INSIDE LINE

Testing the 2011 Mazda 2 and 2010 Honda Fit B-Spec Racecars

Media Player

  • 2011 Mazda 2 and 2010 Honda Fit B-Spec Racecars Track Tested

    We test race-prepped examples of the 2011 Mazda 2 and 2010 Honda Fit that were built to prove the B-Spec racing concept at the NASA 25 Hours of Thunderhill. | March 30, 2011

1 Video , 58 Photos | See more photos in this gallery »

Feature

Testing the 2011 Mazda 2 and 2010 Honda Fit B-Spec Racecars

Killer Bees

    31 Ratings

    Flirting with the rev limiter at the top of 4th gear, a faint brush of brakes is required as we hurtle into the left-hand kink at the end of the long front straightaway. The optimum turn-in point isn't entirely clear because our view of the exit curbing is blocked by the pavement itself as it rises and falls slightly between here and there.

    And that's just Turn One. Four or five other corners here at Thunderhill Raceway are similarly obscured by the track designer's strategic exploitation of the gently rolling terrain found here in the foothills west of Willows, California.

    A good lap around this place requires enough practice to "just know" the line despite the topography. After that it's a flowing circuit that favors a nimble car that can preserve momentum even as the surface below tries to shrug it off into the weeds. Luckily, that's just what we've got under us in the form of a pair of B-Spec racecars from Mazda and Honda.

    Race-prepped versions of the 2011 Mazda 2 and 2010 Honda Fit are here at Thunderhill for NASA's (National Auto Sport Association) annual 25-hour enduro, and we've been invited by Mazdaspeed and Honda Performance Development to sample and compare the two on the open test day that precedes the event.

    B Student
    Small cars that we call subcompacts are termed B-segment cars within the auto industry. The Honda Fit and Mazda 2 occupy this space along with the Chevrolet Sonic, Ford Fiesta, Hyundai Accent, Kia Rio and others. Bigger cars like the Focus and Civic belong to the C-segment and the alphabet marches on from there.

    But why make racecars out of the diminutive Mazda 2 and Honda Fit? For one, they're inexpensive to buy and maintain. Also, their small size makes them inherently lightweight and nimble.

    From the automakers' perspective, these cars represent a growing segment in our market as manufacturers strive to meet tightening CAFE standards and consumers seek refuge from steeply rising gas prices. It's a far easier sell if people see subcompacts as something other than a P.O.S., a penalty box or a consolation prize. They want it known that small, economical cars can be spry and fun, too.

    We totally get it. There's a certain perverse pleasure that comes from hustling a small car through twisty corners and then cruising innocently down the straights in classic "who, me?" fashion. Many such cars are just a set of tires and a couple of easy suspension mods away from embarrassing sleds that cost thousands more.

    And that's exactly what the B-segment racers are all about. Representatives from Mazdaspeed and Honda Performance Development put their heads together to create a rules framework for a "B-Spec" race series in which the Mazda 2, Honda Fit and their competitors can do battle. Other manufacturers have been invited to join in and are watching how these two proof-of-concept machines perform on the track.

    Race-Prep Recipe
    Safety mods make up the bulk of the prep time and cost, as the innards of these racers have been gutted to make room for a substantial roll cage that's welded to the unibody at eight strategic points. Substantial steel side members extend into the doors, which have been cut open and stripped of their window mechanisms to make room.

    Cars they beat include the Corvette Z06, Porsche 911 GT3 and any number of Nissan GT-Rs we've tested.

    The lone seat in each car is a Sparco racing bucket mounted on the stock seat track so it can be repositioned to suit a variety of drivers. The dash and gauges are the only recognizable interior remnants.

    Performance modifications are few and tightly constrained in order to keep costs down and real-world relevance high. That's why the internals of the engine and transmission can't be altered. There are no supercharger kits, no headers, no wild cams. Bottom line: The underhood area remains more or less showroom stock.

    Underneath, both B-Spec racers ride on a Bilstein B14 PSS performance suspension kit that consists of monotube front struts and rear shocks with non-adjustable damping and matching springs that are height-adjustable. The original stabilizer bars and suspension bushings are retained, and no changes can be made to the brake system except for aftermarket brake pads and braided stainless brake hoses.

    Finally, there's a common "spec" wheel and tire package, namely P205/50ZR15 BFGoodrich g-Force R1 Comp semi-slick race tires mounted on 15-by-7-inch alloy rims. They provide tons of stick, but don't even dream of street use because they've got almost no tread and their wear rating is 40. No, that's not a typo.

    Over Thunderhill and Dale
    In the open test session, the Fit and the Mazda 2 lap the 3.0-mile circuit within the same second, and with traffic it's hard to know if one has the upper hand.

    In pure spec-sheet terms the Mazda 2 gives up 17 horsepower to the Fit, but the difference may be larger here because the Honda team removed their catalysts, while the Mazda folks went with a cat-back exhaust. Not only is the B-Spec Fit significantly louder, it's faster down the long front straight when we stand on the gas.

    But the Mazda 2 has the advantage under braking, with a firmer pedal and more direct response. It carries a smidge more speed into corners, too, as the body rolls less, owing to a firmer setup despite similar suspension upgrades.

    Physics is no doubt helping, as the Mazda 2's as-raced weight is 105 pounds less than the Fit's (2,237 vs. 2,342). It also stands 1.9 inches shorter (58.1 vs. 60) and measures a half-foot shorter in overall length (155.5 vs. 161.6 inches).

    By contrast, the B-Spec Fit rolls a bit more in turns and its brakes and shifter feel somewhat more vague — the latter less of an issue because the Fit uses just 3rd and 4th gear while the Mazda 2 makes occasional forays into 2nd.

    In the end, the Fit's power advantage makes it easier to work through traffic because it can more readily recover from being balked — a likely advantage in the 25-hour contest to come.

    Bees on Our Test Track
    Let's cut to our own test track for a moment to see just how much the simple B-Spec mods improve performance over that of the 2011 Mazda 2 and Honda Fit sitting on your nearby dealer's lot.

    There's little reason to expect much change in the quarter-mile, but stickier tires and exhaust mods apparently do count for something. The B-Spec Fit gets there in 16.2 seconds at 83.0 mph, about 0.4 second and 0.6 mph better than a normal Fit. At 16.6 seconds at 81.0 mph, the Mazda 2 racer is a bit slower, but it still bests a production version by 0.8 second and a full 2.5 mph.

    Panic stops from 60 mph require 129 feet in a garden-variety Honda Fit, but the modified one is stationary in 111 feet. Similarly, our "before" 2011 Mazda 2 long-term test car stops in 133 feet, but the "after" B-Spec version gets it done in just 106 feet.

    Reality starts to come unglued through the slalom. A standard Mazda 2 and Honda Fit make runs of 65.0 and 66.0 mph, respectively. But the B-Spec racers do it about 7 mph faster, with the prepped Fit knifing through at 72.9 mph and the Mazda 2 coming through at 72.0 mph. This is rarefied $100,000 car territory.

    Both Bs putter around our skid pad with little apparent effort, drama (or obvious speed), but the two-way average of the B-Spec Fit nevertheless works out to 1.03g, 0.21g better than a stock Fit. The Mazda 2 responds by knocking the Fit off its short-lived podium, registering 1.04g on identical tires.

    A partial list of cars they both just beat includes the Chevrolet Corvette Z06, the Porsche 911 Turbo (or GT3), the Dodge Viper SRT10 and any number of Nissan GT-Rs we've tested, including the 2012 Black Series.

    Racing Through 25 Hours
    Because they have little in the horsepower department, the B-Spec Mazda 2 and Honda Fit are classified in the E3 category, the slowest of the five classes sharing the track for the NASA 25-hour enduro. In all, 69 cars line up for the start, with the Honda Research West #15 Honda Fit starting 34th and the Robert Davis Racing #20 Mazda 2 starting 40th on the strength of their fastest laps in a traffic-filled qualifying session that we happily watched from the pits.

    In the early going, the Fit's advantage in traffic allows it to edge away from the Mazda 2, leaving several cars in between as a buffer. Then the first pit stops allow both Bs to demonstrate their fuel economy advantage. NASA rules allow just 10 gallons to be added per stop, and the two B-Spec racers ride that for nearly 2 hours, oftentimes 30 minutes longer than those around them. The high-powered leaders are stopping every 45 minutes.

    And then the rains come — or rather, the heavy drizzle. This benefits the Fit and its softer suspension much more that the stiffer Mazda 2, and at one point the Honda drives past the leading Porsche 911 GT3 and some other front-runners before everyone eventually decides rain tires are a good idea.

    Wet or damp asphalt dominate the event for something like 20 hours as the two B-Spec cars march steadily up the charts. The track doesn't actually dry enough for really quick times until the final hour, at which point Honda plugs pro racer Simon Pagenaud into the Fit to lay down its fastest lap of the weekend, a 2:09.364. At that point the Mazda 2 is nursing worn-out brakes and can't respond with anything better than a 2:14.

    In the end the Fit finishes 15th overall and the Mazda 2 comes across 19th — pretty damn impressive for lightly modified subcompact cars with unmodified 1.5-liter four-bangers.

    It's a Hit
    This dry run of the B-Spec racing concept has people smiling up and down the pit lane. Pagenaud is as enthusiastic as anyone, climbing out of the Honda Fit at the end with a huge grin, saying, "I love it. It's one of the best cars I ever drove." We're pretty sure he actually means it, too. The Mazda 2's drivers and crew are slightly less famous but no less enthusiastic.

    In 25 hours, neither car had a serious problem or an on-track incident. Their crews poured gas in them, changed a few tires and rotated drivers in and out. The Honda team installed new front brake pads sometime during the night, totally expected in a 'round-the-clock enduro, while the Mazda 2 squad went the distance on the ones they started with — barely.

    The proposed B-Spec series is envisioned as a sprint race series to keep costs in check, but this 25-hour test proved beyond a doubt the cars are durable and raceable. In addition to proving that the concept has merit, the Thunderhill experience gave the rule makers some real-world data to chew on.

    Both sides think it's better to run functional catalysts with cat-back exhausts, and things like ballast and car-specific ECU reflashes are being tossed around as possible ways to equalize cars with different horsepower levels.

    Let's hope the B-Spec concept takes root somewhere and that Ford, Chevy and others decide to play, too. From where we sat, inside both cars and in the pits, the B-Spec Mazda 2 and Honda Fit deserve a huge thumbs-up.

    Beyond the actual racing, the Thunderhill weekend underscores what the manufacturers are trying to say with the B-Spec series: The current and future crop of small, hyper-efficient economy cars can also be fun. It makes us want to bolt a few strategic mods on our own 2011 Mazda 2 long-term car and see what a street version of the B-Spec formula is like.

    Sort By:

    tsarheld1 says:

    08:19 PM, 08/22/2011

    It's kind of funny....in our household we have the 2009 Honda Fits and a just purchased 2011 Mazda 2.....love both of them.

    eric_ says:

    07:53 AM, 07/23/2011

    why didn't they wash the cars? ;)

    bassrockerx says:

    06:16 PM, 04/05/2011

    what catback is on that fit? sounds great!

    ru5tynut5 says:

    10:14 PM, 04/04/2011

    oh, I just went and re checked the results on the SCCA website and I was 26th overall in the 2, not 36th.

    ru5tynut5 says:

    08:55 PM, 04/04/2011

    I work for a mazda performance company and when we started talking about going autocrossing this year of course I was looking at our RX8 or our speed3 as the main options to run but someone convinced me to try our Mazda 2.  Man, I will autocross our 2 over ANY of our other cars any day.  that car is so much fun to drive on the small autocross tracks.  at the last event there was a total of 110 cars or so and I had the 36th overall fastest time in a Mazda 2, the list of cars that ran slower than me included Z06 vettes, mustangs, 5 series BMW's, RX7's, RX8's, STI's, mazdaspeed 3's, etc.  these cars may not be the fastest straight line cars but they will put the biggest smile on your face on the autocross track...

    jacton says:

    06:47 PM, 04/02/2011

    I would love to see some mods on IL's long term Mazda2.  I think it could be a superb platform for a cheap autoX/track day car; the Fit, Sonic, and Fiesta included.  

    alex38 says:

    06:45 PM, 04/02/2011

    looks like both cars are a lot of fun.. That mazda is certainly a compelling package; would be happy to drive either one..

    firstwagon says:

    03:31 PM, 04/02/2011

    I think this type of racing is by far the purest form.

    I really could care less about million dollar race cars and multi-million dollar budgets of the so called professional teams.  Too much politics and sponsers.  Something to watch on TV when you bored.

    For anyone who thinks "wrong wheel drive"... remember the original Mini?  A legend in racing and FWD.

    dgmail says:

    09:42 AM, 04/02/2011

    re stovt001,

    Yeah, sure you have.

    jguan says:

    05:44 PM, 04/01/2011

    The wheels are actually TRMotorsport C1 from tirerack.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2011 Mazda 2 Sport 4dr Hatchback (1.5L 4cyl 5M)
    Vehicle TypeFWD 4dr 5-passenger Hatchback
    Base MSRP$14,975
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front-engine, front-wheel drive
    Engine typeNaturally aspirated port-injected inline-4
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1,498/91
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder, variable intake-valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.0
    Redline, indicated (rpm)6,300
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)100 @ 6,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)98 @ 4,000
    Transmission typeFive-speed manual
    Transmission ratios (x:1)I = 3.416; II = 1.842; III = 1.290; IV = 0.972; V = 0.775
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)4.105 (EU)
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent Bilstein inverted monotube MacPherson struts, Bilstein height-adjustable coil springs, factory stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearSemi-independent twist-beam axle, Bilstein height-adjustable coil springs, Bilstein monotube dampers
    Steering typeElectric-assist speed-proportional rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)15.0
    Tire make and modelBFGoodrich g-Force R1
    Tire typeSemi-slick DOT race tires
    Tire sizeP205/50ZR15
    Wheel size15-by-7 inches
    Wheel materialCast aluminum
    Brakes, front10.2-inch ventilated cast-iron discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rear8-inch drums
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)3.0
    0-45 mph (sec.)5.4
    0-60 mph (sec.)8.8
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)8.5
    0-75 mph (sec.)14.0
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)16.6 @ 81.0
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)27
    60-0 mph (ft.)106
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)72.0
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)1.04
    Sound level @ idle (dB)53.1
    @ Full throttle (dB)87.0
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)83.2
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)3,600
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsNeeded at least 4,000 rpm to avoid bogging. Shift lights and racing dash were handy and appreciated. Shift throws were shorter but a little more reluctant than the Fit. Obviously taller grearing in Mazda -- it made it in 3rd gear. As dusty as Honda (no side windows), but not nearly as loud.
    Braking commentsMashing the pedal resulted in crazy, shuddering ABS freakout and long stops (because the ABS was not calibrated to the BFG racing tires). Fortunately the pedal is informative and it was easy to find the optimal threshold before ABS kicked in. Zero dive, always straight, no fade.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: Not sure, but it sure felt like the car was picking up a tire around the skid pad. (Outside observers say no.) Crazy grip. Car wasn't so happy with changes in paint, bumps, etc., so it required some steering input. Steering was quick, but not as precise as Honda's. Slalom: Some disappointing delay/gain on turn-in that required me to anticipate rather than command the situation. Also, while it's not what I would call bump steer, the car did not handle the dip/hop at cone number three very well and that was another item to anticipate. Still, crazy grip with only a slight threat of spinning off makes for a very fast run.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date1/19/2011
    Test locationCalifornia Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)70.7
    Relative humidity (%)38.6
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)28.77
    Wind (mph, direction)3.9 headwind
    Fuel Consumption
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)11.3
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)2,306
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)2,237
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)62/38
    Length (in.)155.5
    Width (in.)66.7
    Height (in.)58.1
    Wheelbase (in.)98.0
    Seating capacity1
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2010 Honda Fit 4dr Hatchback (1.5L 4cyl 5M)
    Vehicle TypeFWD 4dr 5-passenger Hatchback
    Base MSRP$15,650
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front-engine, front-wheel drive
    Engine typeNaturally aspirated, port-injected inline-4
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1,497/91
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainSOHC, four valves per cylinder, variable intake-valve timing and lift
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.4
    Redline, indicated (rpm)6,800
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)117 @ 6,600
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)106 @ 4,800
    Transmission typeFive-speed manual
    Transmission ratios (x:1)I = 3.308; II = 1.870; III = 1.303; IV = 0.949; V = 0.727
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)4.620 (effectively 4.808 with these shorter tires)
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent Bilstein inverted monotube MacPherson struts, Bilstein height-adjustable coil springs, factory stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearSemi-independent twist beam-axle, Bilstein height-adjustable coil springs, Bilstein monotube dampers
    Steering typeElectric-assist speed-proportional rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)12.7
    Tire make and modelBFGoodrich g-Force R1
    Tire typeSemi-slick DOT race tires
    Tire sizeP205/50ZR15
    Wheel size15-by-7 inches
    Wheel materialCast aluminum
    Brakes, front10.3-inch ventilated cast-iron discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rear7.9-inch drums
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)2.7
    0-45 mph (sec.)5.1
    0-60 mph (sec.)8.3
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)8.0
    0-75 mph (sec.)12.7
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)16.2 @ 83.0
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)28
    60-0 mph (ft.)111
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)72.9
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)1.03
    Sound level @ idle (dB)58.5
    @ Full throttle (dB)93.8
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)83.8
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)3,300
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsOnly required 3,500 rpm to get optimal launch with some wheelspin and no bog. Tach is analog and a little slow. Shifter has long-ish throws but well-defined close gates. Gear spacing seems about right and it stays on the cam through each upshift. Also, loud and dusty! (No side windows.)
    Braking commentsUnlike the Mazda 2, this ABS system wasn't as freaked out by the grippy tires, but it still didn't feel right. Also, the pedal wasn't as informative so it was difficult to stay out of the ABS -- not sure if I ever managed to. Zero fade, always straight, a little dive.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: Good compliance that soaked up irregularities without altering course. Steering didn't load up much but I could "steer" mostly with the throttle. Very neutral -- couldn't even make it rotate by jumping off the throttle. Slalom: Friction-free steering and awesome turn-in with inch-perfect precision. Still not much feel through the steering wheel, but a very good setup. I could use lift throttle to rotate the car, then go back on throttle around each cone. Hit limiter in 3rd gear at exit, so used 4th for the best runs. Again, the compliance in the suspension helped maintain good grip and control.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date1/19/2011
    Test locationCalifornia Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)70.6
    Relative humidity (%)38.9
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)28.74
    Wind (mph, direction)5.0 headwind
    Fuel Consumption
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)10.6
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)2,489
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)2,342
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)64/36
    Length (in.)161.6
    Width (in.)66.7
    Height (in.)60.0
    Wheelbase (in.)98.4
    Seating capacity1
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement