INSIDE LINE

2011 Honda CR-Z First Drive

Media Player

  • 2011 Honda CR-Z Picture

    2011 Honda CR-Z Picture

    It's like a Tesla Roadster, only at a Honda price. | March 16, 2010

Road Test

2011 Honda CR-Z First Drive

A Tesla Roadster at a Honda Price

    91 Ratings

    Finally the 2011 Honda CR-Z has come down off the stand at the auto shows and it's sitting right here on the asphalt on Naruto Skyline, a mountain road down the spine of Shikoku, the smallest of the main islands of Japan. We've been waiting to get behind the wheel of this car since the concept first appeared at the 2007 Tokyo Motor Show, and now we're getting our chance.

    Already there's plenty of hype building for the car's introduction to the U.S. late this summer, as American Honda has already built a Web site to promote the car's arrival. But this is the real car in front of us, ready to be released into the Japanese market, and Honda officials tell us that the American version won't be much different.

    The 2011 Honda CR-Z asks a lot of questions. The recession has dramatically affected Honda's adventurous engineering spirit, and the company has had to sell its Formula 1 team, cancel the development of its new front-engine replacement for the Acura NSX and end the sale of the Honda S2000 in America. Does this company still have the imaginative engineering that makes it so different?

    The Honda CR-Z is certainly a different kind of car. A hybrid can be a lot of things. Clean, clever and fuel-efficient, without a doubt, and a poster child for a forthcoming generation of sensible cars. But fun?

    Smart Car
    Honda has been working hard to make sure that the 2011 Honda CR-Z makes us remember the Honda CR-X, its two-passenger coupe built from 1983-'91. Just as with the CR-X, the mission here has been to build a small, smart, eco-friendly coupe for the modern era. Lightness and efficiency are the key attributes, because the combination of 122 horsepower and a curb weight north of 2,550 pounds tells you the CR-Z is not going to be blowing too many doors off a Bugatti Veyron any time soon.

    The CR-Z is like a Tesla Roadster, but without the $109,000 price tag.

    Here on the Naruto Skyline, the CR-Z defies its critics in cyberspace, who have been quick to dismiss the idea of the first hybrid with a six-speed manual transmission. It proves surprisingly taut, sporty, agile and entertaining as it tackles the twists and turns of the Shikoku roads.

    Of course, it's a totally different car from the CR-X coupe. That is to say, it's not some kind of cut-down Honda Civic coupe with a manic 1.6-liter VTEC twin-cam engine screaming its way to an 8,000-rpm redline. Nor is it a redo of the original Honda Insight, the slippery 1.0-liter hybrid coupe that Honda launched back in 1999 as the first hybrid to go on sale in the U.S.

    Fact is, the 2011 Honda CR-Z falls somewhere between the two — both in terms of design and in the amount of performance on offer. Honda believes that this is the right combination to build a network of CR-Z enthusiasts from Mini-type buyers who like the idea of a smart premium-style compact, only with the green image that a hybrid conveys.

    The CR-Z is like a Tesla Roadster, but without the $109,000 price tag.

    Hybrid CAFE Racer
    While the CR-Z is loosely based on the current four-door Honda Insight sedan, you'll be cheered to know that the Honda engineers have massively improved the formula by shortening the wheelbase, widening the front and rear track and making the structure far more rigid.

    The car measures 160.6 inches from end to end, 68.5 inches wide and only 54.9 inches to the tip of its antenna. The wheelbase is 95.8 inches, some 4.6 inches shorter than the Insight, and the CR-Z retains the suspension of the Insight platform with front MacPherson struts and a rear torsion-beam setup. The bad news is, Honda claims only a 97-pound reduction in weight from the Insight sedan.

    Once you pull open the somewhat heavy door, a novel interior design awaits, a kind of cost-conscious, Honda-type attempt to deliver the arty style of a Mini or Fiat 500. The low-set driving position is just what you want in a performance car, and the pedals and shift lever feel perfectly placed. The sport seat offers fine all-around support and looks good. The instrument panel is a busy mass of buttons, lights and switches, but there are cool touches like the usual entertaining display of power flow through the internal combustion engine and hybrid system.

    Don't look back, though, because rear vision is badly hampered by that dramatic, sloping roof line, especially into the blind spots over your shoulders. In Japan, the CR-Z comes as a 2+2 with kid-size jump seats behind you, but the new small Honda will be strictly a two-passenger vehicle in the U.S.

    It's the Power
    The SOHC 1,496cc inline-4 with i-VTEC variable valve timing and lift comes from the Honda Fit, and it delivers 111 hp at 6,000 rpm and 106 pound-feet of torque at 4,800 rpm. It's matched up with a six-speed manual transmission with ratios selected from the European Civic.

    Just like the Insight, the 2011 Honda CR-Z features a parallel hybrid system with an electric motor powered by nickel-metal hydride batteries. The motor is rated by Honda at 13 hp, and some complicated calculations by the engineers (don't ask) lead Honda to rate the combined output of the CR-Z's powertrain at 122 hp at 6,000 rpm and 128 pound-feet of torque at 1,000-1,500 rpm (123 pound-feet when equipped with the optional CVT).

    The CR-Z adds sport to the hybrid system with a three-mode drive system. Three backlit buttons on the dash give you the choice of Economy, Normal or Sport, and the inner ring of the tachometer is illuminated in green, blue or red to match. Each mode offers a different combination of throttle response, steering effort, idle-stop time and power from the hybrid system.

    It's Alive!
    Once you bring the engine to life, you'll recognize the uninspiring clatter. But when you select a gear from the six-speed manual, your frame of reference shifts along with the gears, as this tight, precise, short-throw linkage makes you think of the CR-X.

    From the first, the CR-Z's chassis also feels infinitely better than you expect, far better damped than the Insight and with an incisive feel to the way it responds to the steering. The front struts have forged-aluminum lower control arms to reduce unsprung weight, while the compact, H-shape torsion beam in the rear (which helps make it possible to package the batteries unobtrusively) doesn't feel like a handicap.

    And in the cut and thrust of driving — both in the city and on back roads — the 2011 Honda CR-Z feels sharp and punchy. Put that down to the extra push (in the way of torque) provided by the electric motor. In the Honda hybrid style, the electric motor is more than just a device to make it possible to stop and start the 1.5-liter engine at stoplights or propel the car silently across parking lots. Instead the motor delivers a maximum of 42 lb-ft of torque just as the 1.5-liter gas engine is getting into its stride. As a result, the CR-Z's powertrain has a sweet spot between 1,000 and 5,000 rpm on the tachometer, a smooth, seamless blend of power that gives the CR-Z a zest you don't expect.

    On the highway, the CR-Z cruises easily at 80 mph, the sportified suspension giving a firm but not harsh ride. Up over the Naruto Skyline, the CR-Z uses its quick-ratio electric-assist steering, tight front suspension calibration and wide 195/55R16 Bridgestone Potenza RE050A tires on special lightweight wheels to turn into corners well and neatly stay on line. There's good consistency to the steering feel and the CR-Z seems entirely predictable and linear in the way it behaves.

    We also tried the 2011 Honda CR-Z with its optional continuously variable transmission (CVT), and even with the slightly detuned engine (111 hp; 106 lb-ft of torque) required in this configuration, the car still accelerates briskly and smoothly.

    Three Modes of Go
    Gearheads, now look away.

    This Fit-based 1.5 is no sports-car engine and starts to get loud at around 5,000 rpm. Keep the hammer down and all too soon you find the engine stuttering as it hits the ignition cutout at 6,500 rpm. Worked hard, the engine sounds flat and hard — not exciting at all. And when you're on the limit rather than just pushing along, the CR-Z gives in to soggy, plowing understeer, and the body rolls over in distress. And a few hot runs up and down the hills soon had the brakes smoking. Yikes.

    There is, meantime, a big difference if you choose the Sport button over Economy. Throttle response is massively sharper in Sport (as it should be) and the Honda feels as if it's suddenly gained an extra 50 hp. But remember, on the hybrid side, there is no EV mode in Economy as such, and the CR-Z doesn't run in silent, zero-emissions mode like a Prius.

    As far as fuel economy is concerned, American Honda tells us that we can expect the six-speed CR-Z to record 31 mpg city/37 mpg highway, while the CVT-equipped CR-Z will return 36 mpg city/38 mpg highway.

    Is This a CR-X or Not?
    So what to make of the 2011 Honda CR-Z? Honda says CR-Z stands for "Compact Renaissance Zero," a phrase meant to capture Honda's commitment to go back to the point of origin (zero) to take on the challenge of creating a new kind of compact car, one not bound by the values expressed by traditional coupes.

    Down in Shikoku, the CR-Z proved that while it's not a machine to have the Nissan GT-R running for cover, it does have its own kind of sophisticated green-tinged driver appeal. Up to a pretty high level, it works, and that's pretty much all the CR-X offered us, however much we have romanticized the car in the past two decades.

    At a price of between $25,000 and $27,600 in Tokyo, the Honda CR-Z is fairly expensive, but early orders have still been flooding in. Come late summer, will Honda's formula with the CR-Z click with Americans?

    Edmunds attended a manufacturer-sponsored event, to which selected members of the press were invited, to facilitate this report.

    Sort By:

    mikde says:

    07:13 AM, 02/12/2011

    I traded in my 2008 civic si to purchase a new CRZ. although the crz has far less power it is a blast to drive. i trust there will be many performance items to boost the performance soon. The crz recieves many looks... the car does all I could expect from a sport hybrid... this breed od car will only get better.

    yamahr1 says:

    04:42 PM, 06/26/2010

    Not surprisingly, Edmunds gives this impractical econo-car (with only 2 seats) an overly positive review because it's a Honda. Really a "mild hybrid", not much different than the never cheered (by magazines) GM BAS system, here it's made to sound fancier by calling it a "parallel hybrid". Bad design, slow, not especially economical given all the compromises, and probably noisy if it's anything like most Hondas already out there, this car should be an epic flop. But being a Honda, it's sure to sell more than it deserves to, due to a brainwashed public and an overly fawning press.

    carlos20 says:

    11:00 AM, 06/22/2010

    Ive owned a 1985 civic si, a 1988 CRX si and rigth now a 1999 Accord lx.
    Last year CRX was sold with maybe 200,000.00 miles, just for a riot of my wife and
    the birth of my daugther. How many of the people posting about the CRZ have
    drive a CRX for almost 20 years. I really like the the CR-Z.
    The GTI was faster than my Rex, the miata handled better, but the CRX really felt
    like a sport car and the CRZ look and feel like a sport car.
    It is the esence of this car and people that have owned many Hondas knows that.
    The opinion of people driving a 1980 Hyundai excell really dont matter.

    jm10 says:

    08:10 AM, 06/19/2010

    I find this funny.Been following articles,etc. on this car since it was announced,and have been hearing the same thing everywhere. Thing is,not a single one of you have yet seen it in the flesh,much yet driven one yet. But, are quick to clobber it,based on specs "on paper".
    Sure,It might end up a disappointment.But who knows? Yet. How about wait until one of these-the production versions (not the usually pre-production ones tested/reviewed)are actually on a dealer's lot for us to try for ourselves?
    Yes, the car is a bunch of compromises,Im sure.But what if we try it out on it's own merits,and see first?
    At the end of the day,it's a Honda. End of discussion. It may not out-run Ferraris,it may not sound awsome once a lot of you goobers stuff one of those silly coffee-cans on the exhaust,or start trying to wedge cold-air intakes under the hood.But whatever it ends up actually being,you wont likely find yourself broken down on the side of the road,or up on the lift in the shop anytime in the next 15-20 yrs.

    I'm not at all crazy about the whole hybrid idea in general,myself.But I am curious to see what Honda can-or cant-make of it,compared to the others.
    But c'mon folks,at least give it the benefit of a doubt,and try it in person-before slamming them.Specs on paper,are one thing,actual workings on the street are almost always a world apart.
    And yes, Edmunds and just about any other "review" outfit out there writes promo peices like this for just about everything. When is the last time any of you can recall reading a review that actually SLAMMED a product?
    Heck,if you recall, those old Pacer's and Gremlins and the like were God's gift to automobiles,according to most "reviews" at the time..

    mountainking says:

    04:23 PM, 06/17/2010

    Well, it may only seat two, and be ugly, but at least it has poor performance and a high pricetag. CR-Z FTW!

    rsxs says:

    12:09 PM, 06/17/2010

    I was really hoping for better performance. I remember the 99 to 2001 civic si's 0-60 7 flat , .82g, and 41 mpg on the highway. Not to mention a very fun car two drive. oh ..and it seats 5 people. Not even sold on the styling of the CRZ. Hybrid tech, whatever.
    Come Honda, ever since 2006 , nothing but ugly cars made.
    Except the two door Accord coupe.

    xorbe says:

    11:10 AM, 06/17/2010

    Reposting articles from 3 months ago is just as annoying as the CR-Z.

    capoany says:

    06:12 AM, 06/16/2010

    I miss the old Honda. Have owned Honda Auto and Motorcycle products for better part of 30 years. This is another step off the cliff. Unattractive, and the mileage is nowhere near good enough for all the compromises. Their motorsports heritage is not remotely visible in their car lineup. And don't get me started on their bukes...the Fury??

    alex38 says:

    02:43 AM, 06/16/2010

    Yep, the exterior looks just as horrific as the last time IL posted this article..
    What happened to Honda???

    ravenstyle says:

    09:03 PM, 06/15/2010

    Epic Fail!! It is too bad that this car is a representation of the evolution of the CR-X.  what is happening to the automotive industry these days?? Someone say a prayer for making fun cars that are worth the money again.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2011 Honda CR-Z

    Base Price:

    $26,000 (est.)

    Engine:

    DOHC 1.5-liter inline-4; brushless DC electric motor

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed manual

    Power:

    122 hp at 6,000 (combined); 128 lb-ft of torque at 1,000 rpm-1,500 rpm (combined)

    EPA Rating:

    31 mpg city/37 mpg highway (est.)

    On Sale:

    Summer 2011

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2011
    MakeHonda
    ModelCR-Z
    Style2dr Hatchback (1.5L 4cyl gas/electric hybrid CVT)
    Base MSRP$25,500 (in Japan)
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeFront-wheel drive
    Engine typeInline-4 plus 10-kW electric motor
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1,496cc (91 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainSingle overhead camshaft, four valves per cylinder, variable valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.4:1
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)111 @ 6,000 (engine only); 13 @ 1,500 (electric motor only); 122 maxium combined hp
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)106 @ 4,800 (engine only); 58 @ 1,000 (electric motor only); 128 lb-ft maximum combined torque
    Transmission typeSix-speed manual
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent, MacPherson strut
    Suspension, rearSemi-independent, torsion beam
    Steering typeElectric-assist power rack-and-pinion steering
    Tire size, front195/55 R16 86V
    Tire size, rear195/55 R16 86V
    Wheel size16-by-6 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialAluminum
    Brakes, frontVentilated discs
    Brakes, rearSolid discs
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)36 city/38 highway
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)2,725
    Length (in.)160.6
    Width (in.)68.5
    Height (in.)54.9
    Wheelbase (in.)95.8
    Seating capacity2
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years/60,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistanceNot available
    Free scheduled maintenanceNot available
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsDual front
    Head airbagsFront
    Antilock brakesFour-wheel ABS
    Stability controlStability control
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemTire-pressure monitoring system
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement