini-E just doesn't cut the mustard.
anthonylam66 says:
05:37 AM, 07/17/2010
I'm going to miss reading about this car. I hope Edmunds get a Nissan Leaf or a Chevy Volt or better yet, both.
It really seems that most manufacturers are spending a lot of time and money on BEV's. With this much investment I bet we will see huge battery improvements is short time. 200+mile range and fast charging will be here within three years I bet. This will still not be enough for some, but many others will give these cars a try once they squeeze a little more range out of them.
I never realized how many Canadians read Edmunds, but what I really can't believe is how ANY of you would think Mike was serious about the comment "unpleasant nations". Have you been reading the MINI-E thread at all? During the year there have been dozens of arguments about where we get our oil from as people have posted about how they don't want to send their money to terrorist sponsoring nations like Iran, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Venezuela.etc, while others quickly pointed out that we get the most oil from our friends North of the border! Contrary to what you may believe, we really do like and appreciate our friendship with Canada.
alex38 says:
12:13 AM, 07/17/2010
@ tmanz & eclogite
"Canadians are such a sensitive lot. I think it was a joke...."
"I think alex38 missed the joke too.."
Aren't jokes supposed to be funny?
120mmgun says:
03:14 PM, 07/16/2010
@intothewest
Don't worry. Most Americans don't pay attention to these envirowhackos.