INSIDE LINE

2012 Hyundai Accent GLS vs. 2012 Nissan Versa 1.6 SL Comparison Test

Media Player

  • 2012 Hyundai Accent GLS vs. 2012 Nissan Versa 1.6 SL Comparison Test Video

    The new 2012 Nissan Versa and 2012 Hyundai Accent sedans don't just compete against other new cars. With one (stripped to the marrow) Versa model going for $10,990 and the cheapest Accent starting at just $15,195, these two face off with used cars, motorcycles, scooters, subsidized subway systems and deeply discounted bus passes. | October 24, 2011

1 Video , 34 Photos | See more photos in this gallery »

Comparison

2012 Hyundai Accent GLS vs. 2012 Nissan Versa 1.6 SL Comparison Test

Better Than Taking the Bus

    101 Ratings

    The new 2012 Nissan Versa and 2012 Hyundai Accent sedans don't just compete against other new cars.

    With one (stripped to the marrow) Versa model going for $10,990 and the cheapest Accent starting at just $15,195, these two face off with used cars, motorcycles, scooters, recumbent bicycles, luxurious skateboards, high-end hiking boots, orthopedically correct flip-flops, subsidized subway systems and deeply discounted bus passes. They are subcompact sedans to which no one aspires except when all the viable alternatives aren't other new cars. And they're not alone.

    The entry-level new car class is thick with strong players. The Versa and Accent also face off with Ford's sophisticated Fiesta, the Fiesta's slick cousin the Mazda 2 and Honda's nimble Fit, while Kia's revamped Rio (brother to the Accent) is imminent and Chevrolet will soon replace the crummy Aveo with the promising new Sonic.

    This is a two-car face-off, but in two months it could be a knockdown, drag-out battle royale among six strong featherweight fighters.

    So let's get to today's qualifying round. Let's take "practicality" for $200, Alex.

    Accent-uate the Versa-tile
    The stripped-down versions may be super cheap, but our test vehicles came in well equipped, had automatic transmissions and were pimped out in their makers' best trim. So the as-tested price of the Hyundai Accent GLS sedan — including a $1,300 Premium package, some floor mats and an iPod cable — came in at $17,385. And the Versa 1.6 SL with the Tech package was barely behind at $17,190.

    The Versa and Accent are small cars by current standards, but not so tiny in historic terms. For instance, the 2012 Versa four-door is 175.4 inches long overall and rides on a 102.4-inch wheelbase. That dwarfs the Sentra sedan that Nissan introduced for 1991 that stretched out just 170.3 inches long over a 95.7-inch wheelbase. When it was introduced as a replacement for the Excel, the original 1995 Accent sedan was 162.1 inches long and rode on a 94.5-inch wheelbase. The new Accent is 172 inches long atop a 101.2-inch wheelbase. These are (relatively) inexpensive cars, but they're nowhere near being micro- or mini-cars.

    That size pays off with interior room. Neither the Versa nor the Accent feel at all cramped; four will fit comfortably into either car and five can cram aboard in a zombie emergency. And both have usable, roomy trunks. These cars can handle what 99 percent of the population does with cars 99 percent of the time.

    The Accent is well detailed and substantial in a way the Versa can't come close to matching.

    Many of the Versa's and Accent's interior dimensions are right atop one another. They both, for example, claim 41.8 inches of front legroom. The Accent has the Versa covered in shoulder and hiproom and it betters the Nissan by about 2 inches overall. Meanwhile the Versa has the clear advantage in rear-seat legroom, offering up 37 inches of stretch-out compared to the Hyundai's 33.3 inches. If you're wide, go Accent. If you've got long-legged kids, pony up for a Versa. And the Versa's 14.8-cubic-foot trunk is slightly larger than the 13.7 available in the Accent.

    Simple Mechanics
    Both the Versa and Accent are unibody front drivers with MacPherson struts holding up their noses and torsion axles in back. Both have electrically assisted power rack-and-pinion steering; both have standard ABS and brakeforce distribution; both have the mandated stability control. Chassiswise, about the biggest difference between the two is that the Nissan runs rear drum brakes while Hyundai equips the Accent with solid discs. In other words, their hardware is about as ordinary as ordinary gets.

    But all that direct comparability ends in the engine bay. Both cars are equipped with all-aluminum, slightly oversquare 1.6-liter DOHC 16-valve four-cylinder engines with continuous variable valve timing, but the Accent engine's also has direct fuel injection. The additional technology brings the Accent's output to 138 horsepower at 6,300 rpm and 123 pound-feet of peak torque at 4,850 rpm compared to the Versa's 109 hp at 6,000 rpm and 107 lb-ft of peak torque at 4,400 rpm.

    Beyond that, the Accent has a sweet-shifting six-speed automatic transaxle backing up all its power, while the Nissan's more modest output has to struggle against a continuously variable transmission (CVT). The gear ratio range of the two transmissions is similar but the Hyundai six-speed reacts athletically and positively, while the Nissan CVT is less eager to transmit its driver's inputs to forward motion.

    Racing the Non-Racers
    Combine the Hyundai's additional power with the clearly superior transmission and it humiliates the Nissan in every performance category. With the traction control turned off, the 2,563-pound Accent runs from 0-60 mph in 9.8 seconds — or 9.5 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like at a drag strip. And it plugs through the quarter-mile in 17.1 seconds at 81.2 mph.

    Nissan's 2,461-pound Versa, meanwhile, needs 10.4 seconds to reach 60 mph from a dead stop with the traction control turned off — 10.1 seconds with a 1-foot rollout. And it requires a languid 17.6 seconds to run the quarter-mile at 79.0 mph. If speed matters, then the Hyundai is the only choice.

    And if the EPA is to be believed, the Hyundai enjoys a fuel economy advantage, too. The Accent's 30 city and 40 highway mpg EPA numbers edge out the Versa's 30 city and 38 highway mpg ratings. Our testing revealed a near dead heat, with the Versa yielding 28.1 mpg to the Accent's 28 mpg in combined driving.

    When it comes time to throw out the anchor, the Hyundai is again better. The Accent required 123 feet to stop from 60 mph, while the Versa needed 128. Though the Accent's tires squeal under hard braking and the ABS makes a racket, the car tracks straight. The Versa's brake pedal has a nice firm feel, but the car wiggles its tail when braking hard and needs some countersteer to stay on course. It's not dangerous, but it's also not confidence-inspiring.

    Driving the Point
    Riding on P195/50R16 Kumho Solus KH25 all-season tires, the Accent is hardly equipped to set low lap times. But it managed a respectable 64.6 mph through our 600-foot slalom and pulled a decent 0.78g on the skid pad with the stability control off. The Versa, on the tiptoes of its P185/65R15 Continental rubber, managed 62.4 mph in the slalom and a 0.75g skid pad orbit. But the numbers only hint at the whole story.

    "Holy sloppy handling," reported test-driver Mike Monticello, coming off the slalom course in the Versa. "Major body roll and tires that prefer to slide rather than grip make it a handful to swing the Versa around the cones. The steering isn't really all that loose, but the Versa just flops around on its soft suspension."

    In contrast, the Accent was a joy. "So much more planted through the slalom than the Versa," Monticello reported. "The suspension has enough antiroll characteristics and the tires are grippy enough that you can really throw it around. Understeer is the limiting factor in achieving a quicker time and the Accent doesn't have much in the way of punch at the slalom exit," he said. But no car in this class does.

    What's apparent on the track is even more obvious on the street. The Accent is one of the most confident-handling and best-riding subcompacts ever built. It's not a tied-down sportster, but there is a truly sweet feel to its steering, the body roll is well controlled and the transmission seems to get the most out of the engine in daily driving. And it rides well, too.

    The Versa always feels as if it's on its tiptoes: nervous entering a corner, doubling over as it goes through it and squealing relief on its exit. The steering has some good, communicative feel, but most of what it's reporting back is a desperate struggle for traction. Then there's the CVT, which isn't bad by CVT standards, but is a droning nuisance compared to the Accent's outstanding six-speed.

    The new Versa drives better than the old Versa — a car with such lousy directional stability that a baby fart would blow it over a couple of lanes — but it's a dynamic also-ran compared to the Accent.

    Decorum
    So the Accent is quicker and drives better. But beyond that, it looks and feels better, too. The new Versa looks much better than the old one, but it's still an awkwardly shaped machine that screams "cheap" like a store in Jersey City that sells $49 suits.

    The Accent, on the other hand, looks like a scaled-down Elantra that, in turn looks like a scaled-down Sonata. It's amazing how well similar styling works on the three Hyundai sedans. It's like putting the same dress on Adriana Lima, Snookie and Kathy Bates and having them all look fantastic in it. The Accent is well detailed and substantial in a way the Versa can't come close to matching.

    And the contrast grows even more substantial inside the two cars. The Versa's interior is finished in contemporary style but the surfaces are monochromatic and chintzy. Its dashboard is simply designed and perfectly legible, but stark. The steering wheel is nicely designed with neat, circular redundant audio and cruise control switches, but the rim itself is hard, cold and cheap to the touch.

    The Accent's interior falls well short of luxurious, but at least there's some visual interest in various areas. The Premium package with which this test car was equipped brought with it several gloss black surfaces that contrasted well against the brushed silver, matte black and vanilla-colored surfaces that make up most of the interior panels. The instrumentation is straightforward and brilliantly illuminated.

    The Accent's seats are too flat and unsupportive, and Hyundai has crammed too many indistinct buttons onto the steering wheel. Even so, on interior decoration alone, the Accent feels $5 grand more expensive than the Versa.

    A Clear Win
    We'd love to give you a list of the Versa's strengths relative to the Accent, but the simple fact is that there aren't many. Sure, there's a small advantage to be had in certain interior measurements and it's $195 less expensive, but those benefits aren't enough to outweigh the Accent's overwhelming domination of nearly every criteria worth considering — both objective and subjective.

    This one is a walkover for the Hyundai Accent; it's better than the Versa in virtually every way. The Accent is an entry-level car that doesn't feel like one, look like one or drive like one. And that's true whether it's your first new car or your last.

    The manufacturers provided Edmunds these vehicles for the purposes of evaluation.

    Sort By:

    macsaan says:

    12:40 PM, 02/09/2012

    kidding me?
    versa can't beat accent lol

    accent rules

    jtnct says:

    02:20 PM, 01/20/2012

    turbo6spdfun says:

    09:20 PM, 10/25/2011

    I sold nissan for over two years and that CVT is a great simple transmission for these little 4 cylinders and such a great selling point, therefore you stupid comment stating that no one likes cvt is simply bs. Also hyundai having a better interior.. what in hell is wrong with you IL editors. Hyundai's low end cars have the cheapest and most plasticly crappy feeling interiors.

    Nissan is a very solid automaker. People that don't know shit about cars buy hyundai.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I loved and bought Maxima's for years, but I hate to say it but Hyundai and Kia are stepping their game up ten/fold. They have amazing motors with class leading HP and fuel millage. They have more options for the money compared to anything in their price range. And what Nissans did you sell in never-never-land? They have some hard ass plastics and cheep interiors in their small cars. Just say'en.

    pathos says:

    04:54 PM, 12/13/2011

    turbo6spdfun says:

    09:20 PM, 10/25/2011

    I sold nissan for over two years and that CVT is a great simple transmission for these little 4 cylinders and such a great selling point, therefore you stupid comment stating that no one likes cvt is simply bs. Also hyundai having a better interior.. what in hell is wrong with you IL editors. Hyundai's low end cars have the cheapest and most plasticly crappy feeling interiors.

    Nissan is a very solid automaker. People that don't know shit about cars buy hyundai.
    -----------------------------------------------------
    You worked for Nissan! Awesome! I'm going with you! F car mags and car websites!

    bricknord says:

    08:57 AM, 12/13/2011

    I can't think of a new car that would be more emasculating to own than a Versa.  Way too many other superior choices in this segment these days.  Mazda2, Fit, Yaris, Accent, Fiesta, Sonic...the list goes on.  It would be rough, having purchased a Versa (sedan), to realize that you just bought the lowest common denominator in class...and paid hard-earned money for it.

    hampollo says:

    10:15 PM, 10/31/2011

    Hey Lake3,

    Have you driven the two cars?  I highly suggest you spend time in both.  You're about to spend a good amount of money and it would be wise to check the Accent (and sister Kia Rio) out.  They are very good cars.  Really.  And if you want navi, any smartphone has a great system.  

    alex38 says:

    02:19 AM, 10/31/2011

    @ lake3 "Japanese a lot better than Korean."

    Now why do you have to broadcast your ignorance like that.  No question the Japanese cars where far superior to Korean, German and U.S. makes over the past couple of decades in terms of general reliability.  However, up to a few years ago, Toyota's 10+ MILLION VEHICLE recall and a number of deaths due to unintended acceleration should really put that notion to rest.  

    I think the Japanese still great great machines (tho I'd now probably take American and Korean makes ahead of Japanese ones) but the Japanese have lost their touch with respect to design.  Honda has gone to having on the best lineups of cars in the 1990's to one of the worst today imo. Toyota's not much better..  (i've owned 2 Toyotas and they have both been absolute nightmares, my Ford was much more reliable)

    THUS, back to this comparison, here are reasons I think the Accent is a much better buy than the Nissan:

    1) Better fuel efficiency (on paper anyways, real world likely similar)
    2) Better handling
    3) 6-speed auto (have sat in CVTs before and the drone gets tiring very quickly)
    4) Better range
    5) Hyundai has the better warranty
    6) More horsepower (AND better fuel efficiency)
    7) Quieter interior
    8) Interior much better looking with better materials
    9) Better breaking (this is a safety feature)
    10) but realistically, if i had to trade in a bus pass, i'd buy the Accent on exterior looks alone.  Nissan really chintzed out with what looks like 13" rims...they should have put 16" rims to fill up the wheel wells like Hyundai did.  

    Fine, the Nissan comes with nav.  Go pony up 3 bills for the Garmin navi and the Nissan doesn't look as great a deal anymore in my opinion..

    viperjim12 says:

    11:11 PM, 10/30/2011

    I bet the exhaust on that thing is not as good as my Boxter's 2.5 Stebro--->

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_M-bnqq1uc4

    It's an eargasm I'm telling you!

    bestjinjo says:

    01:43 PM, 10/29/2011

    flc2006 says: "I would get the Nissan Versa because it is a better Value than a Hyundai accent; You get navigation for under 18,000 including destination charge."

    OR any of these:

    1-2 year old Mazda 3, Honda Civic, Hyundai Elantra, Ford Focus, Chevy Ruze and a $300 Garmin navigation that blows the doors off most in-car $2000 units.

    Car like these never made any sense to me since you can buy a barely used 1-2 year old car with low mileage for about the same.

    hako says:

    06:54 PM, 10/28/2011

    @ Lake3...if you need the warranty, why not get a warranty that covers the length of the car loan.....like Hyundai's warranty?   Unless something has changed recently, Nissan has a weaker warranty.   Also, Hyundai's reliability rating has been higher than Nissan's for a while now....like years.

    lake3 says:

    02:53 PM, 10/28/2011

    I am about to purchase a 2012 Versa. and the reason why are:
    First, Nissan make reliable cars while Hyundai is "starting" to make reliable cars. Japanese a lot better than Korean.
    Second, Versa is Cheaper than Accent because it includes more features (Navigation)
    Third, CVT is really good in day to day driving and efficient (wider ratio spread) even if it is not the best for rapid acceleration.
    Fourth, I am buying a cheap new car  because of the warranty and the peace of mind, I do not have to worry if it breaks and I will not be abble to fix it.
    Fifth, I really do not need a bigger car.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    1st Place: 2012 Hyundai Accent GLS:

    A great-driving subcompact with an efficient powertrain, quality interior and styling that works.

    2nd Place: 2012 Nissan Versa SL:

    An improvement over the previous Versa, but one that still misses the always-moving benchmark in the segment.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2012 Hyundai Accent GLS 4dr Sedan (1.6L 4cyl 6A)
    Vehicle TypeFWD 4dr 5-passenger Sedan
    Base MSRP$15,195
    Options on test vehiclePremium Package ($1,300); Floor Mats ($95); iPod Cable ($35)
    As-tested MSRP$17,385
    Assembly locationUlsan, Korea
    North American parts content (%)1
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front engine, front-wheel drive
    Engine typeDirect-injected inline-4, gasoline
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1,591/97
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDouble overhead camshaft, four valves per cylinder, variable intake + exhaust valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)11.0
    Redline, indicated (rpm)6,750
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)138 @ 6,300
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)123 @ 4,850
    Fuel typeRegular unleaded
    Transmission typeSix-speed automatic
    Transmission ratios (x:1)4.400, 2.726. 1.834, 1.392, 1.000, 0.774
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontMacPherson struts, coil springs, twin-tube dampers, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearTorsion beam with coil springs, monotube dampers
    Steering typeElectrically assisted rack-and-pinion
    Steering ratio (x:1)14.9
    Turning circle (ft.)34.1
    Tire make and modelKumho Solus KH25
    Tire typeAll-season radial
    Tire sizeP195/50R16
    Wheel size16-by-6 inches
    Wheel materialAluminum alloy
    Brakes, front10.1-inch ventilated rotors, single-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rear10.3-inch solid rotors, single-piston sliding calipers
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)3.4
    0-45 mph (sec.)6.1
    0-60 mph (sec.)9.8
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)9.5
    0-75 mph (sec.)14.6
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)17.1 @ 81.2
    0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.)3.7
    0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.)6.4
    0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.)10.2
    0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)9.8
    0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.)15.2
    1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph)17.3 @ 80.6
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)32
    60-0 mph (ft.)123
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)64.6
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON63.9
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.78
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON0.78
    Sound level @ idle (dB)42.3
    @ Full throttle (dB)75.3
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)65.7
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)2,250
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsExtremely lazy off the line, dosen't feel like 138 hp. If you power brake the snot out of it you can get just a smidgen of wheelspin for like a nanosecond. Agonizingly slow upshifts, but super-smooth. Upshifts at 6,250 rpm every time, whether in Drive or Manual mode. Manual shifting via console lever (pull back for downshifts). Does not hold gears to redline. Does not blip throttle on downshifts.
    Braking commentsFirm pedal and a nice, short travel. Plenty of tire squeal and ABS commotion, but the Accent tracks straight and true. Not bad for a little %#@* box.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: ESC was very controlled at cutting throttle, actually better at keeping the car balanced than the test driver because the abrupt throttle is hard to modulate. Steering has decent weighting. Drop-throttle had some effect, but basically the front tires get punished.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date8/9/2011
    Test locationAuto Club Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)68.3
    Relative humidity (%)28.8
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)68.8
    Wind (mph, direction)2.3, headwind
    Odometer (mi.)2,128
    Fuel used for test87 octane
    As-tested tire pressures, f/r (psi)32
    As-tested ballasted trailer weight (lbs.)32
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)30 city/40 highway/33 combined
    Edmunds observed (mpg)28
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)11.4
    Driving range (mi.)456
    Audio and Advanced Technology
    Stereo descriptionAM/FM/XM radio with CD/MP3 player, 172 watts, six speakers
    iPod/digital media compatibilityYes, standard aux input and USB
    Satellite radioAvailable
    Bluetooth phone connectivityYes
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)2,463
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)2,563
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)62.2/37.8
    Length (in.)172.0
    Width (in.)66.9
    Height (in.)57.1
    Wheelbase (in.)101.2
    Track, front (in.)59.3
    Track, rear (in.)59.5
    Legroom, front (in.)41.8
    Legroom, rear (in.)33.3
    Headroom, front (in.)39.9
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.2
    Shoulder room, front (in.)53.7
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)53.4
    Seating capacity5
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)13.7
    GVWR (lbs.)3,527
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper5 years/60,000 miles
    Powertrain10 years/100,000 miles
    Corrosion7 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance5 years/Unlimited miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2012 Nissan Versa 1.6 SL 4dr Sedan (1.6L 4cyl CVT)
    Vehicle TypeFWD 4dr 5-passenger Sedan
    Base MSRP$15,560
    Options on test vehicleTech Package ($700); Floor and Trunk Mats ($170)
    As-tested MSRP$17,190
    Assembly locationAguas, Mexico
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front engine, front-wheel drive
    Engine typeInline-4, gasoline
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1,598/98
    ValvetrainDouble overhead camshaft, variable intake + exhaust valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)9.8
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)109 @ 6,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)107 @ 4,400
    Fuel typeRegular unleaded
    Transmission typeContinuously variable
    Transmission ratios (x:1)4.006 to 0.550
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)3.882
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontMacPherson strut, coil springs, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearTorsion beam, coil springs
    Steering typeElectrically assisted power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)16.8
    Turning circle (ft.)34.8
    Tire make and modelContinental Conti ProContact
    Tire typeAll-season front and rear
    Tire sizeP185/65R15
    Wheel size15-by-5.5 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialAlloy
    Brakes, front10-inch ventilated rotors, single-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rear8-inch drums
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)3.8
    0-45 mph (sec.)6.6
    0-60 mph (sec.)10.4
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)10.1
    0-75 mph (sec.)15.8
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)17.6 @ 79.0
    0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.)3.9
    0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.)6.8
    0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.)10.7
    0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)10.4
    0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.)16.2
    1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph)17.8 @ 78.6
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)31
    60-0 mph (ft.)128
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)62.4
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON61.7
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.75
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON0.75
    Sound level @ idle (dB)43.1
    @ Full throttle (dB)76.5
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)68.9
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)2,500
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsIt gets off the line with at least some sense of urgency. But gets hung up at 4,750 rpm before the CVT slowly rubberbands its way up to 6,000 rpm, where it holds station through the quarter-mile. Power braking and moving the console shifter to "L" produced the quickest (if that's appropriate here) run. No manual shifting ability.
    Braking commentsImpressively firm pedal feel, but the Versa wiggles side to side vigorously as its slippery tires try to find traction. There's some occasional tire lockup, causing me to have to countersteer to keep it straight. Not very confidence-inspiring.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: The CVT makes it difficult to have the correct engine speed here, so I just slapped it in "L.." Massive body roll sometimes causes the inside front tire to spin up a bit, during clockwise running. But there are two main points here: low-grip tires and massive understeer. Slalom: Holy sloppy handling! Major amounts of body roll and tires that prefer to slide rather than grip make it a handful to swing the Versa around the cones. The steering isn't really all that loose, but the Versa just flops around on its soft suspension. ESC system was surprisingly unintrusive when switched on.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date9-Aug
    Test locationCalifornia Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)71.3
    Relative humidity (%)62.3
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)28.8
    Wind (mph, direction)4.1, headwind
    Odometer (mi.)2,888
    Fuel used for test87-octane gasoline
    As-tested tire pressures, f/r (psi)33/33
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)30 city/38 highway/33 combined
    Edmunds observed (mpg)28.1 combined
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)10.8
    Driving range (mi.)410.4
    Audio and Advanced Technology
    Stereo descriptionAM/FM/XM radio with CD/MP3 player with four speakers. Optional audio controls on steering wheel
    iPod/digital media compatibilityOptional USB
    Satellite radioOptional
    Bluetooth phone connectivityOptional
    Navigation system5-inch color touchscreen
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)2,459
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)2,461
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)59/41
    Length (in.)175.4
    Width (in.)66.7
    Height (in.)59.6
    Wheelbase (in.)102.4
    Track, front (in.)58.3
    Track, rear (in.)58.5
    Legroom, front (in.)41.8
    Legroom, rear (in.)37
    Headroom, front (in.)39.8
    Headroom, rear (in.)36.6
    Shoulder room, front (in.)51.7
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)51.9
    Seating capacity5
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)14.8
    GVWR (lbs.)3,389
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years/60,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance3 years/36,000 miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement