INSIDE LINE

2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG First Drive

Media Player

  • 2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Picture

    2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Picture

    The 2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG revives the legend of the 300 SL. | November 04, 2009

Road Test

2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG First Drive

Beginner's Skill

    24 Ratings

    Did someone shorten the straightaway between Turn 11 and the start-finish line here at Laguna Seca? The track also seems strangely narrower since our last visit, and the kink that is Turn 1 seems more like, well, an actual turn as we hurtle toward it in this gleaming silver 2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG.

    That's what a 563-horsepower 6.2-liter AMG V8 engine can do to perception when it's set deep within the all-aluminum chassis of a purpose-built ultra-performance sports car such as this.

    But blunt-force V8 engines with a calm in-town demeanor and an intoxicating exhaust note are hardly news where AMG is concerned — the company from Affalterbach has been impressing us with its approach to V8 high performance for some time.

    No, the news here is the car itself. The 2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG is AMG's first complete car, designed and developed entirely in-house with no donor Benz chassis to start from. That the SLS AMG is destined to be a flagship car for Mercedes-Benz (as well as the re-embodiment of the beloved 300SL Gullwing) is a testament to the engineering resources of what once was just a small, independent tuning company and now is the official high-performance division of Mercedes-Benz.

    Not a Warmed-Over SLR McLaren
    Comparisons to the SLR McLaren are unavoidable, as both it and the SLS AMG are front-midengine coupes with impossibly long hoods and oddly hinged doors. The SLR paradoxically paired an extremely expensive carbon-fiber chassis with a traditional five-speed automatic transmission, whereas the SLS employs a less costly (but still exotic) aluminum unibody and a rear-mounted seven-speed automated manual transaxle.

    But AMG wasn't yet ready to deliver on the entire automotive package back when the SLR was conceived, so its involvement with that project was more or less limited to providing the supercharged 5.5-liter V8 engine. So AMG got to work by steadily expanding its contribution to mass-produced Mercedes-Benz road cars while the McLaren F1 boys were busy playing with their beloved carbon-fiber.

    AMG's effort eventually led to thoughtful and effective upgrades to the front suspension and brakes of the 2008 C63 AMG, a car that showed how far AMG can take a production car with a bolt-on tuning approach. From there AMG stretched a bit further to make the 2009 SL65 AMG Black Series, in which it extensively modified the body structure of an SL roadster, turning it into a rigid platform for a much more manic coupe.

    All of this was part of a build-up of staff and experience that would allow AMG to finally design an entire car.

    Body and Soul
    In deference to the 300SL, which won the 1952 24 Hours of Le Mans and was built as a production car from 1955-'63, the aluminum body shell of the SLS was designed with gullwing doors from the start. And since gullwing doors disallow the use of fixed roof rails above the side windows, the remaining slender central roof section cannot be relied on to provide much body rigidity. Instead the side sills of the SLS utilize a massive rectangular cross-section to provide the necessary chassis rigidity.

    A bare SLS aluminum body shell weighs just 532 pounds, and the finished car tips the scales at just 3,573 pounds — some 277 pounds less than the carbon-fiber SLR McLaren, a car which is longer by only 0.7 inch. What's more, at 76.3 inches the SLS is actually 1.2 inches wider than an SLR.

    Physical comparisons to the SL63 AMG roadster are more impressive. The SLS AMG is 4.1 inches longer, 4.8 inches wider...and more than 700 pounds lighter than the roadster we drove on the Nürburgring last year. With 45 hp more, no wonder the SLS AMG will turn a lap of the Nürburgring Nordschleife in 7:40 compared to the SL63 AMG's 8:15.

    Revised 6.2-liter V8
    Though the SLR used a supercharged 5.5-liter AMG V8, the normally aspirated 6.2-liter V8 in the SLS shares one vital modification. That is, the wet-sump oil pan has been replaced with a dry-sump scavenging system and a remote oil tank. This allows the engine to sit far lower and farther back in the chassis.

    It's easy to forget the 563 hp and the lightweight chassis when everything is rushing past so effortlessly.

    The SLS iteration of what AMG continues to call a 6.3-liter V8 (despite its actual 6,208cc displacement, an homage to the 6.3-liter Mercedes with which AMG earned its reputation in racing) has been pumped up to 563 hp through revisions to the valvetrain and the intake and exhaust systems.

    We can't even see much of the most visible change, which is a new magnesium intake manifold with eight interlaced, individually tuned velocity stacks, each 11.4 inches in length and 2 inches across. Bucket-type tappets allow a more aggressive cam profile, and large-diameter tubular exhaust headers guide the spent gases out through tuned-length runners that minimize back-pressure.

    On the track, it adds up to a healthy shove as we exit Turn 11 at Laguna, hard on the gas and flicking through the gears in rapid succession.

    All-New Transaxle
    Those gears actually reside between the rear wheels in a new seven-speed transaxle developed in-house specifically for the SLS. It's an automated manual with dual wet clutches, one each for the odd- and even-numbered gears. A multiple limited-slip differential resides in the same housing, slightly forward of the gear clusters.

    A rigid aluminum torque tube connects the transaxle to the engine. This reduces overall driveline slack immensely, as the engine and rear end aren't free to twist and buck in their mounts relative to one another. Hidden inside the torque tube is a lightweight carbon-fiber driveshaft that rotates at engine speed.

    Shift paddles on the steering wheel control it all in Manual mode, though the familiar console-mounted lever and a rotary dial with three additional automatic modes (Controlled Efficiency, Sport and Sport Plus) make it easy to control at whatever pace you require. On the track, we find that Sport Plus nicely initiates rapid up- and downshifts in accordance with whichever pedal we're standing on at the moment.

    Manual-mode shifting is aided by a set of F1-style shift indicator lights. But they seem a bit too far away from the driver's line of sight on the track and we find ourselves in the rev limiter more than once. AMG engineers are also quick to point out that final programming for the transmission is yet to be finalized in these last months before production.

    Of course a rear-mounted transaxle provides another obvious benefit in that it shifts weight distribution rearward. And so the front-midengine layout (the engine is behind the line of the front axle) of the SLS AMG places just 47 percent of its weight on the front tires, with the remaining 53 percent out back to put the power to the pavement.

    Balance
    All of this leads to a chassis that feels reassuringly responsive, rigid and well balanced. The SLS AMG responds precisely to steering inputs and we have no trouble placing the car just where we want on the track. Understeer and oversteer seem well tamed and by the 19-inch front and 20-inch rear Continental tires.

    There's only one thing that can upset this rapidly moving apple cart, and that's an overly enthusiastic right foot. It's quite easy to forget about the 563 hp on tap and the lightweight chassis when everything is rushing past so effortlessly. It's a bit easy to get into the throttle too hard and break the rear tires loose and get into oversteer, even with the stability control in the intermediate Sport mode.

    None of this is a concern on the road, where you're likely to be further from the limit with the stability control system at full watchfulness. Here the ride of the standard suspension, which uses nonadjustable monotube dampers, feels reassuringly firm and well damped.

    The optional AMG performance suspension features springs that are some 15 percent firmer, and the dampers have been retuned to suit, but the tires and stabilizer bars remain unchanged. As we've said of the C63 and E63, don't rush toward this option if your municipality doesn't fully fund its road maintenance crew.

    Life With Gullwings
    There's something about gullwing doors that makes you want to open and close them, or maybe just leave them open and stand back a few paces.

    These certainly provide much better access than any Lambo-style scissor doors we've ever tested, and they're easier to live with in narrow parking stalls than the funky guillotine-style doors found on the Ford GT.

    From the driver seat it's an easy reach for this tall test driver to the grab handle, and shorter drivers can grab hold before they're fully seated and pull it down as they slide in or use the hanging loop that AMG can provide. Unless you're an NBA star, there's no need to duck as you close these doors, either. The inner panels are scalloped to provide clearance.

    But there can be no map pockets, so interior storage is at a premium. The stubby rear deck lid conceals just 6.2 cubic feet of storage, just enough for weekend luggage for two. Legroom isn't terribly generous, either. Our 6-foot-2-inch frame could have used another inch of seat travel for true long-distance comfort.

    The rest of the car is finished in familiar Mercedes AMG fashion. The level of trim is outstanding, as is the Bang and Olufsen sound system.

    An Impressive Achievement
    All in all, the 2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG represents an impressive achievement. It's a car that delivers just what you'd expect from a reborn gullwing Mercedes developed by the modern-day AMG.

    We won't have long to wait to see production examples, either, as the 2011 SLS AMG will hit these shores late in April 2010. Orders are being taken now, but the U.S. price is still to be determined. European prices start at €177,310, but this includes a 19 percent value-added tax. We're estimating a price in the neighborhood of $235,000, notwithstanding the gas-guzzler tax we'll doubtless pay here.

    Whatever the price turns out to be, it's about $200,000 less than the McLaren-built carbon-fiber SLR. And from where we sit, the SLS AMG is the far better car.

    Which leaves us with just one question for the guys at AMG: Where do you go from here?

    Edmunds attended a manufacturer-sponsored event, to which selected members of the press were invited, to facilitate this report.

    Sort By:

    eyehypnotiz says:

    12:26 AM, 08/15/2010

    Come to mamma! When they designed this car, they had me in mind. Thank you Mercedes! I can't wait to get my hands on it. ...And for those of you who are bitter because you can't afford it, go meditate!!!

    colorado1974 says:

    09:36 AM, 11/11/2009

    Honestly, in looking at the photo gallery, the SLS looks like someone made a cheap kit car out of a Viper but decided to make the front end look like a Carp.  It's hideous.  

    yeah, it has a lot of electronic gizmos!  well, so does a $15,000 Dodge Caliber.  OOOO, it has a manual shift mode!  so does almost every car and truck.  hey, it's really really light!  well, not really.  It is only 300 lbs lighter than a 2SS Camaro and 200+ lbs heavier than the Corvette ZR1.  

    Now there's a car.  The ZR1 has more power, better performance, is more easily lived with, has all the electronic gizmos, and is again, over $100,000 less.  

    but you don't get the signature on the engine...to me, the SLS is the car that nobody asked for or needs.  It's like the SLR.  It will have a short life then fade away with the Merceded PR team telling their spin story to everyone that "it was a short term car and we planned it that way...".  

    colorado1974 says:

    08:58 AM, 11/11/2009

    alman 08.  Thanks for proving my point.  does anybody care about 1.3 inches here or .75 inches there?  You can say the same thing about a honda pilot and an acura mdx...however they are on the same chassis.  

    "ONLY a fool would think these 2 are platform sharing when looking at them parking side-by-side."  then you just called half of the people who posted here fools.  

    "leather versus hard plastic"  I guess for an extra $160,000, you should get something.  I mean, you sure don't get better performance.  You certainly don't get improved reliability.  

    Maybe the signature on the engine is where the money goes.  Kind of like paying $50 for Peyton Mannings signature but instead it cost a lot more and is some dude in Germany.  

    No, I'm not rich or do I live in Colorado.  I'm a normal guy that owns a Chevrolet Chrysler Dodge Jeep dealership.  If it were me, I'd buy a Challenger RT with a manual.  Not only do the looks grab you, the performace is decent and it's incredible to drive on a daily basis, unlike the knife-edge camaro or rental mustang.  but I digress.  

    inlinesix says:

    07:45 PM, 11/09/2009

    The two Mercedes we have owned have been comfortable, great cars. We don't typically own cars for that long but our C-class is here to stay for a while. The previous car, a SLK350, was a good car but I disliked the 7-speed auto transmission a lot. Very slow in manual mode for a sporty car. I really like the look of most Mercedes and the interiors are outstanding, durable and stylish, IMO.  

    I had one mechanical (windshield wiper motor) problem in several years of owning MB cars that were 05 and newer. Overall I would buy several more Mercedes.

    For Mercedes dealerships: Stop hiring snotty sales people. Just because you sell MB cars doesn't mean you are now part of the Gates family. The service departments are great.

    aston_dbs says:

    08:14 AM, 11/06/2009

    For all the MB fans out there: RELAX!

    Nothing personal against MB, I think they are nice cars (just nice... nothing more)

    But... I have enough friends who own MB (E-Class, ML, and SLK) and my goodness, they swear they will never own one again.

    One really close friend who own the 2006 E Class (and I'm not making this up!!):
    He said every morning before he turn the key, he pray first, concern if any of the 'light' goes on.

    One (of many) nightmares story: one day, he was about to go, the car was on, but the transmission was locked for no apparent reason.

    MB towed the car, said nothing is wrong with it, but still charge $1200.

    And, don't get me started on my other friends' ML and the SLK.

    So, as you can see, it's not BS if I've seen it with my own eyes.

    But hey, just RELAX!! If you like it, it's your own money... For me? Thanks but NO, thanks!

    the_car_master says:

    08:48 PM, 11/05/2009

    the back is not attractive!!!!!

    frazier500 says:

    02:45 PM, 11/05/2009

    @arumage

    I was agreeing with mercedesfan...

    mercedesfan says:

    02:21 PM, 11/05/2009

    @aston_dbs

    I can't comment on whether the SLS will be reliable or not, but MB has substantially turned itself around with each new model.  The redesigned E, CL and S as well as the revised SL all went from near the bottom of their respective segments to top 2 or 3 in quality in tests by JD Power, Strategic Vision, and even Consumer Reports.  MB is now ranked higher than BMW and Audi by all and only a stones throw from Lexus (held back only by the ML and GL which use electronics that date to before 2006).  My experience backs this up, my 2007 S550 has 75,000 miles on it and I have never had it back to the dealer for anything but scheduled maintenance.  They certainly built some electrical nightmares from 1997-2006, but Zetsche has re-focused the company on quality and its really starting to become apparent.    

    cwmoo740 says:

    01:59 PM, 11/05/2009

    Wait until you see the track test numbers for this car. The last IL article estimated the skidpad at around 1.2G(!). And this seven-speed transaxle and  NA V8 is going to be way more exciting than something like the 911 Turbo (sorry, porsche) or the upcoming M5/M6 SUV engine. It's also 100,000 less than an LF-A. This is in Ferrari territory now, and I think it can keep up.

    aston_dbs says:

    12:31 PM, 11/05/2009

    Mmmhhh...

    As classic looking as this can be (I honestly love the look of this SLS... Retro Classic!),
    I'll take the Lexus LF-A any day compare to any of the MB reliability/glitch/electrical nightmare.

    If this SLS is not different than any current MB, what is the point of spending that much money NOT driving it? The car will mainly spend most of its time being repaired in dealership...

    Clean up the act, MB!!
    Even Porsche is much more reliable while being used everyday...

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG

    Base Price:

    $235,000 (est.)

    Engine:

    6.2-liter V8

    Gearbox:

    Seven-speed dual-clutch automated manual transaxle

    Power:

    563 hp @ 6,800 rpm; 479 lb-ft @ 4,750 rpm

    EPA Rating:

    NA

    On Sale:

    April 2010

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2010
    MakeMercedes-Benz
    ModelSLS AMG
    Style2dr Coupe (6.2L 8cyl 7A)
    Base MSRP$235,000 (est.)
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeRear-wheel drive
    Engine typeFront mid-mounted longitudinal V8
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)6,208cc (379 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDouble overhead camshaft with four valves per cylinder and variable valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)11.3:1
    Redline (rpm)7,200
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)563 @ 6,800
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)479 @ 4,750
    Transmission typeSeven-speed dual-clutch automated manual housed in rear-mounted transaxle
    Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)I = 3.40; II = 2.19; III = 1.63; IV = 1.29; V = 1.03; VI = 0.84; VII = 0.72; Final Drive = 3.67
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndendent double-wishbone suspension with coil springs, monotube dampers and stabilzer bar
    Suspension, rearIndendent double-wishbone suspension with coil springs, monotube dampers and stabilzer bar
    Steering typeSpeed-proportional hydraulic power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)13.6:1
    Turning circle (ft.)39.0
    Tire brandContinental
    Tire modelContiSport Contact 5P
    Tire typeHigh-performance summer
    Tire size, front265/35ZR19 98Y
    Tire size, rear295/30ZR20 101Y
    Wheel size19-by-9.5 inches front -- 20-by-11 inches rear
    Wheel materialCast aluminum alloy (forged aluminum optional)
    Brakes, front15.4-inch floating ventilated, drilled and slotted discs and six-piston fixed calipers
    Brakes, rear14.2-inch ventilated, drilled and slotted discs and four-piston fixed calipers
    Track Test Results
    0-60 mph (sec.)3.7 (mfr estimate)
    Fuel Consumption
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)22.5
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,573
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)47/53 (mfr.)
    Length (in.)182.6
    Width (in.)76.3
    Height (in.)49.7
    Wheelbase (in.)105.5
    Track, front (in.)66.2
    Track, rear (in.)65.1
    Legroom, front (in.)41.7
    Headroom, front (in.)39.1
    Shoulder room, front (in.)58.4
    Seating capacity2
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)6.2
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard dual front
    Head airbagsStandard front
    Knee airbagsStandard
    Antilock brakesFour-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsBraking assist, electronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard; with normal, sport and off modes
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemDirect tire-pressure monitoring with pressure display
    Emergency assistance systemPre-collision safety system
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot available
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot available
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot available
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot available
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot available
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement