INSIDE LINE

2009 Honda Fit Sport Long-Term Test

Media Player

  • 2009 Honda Fit Picture

    2009 Honda Fit Picture

    Our 2009 Honda Fit Sport with Navigation had an MSRP of $18,780. | March 16, 2010

Road Test

2009 Honda Fit Sport Long-Term Test

Wrap-Up

    14 Ratings

    Honda pays the bills by offering the most amount of car for the least amount of money. This philosophy has evolved into progressively larger cars as Honda has adapted to life as an American company, but this process has threatened the company's role in the subcompact segment. As the Honda Accord grew in proportions, so, too, did the Honda Civic as it filled the void. And then the Civic's growing size and sophistication opened the door for a subcompact Honda, which wasn't available. But when rising fuel prices and shrinking pocketbooks made subcompacts suddenly popular, Honda finally brought in its international-size car, the Honda Fit.

    American consumers accepted the 2007 Honda Fit, and it quickly took control of the subcompact market. But where the Fit excelled in international-size utility, it suffered in international-size ergonomics. A seating position meant for the slight of stature was matched with a thrifty but underpowered engine, and small tires limited the Fit's appeal to hard-core fuel misers.

    Fortunately a second-generation Fit was in the pipeline and with the 2009 Honda Fit we have the new features we wanted without compromising those that we already appreciated.

    Why We Got It
    By the time we concluded our long-term test of the all-new 2007 Honda Fit Sport, we had accumulated over 25,000 miles. This new Honda brought an element of driving fun to an excruciatingly dull segment of subcompacts. We drove it everywhere and did so with only a few of the typical complaints that any econocar attracts. When we learned that the redesigned 2009 Honda Fit Sport addressed the handful of issues we'd had with the original, we were sold.

    We never felt the 2007 Honda Fit was built with full-figured Americans in mind. But our full test of the 2009 Honda Fit presented a revised package that would coddle our American-size physiques with comfort and convenience.

    To begin with, the wheels and tires were an inch larger in diameter, a measure that would simultaneously offer more sport and a somewhat more compliant ride. A tilt-and-telescoping steering wheel adjustment made the seating position more comfortable for taller drivers. An available navigation system was a treat in this sub-$20,000 car. Also new for 2009 was a more powerful 1.5-liter inline-4, generating 117 horsepower and 106 pound-feet of torque.

    We introduced the Fit to our fleet with questions. How much better was it than the 2007? Was it any better on long trips? Would it survive 12 months on the long-term blog pages?

    Durability
    Subcompacts are often stereotyped as errand runners. And we were as guilty as the rest in this regard. But once we spent time with the 2009 Honda Fit, accepted its shortcomings and saw the car for what it was, we learned that the driving experience was pretty enjoyable.

    The Fit requires some wheelspin to maximize what little power it has. But it was easier to pedal it with worn tires.

    Inside Line Senior Editor Erin Riches complimented its steering. "When you give the Fit a bigger steering input as you're about to enter a corner or unusually technical freeway entrance ramp, the little car turns in smartly. It's not so quick that you imagine yourself in a sport compact, but at that moment, you don't feel quite so dorky driving around in an orange hatchback. For me, it's addictive. I take every opportunity to pitch the car into corners at speed."

    Riches continued, "And the engine. You're always going to hear it, so you'd better learn to love its scrappy demeanor. It's not that the Fit's gearing is so incredibly short. It's that there simply isn't a lot of sound-deadening material. That's a big reason why the Fit is lightweight. Lack of weight makes it feel as quick and nimble. So it has never once occurred to me that the Fit should be quieter. On the contrary, a quieter Fit would be a heavier, less direct-handling Fit, and I'll have none of that."

    This fun-to-drive personality was evident in the first Fit, so we weren't surprised that the second-generation car measured up. But inside the cabin was where the 2009 model was supposed to be different.

    Director of Vehicle Testing Dan Edmunds reflected, "One of the main reasons I disliked driving our 2007 Fit was that I didn't fit in it. It had no seat height adjustment and the non-telescopic steering wheel was too far away. My 6-foot-2 frame was utterly incompatible. But all of my complaints have been magically wiped away in the 2009 Fit. Being able to lower the seats and pull the new telescopic wheel back has several benefits. My knees have clearance behind the wheel, which means I can operate the clutch and other pedals without splaying my legs apart, mantis-style. I can also reach the wheel without reaching, maintaining a nice bend in my arm."

    Meanwhile, Edmunds Senior Editor Bryn MacKinnon noted, "I was sitting in the back of the Fit and decided to rest my arm on the armrest on the door. It wouldn't let me. The slope of the rearmost part is extremely raked, and my arm sort of kept slipping off. That's an unrestful armrest."

    Over time our 2009 Honda Fit showed some flaws. Squeaks and rattles from the dash were mentioned on more than one occasion. Our sole warranty repair claim began with a dead battery and led us to a door-ajar warning illuminated on the instrument cluster. We visited the dealer for this known issue and had it fixed by replacing the lock switch for the front door.

    Honda of Santa Monica treated us fairly so we stuck with them for all service needs, including scheduled maintenance at 10,000 and 20,000 miles. A bubble in the sidewall of the Fit's right-front tire set us back over 160 bucks for a replacement Bridgestone Turanza. But even at that, the Fit never left us stranded.

    Total Body Repair Costs: None
    Total Routine Maintenance Costs (over 12 months): $227.57
    Additional Maintenance Costs: $161.92 for replacement tire
    Warranty Repairs: Front door lock switch replaced
    Non-Warranty Repairs: None
    Scheduled Dealer Visits: 3
    Unscheduled Dealer Visits: 1
    Days Out of Service: 2; 1 waiting for door lock switch, 1 for a new tire
    Breakdowns Stranding Driver: None

    Performance and Fuel Economy
    We first tested the 2009 Honda Fit with 1,000 miles on the odometer. As is our routine, we tested it a final time at 20,000 miles. We were impressed with the Fit's durability over the span of our test.

    During its entrance exam the 2,500-pound Fit accelerated to 60 mph from a stop in 8.9 seconds (8.6 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip) and covered the quarter-mile in 16.6 seconds at 81.6 mph. Chief Road Test Editor Chris Walton drove for its final exam. "It's just as quick now as when it was new," he said. "The Fit requires some wheelspin to maximize what little power it has. But it was easier to pedal it with worn tires. Clutch and gears still feel healthy."

    Dynamic tests told a similar story. An initial slalom speed of 65.8 mph was matched at test end by one of 66 mph. We did experience an anomaly during skid pad tests, though. The as-new Fit recorded lateral grip of 0.78g, while nearing retirement it pulled 0.82g on the skid pad. Surface variations in our test facilities were the culprit, as the 0.82g figure was confirmed at the 10,000-mile mark when this Fit was used for a comparison test against the Ford Fiesta. Following dynamic testing Walton proclaimed, "I had forgotten how fun the Fit Sport is in the slalom. Friction-free, responsive steering, a narrow track and an ability to rotate. Seems more neutral than the previous Fits, which I remember being a little squirrely. ESP-on prompted nearly as quick due to uncharacteristically lenient tuning that returns control to the driver quickly."

    Best Fuel Economy: 39.0 mpg
    Worst Fuel Economy: 24.9 mpg
    Average Fuel Economy: 31.4 mpg

    Retained Value
    We added a 2009 Honda Fit Sport with Navigation to our fleet just over one year ago. At that time it had an MSRP of $18,780. After a full term of service the Fit depreciated 23 percent based on a private-party sale through Edmunds' TMV® Calculator. This seems strong considering our long-term 2007 Nissan Versa depreciated 26 percent following its test.

    True Market Value at service end: $14,538
    Depreciation: $4,242 or 23% of original MSRP
    Final Odometer Reading: 21,568

    Summing Up
    Honda reclaimed its influence on the subcompact segment with the introduction of the 2007 Fit to the U.S. market. But it wasn't a home run. Smaller proportions and awkward design elements didn't appeal to the full-bodied American public. And so, as if listening to our suggestions, Honda took the Fit and redesigned it.

    Our long-term 2009 Fit received a warm reception. It still had to overcome the stigma of being a small car. But once we accepted the limitations inherent in its stature, it became a favorite. After 12 months and 21,000 miles, the Fit had survived a year of full-service American driving. We subjected it to an onslaught of stop-and-go traffic, thousand-mile vacation treks and rambunctious children. It took all we could give with no more than a faulty door lock switch.

    The 2009 Honda Fit turned out to be more car than its predecessor, and in a good way. It was fun and utilitarian for its size. Improvements in ergonomics were immediately apparent and appreciated. When it came to our daily needs, the new Fit was a better fit.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Road Test

    Introduction

    The 2009 Honda Fit seems to be the right car at the right time. When the Fit first appeared in the U.S. midway through 2006, even Honda seemed unsure just how many examples could be sold in America, envisioning it more as a cool rival to the Scion xA than the super fuel-efficient people mover that had become a sales phenomenon as the Honda Jazz in Europe. But from the first, this small, frugal wagonette found an audience in America and Honda found itself ratcheting up the number of boats bringing the Fit across the water from Japan.

    Soon after, Inside Line bought a 2007 Honda Fit Sport for a long-term road test. We loved it, but also thought the small car wasn't quite up to the demands of drivers built to the corn-fed scale of Americans. As our Dan Edmunds noted in the road test logbook: "When your knee whams the back of the steering wheel every time you let the clutch out, you tend to have a hard time liking a car. I feel like a praying mantis in this thing. A telescopic steering wheel is an absolute must."

    Fortunately, Honda heard his plea. The 2009 Honda Fit Sport not only has a telescoping steering wheel, it also has a personality that suits our country of big spaces and wide-open roads. The 2009 Honda Fit Sport might look familiar, but this Fit is all-new, a car that has been designed from the ground up with American tastes in mind. Being Americans, we decided to call Honda's bluff, so a 2009 Honda Fit Sport has joined our long-term fleet. Let's see if it really is more 'Merican.

    What We Bought
    As is customary with Honda, there are no options as such for the 2009 Honda Fit. Instead the options are bundled together and sold as trim levels. The 2009 Fit lineup is comprised of the Fit, Fit Sport and Fit Sport with Navigation.

    Central to the revised Fit is an upgraded 1.5-liter inline-4 that produces 117 horsepower and 106 pound-feet of torque compared to the 109 hp and 105 lb-ft for the previous-generation Fit. The new power comes at the price of a slight decrease in fuel economy, as it records an EPA-estimated 27 mpg city and 33 mpg highway, a 1 mpg loss compared to the previous car, which was also 63 pounds lighter.

    Transmission options have not changed, as a five-speed automatic is available (with shift paddles on the Sport model) and a five-speed manual is standard.

    What separates the 2009 Honda Fit and Fit Sport starts at the ground and works up. Wheels on the 2009 Fit Sport are 16s wrapped with 185/55R16 all-season Bridgestone Turanza EL470 tires. Non-Sport models are equipped with 15-inch wheels and skinnier tires. This represents a full 1-inch increase in diameter across the board from the prior Fit, making it more American both in appearance and in on-ramp cornering grip. The Fit Sport also benefits from a 17mm rear stabilizer bar to reduce understeer for livelier handling, while the base Fit predictably makes due without one at all. The Sport also has a kit of bodywork trim, foglights and a chrome exhaust tip.

    Mechanically and visually, the Sport might not seem to add up to anything special, but there are a host of convenience and comfort features available on the Sport that tip the scale in its favor. The features include a security system with remote entry, power door locks, cruise control, map lights, a six-speaker stereo system with USB audio interface and an armrest. The Fit Sport also includes a steering wheel from the current Honda Civic, which includes stereo controls and a leather-wrapped rim.

    Like the first generation, the new Fit has a "Magic Seat" feature that allows the rear seat to be configured in numerous ways. The seat can be folded flat with just the touch of a lever. The rear seat cushion also flips up to allow the Fit to accommodate tall cargo.

    We chose the 2009 Honda Fit Sport with Navigation. Navigation is an option that is getting more common by the day but is still a treat in a sub-$20,000 car. When navigation is applied to a Fit Sport, stability control (Vehicle Stability Assist) and traction control are also added. It seems an odd pairing at first, but the reasoning is sound.

    Why We Bought It
    The 2009 Honda Fit Sport's iPod adapter, navigation system and stability control make it apparent that Honda has learned from the transition the first-generation Fit made when jumping across the pond, as this one has been designed to appease U.S. drivers.

    What might not be as obvious are the demographics of Fit buyers. Take a look at the 2009 Fit's seat bottom (sounds thrilling, doesn't it?). It will look strangely familiar to those who have spent a lot of time in the Honda Accord because it is from the Honda Accord.

    The Accord's seat bottom is wider and longer and thus more comfortable for larger and older drivers. Honda discovered that Fit buyers — much like a large percentage of Scion buyers — were not the kids looking for a cheap ride, even though this had been the target audience. Instead, Fit buyers have been older drivers who were trading down to something smaller, easier, greener and cheaper. These buyers expect more than a tin can that gets 30 mpg, and Honda's finally giving them what they wanted the first go-round.

    American Ride
    In our full test of the 2009 Honda Fit Sport, Chief Road Test Editor Chris Walton praises the '09 Fit for its "broader torque plateau; improved driving position for taller drivers; better ride quality." He concluded, "If only every sequel were so good. It's as if Honda used our long-term test blog about the 2007 Fit as a road map for the 2009 model's improvements."

    It's check time again, Honda. Is the '09 just going to serve as a beta platform for the 2012 Fit, or will this prove as thoroughly engineered for the American road as we hope?

    Follow along for the 12-month, 20,000-mile ride on our long-term road test blog.

    Current Odometer: 1,052
    Best Fuel Economy: 34.2 mpg
    Worst Fuel Economy: 33.5 mpg
    Average Fuel Economy (over the life of the vehicle): 33.8 mpg

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Sort By:

    cmj912 says:

    08:12 AM, 04/23/2010

    I had a Jetta 2 cars back. It was second only to the Volvo that I traded it for in highest ownership and repair costs. The Jetta's engine was a leaky sludge-factory despite the fact that I was religious about changing the oil, and I don't think the Volvo had every light-bulb in the car functioning all at once, ever. Both of the cars also developed transmission problems at 60k.

    I agree that the Fit is an A-effort. I own one now, and it has its pluses and minuses. I feel like what Honda tried to do was a little bit of everything they could do without making the car cost a fortune, so it does what it *can* do well. They can make it light, nimble, functional, handy, convenient and cute. They can build it with great build quality for the price. It is not, nor do I think it aims to be a GTI or WRX-killer and probably not even a competitor. I know that even if the WRX was something I'd like to upgrade to someday my eyes would bleed from reading my car insurance statement.

    Perhaps the Fit's aim is, rather, to give one some smile miles now and then and do its duty the rest of the week hauling dogs, baby seats, bags of mulch, and picking up the 'rents from the airport in a reasonable stylish, handy, reliable automobile. My neighborhood Home Depot is at the top of a long, twisty hillside road. Newly paved. Hmm.

    But at different times, we have different needs. I needed something relatively inexpensive that came well-recommended. Each time I remember fondly the curve-hugging, feature-laden Volvo or the sporty and solid-feeling Jetta, I remember that I spend most of my time in the car these days sitting in traffic; glad I've got an iPod-port and cupholder that the heat blows on on cold days. The most driving-pleasure I get is when I get to punch it on an exit ramp.

    I'm not saying that there are days I don't roll my eyes when I see a steep hill in my Fit, anticipating the sound of the engine turning from low adult contemporary to high Gothic death-metal.

    I also remember, in this economy, the blistering service costs of the two Europeans.  

    I think it was on Top Gear, if I'm remembering correctly, that it was said that the Honda Fit "is the closest to reality car that money can buy, meaning that a Honda Jazz {Fit} can cover the majority of the automotive needs that man has today." After 4,000 miles with mine, I pretty much agree.

    No harm/flames meant to anyone else's posting. Just my .02...

    siarizona says:

    06:17 AM, 03/28/2010

    I have an 09 Fit Sport with the 5-speed manual tranny and over 22,000 miles.  I got it specifically for the gas mileage, 4-door hatch & cargo capacity, and low price.  It's great for carry my dog & all my gear, and it reminds me of driving my 1989 Civic Si 2-door hatch.  Light and relatively tossable, and winding the engine out with no worries.  It's a great city-commuter car.

    shelbyturboz says:

    07:56 PM, 03/27/2010

    I liked the 07 model but when they came out with the new 09 i did not. they got  a nav and bigger tires and he said one tire cost $160. I dont have alot of money and could not pay that. They allways wonder why people buy a chevy aveo when nobody has ever gave it a good review. the reson is the price, if  honda would make a strip down model people would buy it faster than they could make them. the price is the key in this class, not what you can get in it, allways has been. dont get me wrong quality is good too, but kia would not be here today if quality and fun to drive were the selling points. honda make a car that starts at 10000$ build it and they will come.

    charlesb says:

    10:00 AM, 03/27/2010

    The Golf R will cost twice as much as a Honda Fit so I'm really not sure what that has to do with this long term wrap up.    The base Golf is a bit of a guzzler and TDI is pricey.  VW doesn't really offer something to compete with the Fit on price & efficiency.

    eldaino2 says:

    08:07 AM, 03/27/2010

    xorbe:

    the new golf r is going to be spectacular.

    however, honda will never to a 1.5turbo in their fit....and even if it offered similar acceleration times to a gti (rather unlikely), it will never match the 'feel' that small german cars afford with the way they are built.

    my gti with 18 inch wheels, sport suspension, and 40 series tires, has a ride quality that the fit (gd, ge or even the fit based insight) could never match with regards to quiet-ness, impact harshness and out right grip. (sounds like a stretch, but the same could be said of the base golf.)

    eldaino2 says:

    08:02 AM, 03/27/2010

    bricknord: get a golf tdi. it bests the civic in highway and city driving (30/40) and even the 2.5 is no slouch (30 highway) while offering SUBSTANTIALLY faster acceleration and torque.


    fuhteng: i wont have someone living in a cave telling me to stop hiding under a rock. jd powers tests are never long term, and just on initial quality, unlike consumer reports who talks to ACTUAL OWNERS.

    most honda heads will tout consumer reports' approval of virtually every honda as the gold standard for why they are good cars....go check out your newstand for the latest edition...you would be plesantly (unpleasantly?) suprised.

    and all 1st model year cars are more problematic than the later ones, even honda is not exempt. stop drinking the honda kool aid. i'm speaking from MY OWN actual honda AND vw experience...not just what i read online.

    bricknord says:

    04:38 PM, 03/22/2010

    We bought a 2009 Fit Sport Navi and traded it 6 months later.  The ride quality sucked to the point of being miserable--constant jitter...you run over a dime and you say "heads" or "tails".  In strong wind or in hilly country the automatic transmission constantly hunted as the overtaxed engine tried to cope.   Constant tire pressure warning lights no matter how diligent we were with checking and maintaining tire pressure.  We traded to a Civic EX and we're getting the same MPG we had on the Fit with a huge improvement in comfort and driveability.  We did lose some cargo space, sadly.  Oh, almost forgot...the Fit's climate control has a flaw in that the vent air, even on the coldest setting, was always 10 degrees warmer than ambient.  They must run the fresh air duct over the exhaust manifold or something.  If it was over 65 degrees outside you had to run the A/C to cool the cabin.  Honda dealer said this was normal.  I consider the Civic to be a far better car unless the wagon shape and cargo capacity is worth trading off everything else.  The steering was quite responsive on the Fit and a strong point.

    As far as VWs go, our 151k mile 1998 MK3 Golf is every bit as reliable as our 2010 Civic.  Unlike the Civic, all 4 windows go down with one touch.  All 4 window switches are illuminated at night on the VW, Honda cheaped out and forgot the rears.  The Golf has 5 way heated front seats, the Civic has 2 settings.  The Golf is far more fun to drive, much quieter, and has much less of a "tinny" feel.  If the current crop of new VWs didn't get such poor fuel economy compared to the new Civic, we would have bought another VW in a heartbeat.  In the era of $3 a gallon gas, couldn't justify 20's MPG vs 30's, though, so we settled for the Civic.  Our 98 Golf gets within 3 MPG of the Honda.  Wish I could buy a new 1998 Golf today.  

    herrstreet says:

    05:09 PM, 03/21/2010

    I've had four VW's and the worst problem I've ever had was a battery that was dying and the car told me about it with an idiot light.  They only reason I got rid of them was to buy more VW's and when I bought my G8.

    says:

    08:05 PM, 03/20/2010

    I have a Revolution Orange '09 Fit Sport (non-nav) with the Mugen quick-shift in my garage right now and I am quite happy with it after 11,000 miles. It's a sharp-looking car that gets me 33-36 MPG with enthusiastic driving and it offers fantastic utility. It's comfortable enough and a joy to drive, and it's easily the most thoughtfully engineered car I've ever been in. Long live the Thunderpumpkin.

    fuhteng says:

    01:15 PM, 03/20/2010

    I'm going to do my best to keep people from buying bad cars, whether they be a dull Toyota or an unreliable VW. If I was going to lease a car I will admit a VW (GTI or that new CC) would certainly be on the list. I can't understand why someone would buy something with such dreadful reliability.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Advertisement