INSIDE LINE

Full Test: 2005 Honda FCX

Road Test

Full Test: 2005 Honda FCX

Cruisin' the hydrogen highway

    0 Ratings
    Even as Honda plows forward with plans to be the first to introduce a fuel-cell production car, I found myself strangely uninterested in this alternative-energy vehicle. It seemed like an outdated look into the future, like finding a back issue of Popular Mechanics that said flying cars would be the next big thing.

    Then one Sunday, the odd-looking, zero-emissions 2005 Honda FCX was delivered to my house. It sat there while I wrestled with how to fill it up with hydrogen on the weekend. I began to view it as a giant pain, an albatross that would never be more than a footnote in the history of transportation.

    But then I drove it.

    After about 20 seconds of beeps, whirs and strange groans, the display panel flashed "Ready to Drive." I slid it into gear and pulled onto the hydrogen highway. Within a mile, I knew what I would say in my review: Make the cost of this car competitive, make hydrogen stations readily available, and I'd be content to drive one of these babies from here on out.

    But huge questions loom: Can you manufacture hydrogen inexpensively? Can you ship and store it safely? Answers to those questions are being hotly investigated by many more qualified minds than mine. And they are questions that will need to be answered before Honda's production vehicle, to be released in two years, can be more than just a pilot program. All I can tell you about is how it feels to drive this car. Cut back to me driving the FCX and push in for a tight shot revealing a smile on my face.

    Are fuel cells coming of age?
    The first usable fuel-cell cars began to appear on the roads in 2002, but they were limited in range and wildly expensive. The 2003 Honda FCX was the first hydrogen-powered fuel-cell car to be certified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the U.S. EPA in July 2002. The 2005 FCX received a Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) rating by CARB and an EPA Tier-2 Bin 1 rating, the lowest possible national emissions rating.

    The 2005 FCX — which uses the same body as the Honda EV+ electric car — contains the first Honda-produced fuel-cell stack. It's quicker, has a longer range and gets better fuel-efficiency than earlier prototypes that lacked this power plant. Honda said the two primary goals achieved by the technology in this car were "to increase the fuel cell's environmental adaptability to a wide range of climates, and to make mass production more viable."

    This second-generation FCX is a prototype worth more than a million dollars. It is capable of starting at temperatures as low as minus-4-degrees Fahrenheit and has a range of about 190 miles on a tank of hydrogen. The Honda Fuel Cell Stack PEMFC (Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell) delivers 107 horsepower via an electric motor. Additionally, it uses a regenerative braking system similar to what is used in hybrid cars, which converts the kinetic energy produced by the brakes into electrical energy and stores it in an ultra capacitor (no, not the "flux capacitor," from Back to the Future) which functions a bit like a battery. As a result, fuel economy is equivalent to a car getting an EPA city/highway rating of 62/51 miles per gallon of gas (57 mpg combined).

    Fuel cell — a simple concept
    The theory behind fuel-cell cars is simple enough. Hydrogen, which is stored under pressure in a tank, is mixed with oxygen from the air to produce an electrochemical reaction. It's a bit like having a battery that never goes dead as long as you keep adding hydrogen. Once the electrical power is generated, it can be used to turn a motor that propels the car. Power delivery is augmented by regenerative braking. In essence, driving a fuel-cell car is very similar to driving an electric car — except a fuel-cell car has a tailpipe from which water vapor is the only emission.

    While development of the fuel-cell stack seems to have taken a big step forward, the infrastructure supporting the car is lagging severely behind. When we needed a refill for our test car, we had to take the FCX back to Honda's Torrance headquarters. The next time we were nearing empty, Honda arranged a fill-up only three blocks away from Edmunds.com's offices at the City of Santa Monica department of public works. While 25 hydrogen stations are listed as being within 100 miles of Los Angeles, only one is open to the public. The others are either still in the planning phase or are for private vehicle fleets.

    Fill 'er up (with hydrogen)
    The refueling process was similar to that used to refill compressed natural gas vehicles (CNG) except that, due to the extreme volatility of hydrogen, a ground connector is attached. The ground connection also reads information about the car's operation, including the temperature of the tank, so the maximum amount of hydrogen can be pumped into it.

    The Department of Energy sets a benchmark price for hydrogen at $5 per kilogram (a kilogram is roughly equivalent to a gallon of gasoline). However, depending on how hydrogen is manufactured — often it is made as a byproduct of natural gas refinement — the price could vary significantly. Currently, there are stations selling hydrogen for as little as $3.60 a kilogram. Given that the fuel economy of the FCX is nearly twice that of a typical gas car, this makes the price per mile driven more economical.

    Honda is planning a Home Energy Station (HES), an integrated module that runs off a household's natural-gas supply to generate hydrogen vehicle fuel. The HES could also provide heat and electricity back to the house.

    Unique driving experience
    Step on the accelerator of the FCX and you get instantaneous power. There is none of the wind-up, no climbing a torque curve as in a gasoline-powered car. All the power is right there, whenever you want it (and can find hydrogen). Since it uses an electric motor, there is no need for a transmission. It's like being directly connected to a silent but powerful source of energy. It feels effortless: a pleasant feeling of freedom. Furthermore, since you know you are only leaving behind a trail of water vapor, you feel downright virtuous.

    Because our test track is over 150 miles from home, however, we had to tow the Honda to the facility. Once there the front-drive FCX delivered a rather pokey 13 seconds from zero to 60 mph. Despite that ultimately slow acceleration number, the FCX delivered a strong 0-30-mph time (3.7 seconds) and had plenty of acceleration for brisk around-town driving. On the highway, it easily cruised at 70 mph and offers a top speed of 93 mph.

    Our test driver found the two-door car's handling to be poor, reaching a slalom speed of only 60.4 mph. This could be because of the added weight of the fuel-cell powertrain, which pushes it up to a hefty 3713 pounds. The brake pedal provided plenty of reliable feedback, and stopping distances were average at 135 feet from 60 to 0 mph.

    A very enjoyable car
    The EV+ body that is now used by the FCX looks a little odd, but the interior configuration provides a desirable, tall driving position. This requires a significant step up to get inside. If you think to examine the car's configuration, it's apparent there is at least 1 foot of storage space between the bottom of the car and the interior floorboards, space that is used to store the electronics. Creating a vehicle with these dimensions could pose a problem to future production fuel-cell cars.

    One nice touch is the unusually good legroom and visibility for rear-seat passengers. The seats throughout are very comfortable, and all interior features are of the usual high quality expected of Honda. It was a smart move to make this cutting-edge car so ordinary and pleasing in every other way.

    Our test vehicle had a navigation system, a very useful feature when searching for out-of-the-way hydrogen fuel stations. The nav screen moves up to reveal a CD player beneath and a slot for memory cards. All the climate controls are simple and straightforward. We particularly enjoyed the attractive and cool blue gauges that flicker constantly to show the inner workings of the fuel-cell system. Our eyes were often drawn to the "miles to empty" gauge, which seem oddly low-tech given its extremely important role.

    But what of safety?
    Many people who rode in the fuel-cell car were concerned about the rear-positioned hydrogen tank, perhaps because of the horrific images of the Hindenburg explosion in 1937. However, Honda said the fuel tank in the FCX has been extensively tested — once it was crash tested in a collision with a train — and it never ruptured. Furthermore, hydrogen is extremely light and, if a leak occurred, the vapor would rapidly rise and quickly dissipate. This is actually safer than a normal car which, if it leaked would leave pools of flammable gasoline under it.

    Where does this road lead?
    Honda admitted that the future of fuel-cell cars is uncertain and there is no guarantee that this type of car will ever make a practical contribution to meeting our transportation needs. The platinum fuel-cell stack is expensive and very labor-intensive to assemble. Notwithstanding, Honda has set an admirable example by putting 15 FCXs on the road, mainly with public agencies in California, and has another five cars that are used for Honda's internal fleet.

    Honda is also pressing forward with plans to introduce a production fuel-cell vehicle slated to go on sale in two years. The cost of this production vehicle, currently named the FCX Concept, has not yet been set or even estimated. And clearly, to make it practical would require the completion of California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's Hydrogen Highway. This, and many other things about hydrogen fuel-cell cars, are still very much in the planning — and dreaming — phase.

    Road Test

    Second Opinions

    Edmunds.com Editor in Chief Karl Brauer says:
    After a short spin in Honda's fuel-cell car I confirmed that it was very similar to GM's EV1 (a car I drove back in 1997). Not surprising when you consider they are both, essentially, electric cars. But where the EV1 burns electricity stored in batteries, the FCX burns electricity produced from hydrogen. The car has plenty of pep (electric motors offer great torque) and the car's driving dynamics are, thankfully, very Honda-like. Great steering weight and road feel, comfy seats with just the right blend of cushion crunch and support, and logical ergonomics in terms of switchgear placement. The FCX is, of course, whisper quiet — except for a few strange, subtle whirs and whines as the hydrogen is processed. And at one point it did hit me, "Hmm, the only emission this car is creating is water vapor..." which is pretty cool.

    There's room for four, and the total range is about 190 miles, though that can change somewhat based on how it's driven (just like in the EV1). If there's a downside, it's the refueling hassles. There's actually a station in Santa Monica, right near Edmunds.com. But even then, Honda had to give the station advance notice that we were coming by before we could "fill up." And every time we went somewhere we had to keep the range/refueling issue in mind. We also had to use a flatbed to get it to our testing facility, as there was no way it would make it there and back.

    But I can say this with confidence: If the price was right and a fueling station was near my house, I'd happily replace the wife's Malibu with one of these. Maybe someday...

    Inside Line Editor in Chief Richard Homan says:
    It's always a hoot to drive around in the future, or at least in one of the vehicles that may become the future. With the FCX fuel-cell vehicle, Honda has put its stamp on one version of a possible future in transportation. As short a while back as the most recent turn of the century, experts were insisting that fuel-cell transportation was an exciting idea, but one for a distant future that appeared to be decades away.

    Honda, Mercedes-Benz and a few other companies disagreed, pumping budgets and engineering into the possibility of a fuel-cell-powered tomorrow. (Sorry for all the cliches, here, but I'm on a roll.) Now the Honda FCX has come to our offices, and even been tested. Actually tested. And that's a level of techno cool and manufacturer confidence that I refuse to get over.

    In some ways, this is just another way of doing an electric car, with the same quirky quietude and servo-gurgling during its morning exercises and great on-throttle tip-in and limited range. I don't know if the FCX will take its place on the nostalgia shelf like plug-in electric cars have, waiting for the great technological leap forward. But as a curious cat and a realistic optimist about the future, I'm just happy to see a company investing in the future and checking in with the present to see how they're doing with it.

    Engineering Editor Jason Kavanagh says:
    The future doesn't seem like such a bad place. By no means a one-off lab exile, our Honda FCX tester with a few thousand miles on the clock was equipped like, and drove essentially as, a new car. From the nav system to the air-conditioning, all the way down to the standard-issue owner's manual in the glovebox, the FCX is a full-on Honda production car.

    With only one exception: It's not for the general public yet. Not because it doesn't drive well, because it does. Just wait a few seconds at key-on and drive away on a wave of electron-induced torque in utter silence, save for a high-pitched compressor whine. The seats are comfy, and the interior completely normal. The only clues to its dramatically atypical means of energy storage are a high step-up in the cabin and a few zoomy gauges in the instrument cluster.

    So why not sell it to Joe Public, then? Try finding compressed hydrogen on a weekend. Turns out that, like the rest of the business world, the people who sell you the stuff don't work weekends. Even during business hours, finding compressed hydrogen is a chore requiring forethought and patience. Combine this with a driving range half that of a gasoline-powered commuter car and dashed were my cackle-infused aspirations of driving the carpool lane solo across Southern California.

    Inevitably, fuel cells will shrink, range will increase and performance will improve. All great stuff, but today's FCX proves that it's not the vehicles that are the limiting factor, but the means to refill them.

    Road Test

    Consumer Commentary

    "About the FCX, Americans would laugh at its size and shape. Plus, how will all these tiny little fuel-cell cars pass crash tests?" — esneed1, October 4, 2005

    "Apparently, the hydrogen at these refueling systems will be generated on-site using natural gas (unless someone can correct me on that). Which leads to a further question: Given the inefficiencies of generating hydrogen from natural gas (more energy is consumed to generate the hydrogen than energy available in the hydrogen) as well as the inefficiencies within the fuel cell and drivetrain of the vehicle, wouldn't it make more sense to simply burn the natural gas directly in a natural-gas-powered vehicle? Or are these the type of questions that one shouldn't ask when discussing fuel cells?" — rorr, October 5, 2005

    "The reality is, with large fleets of hydrogen fuel-cell cars, the hydrogen will have to be produced through the consumption of fossil fuels at either large-scale production plants or at the hydrogen refueling station. But, since it takes more energy to produce the hydrogen than can potentially be extracted in a fuel cell, the overall energy balance would mean the consumption of more fossil fuels with a transition to hydrogen fuel cells, rather than less." — stevedebi, October 10, 2005

    Sort By:

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Featured Specs

    • 107 hp
    • 190-mile range
    • Million-dollar price tag
    • Equivalent of 57 mpg of gasoline

    What Works

    Smooth and quiet, power on demand, zero emissions, Honda quality throughout.

    What Needs Work

    Scarcity of available hydrogen, small trunk, megabucks sticker, limited range, slow 0-60 time.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2005
    MakeHonda
    ModelFCX
    StyleN/A
    Base MSRPN/A
    As-tested MSRPN/A
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeFWD
    Engine typeAC Synchronous Electric Motor (permanent magnet)
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC)
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)107
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)201
    Transmission typeNo transmission for electric cars
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontStrut
    Suspension, rearTorsion beam
    Steering typeRack-and-pinion
    Tire brandYokohama
    Tire modelE-Spec EF1
    Tire size, front205/60R15 91H
    Tire size, rear205/60R15 91H
    Brakes, frontFront disc, rear drum
    Track Test Results
    0-45 mph (sec.)7
    0-60 mph (sec.)13
    0-75 mph (sec.)N/A
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)19.0 @ 69.0
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)32
    60-0 mph (ft.)135
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)60.4
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.71
    Sound level @ idle (dB)42.6
    @ Full throttle (dB)68.4
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)64.7
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsToo slow to be practical. Power delivery was seamless.
    Braking ratingAverage
    Braking commentsLong brake distance could have been from long-wearing tires.
    Handling ratingPoor
    Handling commentsEverything about this car is different from other cars. It is like driving a digital clock. It isn't designed to be a performance car and it certainly wasn't pleasing from an enthusiast's standpoint. Long-wear tires might have been responsible for poor handling.
    Testing Conditions
    Elevation (ft.)N/A
    Temperature (°F)78.8
    Wind (mph, direction)2
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)51 City 62 Highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)53
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)3.8
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3713
    Length (in.)164 inches
    Width (in.)69.3 inches
    Height (in.)64.8 inches
    Wheelbase (in.)99.3 inches
    Legroom, front (in.)N/A
    Legroom, rear (in.)N/A
    Headroom, front (in.)N/A
    Headroom, rear (in.)N/A
    Seating capacity4
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)N/A
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)N/A
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumperN/A
    PowertrainN/A
    CorrosionN/A
    Roadside assistanceN/A
    Free scheduled maintenanceN/A
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsN/A
    Head airbagsN/A
    Antilock brakesStandard
    Electronic brake enhancementsN/A
    Traction controlN/A
    Stability controlN/A
    Rollover protectionN/A
    Emergency assistance systemN/A
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot Tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot Tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement