For the generation of Honda freaks that grew up reading Super Street and Sport Compact Car and worshipping at the Temple of VTEC, the new 2011 Honda CR-Z will represent another blown chance for Honda to return to its tuner-friendly roots. This "sport hybrid" is not a cousin to the old Acura Integra or a high-tech hybrid reimagination of the Honda CRX. But at the same time it's something fun out of the same company that's put a trowel on the front of every Acura and let the Accord swell up into a dirigible.
The CR-Z is a car that finally shows us that Honda is trying to figure out what a Honda should be. It's a car that feels like it has been built by engineers, not dictated by product planners juggling contradictory data from focus groups. Sure, there's a bit too much soulless Asimo robot in the CR-Z's personality and not enough Integra Type R boiling in its blood, but if this is the future, there's hope for Honda.
There's even hope for hybrids.
Cuts Like a Butter Knife
In profile the 2011 Honda CR-Z has a nearly flat tail and a steeply raked windshield that leads to a blunt nose. It looks like a knife all right, but one that's used for spreading butter and jam over an English muffin. Not the sort of sharp blade that one takes to a knife fight. It might be that the new regulations for pedestrian protection in Europe will mean that all cars sold there (like the CR-Z) are doomed to have high, flat hoods like that of the CR-Z (take a look at the new BMW 5 Series, too).
At an overall length of 160.6 inches, the CR-Z looks short, but with its long doors and relatively long 95.9-inch wheelbase (4.2 inches longer than that of a Mazda MX-5), this little coupe is exceptionally easy to get in and out of. The big doors are thick and heavy, so they produce a satisfying thud when you close them, which makes you feel safe and secure. But they also swing out with a lot of inertia, and if you put a little too much shoulder into opening one at the Target parking lot there's a chance that you might put a good-size dent into the side of a Dodge Caravan. (Not that we have any personal experience.)
Command Central
Every control in the CR-Z is angled toward the driver. It's almost as if the engineers were tempted to build the CR-Z as a one-seater, but chickened out.
A large circular tachometer lies within its own shrouded pod, and floating in its center is a digital speedometer. To each side are various ancillary gauges, including a battery charge meter and a status meter for the electric motor assist to the left, plus a fuel gauge and multipage instrument display to the right. There's a bit too much going on, and the objective here seems to be lots of style with a scientific spin.
The seats are nicely shaped, full of airbags and covered in a silvery fabric that feels like a Kevlar mesh. Behind the two seats are indentations that look like they might be seats themselves, but function as bins for the usual flotsam. Close the cover and you get secure storage plus a nice, flat load floor all the way back to the tail. Honda says that 25.1 cubic feet of storage space can be found here, and it's all usable and easily accessible.
For many CR-Z drivers, it will become a ritual after starting the car to hit that Sport button.
While the interior looks great, it's hard to see out to the rear. The long rear window acts like a prism, so reflections toward the edges can get funky. Instead you look through the vertical glass panel at the trailing edge of the hatch and there's a lot that gets hidden, like the grilles of Dodge Chargers, Ford Crown Victorias and other assorted vehicles preferred by our friends in law enforcement.
Three-in-One Motoring
In general specification, the drivetrain of the CR-Z is identical to that of the current Honda Insight. There's a SOHC 1.5-liter inline-4 with i-VTEC variable valve timing making 113 horsepower at 6,000 rpm and 107 pound-feet of torque at 4,800 rpm. It's supplemented by a small electric motor that produces 13 hp and 58 lb-ft of torque. The combined parallel hybrid system is making 122 hp at 6,000 rpm and 128 lb-ft of torque between 1,000 and 1,750 rpm when the car is equipped (as this one is) with a six-speed manual transmission. (If you choose the continuously variable transmission, CVT, the torque rating is 123 lb-ft.)
To the left of the steering wheel are three buttons marked "Sport," "Normal" and "Econ." The default mode is Normal and the CR-Z performs, eh, OK that way, plus the tachometer glows blue. There's no crispness to the throttle response in this mode, but the car isn't significantly more sluggish than, say, a heavily laden Honda Fit.
In Econ the CR-Z feels as if it is dragging an anchor at anything less than full throttle, plus the tach gets a virtuous green aura. Honda says the Econ mode limits power and torque by about 4 percent, but provides "full responsiveness" at full throttle. Since it's misery at anything less than full throttle, what's the point?
The Sport mode pumps in extra electrical power during acceleration, firms up the steering effort and changes the electronic throttle's responsiveness, plus it has the tach burning a bright evil red as if you were actually strangling a Spotted Owl instead of driving a small car. At part throttle in Sport, the CR-Z actually feels pretty neat, with the unique sensation of low-end torque being the most prominent element in that neatness. For many CR-Z drivers, it will become a ritual after starting the car to hit that Sport button.
Almost Sort of Fast
Since we perform our acceleration testing at wide-open throttle, the CR-Z records the same test numbers in any mode, even Econ. And with its stability control disengaged, the CR-Z gets to 60 mph from a standstill in 8.8 seconds (8.5 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip), and the quarter-mile comes up in 16.5 seconds at 84.1 mph. That's better than the Honda Fit we last tested, which did 9.5 seconds to 60 mph (9.4 seconds with rollout) and 16.9 seconds at 81.1 mph in the quarter-mile.
According to the EPA, the CR-Z with its six-speed manual transmission will achieve 31 mpg in the city and 37 mpg on the highway. That's pretty good. And yet because it's a hybrid, we found ourselves expecting somewhat better than that from this 2,635-pound car. In our real-world driving, we achieved 30 mpg, ranging from a best of 38.7 mpg while driving so frugally it nearly killed us to a worst of 26.6 mpg while driving like a complete idiot on mountain roads.
The thing with a Sport Hybrid is, we also expected great performance, and the electric motor did provide some kind of edge, as this car would give us a little scratch between 1st and 2nd gear. We've never heard of anyone ever running the battery in Honda's Integrated Motor Assist (IMA) system out of juice, but we managed on some steep canyon roads while driving far too quickly, and the lack of the electric motor's useful power assist left the car surprisingly lifeless.
Perhaps all this shows you that the presence of the electric motor in this car is about more than just corporate public relations; it really makes a difference in the way the car drives, whether you're trying to get mpg or mph.
Chassis Schmassis
In a hybrid like the CR-Z, handling often seems to be an afterthought. But the CR-Z has a sweet feel to it that's not part of many other hybrids. The electric power steering is direct and responsive, and the suspension is both supple over road zits and dignified in corners.
This, however, doesn't mean the CR-Z is a corner-carving rocket. Its 195/55R16 all-season tires are designed for low rolling resistance, and the nose pushes through corners determinedly. Our 0.83g orbit around the skid pad is pretty respectable, though, while it also achieves 0.82g with the stability control engaged, which shows you that the electronic nanny is pretty permissive.
There's more car here than tire, an impression confirmed by the CR-Z's 61.4-mph run through the slalom.
The CR-Z We All Want
The pricing for the 2011 Honda CR-Z starts at $19,950 and peaks at the CR-Z EX with Navigation and the CVT at $23,960. Our test car, the CR-Z EX with Navigation and a six-speed manual, runs $23,310, which seems maybe too much for a car that's not so quick and for a hybrid that's not so economical. It's also just a few hundred bucks short of the Honda Civic Si coupe with nav that performs much better, or the Honda Civic Hybrid Sedan with Navi that gets better mileage.
Right now, the 2011 Honda CR-Z tantalizingly straddles the territory between what Honda once was and what it is going to be. There's a better, more engaging car waiting to burst out of the CR-Z, and here's hoping the Honda engineers start channeling the solid-state soul of Soichiro Honda himself and find a way to make this sport hybrid thing work better for us.
The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.
Add A Comment »
jrhoglund1 says:
06:09 PM, 11/18/2010
WHY COULDN'T THEY HAVE JUST SHOVED A 2.0 IN IT AND CALLED IT A ROCKET OH THEN IT WOULD BE A CRX DAH.
carlos20 says:
05:34 AM, 07/09/2010
The veloster is back to the drawing board because Hyundai is working in a Sonata Hybrid
engine detuned to 140 HP so they can compete with the CR-Z.
Honda take the automakers off guard with the CR-Z. Nobody compare the CR-Z with another hybrid because nobody want to admit the CR-Z superiority.
The CR-Z is compare wih SUVS, Sedans, Minivans even wih a 1987 model, all with the
hope to make the CR-Z a loser.
bb49 says:
09:55 PM, 07/02/2010
I think this article points out another reason not to buy the CR-Z if you're buying it for sporty performance. The CR-Z's best acceleration is with the assist from the electric motor which supplies the additional hp and torque (even with the assist the car is slow) so when the battery is depleted the driver is left with an electric motor and batteries that just act as a boat anchor and leave the CR-Z to flounder on its extremely weak gasoline motor. I suspect when forced to run on its gasoline engine the modicum of performance that the CR-Z has disappears completely and the driver's is left to ponder the question--where is the Sport?
rsxs says:
12:44 PM, 07/02/2010
Pointless. A normal civic is either quicker or the same from 0 to 60. Handle .83g same also. MPG? pretty much the same. Like the seats but thats about it. Shame on you Honda. I had some high hopes for his car but after delivering these poor numbers just seems pointless. $23 000 plus, ugh... good luck. I'll take an SI.
alex38 says:
07:33 AM, 07/02/2010
@ igo 1
"So is Ferrari which I though you were passionate about. All Ferrari are that way. All true Ferrari fan know."
You do bring up a good point and it is the one thing I DO NOT like about Ferrari's. I'm a big fan of the F430 but if the front overhang was shortened by a couple of inches, would look better to me...
I guess I've been drawn to Ferrari for the racing history, the overall beauty of their designs (sans the longish front overhangs), and supposed fun to drive factor. The engine sound second to none.
So, back on point, the Ferrari, with all that, is forgiven for it's long front overhang.
The CR-Z? Well, from the original CRX, it's heavier, more expensive, more complicated, arguably less fun to drive?, and much worse looking imo. The fuel efficiency numbers are good in its own right (39 MPGs?) but the upcoming Hyundai Veloster, or whatever it's called, is supposed to have better fuel efficiency, WITHOUT A HYBRID SYSTEM (40 MPGs speculated). The CR-Z almost as bad as the Aztec and is ugly as sin..
igo1 says:
06:39 AM, 07/02/2010
THE FRONT OVERHANG IS LONGER THAN THE REAR OVERHANG!!!
So is Ferrari which I though you were passionate about. All Ferrari are that way. All true Ferrari fan know.
xoquixxoqafxo says:
05:27 PM, 07/01/2010
@ ctpax
oh yeah... and if you want an automaker that is targeting the generation Y customers... look at SCION! thats the whole reason toyota created the brand.
fuhteng says:
01:58 PM, 07/01/2010
eldaino2 - when the whole point of a new car is to be fun, I don't think 8.8 s 0-60 cuts it. And by the way, a Fusion hybrid is 0.1 s faster to 60.
A Civic is indeed slower and heavier, but it also seats four, which is more than can be said of this.
Comparing this thing to the only car I can come up with that is close (two seater only, small, tiny engine) it is indeed heavier as a Miata weighs 150 lbs less. Which admittedly isn't much. I guess I read the number wrong before (I thought it was 3,600, not 2,600). However, am I supposed to be impressed that this thing weighs 2635 lbs and handles like a truck?
Tell me again why someone would buy this? Oh wait, suckers are born every minute. Honda-philes will buy anything with an H on it (but then, all fanboys are that way). I think my objections are the lack of purpose for this thing, and that instead of making sure the next Civic would be on time and up to par, money and time was devoted to a vaccuum cleaner.
05redrex says:
11:50 AM, 07/01/2010
"Really? its the fastest hybrid on the market. its faster than most 'ecnoboxes' too."
Thats like saying you're the smartest idiot. PS - It isn't the "fastest hybrid on the market." You're making stuff up. If that were true it would be faster than an LS600h.
autoboy16 says:
11:40 AM, 07/01/2010
Honestly, why not get a regular civic coupe? Its gets about the same MPG, its easier to drive, more powerful, and no hybrid batter woes to worry about. Plus it gets a rear seat and nicer interior quality?
Whats with honda knocking themselves in almost every category? Don't even get me started on having 4 similarly sized sedans that cost the same coin!