INSIDE LINE

Full Test: 2009 Lincoln MKS AWD

Media Player

  • 2009 Lincoln MKS AWD Road Test Video

    Watch the 2009 Lincoln MKS AWD Road Test Video on Edmunds' inside Line | September 25, 2009

1 Video , 14 Photos | See more photos in this gallery »

Road Test

Full Test: 2009 Lincoln MKS AWD

Lincoln Concedes to Cadillac, and Just About Everyone Else

    0 Ratings
    Lincoln versus Cadillac. It's one of the oldest rivalries in the car business and it's all but dead. The 2009 Lincoln MKS proves it.

    Sure, the MKS is about the same price as a Cadillac CTS, but, well, that's where the similarities end. The CTS can legitimately claim various BMWs as rivals. The MKS? It's a luxury sedan and never a sport sedan, not even a little bit.

    Which is fine. Dull can be good. Dull can work. Lexus has been doing dull for years. In fact, the Lexus ES 350, a close competitor to the MKS, is the brand's best-selling model.

    So in an odd historical turn, the MKS could be thought of as Lincoln's attempt to build a better Lexus, except that it's no Lexus. It's no Acura TL either, or even a Hyundai Genesis.

    No, the Lincoln MKS is just a little bit better than the Mercury Sable, which is a little bit better than the Ford Taurus. And never as good as a Cadillac.

    Too Much Metal
    The issues of the 2009 Lincoln MKS have little to do with the fact that it's still primarily a kind of front-wheel-drive sedan (despite this particular model's all-wheel-drive hardware). Cadillac might have made the switch to rear-wheel drive a long time ago, but the Lexus ES 350 that sells so well is also front-wheel drive, as is the recently redesigned 2009 Acura TL.

    With the MKS, the real issue is too much weight. Our loaded test car with the optional all-wheel-drive system dented the scales at 4,349 pounds. To put this into perspective, the Lexus ES 350 could have a driver and three average-size adult passengers on board and still weigh less than an empty MKS. Even the all-wheel-drive Acura TL, no lightweight itself, is 363 pounds lighter than this Lincoln.

    So much sheet metal is no excuse for limited agility, though. There are plenty of big, overstuffed luxury sedans that mask their weight with well-tuned suspensions. The MKS is not one of them. No, this car feels like a classic Lincoln, softly sprung and under-damped — perfect for smooth, straight highways and not much else. Sure, it'll soak up stray bumps, but hit a few in succession and the MKS feels wobbly and crude. Introduce a corner into the mix and it only gets worse.

    With that in mind, the MKS's modest speed through our slalom test proved no surprise. At 60.8 mph, it was on par with the Lexus ES 350 and slightly slower than the Hyundai Genesis V6. The big 19-inch wheels and 255/45R19 tires that come standard on the all-wheel-drive MKS help, but there is still plenty of body roll and, more important, a general unease with changing direction quickly.

    Since the all-wheel-drive system distributes the power between the front and rear wheels, there's very little tugging at the steering wheel under full power. Then again, there's rarely ever any feedback through the steering wheel. It's limp at highway speeds and yet strangely firm when you're lining up a parking space.

    A Drivetrain Under Strain
    So the 2009 Lincoln MKS is not much of a handler; no news there, really. But the story doesn't get any better when it comes to acceleration and braking. Again, moving all that weight around isn't easy.

    The standard 3.7-liter V6 is essentially a larger version of the 3.5-liter engine used in the Ford Taurus, with which the MKS shares its platform. This V6 is capable of generating 275 horsepower and 276 pound-feet of torque when burning premium fuel, although these numbers drop to 273 hp and 270 lb-ft on regular gas.

    With a tank full of premium, our MKS went from zero to 60 mph in 7.5 seconds (7.2 seconds with a 1-foot rollout like on a drag strip), a respectable time that's about a half-second slower than the Lexus ES 350. The Hyundai Genesis V6 and Cadillac CTS go from zero to 60 mph in 6.3 seconds.

    Those disappointing acceleration numbers are matched by the sound of an engine that's running harder than it wants to. For a modern DOHC V6, this engine sounds strained at high rpm, which of course it is.

    Deceleration Curve
    Getting the MKS back down from speed is another issue. The brake pedal is soft and has a long range of travel, and together these things make the task of getting this 4,349-pound car stopped on its Goodyear Eagle RS-A tires feel even less effective. At the track, it takes 130 feet to stop from 60 mph, an average performance. A Hyundai Genesis V6 will do the task in 117 feet.

    The six-speed automatic transmission is the one notable bright spot in the drivetrain. Its programming is spot-on, delivering quick, sharp shifts right when you expect them. Sure, it will hesitate a little when the gas pedal is slapped down abruptly, but there are few automatics these days that don't. There's a manual shift gate, too, and it's properly oriented so you get downshifts when you push it forward and upshifts when you pull it back, not that you would think it appropriate to do so in this Lincoln luxury car.

    Room to Spare
    A world-class sport sedan the MKS is not. It does, however, provide a long list of features designed to make it as comfortable and luxurious as possible when pointed straight ahead.

    Chief among them is a spacious interior. This is not really a feature in the typical sense, but worth noting given the overall size of the MKS's cabin. Compared to the Lexus ES 350 and Cadillac CTS, the 2009 Lincoln MKS is larger in nearly every interior dimension. That extra inch or two makes a difference, too, as the MKS swallows four adults quite comfortably.

    The seats themselves are wide, flat and covered in top-quality leather. There are heaters at all four seating positions and cooled seats for the driver and front passenger. On a long trip you would ask for nothing more than a little extra toe room in back.

    There's an extra-large trunk with 18.4 cubic feet of capacity as well, but the narrow opening, high liftover and two-tiered floor make it hard to use all the space.

    Who Needs iDrive?
    Lincoln is quite proud of all the audio and communications technology offered in the MKS. With a voice-activated navigation system, THX-certified audio system and Sync connectivity, all the good stuff is on the options list, not to mention rain-sensing wipers, proximity parking sensors and push-button ignition.

    Other than Sync, none of this is really unique, but Lincoln deserves credit for offering so much technology without destroying the continuity of the interior. There's no central control knob, no pop-up anything: just simple controls that you can use at a glance. The navigation screen is especially bright and clear, rivaling anything available from Europe or Japan.

    It would be all the more impressive if the rest of the interior were up to the same standard. But while none of the materials are particularly cheap-looking, they're not going to put Audi to shame, either. The gauges are particularly bland and most of the switchgear is just average. Build quality is generally good, although the handle on the door creaked every time we pulled it shut (not the best way to start each drive, we're sure you will agree).

    Big Bottom Line
    None of the Lincoln's shortcomings would be so glaring if it undercut its competitors on price. That's hardly the case, though, as the 2009 Lincoln MKS starts at $37,665 for the front-wheel-drive model and $39,555 for the all-wheel-drive model. Our test car with the Ultimate package topped out at $46,070.

    A loaded Lexus ES 350 tops out around $44K and it handles better, has a more elegant interior and is a far more prestigious nameplate. The new Acura TL, which has been stretched to roughly match the size of the MKS, is expected to top out at $42K with all-wheel drive, a 305-hp V6 and a similar list of features. Then there's the new Hyundai Genesis V6. It matches the MKS for interior room, pummels the Lincoln in every performance category and would only run you $40K fully loaded.

    Then again, if you must buy American, there's the Cadillac CTS. It'll cost you about the same as the 2009 Lincoln MKS, but it drives better in every way and has a distinctive style inside and out that's memorable if not always pretty.

    If Lincoln wants to keep the rivalry going with Cadillac, it's going to have to try harder than the MKS.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Featured Specs

    • 275-hp 3.7-liter V6
    • All-wheel drive
    • 19-inch wheels and tires
    • Sync music interface

    What Works

    Clean interior design; intuitive climate and radio controls; quick shifting six-speed automatic; quiet interior at highway speeds; generous hip- and shoulder room.

    What Needs Work

    Suspension struggles to cope with substantial weight; steering effort varies erratically; engine doesn't sound like it belongs in a $40K car.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    MakeLincoln
    ModelMKS
    Model year2009
    Style4dr Sedan AWD (3.7L 6cyl 6A)
    Base MSRP$40,355
    As-tested MSRP$46,070
    Options on test vehicleUltimate Package -- includes rain-sensing wipers, dual-panel moonroof, adaptive headlamps with auto high beam, Forward Sensing System, voice-activated nav system, Technology Package, intelligent access push-button start, rear window power sunshade, Navigation Package, rearview camera, THX-II sound system with 5.1 Surround, 19-inch premium paint cast aluminum wheels
    Drive typeAll-wheel drive
    Transmission type6-speed automatic
    Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)First: 4.48:1; Second: 2.87:1; Third: 1.84:1; Fourth:1.41:1; Fifth:1.00:1; Sixth: 0.74:1; Reverse: 2.882
    Engine typeV6
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)3.7-liter/227.4
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDouble overhead camshaft
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.3
    Redline (rpm)6,500
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)270 @ 6,250
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)265 @ 4,250
    Brakes, frontVentilated disc
    Brakes, rearVentilated disc
    Steering typePower steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)17:01
    Suspension, frontMacPherson strut
    Suspension, rearMultilink
    Tire size, frontP255/45R19
    Tire size, rearP255/45R19
    Tire brandGoodyear
    Tire modelEagle RS-A
    Tire typeAll season
    Wheel size19-by-8 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialPainted alloy
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)4,276
    Curb weight, as-tested (lbs.)4,349
    Weight distribution, F/R (%)59/41
    Fuel typePremium unleaded (recommended)
    Fuel tank capacity (gal)19.0
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)17 city/23 highway
    Conditions for Testing
    Temperature (°F)86.0
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Wind (mph, direction)5.4
    Performance
    0 - 30 (sec.)2.7
    0 - 45 (sec.)4.7
    0 - 60 (sec.)7.5
    0 - 75 (sec.)10.9
    1/4 mile (sec. @ mph)15.4 @ 90.0
    0-60 with 1-ft rollout (sec.)7.2
    30 - 0 (ft.)31
    60 - 0 (ft.)130
    Braking ratingAverage
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft (mph)60.8
    Skid pad, 200 ft diameter (lateral g)0.75
    Handling ratingAverage
    Sound level @ idle (db)44.0
    Sound level @ full throttle (db)74.5
    Sound level @ 70 mph cruise (db)64.6
    Acceleration commentsAdequate low-rpm power. Shifts come 500 rpm before redline. Manual shift gate goes the right way (upshift = back, downshift = forward). Best run with brake torque to 1,500 rpm.
    Braking commentsLong, soft brake pedal could be more confident. Strangely erratic stopping distances. Still, at 130 feet it's not bad for a car this size.
    Handling commentsDon't be in a big hurry and the MKS does respectably well. Manageable understeer around skid pad. Soft with little roll stiffness as expected. Still, fairly easy to drive through the cones. Well-mannered enough to suit its target audience.
    Specifications
    Length (in.)204.1
    Width (in.)75.9
    Height (in.)61.6
    Wheelbase (in.)112.9
    Front Track (in.)65.0
    Rear Track (in.)65.4
    Turning circle (ft)39.7
    Legroom, front (in.)41.9
    Legroom, rear (in.)38.6
    Headroom, front (in.)39.7
    Headroom, rear (in.)38.6
    Shoulder room, front (in.)58.6
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)57.4
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)18.4
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)18.4
    Warranty Information
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain6 years/70,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance6 years/70,000 miles
    Scheduled maintenanceNot available
    Safety Information
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard dual front
    Head airbagsStandard front and rear
    Knee airbagsNot available
    Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsBraking assist, electronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    Rollover protectionStandard
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemTire-pressure monitoring
    Emergency assistance systemNot available
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement