INSIDE LINE

2006 Economy Sedan Comparison Test: Honda Civic vs. Mazda 3

Media Player

  • 2006 Mazda 3 Picture

    2006 Mazda 3 Picture

    We still prefer the Mazda 3 five-door's looks and function, but we found the sedan's handling marginally sharper. | September 28, 2009

Comparison

2006 Economy Sedan Comparison Test: Honda Civic vs. Mazda 3

Introduction

    0 Ratings
    Mustang vs. Camaro. WRX vs. EVO. Ferrari vs. Cobra.

    Automotive rivalries have a way of driving home loyalty with both enthusiasts and average consumers. And now there's another one to add to the list: Mazda 3 vs. Honda Civic. Even though the battle for economy sedan supremacy won't be played out on drag strips, rally stages or the Mulsanne straight, the stakes, for the automakers involved, are equally high.

    After all, winning consumer loyalty in this segment — which rivals full-size trucks and midsize sedans as a volume leader in the U.S. auto market — can make a serious dent in year-end balance sheets. This is why companies like Honda and Mazda have spent major effort designing and redesigning the Civic and Mazda 3 and why they are the two most prominent players in the game at the moment.

    Top ranked players
    When it comes to economical compact sedans Honda is a serious contender. The Civic is a traditional class leader having won our 2003 Economy Sedan Comparison Test and finishing second in our 2005 Economy Sedan Comparison Test in its last generation. But now there's a fully redesigned 2006 Civic ready to take on all comers with a more powerful engine, multiple transmission options, a new suspension and revised styling.

    The Civic comes standard with a 1.8-liter inline four-cylinder rated at 140 horsepower and 128 pound-feet of torque. The EX model we ordered for this test came loaded with standard features often found only as options on most cars. Key EX features include the five-speed automatic transmission, 16-inch wheels, air conditioning, a moonroof, keyless entry, a 60/40-split-folding rear seat, and a jack for portable music players. Side airbags and side curtain airbags are standard on all Civics. Our test car was outfitted with the standard five-speed automatic transmission and stickered for $19,610, including the $550 destination fee.

    Mazda's 3, however, is the current king of the compact sedan market, beating the Civic in our last comparison test with handling and control feel normally reserved for pure-bred sports cars. Its build quality, materials and design are all top notch. Add up the 3's unbelievable dynamics and superb build quality and it only makes sense that it's the current ruler of the compact sedan roost.

    For this test we ordered an S Grand Touring model, which comes with a 2.3-liter inline four-cylinder rated at 160 hp and 150 lb-ft of torque. Seventeen-inch wheels are standard as are leather seats, side airbags with curtains, xenon headlights and rain-sensing windshield wipers. Our test car cost $22,010 including the optional $950 five-speed automatic transmission, $1,335 moonroof/CD changer package and $560 destination fee.

    The test
    We ordered both cars with automatic transmissions figuring we'd provide the same mechanical playing field we did with our previous comparison test. Plus, more Civics and 3s are sold with automatics than with manual transmissions. Then we drove them like most people would — back and forth to work, through long stints in traffic and for the usual weekend duties. We even loaded a mountain bike in them to see if it was possible. Impressively, the backseat of both cars swallowed the bike with the front wheel removed.

    When we were convinced both cars were capable of the mundane tasks everyone would ask of them, we went to the track and did things no one will ever do in these slushbox-equipped economy cars. Brake-smoking stops, cone-crushing slalom passes and not-so-blistering acceleration runs through the quarter-mile were de rigueur. And when we were done, a clear winner was obvious.

    The winner
    Despite being a rivalry which will be fought at dealerships, this test climaxed first at the track where the Mazda 3 simply stomped the Civic in any test that involved moving. All the instrumented tests fell heavily in favor of the sharper, stiffer, more powerful Mazda.

    On the street the Civic did show its refined heritage. It's a fine car to pilot for everyday duty with quality construction and a comfortable ride. It comes with some smart features we found useful — like the portable music player jack — and a long list of standard luxuries, some of which cost extra on the 3.

    Even so, the Mazda still outshines the newly redesigned Civic when it comes to interior materials and styling. Plus, the Mazda's dash is easier to use than the Civic's two-tiered speedometer/tachometer displays as are its stereo and heater-A/C controls.

    At first, the $2,400 difference in cost between our test cars was a major concern, but then we realized we could do without the $1,335 moonroof/CD changer package on our 3. Without it we'd have a car that cost only $1,000 more than the Civic. That thousand bucks simply buys the better car.

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Featured Specs

    • Manually shiftable automatic transmission that actually works
    • Tire-pressure monitoring system
    • Heated front seats
    • Leather seats

    What Works

    Outstanding dynamics combined with economy car utility and practicality.

    What Needs Work

    Fuel economy could be better.

    Speed Read

    Featured Specs

    • Portable music player (iPod) jack
    • Standard dual-stage front airbags
    • Standard driver and front-passenger airbags
    • Standard side curtain airbags

    What Works

    Excellent fuel economy, classic Honda fit and finish.

    What Needs Work

    Dash design less than functional, poor front three-quarter visibility, minor wind noise.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    MakeMazda
    ModelMazda3
    Model year2006
    Styles Grand Touring 4dr Sedan (2.3L 4cyl 5A)
    Base MSRP$19,165
    As-tested MSRP$22,010
    Options on test vehicle$950 five-speed automatic transmission, $1,335 moonroof/CD changer package
    Drive typeFront-wheel drive
    Transmission typeFive-Speed Automatic
    Engine typeInline four-cylinder
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2300cc
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)160 hp
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)150 lb-ft
    Brakes, frontFour-wheel disc
    Brakes, rearFour-wheel disc
    Steering typeElectro-hydraulic assisted rack and pinion
    Suspension, frontMacPherson strut
    Suspension, rearMultilink
    Tire size, front205/50-17
    Tire size, rear205/50-17
    Tire brandGoodyear
    Tire modelRS-A
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)2,829
    Fuel type87 octane
    Fuel tank capacity (gal)14.5
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)25 City / 31 Highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)22.3
    Conditions for Testing
    Temperature (°F)74
    Elevation (ft.)1100
    Wind (mph, direction)0 to 1 W/SW
    Performance
    0 - 30 (sec.)3.2
    0 - 45 (sec.)5.6
    0 - 60 (sec.)8.6
    0 - 75 (sec.)13.1
    1/4 mile (sec. @ mph)16.4 @ 84.7
    30 - 0 (ft.)30
    60 - 0 (ft.)118
    Braking ratingGood
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft (mph)69
    Handling ratingExcellent
    Sound level @ idle (db)41.7
    Sound level @ full throttle (db)72.1
    Sound level @ 70 mph cruise (db)69
    Acceleration commentsAll tests conducted in drive using light brake torque at launch. Transmission shifted at redline.
    Braking commentsUneventful stops from 60 were accompanied by some ABS noise and mild pedal feedback.
    Handling commentsSuperb control feedback for this class -- on par with far more expensive performance cars. Better balanced than many performance cars. Instant turn-in response and intuitive feedback. Skid pad testing revealed superb off-throttle rotation which was easy to predict and control.
    Specifications
    Length (in.)178.7
    Width (in.)69.1
    Height (in.)57.7
    Wheelbase (in.)103.9
    Turning circle (ft)Not Tested
    Legroom, front (in.)41.9
    Legroom, rear (in.)36.3
    Headroom, front (in.)39.1 (no moonroof)
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.4 (no moonroof)
    Shoulder room, front (in.)54.9
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)54
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)11.4
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)11
    Warranty Information
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain4 years/50,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years/unlimited
    Roadside assistance4 years/50,000 miles
    Scheduled maintenanceNot Available
    Safety Information
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsOptional
    Head airbagsOptional
    Antilock brakesStandard
    Electronic brake enhancementsStandard
    Traction controlNot available
    Stability controlNot available
    Rollover protectionNot available
    Emergency assistance systemNot available
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot Tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot Tested
    Speed Read
    Bottom LineMore performance, utility and style than any car in the segment.
    What Needs WorkFuel economy could be better.
    What WorksOutstanding dynamics combined with economy car utility and practicality.
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    MakeHonda
    ModelCivic
    Model year2006
    StyleEX 4dr Sedan w/Automatic (1.8L 4cyl 5A)
    Base MSRP$19,060 w/o destination
    As-tested MSRP$19,610
    Drive typeFront-wheel drive
    Transmission typeFive-speed Automatic
    Engine typeInline four-cylinder
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1800cc
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)140 hp
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)128 lb-ft
    Brakes, frontFour-wheel disc
    Brakes, rearFour-wheel disc
    Steering typePower assisted rack and pinion
    Suspension, frontMacPherson strut
    Suspension, rearMultilink double wishbone
    Tire size, front205/55-16
    Tire size, rear205/55-16
    Tire brandBridgestone
    Tire modelTuranza EL400 HL
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)2804
    Fuel type87 octane
    Fuel tank capacity (gal)13.2
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)30 City / 40 Highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)29.7
    Conditions for Testing
    Temperature (°F)74
    Elevation (ft.)1100
    Wind (mph, direction)0 to 1 W/SW
    Performance
    0 - 30 (sec.)3.5
    0 - 45 (sec.)6.2
    0 - 60 (sec.)9.6
    0 - 75 (sec.)14.6
    1/4 mile (sec. @ mph)17.1 @ 81.7
    30 - 0 (ft.)32
    60 - 0 (ft.)130
    Braking ratingAverage
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft (mph)64.6
    Handling ratingAverage
    Sound level @ idle (db)42
    Sound level @ full throttle (db)72
    Sound level @ 70 mph cruise (db)70
    Acceleration commentsUninspiring engine and transmission combined with slow-to-react electronic throttle frustrates spirited driving. Driving the Civic will make you good at planning ahead on the freeway.
    Braking commentsThe EX is the only Civic trim level (except the Si, which is a very different car) which comes with rear disc brakes. Pedal feel is acceptable, but braking performance could be better.
    Handling commentsDamping and roll stiffness are on the soft side -- especially compared to the Mazda 3. These difficiencies are most apparent in our instrumented handling tests.
    Specifications
    Length (in.)176.7
    Width (in.)69
    Height (in.)56.5
    Wheelbase (in.)106.3
    Turning circle (ft)Not Tested
    Legroom, front (in.)42.2
    Legroom, rear (in.)34.6
    Headroom, front (in.)38.1
    Headroom, rear (in.)36.7
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)12
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)N/A
    Warranty Information
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years/ 60,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years/unlimited mileage
    Roadside assistanceAvailable -- not standard
    Scheduled maintenanceNot Available
    Safety Information
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard
    Head airbagsStandard (side curtain)
    Antilock brakesStandard
    Electronic brake enhancementsStandard Electronic Brakeforce Distribution
    Traction controlNot available
    Stability controlNot available
    Rollover protectionNot available
    Emergency assistance systemNot available
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot Tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot Tested
    Speed Read
    Bottom LineGood, but not good enough.
    What Needs WorkDash design less than functional, poor front three-quarter visibility, minor wind noise.
    What WorksExcellent fuel economy, classic Honda fit and finish.
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement