INSIDE LINE

Long-Term Test: 2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor

Media Player

  • 2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor Picture

    2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor Picture

    We purchased our 2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor just over a year ago for $39,992. | September 27, 2011

Road Test

Long-Term Test: 2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor

Wrap-Up

    24 Ratings

    Read the introduction of this vehicle to our long-term fleet.

    See all of the blog posts on this vehicle.

    The 2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor is one of the most unique production pickups to come along in years. It represented an all-new direction for the SVT group at Ford. More than just a powerful truck, it was designed to go fast over rough terrain in a way that would destroy most pickups.

    From the first day we drove it, we wanted one — and that doesn't happen often. Subsequent test-drives only made us more enthusiastic and it wasn't long before we began plotting our purchase. The first batch of Raptors only offered a 5.4-liter V8, but when a larger 6.2-liter version was announced later we decided to wait for it.

    The big 6.2 was rated at 411 horsepower and 434 pound-feet of torque, while the mogul-absorbing suspension setup was something previously unseen in a production truck. On top of all this, the Raptor is the meanest-looking rig on four wheels. It was the easiest purchase we'd made in years.

    The First 7,500 Miles
    A couple features of our new truck instantly stood out. Inside Line Editor Ed Hellwig proclaimed, "I hereby nominate the Raptor's front seats as some of the best in the business. Yes, a good ol' Ford pick'em-up has done what no Corvette of the last two decades has been able to muster."

    Seat comfort wasn't all the Ford had going for it, however, as the ride quality was generally good as well. Director of Vehicle Testing Dan Edmunds wrote, "Any time you emphasize something extreme, like high-speed off-road prowess...you're going to lose some day-to-day 'normal' performance. The Raptor's ride is generally soft on smooth pavement. It deals gracefully with swells, dips and other low-frequency stuff. But hit a high-frequency crack or bump and there's a shudder, usually from the back. Sometimes the rear hops to one side a little as one of the big tires bounces off the pavement. This behavior isn't foreign to pickups, but it's more obvious here."

    We put the Raptor to work in its first few months. Instrumented testing was first. Here the 6,000-pound truck accelerated from zero to 60 mph in 6.8 seconds (with rollout) and completed the quarter-mile in 15.3 seconds at 91.4 mph. After the track it was over to the chassis dyno, which measured peak torque of 372 pound-feet at 4,700 rpm and max power of 361 hp at 5,750 rpm.

    Some road trips were next. We meandered through the Sierras and continued up to Oregon. Upon its return home we tucked two motorcycles in the bed and trekked to Buttonwillow Raceway Park, breaking the 7,500-mile landmark en route. It was an uneventful few months for the Raptor, though, as it required nothing more than standard maintenance to keep going.

    7,500-15,000 Miles
    Just over 8,000 miles the service light illuminated and the Raptor was due for its first scheduled service. With no issues of note, the visit was quick and simple. Ford of Santa Monica replaced the synthetic oil, rotated the tires and performed the usual assortment of safety inspections for $87. Then we were back on the streets.

    Suburbia taught us new lessons about the Raptor. Parking structures can be problematic. Features Editor Mike Magrath sighed, "The lower garage has a height limit of 6 feet, 6 inches. The Raptor is listed at 6 feet, 6 inches. Whatever, the upper garage has a clearance of 8 feet, 2 inches so that'll work. Except that it has a 5,000-pound weight rating. The Raptor weighs 6,080 pounds without passengers. D'oh!"

    Photographer Scott Jacobs took the Raptor on an extended trip to Lake Tahoe and came back with nothing but praise for the truck, not to mention admiration from bystanders.

    "I don't know how many conversations I had at gas pumps over the past 10 days. It ranged from dudes with cell phone cameras, to a guy in Truckee asking if this was the one with the 6.2 (he looked at it like a starry-eyed kid when I said yes) to a creepy voice from the back of an Accord wagon in Lost Hills. 'Is that the Raptor? Leave now before I take it from you, bro.'"

    15,000-22,500 Miles
    Engineering Editor Jason Kavanagh noticed the first hint of Raptor mortality during a drive to Central California. Kavanagh wrote, "The Raptor's transmission gets a bit grumpy when it's stone cold. When stepping off from a standstill or shifting from 2nd to 3rd, the revs wind up and the gear engages with an abrupt blam! The 1-2 upshift isn't nearly as violent in this circumstance. Once it warms up, it behaves as normal." We scheduled a dealer appointment for the 15,000-mile-old Raptor to give it a look.

    Ford of Santa Monica had our truck for 17 days to repair the transmission. Originally the dealer said it would need to remove the pan to diagnose the problem. This work was not done. Instead, it determined a transmission software update was needed. Computer issues delayed the reflash a week, at which point Ford technical support instructed them to also replace the transmission main control valve body. Installation fell under warranty, as did fresh lube, gaskets and the reflash. While it was at the dealer, we also had them perform the next scheduled service for $87.

    Just 4,000 miles later the satellite radio antenna failed. So we took the Raptor back to the dealer. We waited a day for the part to arrive. It was installed while we waited and covered under warranty.

    22,500-30,000 Miles
    Things were quiet once the transmission and radio issues were fixed. We braved the $100 fuel fill-up. We towed some stuff. We hauled some stuff. Routine maintenance at 23,000 miles rounded things out. Somewhere between the last service and test end the driver's seatbelt release began to stick and a clip on the plastic bed extender busted. But we did not address either prior to its sale.

    Total Body Repair Costs: None
    Total Routine Maintenance Costs: $397.54 (over 13 months)
    Additional Maintenance Costs: None
    Warranty Repairs: Replaced transmission main control valve body, lubed driveshaft slip yolk splines, replaced radio antenna
    Non-Warranty Repairs: None
    Scheduled Dealer Visits: 4
    Unscheduled Dealer Visits: 1 for satellite radio antenna failure
    Days Out of Service: 17 for diagnosis and repair of transmission hard-shift issue
    Breakdowns Stranding Driver: None
       
    Best Fuel Economy: 15.7 mpg
    Worst Fuel Economy: 10.1 mpg
    Average Fuel Economy: 12.7 mpg
    Average Fuel Economy: 11.7 mpg (towing)
       
    True Market Value at service end: $37,411 (private party)
    What it sold for: $37,000
    Depreciation: $2,992 (dollars)
    Depreciation: 8% (% of original paid price)
    Final Odometer Reading: 29,573 miles

    Summing Up
    Versatility was what set the Raptor apart from the rest of the pack. On the dirt, no other vehicle came close. The heavily modified suspension under the Raptor handled whoops, washboards and off-road obstacles with ease. Equally impressive was the way it handled pavement with the same suspension. The truck eats up miles on the highway with little of the vagueness we expected from a truck with 35-inch tires.

    In our world this was a truck first and a Raptor second. We hauled and towed when we weren't kicking out dirt clods. Although it has a limited payload capacity of just 930 pounds, we never found a situation that proved too much for it. The Raptor was quite suitable for lightweight towing duty, and it hauled our cars and carried our motorcycles on a regular basis.

    Our total cost to own the Raptor was far less than expected. We won't deny that premium fuel gets expensive for a truck averaging less than 13 mpg. But the overall cost for routine maintenance was about $31 per month for the first year of ownership. That wasn't too bad considering we paid dealership prices and used synthetic oil. Ford warranties paid to restore the transmission to normal operating condition and replace the radio antenna. And when it was time to sell we got $37,000. This equaled depreciation from our paid price of 8 percent, or just $2,992.

    Numbers aside, this was a vehicle that many editors said they would consider buying for themselves. It's really that good. It has incredible power, off-the-charts off-road ability and still works as an everyday truck. The fact that it looks and sounds meaner than anything on the road is just an added bonus. If you can afford it, buy it. You won't be disappointed.

    Edmunds purchased this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Go here for a gallery of Raptor images.

    Sort By:

    stupidlefty71 says:

    01:18 PM, 10/12/2011

    Anyone who buys this truck and doesn't beat the crap out of it, wasted their money.  I understand the concept.  

    For all those that say put the Ecoboost in it.  You're all nuts.  If the argument is gas mileage than you've missed the purpose.  If it's to get more power, than I agree with boosting either v8.  Next you'll want an EB in the Super Duty...

    I hear a rumor this weighs 6000lbs.   Ha ha ha

    wikiwiki says:

    11:27 AM, 10/12/2011

    Oh and wiki, what about the THREE new recalls on the Q in ILs fleet and the horrible problems that Car and Driver has had with theirs?  Are they pos' as well?

    Yes.  Apparently they are.

    cokelover says:

    09:58 AM, 10/12/2011

    @ 5lv8 and igo1

    This thing was researched and designed specifically for those people who enjoy offroading. I enjoy driving offroad a lot and I see huge potential in this vehicle. As long as it serves what it's built for, I don't mind its towing capability or its fuel economy. This is one purposefully built truck just to satisfy the need of the very few. Being one of them, I am very glad that Ford engineered and came up with this beauty.

    If you don't like it, don't buy and don't bother to dislike. Very simple. You don't have to try to understand. But please do know that people are different. What totally doesn't make sense to some can totally make sense to others.

    igo1 says:

    08:55 AM, 10/11/2011

    5lv8 says:

    I could not agree more.  Only American gets so excited about SUPER over riced truck like this.  It is a damn truck with just a little different look.  With very little R&D, FORD must be very happy to have these people sucked into this marketing and spend thousands of dollars for nothing.  I just don't get it.

    5lv8 says:

    12:37 PM, 10/08/2011

    I never will understand the market for this truck.  It is slow, guzzles premium fuel, mediocre at towing and is the same price as quality turbo diesel trucks.  Why not use the money to upgrade to a F-250 with a Turbo diesel engine?  If the truck is not being used for towing or hauling stuff, why buy a truck?  Between SUVs and all-wheel drive cars, I could buy something that is just as good off road with a more comfortable interior and probably gets better gas mileage.

    maima says:

    02:45 PM, 10/06/2011

    This article was very helpful for me.

    wvraptor78 says:

    06:15 AM, 10/06/2011

    I have traveled extensively this summer and have seen a Raptor in almost every area that I have visited. Since my Raptor was delivered in July (ordered in January) it has not had a single problem. I did NOT buy this truck to be a garage queen and it has been in the mud, on trails and just driven period. I always get a great reaction from people and am asked almost every time I stop for more than 30 seconds if someone can look at it or take a pic or ask me about it. The front seats are amazing, no fatigue after 6 straight hours of driving. This truck is the best and I will never regret getting it even with the $100 fill-ups. You gotta pay to play and I'm glad I did!!

    stupidlefty71 says:

    01:30 PM, 10/05/2011

    I have seen these trucks around and they do have some street presence here in SoCal.  This truck is an extended cab with a 5' bed and it weighs 6000 LBS!  I know you have to beef things up but 6000 LBS for a 1/2 ton truck?  They had to put the 6.2l in it just so it would get out of it's own way.  

    The Eco-boost would have to be tuned a lot differently than it is now to compensate for the added weight. I'm not sure it would have been as reliable in this truck.  

    It's a cool truck but I'm thinking in a couple of years the fad will be over.  I'm a bit disappointed with Ford.  Everyone has been waiting for a new Lightning and the Raptor showed up.  I'll pass on this one.

    mb20 says:

    04:57 AM, 10/05/2011

    @ v6mx3

    "what Ford needs to do is pot the ECOboost V6 in this bad boy... maybe a lil more boost ;)"


    - Here's a boost option for you for the 5.4L or the 6.2L.

    http://www.procharger.com/Ford_Raptor.shtml

    tqpolo says:

    08:07 PM, 10/04/2011

    @jmess

    You can brag all you want but at the end of the day you're in a Civic. You are classic of what Jeremy Clarkston describes in the Forza 4 - Endanger Species commercial. Yea you care about MPG all you want, some people want raw power and the joy of driving.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4q2KjWG-9Q

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Advertisement