INSIDE LINE

2010 GMC Terrain Full Test and Video

Media Player

  • 2010 GMC Terrain Picture

    2010 GMC Terrain Picture

    Crossing over into American suburbia. | November 19, 2009

Road Test

2010 GMC Terrain Full Test and Video

Disguising the Goodness

    33 Ratings

    Platform sharing is badge engineering's younger, more sophisticated sibling. Done right, platform sharing can create drastically different vehicles from the same pile of metal bits arranged in generally the same fashion.

    Then again, there's no need for drastic changes when the starting point is sound. Slap a fake nose and glasses on a 2010 Chevrolet Equinox and what do you get? The 2010 GMC Terrain.

    Re-Skinned Equinox
    Fortunately, the Equinox is a fine place to start, as it's quite the accomplished compact-ish SUV.

    The biggest difference between these five-passenger crossover stablemates (a.k.a. station wagons) is also the most obvious. Extensive sheet metal changes give the Terrain much blockier, more squared-off styling than the soft-curve Equinox. The soggy jowls on the Terrain's face are a bit forced — OK, they remind us of the cartoon character Droopy the Dog — and its tough-truck box-flares clash with the proportions of the terrifically tacky chrome 19-inch wheels and tires. To our eyes, the Equinox got the better end of the designer's pen.

    There's no denying, though, that the twins' styling will appeal to the sensibility of different consumers, which is the whole point. So, well played, GM.

    Aside from aesthetics, there are differences in the way equipment is bundled and priced. For example, a back-up camera is offered as standard on the Terrain, a pretty cool deal as there's a wide blind spot formed by the C- and D-pillars.

    The Terrain's driving experience exhibits no bad manners but lacks the spirit of some of its contemporaries.

    This content issue between the two muddies things up, but ultimately a Terrain costs more than an otherwise equivalent Equinox. Our Terrain tester (an SLT2 AWD model) starts at $31,745. Equipped with options like a 3.0-liter V6 engine, premium audio with navigation and a few other baubles, the total comes to $36,885. A comparable Equinox would cost a few Benjamins less.

    Success in Cabin
    The Terrain's cabin is nearly a dead ringer for the Equinox's, which is to say smartly styled with surfaces that look inviting to the touch. Our tester sports a two-tone interior treatment that adds life to the already dramatic-looking cabin. Sunny days reveal the folly of the pale gray plastic band at the cowl — it tends to wash out the view through the windshield. Likewise, the cheap-looking plasti-chrome accents on the console and gauge surround cast reflections into your eyes.

    Call it quibbling, though, as on the whole the Terrain's interior is an inviting and well-appointed place. There are heated leather seats, automatic headlights and climate control; a power liftgate; plus the center stack's warm red backlighting complements the neat and logical clusters of controls. The backseat area is outstanding, offering ample legroom with reclining seatbacks and a floor that's flat from door to door.

    A Suitable Everyday Companion
    Its handling offers no surprises on either end of the excitement continuum. Though the Terrain's grip on our skid pad is meager at 0.74g, its 63.7-mph speed through the slalom is a meaningful step up from the 60.2 mph of the entry-level Equinox we tested. This is not an SUV that strives to provide rewarding tactility in the spirit of contemporaries like the Nissan Murano.

    Still, the Terrain's driving experience is cooperative and exhibits no bad manners whether you're plying a parking lot or bending through a freeway on-ramp. Its suspension absorbs choppy pavement pretty well, and the stiff structure imparts a real sense of refinement and composure. It's better finished than a RAV4 and offers a more functional backseat besides.

    Our tester's low-profile 235/55R19 Hankook tires appear to have a bit more stickiness than the standard 18s, as the Terrain's 127-foot stop from 60 mph betters the Equinox we tested by 5 feet.

    Powertrain Effective but Not Perfect
    Our test vehicle's optional, direct-injection 3.0-liter V6 gives a solid bump in power over the base model's inline-4. Indeed, the 264-horsepower bent-six helps the Terrain move out well at full throttle, accelerating to 60 mph from a standstill in 8.3 seconds (8.0 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like at a drag strip) and completing the quarter-mile in 16.3 seconds at 86.5 mph.

    Unlike the larger-displacement V6s found in the Ford Edge and Nissan Murano, the Terrain's mill is down on torque at low engine speeds and comes on boil noticeably around 4,500 rpm. It's not a pretty-sounding engine when you give it the wood, either. Get into the cruising groove, though, and the engine settles down to barely a whisper.

    Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Terrain doesn't feel all that eager at part throttle. The Terrain's smallish V6 is certainly a factor, as is its ample 4,211-pound as-tested weight, but the six-speed automatic transmission deserves a lot of the blame. It's overly slushy at low engine speeds and eager to shift into and remain in the taller cogs of the gearbox in the interests of fuel economy. Not the best pairing for the engine that needs revs to deliver the goods.

    Opting for the V6 over the four-cylinder increases the Terrain's towing capacity from 1,500 to 3,500 pounds, but as there's no tow-haul transmission mode, we can't say for sure whether it has the smarts to perk up its shift schedule accordingly.

    The Terrain's 20-mpg EPA combined rating doesn't reveal a significant fuel economy advantage, either. Consider this our formal request to swap out the 3.0-liter V6 with the 3.6-liter V6, which in other GM applications has shown no fuel economy penalty despite its healthier output.

    Choose Carefully
    The existence of the Equinox makes the Terrain redundant, what with its corporate GMC tax and polarizing sheet metal. A sub-$30K Equinox with the four-cylinder turns out to be a heck of a package, whereas a Terrain that's optioned up to where it's knocking on $37 grand like our tester becomes a less compelling prospect.

    Like the Equinox, though, the Terrain is a solid pick in the five-passenger SUV mix due to its long features list and stylishly functional cabin. Another pass at the powertrain hardware and calibration would only sweeten the Terrain's well-executed package.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Road Test

    Second Opinion

    Vehicle Test Coordinator Mike Magrath says:
    The Sierra I get. The Yukon (and Yukon Denali) I get. They're work trucks for the Boss. For the contractors. For the foremen. The dudes who made it up from hammer-swinging to check-signing. This GMC Terrain, however, I don't get. Not for the brand. Not for the platform.

    It's a nice enough CUV. Solid ride, unique sheet metal, stylish, well-done interior. But a GMC? This is professional grade. This is professional grade soccer mommery. Nothing more.

    The GMC badge on this product seems less a decision based on sound data analysis, and more the acquiescence of a weak parent to a petulant child. "But, uncy-bob...Chevy has a version. I want one, too!"

    Maybe if this had a real-deal four-wheel-drive system with a low-range transfer case while maintaining this level of quality — maybe, then. But as it is, this is a sharp-looking car with solid features; a few grand cheaper and it would have made a stand-out Pontiac. As a GMC, though, it does more to obfuscate the direction of the brand than anything else.

    Sort By:

    adaval says:

    02:16 PM, 02/17/2010

    I am in a lease right now until 2011.  By then I hope the new Buick Crossover SUV will be out and I won't be disappointed.  I love Buick, so I am hoping against hope that the new 5 passenger will have all the comfort, quietness, as Buick is known for.  I sure hope they leave the width in the new Buick Crossover, don't take the 6" off that the Equinox, and Terrain have done.  They would be a perfect mid size crossover if they were not so narrow, takes away from the comfort and style of Buick.  Come on Buick make the 5 passenger crossover unique and to it's self.  If you give the Buick the width that the big boys have, like the Enclave, and the Acadia you will have a hot seller on your hands.  

    1487 says:

    06:07 AM, 11/25/2009

    I wasn't a fan when it was unveiled but in person and even in pics now it looks good. The front end is very detailed and aggressive plus it has standard projector headlamps which most crossovers in this price range lack.

    s197gt says:

    05:38 PM, 11/24/2009

    i saw one on the interstate and it honestly did not look as bad.  i agree, UGLY in pictures, but from what little i saw in real life, it wasn't that bad...

    makakio says:

    04:02 PM, 11/24/2009

    It's ugly.  I really like the design direction that GM/Chevy have been taking, but this thing is overwrought.  If it can hang with Toyo and Honda in long-term quality there are plenty of people here in CA who still like ugly body cladding and chrome wheels though.

    1487 says:

    11:19 AM, 11/23/2009

    "But as it is, this is a sharp-looking car with solid features; a few grand cheaper and it would have made a stand-out Pontiac. As a GMC, though, it does more to obfuscate the direction of the brand than anything else. "

    What? Making this a Pontiac would have been stupid. Pontiac should've never been selling minivans and crossovers in the first place. The presence of this vehicle hurts NO ONE. Some people would rather have a GMC for some reason. GMC/Buick is a separate sales channel from Chevy and they needed a crossover in this price range. They got one. It looks different from the Chevy and it will likely attract a few owners who wouldn't buy the Chevy. Just rate the vehicles, not the brand positioning or the necessity of the vehicles.

    1487 says:

    11:14 AM, 11/23/2009

    "This thing is just too overdone with cladding.  It didn't need to be made.  GM is making good strides, but they definitely took a step backwards on this one."

    Sales have been solid so far and I'm not surprised. Most crossovers look very soft- this one stands out and actually has some masculinity. A very rare attribute in this class. Not many guys willingly drive a RAV4 or CR-V.

    1487 says:

    11:12 AM, 11/23/2009

    "If anyone made a full size wagon in my price range I'd be all over it.  Unfortunatly GM would rather sell this monstrosity than a Malibu or Impala wagon."

    Yeah because midsize wagons are all the rage now. Those Accord and Camry wagons are selling like hotcakes. GM is stupid for not capitalizing on the "hot" wagon market and designing good looking crossovers to compete with such low volume failures as the RAV4, Escape and Cr-V.

    vanman1 says:

    07:47 AM, 11/22/2009

    Nice review. I think the Terrain is different enough from the Equinox that they will really and truely attract different buyers.

    Good product like this is what will help GM come back strong. Good to see!

    smilez says:

    02:14 PM, 11/21/2009

    To add to 'jeepsrt', lord knows that everyone that buys an STI, Speed3, GTI, GT-R, SS, et. all drive them responsibly and never cause accidents.  Not to mention they buy them only to race on tracks, you know, since they are very comfortable daily drivers.

    People buy vehicles for different reasons.  Not everyone with an SUV or truck buy them because they think they look cool or save them in accidents.  Studies just about show the opposite.

    And why don't you take a look at Edmunds mpg charts.  Your little hot-hatches mpg's aren't that far off from these "murderous vehicles" (tommyjones).

    Yeah it would be great if everyone only drove a vehicle that they needed, but it ain't gonna happen.  As long as they're around, there will always be the soccer mom with one kid driving an Excursion; and the 16 year old driving the Civic with the 5-foot spoiler and coffee can exhaust tip.

    I like...some...wagons.  I'm dissappointed they got rid of the Dodge Magnum, it was by far the coolest wagon out there, IMO.  The CTS wagon is pretty nice as well, especially if they make a V version.  But a wagon will not fit my vehicle needs, nor will a hatch, or a CUV.  SO I WON'T BUY ONE.

    My issue with this vehicle is that Chevy already has a version and GMC is really, really getting away from their PROFESSIONAL GRADE motto.  I don't remember where it was, maybe here, but I heard that GMC is coming out with a hatchback.  That's about as bad as the Jeep Compass and Patriot.  Sure, they get great gas mileage, but they're not what the respective company's are about.  Leave that to your sibling companies.

    This thing is just too overdone with cladding.  It didn't need to be made.  GM is making good strides, but they definitely took a step backwards on this one.

    jeepsrt says:

    01:19 PM, 11/20/2009

    @fuhteng

    Yeah, cause no one has been killed by anything but an SUV huh? It's called personal choice and lifestyle that you may need an SUV, I frequently drive up to our cabin in the mountains and am 6'6 so a small/medium wagon with low ground clearance will not do for me. I suggest you mind your own business when it comes to what other people want or buy, what fits you may not fit everyone.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2010 GMC Terrain SLT AWD

    Base Price:

    $31,745

    Price as Tested:

    $36,885

    Engine:

    Direct-injection 3.0-liter V6

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed automatic

    Power:

    264 hp @ 6,950; 222 lb-ft of torque @ 5,100

    0-60 mph:

    8.3 seconds

    What Works (pros):

    Execution of the cabin will make the competition take notice; refinement levels are excellent.

    What Needs Work (cons):

    Slow-motion transmission is paired to a merely adequate V6; its stablemate Chevy Equinox looks better and costs less.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2010
    MakeGMC
    ModelTerrain
    StyleSLT-2 4dr SUV AWD (3.0L 6cyl 6A)
    Base MSRP$31,745
    Options on test vehicleAudio System w/Navigation, Cargo Management Package, 19-by-7.5-Inch Chrome Clad Aluminum Wheels, 3.0L V6 SIDI Engine w/Variable Valve Timing, Trailering Equipment.
    As-tested MSRP$36,885
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeFront engine, all-wheel drive
    Engine type60-degree direct-injected V6
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2,994
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDouble overhead camshaft with variable timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)11.7
    Redline (rpm)7,000
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)264 @ 6950
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)222 @ 5100
    Transmission typeSix-speed automatic with manual-shift mode on console shifter
    Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)I: 4.48, II: 2.78, III: 1.84, IV: 1.41, V: 1.00, VI: 0.74, FD: 2.77
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent, MacPherson struts, coil springs and stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent, multilink, coil springs, trailing arms and stabilizer bar
    Steering typeRack and pinion with hydraulic assist
    Steering ratio (x:1)17.4:1
    Turning circle (ft.)40.0
    Tire brandHankook
    Tire modelOptimo H725
    Tire typeAll season
    Tire size, frontP235/55R19 101H
    Tire size, rearP235/55R19 101H
    Wheel size19 X 7.5
    Wheel materialAluminum alloy
    Brakes, front12.6 x 1.18" ventilated disc
    Brakes, rear11.9 x 0.78" ventilated disc
    Track Test Results
    0-45 mph (sec.)5.4
    0-60 mph (sec.)8.3
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)8.0
    0-75 mph (sec.)12.6
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)16.3 @ 86.5
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)31
    60-0 mph (ft.)127
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)63.7
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.74
    Sound level @ idle (dB)35.1
    @ Full throttle (dB)70.9
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)61.7
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsTraction control on or off. Who cares? Makes little difference. Engine feels like it's working hard to pull the Terrain through the quarter-mile. Manual mode does nothing to help acceleration. Brake-torquing does little. Just stick it in Drive and wood it.
    Braking ratingAverage
    Braking commentsAdequate stopping distance over the first three runs, then whoa! Another 15 feet and a soft pedal. Hold on!
    Handling ratingAverage
    Handling commentsSkid pad: Terrain feels big and heavy here. I could feel the front tires biting for grip around the pad so the AWD is using the front end to pull around the pad. Slalom: There's a real sense of weight here but the Terrain's manners are okay. It's not exciting, but it gets the job done without doing anything scary.
    Testing Conditions
    Elevation (ft.)1121
    Temperature (°F)66.8
    Wind (mph, direction)2.9 mph headwind
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)17 City / 24 Highway
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)18.0
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)4,012
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)4,211
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)56.4/43.6
    Length (in.)185.3
    Width (in.)72.8
    Height (in.)66.3
    Wheelbase (in.)112.5
    Track, front (in.)62.9
    Track, rear (in.)62.1
    Legroom, front (in.)41.2
    Legroom, rear (in.)39.9
    Headroom, front (in.)39.8
    Headroom, rear (in.)39.2
    Shoulder room, front (in.)55.7
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)55.3
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)31.6
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)63.9
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years / 36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years / 100,000 miles
    Corrosion6 years / 100,000 miles
    Roadside assistance5 years / 100,000 miles
    Free scheduled maintenanceNot available
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard dual front
    Head airbagsStandard front and rear
    Knee airbagsNot available
    Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsElectronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    Rollover protectionStandard
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemTire-pressure monitoring
    Emergency assistance systemNot available
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement