INSIDE LINE

2011 Lexus CT 200h Full Test and Video

Media Player

  • 2011 Lexus CT 200h Full Test

    The 2011 Lexus CT 200h is more than just a Euro'ed-up Prius, but it's still a hypermiler, not a sport sedan. Inside Line's James Riswick has the details. | February 14, 2011

1 Video , 28 Photos | See more photos in this gallery »

Road Test

2011 Lexus CT 200h Full Test and Video

Trying To Break the Hybrid Stereotype

    49 Ratings

    We're always looking for an emotional connection with a car, but a hybrid just never hugs us back. What are we meant to do, hug a tree or two as we congratulate ourselves on singlehandedly saving the earth?

    But what if there was a hybrid that the rest of us actually cared to drive, yet still rated a combined 42 mpg?

    The 2011 Lexus CT 200h is supposed to be just such a machine, a hybrid that offers (so its promotional material promises) "superior handling and a dynamic driving experience."

    Prius Power
    The basis for the 2011 Lexus CT 200h is a version of the Toyota MC platform, which underpins the Corolla, Matrix and Prius, as well as the Lexus HS 250h and Scion XB. The CT 200h is more than a Prius with a fancy-pants body, though, as it has independent rear suspension (the Prius makes do with a torsion beam), and the chassis has been tuned differently, including a unique steering calibration.

    A stronger Prius connection is apparent in the CT's drivetrain. Like Toyota's compact hybrid, this Lexus has a 1.8-liter Atkinson-cycle inline-4 that puts out 98 horsepower and 105 pound-feet of torque, and it has been combined with an 80-hp (60-kilowatt) electric motor than churns out peak torque of 152 lb-ft.

    The electric motor gets its juice from a 27 kW/36-hp nickel-metal hydride battery pack located beneath the load floor. The blended output of 134 hp (yes, identical to the Prius, but tuned with Lexus-specific software) powers the front wheels via a continuously variable transmission (CVT).

    Less Giddyup
    For all this, the Lexus CT 200h doesn't exactly set your hair on fire under acceleration. Despite our best efforts — including power braking and running with Drive Mode Select switched to Sport — the CT just won't meander to 60 mph from a standstill any quicker than 10.4 seconds (10.0 seconds with a 1-foot rollout as on a drag strip).

    This means the Lexus CT is 0.3 second slower to 60 mph than that bastion of boring, the Toyota Prius. Maybe it's not surprising when you consider the CT weighs 3,240 pounds, some 198 pounds more than the Prius (due to luxury equipment or extra lard, depending on your viewpoint). The CT 200h does the quarter-mile in 17.6 seconds at 78.8 mph.

    Welcome to the Real World
    Away from the test track the CT doesn't feel like the slug that the numbers suggest. Once away from a stop, the CVT holds engine revs to about 4,500 rpm, so there's enough oomph to accelerate up highway on-ramps without getting squashed by semis as you merge. It even feels plentiful in the critical range between zero mph and 60 mph, although prodding the right pedal once you're above 70 mph yields little in return.

    Which means the Lexus CT is 0.3 second slower than that bastion of boring, the Toyota Prius.

    Of course there's the typical motorboating at high rpm that you get from a CVT any time you call down to the engine/motor room for more power. Around town, though, the CT performs effortlessly, and the transition as the CT goes from engine off at stoplights to engine ignition and engagement is seamless, as is the transition from low-speed all-electric power to engine power.

    Quiet, all-electric power is what makes driving the CT so different from a conventional car, but good luck making practical use of this vehicle's EV mode. It's theoretically available at speeds up to 28 mph and for up to 1 mile, but if you press on the throttle pedal at any more than a level that might crush an eggshell, the engine comes to life. If you want to sneak up on people, you're going to have to buy a Chevrolet Volt or Nissan Leaf instead.

    Got Handling?
    When you hop into the CT 200h's low-slung seat, it's immediately apparent that this is no Prius. First of all, it does offer different driving modes, and when you engage Sport, the throttle response quickens, the steering effort increases and the stability control intervenes less intrusively, plus the instruments turn from Hybrid Blue to Angry Red. The increased effort level of the electric-assist steering is noticeable, and the feel is syrupy.

    To its credit the CT 200h feels tossable as we start to weave around the cones of our slalom test, but then the nondefeat stability system hits the brakes just as you're getting the fun going. Nevertheless, the CT's effort of 63.2 mph is reasonably quick, demolishing the Prius (59.1 mph), besting the HS 250h (62.9 mph) and approaching the Honda CR-Z (64.1 mph).

    The CT's skid pad number of 0.86g is on par with competitors such as the Audi A3 (0.86g) and Volvo C30 (0.85g), and also gives a hint of what this car might be capable of if only the stability control nanny wasn't so overbearing.

    The CT rides on the firm side for a Lexus, and it seems incapable of soaking up sharp bumps with the resiliency for which other Lexus sedans are famous. Yet on most roads it delivers a smooth, well-damped ride, while the cabin is nearly silent and free of wind and road noise.

    Up That Winding Road
    Because the 2011 Lexus CT 200h is meant to be a sporty hybrid, we felt it only prudent to see how it would perform on a mountain road. Turns out, a 3,240-pound hybrid with 59 percent of its weight resting on the front tires doesn't provide for an overly joyous experience. It's more fun than, say, walking, but there's nothing about it that resembles any sport-oriented car you can think of.

    The combination of meager power, near-zero engine braking, weak brakes and a lack of steering feel means this car responds far from adroitly when you throw it into a corner. It doesn't do anything horribly wrong, but the lack of feedback from the powertrain, the chassis and the controls means you're just not 100 percent sure what the car is doing.

    Cornering grip from the P215/45R17 Michelin Primacy MXM4 all-season tires is actually quite good, and the stability system proves nowhere near as intrusive as it is at the test track.

    A Lexus Inside
    With a starting price of $29,995 (including destination), the 2011 Lexus CT 200h will be the cheapest Lexus on the lot when it goes on sale this March. But you wouldn't know it from the interior.

    With soft-touch materials and a first-rate set of comfortable yet supportive sport seats, the CT's cabin is a nice place to spend time. The small-diameter, thick-rimmed leather-wrapped steering wheel is also a tactile delight. And tech geeks will get a kick out of the computer-mouselike controller for the navigation system ($2,445), complete with an ergonomic wrist rest.

    Despite the cabin's sloping roof line, there's plenty of head- and legroom for rear-seat passengers, although small rear doors hamper ingress/egress. Luggage room is adequate at 14.3 cubic feet, which turns into a truly spacious amount as you fold the rear seats flat.

    Sportier Hybrid, Not Sport Hybrid
    So the 2011 Lexus CT 200h's performance numbers don't make it the first coming of a truly sporting hybrid, after all. Driving enthusiasts will have to wait for something better.

    But if you're looking for terrific fuel mileage — we averaged 39.8 mpg over 612 miles — in a Euro-esque hatchback with a whole lot less dork factor than a typical hybrid, this could be your car, especially since it lives up to Lexus standards of luxury and quality. Just don't expect to get emotionally attached.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Sort By:

    anythngbutgm says:

    03:57 AM, 11/07/2011

    Give it AWD and I'd buy one to replace my Subaru

    hooklyn says:

    11:05 AM, 11/03/2011

    I've been a CT200h a few times and I think the interior sucks...

    The A3 TDI is the easy winner here for me.
    - MUCH Faster
    - Similar mileage
    - Better looking exterior
    - Higher quality interior

    I think the CT200h is worse then an A3 TDI in literally every way actually.

    anvitasilva says:

    10:51 PM, 09/22/2011

    http://www.gov-auctions.org

    anvitasilva says:

    10:50 PM, 09/22/2011

    car auctions

    bmac023 says:

    12:35 PM, 04/24/2011

    Additional engine options are definitely needed and or more models (non-hybrid). I guess lexus is planning on milking this model for the next 10 years like their other models, lol. Maybe we will see a direct/forced injection engine option in 2020.  Also, lexus ads display the vehicle with the f sport options and even acknowledge the additional equipment in their super small legal txt. When I went to my dealer they didn't even know what I was talking about. I had to educate them!!!  

    losfelizrider says:

    01:05 PM, 03/14/2011

    Unlike a lot of commenters, I actually own a hybrid car - two, in fact. My wife drives a '04 Prius and I drive a '07 Lexus RX400h. We bought them new, and have 110,000 real-world miles between the two cars.  (We live in Los Angeles.) The number of uninformed comments about hybrid cars always amazes me, in addition to commenters extolling diesel VWs or '84 Honda Civics.

    Here's what I know from owning our Prius and our Lexus hybrids:

    - In gridlock and bumper-to-bumper traffic, the hybrids *destroy* conventional gas or diesel engine fuel economy. That MINI Cooper stop-and-go'ing for 45 minutes on the I-10? I'm getting 35 MPG in my [nicely appointed] RX400h and that car is lucky to be over 22 MPG. In our Prius? We're getting 50 MPG.

    - It's not only about what you pay at the pump. Hybrids are also about polluting less, and, again, there is no gas or diesel car available that pollutes less. It'd take you two weeks to kill yourself by running one of our cars in a closed garage. Older conventional cars pollute, badly.

    - The world is noisy. I love how quiet our cars are.

    - The world is unpredictable and dangerous. The Lexus is safe. That '84 Civic getting good MPG? Good luck when it's T-boned at 50 MPH.

    - The Prius is a technological wonder (really) but it also feels slow and cheap. The Lexus is the same wonder but feels expensive and fast (and it is; 0-60 MPH in 7.5 secs and $50k before tax).

    The sweet spot I've been waiting for would be the fuel economy of the Prius with the power and luxury of the Lexus. From what I've read, the CT 200h misses that mark but is aiming for the right bulls-eye. The MSRP is terrific.

    Maybe the next hybrid will hit that sweet spot. (Maybe the Porsche Panamera hybrid!)

    mardani977 says:

    01:40 PM, 03/02/2011

    Am I the only one who thinks this new Lexus, Hybrid looks as much like the Toyota Matrix as the other Lexus Hybrid looks like the Toyota Corolla? For the price difference between the Lexus Hybrid Matrix and the Toyota non-hybrid Matrix, I can afford the extra gas used.

    thkim says:

    12:20 PM, 02/27/2011

    I drive a 2010 Prius now... I drove the CT200h and it is a HUGE difference.  Where as the Prius feels tinny and light, the CT feels strong and tight.  It is quieter, feels sporty, the TACH to Hybrid Energy indicator is very very cool.  

    Drive one and you will like it... 0-60 times arent important when you have enough power to do everything you need to do.  This car handles amazingly...

    Give it a chance and you will be rewarded with 40-42 mpg/avg

    jpdisarro says:

    03:59 PM, 02/24/2011

    "Lets not forget Toyota's introduction of the Mirano convertible a few months ago--it was amazing to see how many people were remineded of the Pointic Aztec... "

    When did Toyota start building this so-called "Mirano"?

    asdfkj says:

    10:38 AM, 02/21/2011

    I'd actually buy one, but 134hp!? What was wrong with the 187hp engine from the HS250? At least offer a second engine as an option, this car has less horsepower than a Civic.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2011 Lexus CT 200h

    Base Price:

    $29,995

    Price as Tested:

    $33,565

    Engine:

    1.8-liter inline-4 + 27kW battery pack

    Gearbox:

    Continuously variable transmission

    Power:

    134 hp @ 5,200 rpm

    0-60 mph:

    10.4 seconds

    Fuel Mileage:

    43 city/40 highway/42 combined

    What Works:

    Excellent fuel economy; premium interior; Euro-chic styling; better-than-Prius handling.

    What Needs Work:

    Slower than a Prius(!); syrupy electric steering; portly curb weight.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2011 Lexus CT 200h 4dr Hatchback (1.8L 4cyl gas/electric hybrid CVT)
    Vehicle TypeFWD 4dr 5-passenger Hatchback
    Base MSRP$29,995
    Options on test vehicleHDD Navigation ($2,445 -- includes Remote Touch controller and rearview monitor); Premium Audio Package ($1,125).
    As-tested MSRP$33,565
    Assembly locationFukuoka, Japan
    North American parts content (%)Not available
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front-engine combined with electric motor, front-wheel drive
    Engine typeNaturally aspirated, port-injected, inline-4, Atkinson cycle, gasoline with auto-stop/start
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1,798/110
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder, variable intake-valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)13.0:1
    Redline, indicated (rpm)5,400
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)98 @ 5,200 (gasoline engine); 36 hp (battery pack)
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)105 @ 4,000 (gasoline engine)
    Fuel type87-octane recommended
    Hybrid typeSeries-parallel
    Electric motor rating (kW)60
    Combined horsepower (hp @ rpm)134
    System voltage650
    Battery typeNickel-metal hydride
    Battery voltage201.6
    Battery capacity, rated (kW-hr)1.31
    Transmission typePlanetary-type continuously variable
    Transmission ratios (x:1)Final-drive ratio: 3.267
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)3.267
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent MacPherson struts, coil springs, monotube dampers, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent double-wishbone, coil springs, monotube dampers, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeElectric-assist, rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)14.6
    Turning circle (ft.)34.2
    Tire make and modelMichelin Primacy MXM4 Green X
    Tire typeAll-season
    Tire sizeP215/45R17 87V
    Wheel size17-by-7 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialAluminum alloy
    Brakes, front10-inch ventilated discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rear11-inch solid discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Track Test Results
    0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.)3.7
    0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.)6.5
    0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.)10.4
    0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)10.0
    0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.)16.0
    1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph)17.6 @ 78.8
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)30
    60-0 mph (ft.)120
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON63.2
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON0.86
    Sound level @ idle (dB)37.7
    @ Full throttle (dB)70.8
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)64.5
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)2,100
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsQuite Prius-like in accelerative progress. Wonder why? Kidding. Quick as a snail off the line, with not even a hint of front wheelspin. With CVT, just barely reaches 5,300 rpm by the end of the quarter-mile. All five runs were within 0.06 second through the quarter, and it didn't matter whether in Eco, Normal or Sport modes, or power braking or not. Battery power remained at 1-2 bars down from a full charge throughout acceleration testing.
    Braking commentsInitial dead pedal feel, giving way to some firmness toward the end of the stroke. Occasional bit of rear lockup, causing a minor amount of tail-wagging. Stopping distances were utterly consistent (the fifth stop within a foot of the first), and although pedal feel was vague, it never worsened.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: Non-defeat ESC was not a big problem here, only cutting power intermittently. The CT's attitude could be noticeably altered with changes in throttle openings via the driver's right foot or the computer. Slalom: Despite its firmer than HS 250h and Prius damping, the CT still exhibits plenty of body roll. Electric-assist steering has decent weighting in Sport mode, but lacks real feel. Our guess is the CT has more dynamic abilities than its 63.2-mph slalom time would indicate, but the nondefeat stability system intervenes far before it can strut whatever sport-hybrid stuff it might have.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date1/5/2011
    Test locationCalifornia Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)50.8
    Relative humidity (%)46.1
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)29.1
    Wind (mph, direction)1.4, head/crosswind
    Odometer (mi.)4,206
    Fuel used for test91-octane gasoline
    As-tested tire pressures, f/r (psi)33/32
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)43 city/40 highway/42 combined
    Edmunds observed (mpg)39.8
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)9.9
    Driving range (mi.)396
    Audio and Advanced Technology
    Stereo descriptionLexus Premium Audio system with AM/FM/XM/6-disc in-dash CD with 10 speakers.
    iPod/digital media compatibilityStandard iPod via USB jack
    Satellite radioStandard XM with 90-day trial subscription
    Hard-drive music storage capacity (Gb)Not available
    Rear seat video and entertainmentNot available
    Bluetooth phone connectivityStandard
    Navigation systemOptional hard drive with 8.0-inch display screen
    Telematics (OnStar, etc.)Optional, 12 month trial subscription
    Smart entry/StartStandard ignition doors trunk/hatch
    Parking aidsOptional back-up camera
    Blind-spot detectionNot available
    Adaptive cruise controlOptional
    Lane-departure monitoringNot available
    Collision warning/avoidanceOptional
    Night VisionNot available
    Driver coaching displayStandard
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,130
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)3,240
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)59/41
    Length (in.)170.1
    Width (in.)69.5
    Height (in.)56.7
    Wheelbase (in.)102.4
    Track, front (in.)60.0
    Track, rear (in.)59.8
    Legroom, front (in.)41.5
    Legroom, rear (in.)32.9
    Headroom, front (in.)37.8
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.0
    Shoulder room, front (in.)53.9
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)52.6
    Seating capacity5
    Step-in height, measured (in.)13.8
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)14.3
    Cargo loading height, measured (in.)27.3
    GVWR (lbs.)4,065
    Ground clearance (in.)5.7
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain6 years/70,000 miles
    Corrosion6 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance4 years/Unlimited miles
    Free scheduled maintenance2 years/Unlimited miles
    Hybrid/battery8 years/100,000 miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement