We're at a press conference in Seville, Spain, for the 2012 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Coupe. It's usually a good time to take in huge chunks of information, but the Italian journalist next to us has his translation earpiece turned up so loud we can barely hear the Mercedes engineer speaking barely 5 feet away.
Between his German-accented English and the shrill Italian woman screaming in the guy's ear beside us, all we can make out are phrases like "sporty and dynamic," "expressive design," and "new target groups." We also start to get a craving for pasta.
Once we snap out of our haze, it's clear that Mercedes is counting on reaching a younger, hipper demographic with the first real C-Class Coupe. Yes, we know there was a C230/C320 Sport Coupe in the early-to-mid 2000s, but Mercedes doesn't count that as a coupe because it was a hatchback. Plus, we would all like to forget that car ever existed, so it's easy to agree that this is the first real C-Class Coupe.
Direct Injection of Power
The top-of-the-line 2012 Mercedes-Benz C350 Coupe uses a new, direct-injected version of Mercedes' 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Equipped with variable valve timing on both intake and exhaust, it's a smooth runner from startup to its 6,750-rpm redline.
Horsepower jumps to 302 at 6,500 rpm, versus the previous 3.5-liter's 268 hp at 6,000. Torque follows a similar path: There's more of it — 273 pound-feet — but it's produced a bit higher, from 3,500-5,250 (old engine: 258 lb-ft from 2,400-5,000).
So there's more power, yet the fuel efficiency has actually increased as well. Between the new engine and the standard 7G-Tronic Plus seven-speed automatic, the C350 Coupe is expected to deliver 22 mpg combined, a 2-mpg improvement over the 2011 C350 Sedan.
It's significant enough that Mercedes saw fit to slap its "BlueEfficiency" badge on the side of the C350 Coupe. Then again, it does the same thing with the gas-guzzler-tax-paying CL550 Coupe, too, so it's hardly the "green" badge of honor its name implies.
The smooth V6 and equally silky tranny complement each other out on the road. In Drive mode the transmission is quick to downshift, and gives relatively speedy upshifts as well. Unfortunately, even in Manual mode it shifts for itself at redline when you're using the standard steering-wheel paddle shifters; it also makes pathetically lazy attempts to blip the throttle on downshifts. We wouldn't care so much if there was a manual transmission available, but sadly, the seven-speed automatic is the only transmission headed to the U.S.
Mercedes claims the extra sauce and quicker shifting should result in a 0-60-mph sprint of 5.9 seconds, which seems quite believable. While it's true the engine isn't big on low-end power, it makes up for it with an exciting high-rpm rush, accompanied by an equally stirring rasp from the exhaust.
Sport Means Sport
All U.S. C-Class Coupes will come standard with a sport suspension, which is optional in Europe. Our test cars were fitted with Mercedes' optional Advanced Agility package, which features electronically controlled adaptive dampers. The driver can switch from the standard setting to Sport with the press of a button. Not only does this provide a stiffer suspension, but Sport also sharpens throttle response and adds some weight to the steering.
In typical understated Mercedes fashion, the C Coupe's interior is small on style but big on buttons.
We're glad to find that the Sport setting makes a real difference in the way the car handles. It goes from a slightly vague, light-steering car with significant body roll to a flat-handling, shockingly stiff and sharp sport coupe that's glued to the road. It's impressive, and perfect for some real canyon running.
Despite its firmness, there's enough compliance to keep the rear end buttoned-down over midcorner bumps. So while it may lack a true manual transmission, the C Coupe definitely handles like a serious sport coupe.
Would You Like a Turbo With That?
If you don't want to fork over the $42,000 or so we expect the 2012 Mercedes-Benz C350 to command, there's a base C250 Coupe, too. It uses a new direct-injected 1.8-liter turbocharged four-cylinder with 201 hp at 5,500 rpm and 229 lb-ft of torque from 2,200-4,300 mated to the same seven-speed automatic.
Although this engine feels oddly coarse for a Mercedes, and somewhat dieselly-sounding at low revs (probably due to the direct injection), it's actually pretty smooth for a four-cylinder. It's a bit sluggish off the line, but it does a decent job of moving the 250's 3,419-pound curb weight (143 pounds less than the C350). It's no match for the grunt of the V6 in terms of sheer acceleration, though, as Mercedes claims a 0-60 mph time of 7.1 seconds for the turbo-4.
On the other hand, the C250's more sprightly nature is definitely felt when you point it at a corner. It feels a little more willing to change directions and less likely to lapse into understeer. Smaller brakes (11.6-inch front rotors compared to the C350's 12.7-inchers) feel weaker, though, and less confidence-inspiring. We expect the C250's main draw will be its estimated 30 mpg on the highway and a significantly lower price point.
Two Against Four
Compared to the C-Class Sedan, the C-Class Coupe measures just a tenth of an inch shorter while riding on an identical 108.7-inch wheelbase. Width is also unchanged between the two body styles, showing just how closely related the coupe and sedan remain. The big difference comes in the form of the Coupe's swoopier roof line, which is a significant 1.5 inches lower. This is even more pronounced by the standard panorama sunroof, which gives the car a blacked-out roof look.
As you can imagine, that radical roof line has ramifications. Reduced head- and knee room in the backseat is the primary change, as the center seat has been ditched in favor of two individual buckets. Even though rear headroom is down by 1.4 inches compared with the sedan, average-sized adults can survive back there thanks to cutouts in the roof.
In typical understated Mercedes fashion, the C Coupe's interior is small on style but big on buttons, the chrome ones below the stereo on the center stack at least adding some sense of color to the otherwise all-black equation. Staid, yes, but generally a well laid-out cabin, although it would be more properly sporting if the coupe's center stack was canted slightly toward the driver. Also, we'd appreciate if the gear indicators for manual shifting were larger; with seven of them in a row within the speedo, it's difficult to quickly make out which gear is currently highlighted.
On the plus side, the 11.7-cubic-foot trunk (down from the sedan's 12.4) should be able to handle enough luggage for four people to get away for the weekend. Even better, the rear seats fold down in a 60/40 split if the wife/girlfriend really does want to bring everything plus the kitchen sink.
To Coupe or Not To Coupe
The 2012 Mercedes-Benz C350 Coupe only weighs 53 pounds less than the C350 sedan, while acceleration, handling and fuel mileage should be pretty much equal to the four-door.
So pure performance isn't a reason to buy this coupe (the sedans will be available with the same Advanced Agility suspension). The question is whether losing the convenience of two extra doors and some head- and legroom is worth the sportier styling.
Mercedes obviously thinks so or it wouldn't have bothered to add this dedicated coupe to the lineup. And as we vaguely remember from the press conference, the company wants to attract new "target groups" to the C-Class, presumably younger ones. Coupes are always good for that and this C-Class does the job. Without a true manual it's not likely to knock the BMW 335i off its perch anytime soon, but it's a solid contender in every other respect.
Edmunds attended a manufacturer-sponsored event, to which selected members of the press were invited, to facilitate this report.
Price and Build Your Own 2012 Mercedes-Benz C350 at Edmunds.com

Add A Comment »
hm12 says:
06:28 AM, 08/01/2011
mmm...looks like an accord? I was under the impression that the Japanese cars STOLE every body style from BMW and Mercedes..NO? YES! indeed.
Otherwise, its tough to single out a better body style between the c coupe and current 3 coupe. Having had c class cars for past 20 years, Ive noticed that Mercedes has gone towards the known compromise between handling and luxury. It has gotten a bit biased lately towards luxury especially with the new E class that without the special damping system, at times feels like a 1990 cadillac when turning the wheel.
However, bmw always has a great feel and tightness as well as an enjoyable ride to boot. Which of these is better? I have just returned my CLK 350 2008. Ive driven the 3 coupe before, but opted with Mercedes. Now, not so sure as of yet. A C class coupe WITHOUT DYNAMIC HANDLING would convert me over to the 3 series coupe for sure. The reviews for the c class WITH DYNAMIC handling is now a whole different story. This is a tough one. Initial colors on the C Coupe are less than inviting, for me at least. IF A BIMMER coupe drove and steered as well or better than a Mercedes C coupe WITH DYNAMIC HANDLING...than the show is over. But no body knows personally, unless you drive the new Mercedes? Back to Body style: well, its tougher than ever. Would it be crazy to say that I still see Mercedes as the cosmetic leader, particularly (for me) because they DID NOT PUT THAT center break light on the UPPER PART OF THE WINDOW,,!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DUMB LOOKING DUMB LOOKING,,,,,AND BMW WAS ONE OF THE FIRST TO DO IT!!!! I might take the mercedes just because that center back light is where it should be on the bottom of the back window....where any artisitic eye sees the symmetry and good design they still retain......good for you mercedes!
6speedsporto says:
11:38 AM, 07/24/2011
Not to crazy on the NEW style, the headlights are hidious...but, if you like,, you buy,, if not.. you don't. I love my 2003 MB SPORTSCOUPE 6-speed.. this one is a whole new style.
I just hope they worked out the bugs on the panorama sunroof.. because mine was a freaking pain in the ass.. still does not work.
BUt!,, I love my coupe otherwise....
it's a GREAT CAR!
rjg96 says:
07:20 PM, 06/17/2011
Mercedes makes some very nice cars these days, but this isn't one of them. The a5 and 3 series coupe both blow this car out of the water in the looks dept.
audirs4 says:
08:13 AM, 06/15/2011
I long for the late 80's & 90's when Mercedes was on the there game and they had the cars everybody wanted. They had a bit more character and i just don't know what Mercedes has been thinking the last 10 years.
I've been in loads of E classes from 06,07,08 and the last few years of the C class as well. Just and incredibly cheap feeling car for the high $$ and the handling and chasis doesn't not feel rock solid German.
This new MB looks to have stepped up the interior, which is much needed.
But the styling? The Honda Accord coupe look is dead on and I can't see why the styling team at Mercedes can't seem to get their act together.
Hyundai and Kia are making better looking cars than Mercedes right now.
bestjinjo says:
07:34 PM, 06/05/2011
deathtollwrx, you are probably right that MB haters just don't understand why Benz has a premium since to them an Infiniti, Acura or Lexus are supposedly just as good without the price premium.
Here is an eye-opener, these are all North American brands that are actually sold as Nissan, Honda and Toyota in Japan. There is no such thing as an Infiniti G37 for example. That's just a Nissan 370Z with luxury sprinkles. Don't even get me started on Acura....the worst of all the premium brands in terms of styling. And Lexus, talking about boredom. Ask anyone who cares about the ISF? You'll probably find 3 guys from far East and that's about it. Lexus is the equivalent of Buick - in other words you buy it because you only care about reliability and don't really want a sporty luxury vehicle. So basically, an old person car. When was the last time Lexus made a sexy roadster/convertible, or a fun to drive 2 door coupe?
When people start mentioning cars like the TL or even Lexus IS next to a Mercedes C-Class or BMW 3-series or Audi A4/A5, they obviously can't tell the difference between a good driving machine or what weighted steering and proper handling should feel like. Acura and Lexus are only premium in branding, without any of the premium feel on the road imho. In fact hardly anyone in Europe views them as prestigious.
melohor says:
03:20 PM, 06/05/2011
it's sure nothing like as good looking as the E-coupe pillarless and huge rear wheel fender design, the overall exterior looks like a re-badged Honda Accord Coupe, boring looking. The whole C-class line just look cheap. Not an good idea to attract new buyer into MB and beat the BMW 3 Series and Lexus IS Line.
skidrive9 says:
02:33 PM, 06/03/2011
The styling absolutely kills this car. Yes it's a Mercedes, but man, what a boring looking car this is. Why would anyone choose this over the looks of an A4, 335i? I mean, sure looks aren't everything, but if you want to attract a younger crowd, you really need to make the car look more aggressive. As far as everything else goes, I'm sure its up to Mercedes quality, and I'm sure its a great car.
deathtollwrx says:
01:02 PM, 06/03/2011
First of all every new Mercedes Benz sold in the United States has Bi Xenon HID headlights.
I don't know why we are seeing alot of yellow headlights (check the edmunds Kia Optima photos).
Everyone likes to knock Mercedes but I give you this challenge. Go test drive a 2011 C300 and
tell me it's not a great driving and handsome car.
I'll bet good money nine of of ten Mercedes haters have never actually sat in or have driven
one... I was one of those guys until I test drove one and bought it.
6sptl says:
09:24 AM, 06/03/2011
sniperruff says:
07:35 AM, 06/03/2011
6sptl says: "Mercedes has built some of the most unreliable cars in the market for decades. "
Because you know better than the German Automobile Club:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_C-Class#Reliability
People who buy a luxury coupe doesn't care about horsepower and a manual gearbox. The C-class outsold Infiniti's G35 consistently. In 2003, the G35 out-powered the C-class equivalent (C240) by over 100hp (280hp vs. 170hp), yet the C-class still outsold the G35.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_C-Class#Production_and_sales
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infiniti_G#Sales_by_Calendar_Year
Personally I think it looks like a CLK. As for Hyundai having better design over Mercedes:
http://www.insideline.com/hyundai/genesis/2012/2012-hyundai-genesis-prada-on-sale-but-not-in-the-us.html
http://www.insideline.com/mercedes-benz/s-class/2007/2006-los-angeles-2007-mercedes-benz-s600.html
Hyundai designs ARE Mercedes designs, from 5 years ago.
Personally I'd buy the new BMW M1.
I'd rather use consumer reports to gauge reliability than a German industry advertising source. BTW my family has owned a few all have been crap replaced by either Lexus or Acuras.
icerabbit says:
08:39 AM, 06/03/2011
I just have to laugh when I read some of the comments.
This car is inferior because it lacks 30HP? Because it lacks a manual transmission? ...
Does an extra 30 peak HP really matter when your vehicle is already in the 300HP range?
And do you really redline your car to pull out every single 300+HP?
In a congested USofA with its 65mph speed limit on the interstate. (for the most part)
The target demographic for probably 99% of Benzes in the USofA wants an automatic.
They want some style, comfort, reliability and an engine that makes it go.
I'm for keeping it a bit simple, reliable, detuned, ... while hopefully passing on some of the savings to consumers.
The headlights does seem a bit like an odd choice, but they typically have the Bi-Xenon with curve illumination options.
Also, with the horrible US dollar vs the Euro exchange rate, MB may have had a price point target they had to reach a bit more aggressively and that's how that came about. And, maybe some other things that are considered "too generic" for a luxury car.