INSIDE LINE

2010 Hyundai Tucson Full Test

Media Player

  • 2010 Hyundai Tucson Picture

    2010 Hyundai Tucson Picture

    With the 2010 model year, the Tucson is now in its second generation. | March 25, 2010

Road Test

2010 Hyundai Tucson Full Test

Making the Grade, Not Raising the Bar

    36 Ratings

    With the introduction of the 2010 Hyundai Tucson, the Korean manufacturer hopes to pull a Ben Kenobi. "The previous-generation Tucson never existed," this new vehicle appears to suggest.

    The first-generation Tucson was a popular, though middle-of-the-road, compact SUV, and even at a dozen paces it is apparent that the 2010 model is an altogether more serious attempt. There are a lot of choices among these tall wagons, though, including newcomers like the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox and 2010 GMC Terrain as well as established players like the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4.

    The Tucson can try to use the Force to grab a bigger share of the market for compact utilities, but it won't be easy.

    Smartly Kitted
    Our 2010 Hyundai Tucson was a base-model GLS, equipped with just two options. The Navigation package commands $3,700 as it bundles nav with a slew of other stuff like 17-inch wheels, a steering wheel that telescopes and is sprinkled with controls, a back-up camera, Bluetooth and re-trimmed upholstery.

    Carpeted floor mats add another hundred bucks for a final tally of $26,090. This pricing puts the Tucson in the mix with its contemporaries, though adding navigation to the competition adds another chunk of change to the bottom line compared to the Tucson.

    Draping an original shape onto the two-box proportions of the modern compact crossover (a.k.a. station wagon) is no simple task, but Hyundai's designers did an admirable job of making the most of the situation. The points and creases at the Tucson's nose add surface tension without looking forced, and the contrasting scallop at the rocker panels discreetly slims the profile's visual bulk. Overall, the look is elegant and assertive without the clunky faux machismo of, say, the GMC Terrain.

    Compact Yet Roomy
    Just because a compact crossover thing resides at the entry-level end of the spectrum doesn't mean it has to cramp your style, or your physique. The front seats offer decent comfort but are fairly broad, and the view outward is quite good. And although the backseat butt cushion is unrelentingly flat, the head- and legroom in the aft row are excellent even for full-grown adults.

    It's not until you really bury the throttle that you realize how little power is in reserve.

    Thankfully, Hyundai didn't fall victim to the temptation of offering an optional third row of seating in the Tucson, which would have compromised the cargo area in those models not thusly equipped. As it is, the 2010 Hyundai Tucson can easily manage the cargo needs of four adults on a road trip. Yes, this is technically a five-passenger SUV, but only in a pinch.

    Matte-silver accents brighten up the attractively trimmed cabin, and the textured, low-gloss plastics wouldn't be out of place on a more expensive vehicle. The Tucson's controls are big and simple and placed where you expect them to be. Hyundai also has been nice enough to include an iPod cable and XM Satellite Radio as standard equipment.

    On the Road
    A tidily sized steering wheel commands a quick, responsive rack, though the steering effort varies noticeably with speed and is not exactly brimming with feel. Still, the steering lends a degree of precision to the driving experience. The leather on the steering wheel, however, isn't especially luxurious, feeling processed to within an inch of vinyl. And while we're picking nits, Hyundai's insistence on lighting its instrumentation in an optically challenging blue hue is something we'll never stop complaining about.

    When it comes to the character of the suspension tuning, the 2010 Hyundai Tucson is closer to the Mitsubishi Outlander's tautness than the smothery ride of the Ford Flex. This might have been a deliberate measure taken by Hyundai's engineers to deal with the Tucson's dearth of suspension travel. The stiff chassis shrugs off the impacts of square-edged craters without protest, but consensus on the Tucson's ride quality eluded our editors. At least the Tucson's tendency toward the firm side of the ride/handling balance harmonizes well with the quickish response from its helm. The result is a smooth-road demeanor that inspires confidence, and that's never a bad thing in an everyday runabout like this one.

    At the Track
    Upon exercising the 2010 Hyundai Tucson to its limits at the track, we found it to be a consistently respectable handler. The Tucson maintains its composure to the tune of 0.74g of grip on the skid pad and 64.5 mph through the slalom. As on the road, it's hard to describe the Tucson as "fun," but neither does it ever get out of sorts.

    Denizens of snow country will appreciate the Tucson's part-time all-wheel-drive system with push-button override. As we've come to expect from today's road-friendly sport-utes, this is not an off-road-biased system with a low-range transfer case. After all, it turns out you don't need a Dakar-worthy four-wheel-drive system to leave the driveway. At the same time, the Tucson's AWD system does weigh something extra, and that isn't helping the Tucson's ability to hustle.

    Though the Tucson's 176-horsepower 2.4-liter inline-4 is reasonably smooth and unobtrusive, it struggles to move this 3,365-pound SUV with any kind of authority. In other words, the Tucson is slow. The 60-mph mark arrives in 9.6 seconds (9.4 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip), and the Tucson covers the quarter-mile in a lazy 17.1 seconds at 81.1 mph. And that's before you load it up with four passengers and all their stuff.

    Pining for More Pep
    In day-to-day use, the 2010 Hyundai Tucson's motivation underfoot is deceptively adequate; it's not until you really bury the throttle pedal that you realize how little power is in reserve. Fortunately the six-speed autobox is smooth and cooperative, serving up downshifts promptly. Perhaps at some point in the future Hyundai will wise up and swap in the torquier direct-injected 2.4-liter four from the Sonata. In the meantime we're sure Hyundai would be quick to point out that its other crossover, the Santa Fe, offers a V6.

    The usual upside to this four-cylinder-only approach, of course, is fuel economy. However, our tester achieved an average of 19.1 mpg in mixed driving during its short stay with us, against its EPA combined fuel economy of 24 mpg (21 mpg city/28 mpg city). Perhaps the heavy throttle foot necessary to keep pace with traffic is partly responsible for our result.

    The Tucson's ultimate braking capability is good, bringing it to a halt from 60 mph in 123 feet, though our test-driver reported that the pedal effort was much higher than he'd have expected for a vehicle in this class. Drivers of performance cars expect and even demand that kind of hard pedal, but average crossover customers would be better served by a brake pedal that delivers its effectiveness with less effort.

    In the Hunt
    Jedi master Obi-Wan's vehicle of choice may be an open-cockpit levitating sand speeder, but earthbound families are better served by something like this Tucson GLS. Besides, the only child ol' Ben had to deal with was old enough to pilot the thing, and did you ever try cleaning the grit out of a droid's servos after a blast across the desert?

    The 2010 Hyundai Tucson has evolved in leaps and bounds from its previous generation into a perfectly acceptable class-competitive SUV that offers a lot of value. That is not to damn the Tucson with faint praise; rather it acknowledges that there are many excellent choices among tall wagons. And the Tucson is certainly one of them. Welcome to the club.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Road Test

    Second Opinion

    Senior Editor Erin Riches says:
    Whereas a 2011 Hyundai Sonata GLS is quite the deal for $20,000, this 2010 Hyundai Tucson GLS is not quite so tempting for $26,000.

    Mind you, there's nothing grievously wrong with the compact Tucson. It looks wonderful on the outside. It's a fashionable, almost delicate-looking crossover in a class where it often feels like automakers are deliberately aiming for unmemorable design.

    Inside, the Hyundai Tucson is as useful as any other crossover SUV. The front seats are comfortable, the driving position is good and the back-up camera display has gridlines to get you through the toughest of parallel-parking assignments. The backseat is hardly plush, but average-size adults fit with no problem. The cargo bay has room for a large hound, and with said hound shooed away, there's good access to the under-floor spare tire.

    The trouble is that the driving experience really isn't much of an experience. Throttle tip-in is aggressive to give the impression of peppiness around town, but when you accelerate up to speed on a highway entrance ramp, the 2.4-liter feels strained by 4,000 rpm.

    Handling isn't bad at all, though, and the electric-assisted steering weights up adequately off-center. The Tucson rides harshly over broken pavement, though. All the while, road noise comes booming into the lightly insulated cabin.

    None of these shortcomings is out of the ordinary among four-cylinder compact crossover SUVs. In fact, the Tucson's unusual style and lengthy equipment list make a compelling case for it over some of the more established players in this class. But I can't shake the feeling that I'd be driving off with so much more car if I bought a cheaper Sonata.

    Sort By:

    pearl says:

    03:44 PM, 03/29/2010

    I thought that the instrument cluster illlumination issue had been settled in tests years ago? The answer was that most humans see red the best. It is not surprising that BMWs and Audis (at least) have used that color for many years. Maybe there is something new on this, but seeing the instruments is clearly a safety issue, so you would think that manufacturers would have a scientific reason to use a color that would make their guages and controls most legible.

    mungmibear says:

    01:11 PM, 03/29/2010

    180HP is plenty for everyday driving.
    Why is it that the Europeans can be happy with around 100HP and Americans cannot?
    Where do we need 300HP SUV and a SUPERSIZE ME SUV?
    it is current trend of automakers to tone down their displacements of engine to be more economical.
    This article and the editor is decade behind.

    m14 says:

    02:51 PM, 03/28/2010

    Also go back to white gauges Blue is not very good looking

    m14 says:

    02:50 PM, 03/28/2010

    Style:8
    Performance:8
    Value:9
    Overall: 25 out of 30

    I like it because it looks very toned down compared to last year's model. It looks more competitive than before. Its a bargain. A base GLS model equipped with nav for less than $27,000 is not bad. And with their 10yr/100,000 mile warranty, they have a real success on their hands. Good job, hyundai.

    narenji says:

    11:14 AM, 03/28/2010

    i think this is a crappy article from edmunds... while the contents are good, to say that hyundai "gets it wrong" is misleading and inappropriate. it shows bias that is not present in the article. its as if they set their expectations so sky high and the tuscon somehow failed to meet their lofty expectations of a small crossover suv...

    mk40 says:

    10:56 AM, 03/28/2010

    It was a good review overall.  Gave me a good sense of the vehicle... What you're getting for the money.  Down to earth.  

    The gauge color is a matter of preference.. & I'm sure they have consumer clinics to get reactions so I can't fault them for that.  Clearly blue is a popular lighting color.

    I do agree, that if you don't have much suspension travel, it's better to tune it taut, because if you don't...  

    But of course, more travel is best.

    Overall a competitive compact CUV, but one on the smaller side in cargo volume.

    isend2c says:

    09:29 PM, 03/26/2010

    @ hyundaismoke

    I AGREE.  I have had two Sonata's (2006 & 2008) and the lime green interior illumination is BY FAR my LEAST favorite feature in the whole car.  The blue on the '09-'11 models looks a thousand fold better.  And to edmunds- I don't find it "optically challenging".

    Also, they should have put the direct injection engine in everything that uses their 2.4 L.  They probably will once their factory can support the demand.

    hyundaismoke says:

    08:21 PM, 03/26/2010

    Edmunds if they go back White and green instrumentation becuase of your complaints, I might stop buying Hyundai.  They are great cars, but many customers asked for it so you're going to have to live with it.

    Yes, the Gauge color really matters that much to some people.  Like your complaints.  Youre not giving Hyundai money, are you?  Well I AM, and I spend plenty of time in these cars, and I want my Blue Gauges damm it!!

    hyundaismoke says:

    08:13 PM, 03/26/2010

    But many people asked Hyundai to get blue instrumentation Edmunds.  Green and White instrumentation is so old, and so cheap.  

    Red Instrumentation is ok, but if you want that buy a KIA.

    herrstreet says:

    02:23 PM, 03/26/2010

    ed124c - I agree with every single thing that you have said about the Outback.  Two problems:  Mini CUV's are tall which the market is on the record as absolutely loving, despite compromises.  Second, the Outback is cover-it-so-the-neighbors-can't-see ugly.  I liked previous editions, but the new one is almost a Subaru Aztek.  

    This is a car a young single woman would buy and could keep after getting married and having a baby, and I don't think that the Subaru is stylish enough to say that, practical or not.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2010 Hyundai Tucson GLS AWD

    Base Price:

    $22,290

    Price as Tested:

    $26,090

    Engine:

    DOHC 2.4-liter inline-4

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed automatic

    Power:

    176 hp @ 6,000 rpm; 168 lb-ft of torque @ 4,000 rpm

    0-60 mph:

    9.6 seconds

    Fuel Economy:

    19.1 mpg as tested

    What Works (pros):

    Well-finished cabin; daring styling that works.

    What Needs Work (cons):

    Tepid acceleration.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2010
    MakeHyundai
    ModelTucson
    StyleGLS 4dr SUV 4WD (2.4L 4cyl 6A)
    Base MSRP$21,495
    Options on test vehicleOption Group 03/AC Navigation Package, Carpeted Floor Mats
    As-tested MSRP$26,090
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeAll-wheel drive
    Engine typeInline-4
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2,359cc (144 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDouble overhead camshaft, four valves per cylinder
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.5
    Redline (rpm)6,500
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)176 @ 6,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)168 @ 4000
    Fuel typeRegular unleaded
    Transmission typeSix-speed automatic
    Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)I=4.212; II=2.637; III=1.800; IV=1.386; V=1.000; VI=0.772: Reverse=3.385; Final Drive=3.195
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontMacPherson strut, coil springs, dampers, 23mm stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearMultilink, coil springs, dampers, 16mm stabilizer
    Steering typeElectric-assist rack and pinion
    Steering ratio (x:1)15.9
    Turning circle (ft.)34.7
    Tire brandKumho
    Tire modelSolus
    Tire typeAll-season
    Tire size, frontP225/60R17 99H
    Tire size, rearP225/60R17 99H
    Wheel size17-by-6.5 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialCast aluminum
    Brakes, frontSingle-piston sliding calipers, ventilated discs
    Brakes, rearSingle-piston sliding calipers, solid discs
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)3.4
    0-45 mph (sec.)6.1
    0-60 mph (sec.)9.6
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)9.4
    0-75 mph (sec.)14.8
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)17.1 @ 81.2
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)31
    60-0 mph (ft.)123
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)64.5
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.75
    Sound level @ idle (dB)40.4
    @ Full throttle (dB)73.1
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)68.4
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsAWD certainly hurts acceleration performance. Engine feels and sounds like it's really working at high rpm. Brake-torquing the launch does little to help runs. Best run in "D."
    Braking ratingGood
    Braking commentsVery high effort for only mediocre return in stopping effectiveness. Very little idle stroke. Overall, feels out of place in an SUV.
    Handling ratingGood
    Handling commentsSlalom: Good steering communication allows relatively precise placement in slalom. Good body control as well. Skid pad: Above traits help Tucson in skid pad as well, where it communicates and responds better than others here. Numbers, however, aren't significantly better.
    Testing Conditions
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)58.2
    Relative humidity (%)56.5
    Wind (mph, direction)5.25 head/crosswind
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)21 city/28 highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)19.1
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)14.5
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,382
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)3,365
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)58.5/41.5
    Length (in.)173.2
    Width (in.)71.7
    Height (in.)65.2
    Wheelbase (in.)103.9
    Track, front (in.)62.4
    Track, rear (in.)62.4
    Legroom, front (in.)42.1
    Legroom, rear (in.)38.7
    Headroom, front (in.)39.4
    Headroom, rear (in.)39.1
    Shoulder room, front (in.)57.1
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)55.1
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)25.7
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)55.8
    Warranty
    Free scheduled maintenanceNot available
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Antilock brakesFour-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsElectronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlTraction control
    Stability controlStability control
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement