- Consumer Reports issued a "Don't Buy" warning for the 2010 Lexus GX 460.
- Toyota issued a statement saying it will duplicate the CR test to determine if steps need to be taken.
- IL's recent GX 460 performance test did not exhibit the same issues as CR's test.
YONKERS, New York — The 2010 Lexus GX 460 was slapped with a "Don't Buy" warning from Consumer Reports on Tuesday after the SUV experienced a problem during routine handling tests that could lead to a rollover. It marked the first time in nearly nine years that the consumer watchdog has issued such a rare warning for a vehicle and was yet another blow to Toyota, which has been battered by the fallout from its massive recalls.
"We're concerned with the results of Consumer Reports testing on the Lexus GX 460 and their suggested buyer recommendation," said Toyota in a statement. "Our engineers conduct similar tests and we feel these procedures provide a good indication of how our vehicles will perform in the real world.
"However, we will try to duplicate the Consumer Reports test to determine if appropriate steps need to be taken."
Consumer Reports issued a lengthy warning and video about the GX 460, saying that "when pushed to its limits on our track's handling course, the rear of the GX we bought slid out until the vehicle was almost sideways before the electronic stability control system was able to regain control.
"We believe that in real-world driving, that situation could lead to a rollover accident, which could cause serious injury or death. We are not aware, however, of any such reports."
Consumer Reports said it paid for the use of another GX 460 from Lexus and "experienced the same problem."
In March, Inside Line completed a full road test of the 2010 Lexus GX 460 including instrumented performance testing. IL Director of Vehicle Testing Dan Edmunds notes: "We didn't experience anything like that — we saw early and aggressive electronic stability control (ESC) intervention in our tests. But our tests are different. Our slalom test features quick direction changes, such as those you might see in an avoidance maneuver."
Edmunds continues: "Is this CR test realistic? That looks a very fast — a deliberate high-speed approach to a corner that's more akin to high-performance track driving than driving a few miles per hour over the speed limit on public roads. And it looks like no brakes were used by the driver at all (no brake lights). I'm not sure how realistic that situation is in the context of a luxury SUV.
"That said, I would have expected stability control intervention in that situation. But I also would expect a driver to apply the brakes if he or she were surprised by the tightness of an unfamiliar corner, too."
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the government watchdog responsible for crash-testing vehicles, has not yet tested the 2010 Lexus GX 460 or rated its chance for a rollover.
The 2001 Mitsubishi Montero Limited was the last vehicle that was given such a dismal rating by Consumer Reports. "The designation is rare for Consumer Reports," it said in a statement, noting that the Montero was judged "not acceptable" in the August 2001 issue.
Consumer Reports said among the 95 SUVs in its current ratings, no other slid as far as the GX 460 in testing.
Inside Line says: CR has issued its warning, but it's unlikely we've heard the last of this issue. — Anita Lienert, Correspondent

Add A Comment »
itm1221 says:
02:43 PM, 01/19/2011
i put the wrong link and info on here oops..
tbone85 says:
05:09 PM, 04/14/2010
So, who but a fanboy would attack the Chevy Volt to deflect attention from the issue raised about Toytota rather than address the topic at hand? GM did not force CR to do this test. How often did you attack the integrity of CR or any other car magazine when they were writing complimentary things about Toyota? Why are they more credible when they write complimentary things about Toyota than when they write negative things?
daskiing1 says:
12:08 PM, 04/14/2010
That looks like a completely ridiculous and over-exaggerated test. No Lexus GX driver in their right mind would ever approach an off-ramp at those types of speeds. But this seems to be par for the course for CR really. CR = fun police.
prodrive says:
05:40 AM, 04/14/2010
It Looks fine to me too, A small to med amount of over steer is always far better & safer then 20+ Tons of unwanted no control Under steer...
How does anyone come up with a "DO NOT Buy" from this is craze ??
cacressida says:
04:12 AM, 04/14/2010
They should've gassed it through that turn and did a four wheel drift!
efinils2 says:
12:24 AM, 04/14/2010
Hmmm, this Lexus could start a whole new sport, SUV drifting!
s73pak says:
12:22 AM, 04/14/2010
It will be fair if there are video footages of other SUVs going through the same test.
It gives good comparison of what CR's expectation of stability control functioning.
ant14 says:
09:10 PM, 04/13/2010
I do know the stability control systems of Toyotas kick in early which is why this is odd, but not surprising. Also saw a report that in Japan 200,000 vehicles including Camrys are getting recalled for crackin weather stripping that is allowing something in the structure coroding, wonder how long before it happens here... Toyota is moving forward alright....
kosmo69 says:
06:35 PM, 04/13/2010
CR should just stick to rating household appliances.
jeremy_c says:
06:15 PM, 04/13/2010
It appears that slamming Toyota/Lexus nowadays is considered "chic"!
A obligatory rite of passage by car mags. Glad that Edmunds didn't jump on the bandwagon.
Just wait until Chevy Volt batteries start to explode when rear ended a la Pinto. Then we see how impartial these journalists are with domestic vehicles.