On May 26, Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) announced profits of $1.71 billion on sales of $16.3 billion for its fiscal year. This closely followed a successful $1.6-billion bond sale and even forced Ford chairman Bill Ford to deny that the $2.3-billion sale of the company to Tata in 2008 had been a mistake.
It's a remarkable turnaround for a company once derided as a millstone around Ford's neck. And while Land Rover remains the dominant partner — it sold 182,000 units in 2010 to Jaguar's 51,000 — Jaguar is playing a key role in JLR's renaissance. Through May, U.S. sales are up this year totalling 5,021 units.
The figures are still comparatively tiny — Mercedes has sold 75,132 units through April — but it's worth remembering that Audi was selling just 12,000 cars a year here in the early '90s, compared with 100K today. With a bold, new design language pioneered by Ian Callum, significant investment from parent company Tata and an impressive new management team, Jaguar could be on the verge of an unprecedented period of success.
The Raw Stats
In 2010, Jaguar's global sales fell by 400 compared with 2009, but this belied a more profitable model mix. The 2009 figures were bolstered by the unloved X-Type, whereas the 2010 stats reflect the launch of the new XJ, which boasts a much higher profit margin. In the U.S., for example, the XJ accounts for 40 percent of Jaguars sold.
Jaguar is also enjoying success in developing markets: Chinese sales were up 47 percent last year and Indian sales grew 437 percent (from a very low base), helped by the local knowledge of parent company Tata. Sales of the XF rose 8 percent globally and it, like the XK, should be further boosted by the arrival of a face-lifted model later this year.
The Success
There are two key drivers for Jaguar's success — improved quality and a new generation of desirable, forward-thinking cars. Design Director Ian Callum's overhaul of Jaguar's style is regarded as a key factor in the sales growth. The Scot was heavily involved in the recent bond sale, regaling investors with his "confidence and understanding of Jaguar's future."
When Callum arrived at Jaguar in 1999, the company was owned by Ford and in the process of launching the X-Type and XJ, both of which offered a pastiche of 1960s Jaguar styling. "Clearly there was an issue to address," says Callum in his thick brogue. "Sales were flagging and we were not attracting younger buyers. The X-Type marketing spoke of a 'new generation' but that wasn't reflected in the design. The management knew Jaguar had to change, but to what? I had the loudest voice and an absolute view as to what had to happen. It wasn't a high-risk strategy — doing nothing would have been a much higher risk." Jaguar's core customer base had shrunk to such a low level that there was little danger in causing offense.
It is a function of a Jaguar to look beautiful. People must want to have a Jag.
Although the 2007 XK was a Callum design, the 2009 XF and the 2011 XJ are the true standard bearers for Jaguar's new design language. While Callum talks of being inspired by the company's heritage, the cars marked a dramatic break with the past. "It is my ambition to make Jaguar a design-led company," he says. "It is a function of a Jaguar to look beautiful, to be stylish but not vulgar, and to have intellectual value. People must want to have a Jag."
While Callum was revolutionizing the design strategy, Jaguar's much derided quality standards were taking a leap forward, a process that began under Ford's stewardship. Chairman Bill Ford recently claimed Ford had taken Jaguar's quality "from the worst in class to the best in class." In the 2011 JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study, Jaguar ranked 3rd, while the 2011 Customer Service Index study ranked Jaguar 2nd among luxury brands.
The Investment
Tata Motors CEO Carl-Peter Forster told Inside Line that Jaguar has now "completed Phase One — two difficult years," and that now is the time to "invest and expand."
Forster, who was previously the CEO of General Motors Europe, has committed to investing over $8B in JLR over the next five years for improvements to the three U.K. plants, a proposed new production facility in China and "40 significant product developments." A thousand more engineers will be employed in Gaydon, England, to work on new models.
Jaguar brand director Adrian Hallmark says the company needs to "expand its product footprint. In the U.S., 70 percent of the XF market is four-wheel drive, which we don't offer. And in Europe, the absence of an XF estate and a 2.0-liter diesel engine means we've been giving away free volume. The XF hasn't realized its full potential because we can't reach some customers' needs." Jaguar will thus embark on a "top-down approach, rather than the bottom-up approach adopted by Audi." New models will slide underneath the current range, boosting volumes and helping Jaguar appeal to a younger audience.
Ambitious Product Strategy
The new 2.2-liter diesel XF, introduced alongside the face-lifted range, should boost European sales and marks the start of an aggressive product strategy. Within five years there will be a small sport saloon to take on the BMW 3 Series. "Just because we didn't hit the bulls-eye last time [with the X-Type] doesn't mean we should give up," says Hallmark. The new "small" car is likely to be similar in size to the current XF, which will be replaced by a larger, second-generation model to compete with the upsized BMW 5 Series and Mercedes E-Class.
An XF estate and a smaller sports car to sit below the XK and take on the Porsche Boxster/Cayman will also be joined by a new crossover, utilizing Land Rover technology. Such a model is seen as crucial to expanding Jaguar's appeal in the U.S. and the developing world. Callum admits, "It will not be easy to take the design language forward to a crossover, but I know [Jaguar founder] Sir William Lyons would have been pragmatic enough to deliver what China and the U.S. wants."
There will also be a new naming strategy. Hallmark admits that the current XF, XJ and XK nomenclatures are proving difficult to communicate in countries unfamiliar with the Jaguar brand.
The Challenge Ahead
One of Jaguar and Land Rover's biggest challenges will be to sustain this rapid pace of development while remaining, in global terms, a small player. JLR is developing hybrid and range-extender concepts, but the company's ability to develop new platforms and keep up with technical change is likely to remain its biggest challenge in the coming years.
Hallmark recognizes the problem and refuses to rule out strategic collaborations with other like-minded brands, citing BMW as an example. "Such collaborations make sense. The market today is totally different to what it was 20 years ago." They could prove critical to the development and supply of new engine technologies, for example. The genesis of the C-X75 supercar, in partnership with the Williams grand prix team, will provide an interesting test of this strategy.
Any discussion of Jaguar's future must also include the £700K, 200-mph C-X75. The range-extender hybrid-powered supercar, which Jag just announced will go into limited production, has been criticized as representing a vanity project at a time when Jaguar really needs more mainstream cars, but Callum sees it as "a clear message of ambition and an attempt to get 15-year-olds talking about Jaguars." Forster maintains the C-X75 is an "important motivator for the company" and that Jaguar can scale up to meet its challenges. "It is a research tool," he says, "and a source of inspiration. We want to inspire and be at the cutting edge."
The Future
The new models could see Jaguar's sales volumes top 100,000 units within the next five years, although this is still small fry compared with the 230K cars that BMW and Mercedes sell each year in the U.S. alone.
"We will not compete with BMW and Mercedes' volume models," says Hallmark.
"We need a credible volume and more than today, but we have no need or desire to sell a million cars a year. We don't need volume, we need profit." He cites Porsche as an example of a highly profitable premium brand selling less than 100K cars a year. Jaguar, though, lacks the support of the Volkswagen empire now supporting Porsche and there's no denying that keeping up with future technological developments will be a challenge for JLR.
But there can also be no denying that Jaguar is in a stronger position today than it has been since the days of its Le Mans victories and the E-Type. It has momentum, desirable products, solid foundations for growth and a brand that, for all the ups and downs, continues to inspire genuine affection.
Jaguar has come back from the abyss, and the legendary marque is poised to develop into a potent, alternative premium brand. It will no doubt be one of the most exciting brands to watch over the next decade.

Add A Comment »
ramon1 says:
10:37 AM, 06/07/2011
Kingon,
I think you English need learn how to write.
kjgood says:
09:06 AM, 06/07/2011
"It's a remarkable turnaround for a company once derided as a millstone around Ford's neck."
It's also remarkable that Ford was both a quality benefactor for Jag, but a millstone around Jag's neck at the same time. Clearly, Callum was throttled in design direction for some time under Ford ownership, and the corporate (and "quaint") concepts of what a Jaguar should be just didn't click with the market... or give Jag any advantage over competitors. Now that Jaguar sits atop JD Power ratings, and Tata have granted Jaguar breathing room for fresh designs, it's the best outcome the company could have hoped for. The only way the Ford keeping Jag would have benefitted both is if Ford could have permitted that same design freedom and the required capital to Jag, right now in 2011. I don't think either of those would have been in the cards, even though Ford did seem to wise up to the wisdom of what Callum wanted to do in the latter days of its owbership.
kjgood says:
08:51 AM, 06/07/2011
"6sptl says: The new Jaguar, excellent performance (the supercharged XF is amazing) beautiful design, however, little parts fall off the car as you are driving out the dealership. I guess it the same old Jaguar after all. Keep the mechanic on speed dial."
Please elaborate, 6sptl. Is this actual experience from owning a current Jag, or are you just trotting out those old, stale Jaguar cliches? Seems pretty suspicious that JD Power keeps rating Jaguar at the top of customer satisfaction for luxury cars, and the vast majority of user comments here on Edmunds don't agree with your opinion. Just curious about whether your opinion is based on any fact.
pushrod says:
02:46 PM, 06/06/2011
Jaguar was never a fit for Ford, and keeping it would have been a distraction. By getting rid of Jaguar and shutting down Mercury, Ford was able to keep their attention firmly on their main brand, Ford. Ford still has a major problem with Lincoln, and it will continue to flounder while the brand is comprised of tarted-up Fords. But keeping Jaguar made even less sense.
b_h_dork says:
12:46 PM, 06/06/2011
Did Ford sell Jaguar too soon? Maybe. Ford spent a lot of money on platform and product development for the current generation of Jags that are turning a profit. If they had held on, they could have recouped a small part of their investment, and Jag/LR might have been worth more in this market than it was a couple of years ago.
But you missed the biggest challenge ahead for Jaguar - making enough profit to fund the development of the next generation of cars. Making $1.7b profit in one year sounds great but that's somewhere between half and a third of the platform development cost for one new model. It's nowhere near enough to make Jaguar viable over the long term. Just to break even they probably need to make enough to fully fund one next-model development every year. Sharing engine development with other makers will help a little, but this level of profitability is still at least half of where Jag/LR needs to be if it's going to be a viable company.
90in55 says:
09:03 AM, 06/04/2011
Ford had zero respect Jaguar's rich history and pedigree, thus giving the world the turd that was the X-Type.
nto1 says:
08:09 PM, 06/03/2011
still crappy long term
bgsntth says:
02:13 PM, 06/03/2011
I was lucky enough to have a 2011 XJ L for 5 days while my Land Rover was waiting for parts (rubber grommets for the roof rack - cynics!). The interior design, luxury, ride with the active dampers, cornering prowess, and smooth - turbine like power, were all major revelations. The car is an amazing value compared to the German competitors, and has a much "friendlier" demeanor. An XJ, comparably equipped, is very near a 5-series in price. Consider too the size difference, and then look at the weight differences. I would not discount Jaguar until you have sampled their products.
mk40 says:
01:02 PM, 06/03/2011
No, Ford waited to long to reform itself & then did not move quickly enough earlier on and therefore did not have the captiol to invest enough in JLR to complete the job. The looked backwards instead of forwards initially and wasted valuable time/money on J & then found they did not have the customer to generate revenue. From JLR's perspective the sale to Tata was a good thing since now they are investing in JLR and improving efficiency & modernizing plants. Now JLR can really focus. The only way they could have held on would be with a gvt. loan, but the American public has a problem with gvt. intervention & the backlash would have been too costly.
kingon says:
01:00 PM, 06/03/2011
I think BMW have more more blame Ford Motor Company has sold Land Rover, Jaguar, Aston Martin and Volvo to other companies. I think Ford have study and attention green environmental. I think Lincoln have very poor profit. I can tell you about Ford will no more RWD layout for next generation models future. Republican Party people hates Ford Motor Company are liberal, support gay and lesbian and green environment but Republican Party suppose Ford Mustang , Ford F-Series trucks and traditional SUV. I think Mazda has divorcing to Ford soon. I think Tata keep Jaguar and Land Rover are safe brands. I think Ford will become more worthless business near future.