What is it?
2013 Dodge Dart
What's special about it?
It's all well and good to build sweet-looking Chargers and Challengers, but if you want to sell cars to mainstream Americans, you need a credible entry in the compact car segment. And it looks as if Dodge may finally have one in the 2013 Dart.
Dodge's new front-wheel-drive sedan is essentially an enlarged version of the Alfa Romeo Giulietta we drove last year. Its 106.4-inch wheelbase is about the same as the Hyundai Elantra's, but it's longer (183.9 inches) and wider (72 inches) than the Elantra and other likely rivals such as the Chevrolet Cruze, Ford Focus, Honda Civic and Mazda 3. Legroom in the Dart looks to be competitive but not class-leading, but it has more front shoulder room and hiproom than its rivals.
Looking at the Dodge Dart, it's obvious that style is going to be a huge part of its appeal. Company designers have applied styling elements from the rear-drive cars, including Charger-esque LED taillights, but nothing feels forced or cartoonish. Moreover, there's good reason to think the Dart will actually be pretty agreeable to drive.
Dodge is offering three engines on this car. On SE, SXT, Rallye and Limited, you'll start out with a 160-horsepower 2.0-liter inline four-cylinder, and either a six-speed manual or six-speed automatic transmission. Dodge has nicknamed this engine Tigershark for 2013, but you've seen it before in the Caliber and Jeep Compass.
In any case, we'll probably want to skip right over this engine in favor of the optional turbocharged, 1.4-liter inline-4, which features Fiat's Multiair variable intake valve system. The 1.4-liter turbo also makes 160 hp, but offers considerably more torque — 184 pound-feet at 2,550 rpm compared to 145 lb-ft at 4,800. This engine takes either the six-speed manual or a six-speed, dual-clutch automated manual gearbox, and we're guessing it will be the fuel economy leader in the Dart family.
Finally, there's the Dart R/T, which has a 2.4-liter version of the Tigershark engine. Importantly, though, this engine has Multiair-style intake valves, which help it to 184 hp at 6,250 rpm, but oddly, only 145 lb-ft of torque. Equally odd is the fact that you can't have the dual-clutch box on the R/T, just the six-speed manual or six-speed automatic.
Never mind that for now, though, because what impressed us the most about the Giulietta was its stiff chassis and well-tuned suspension. The larger Dart weighs about 200 pounds more (and 68 percent of the metal in its unit-body is high-strength steel, says Dodge) and features the same fully independent suspension with MacPherson struts in front and a multilink rear. The power steering is electric — we liked how it was tuned on the Alfa, so there's every reason to be optimistic here.
Much like on the Elantra and Focus, a ridiculous amount of feature content will be offered on the 2013 Dodge Dart. As you've seen in the early photos, the gauge pack in at least some models is a 7-inch thin-film transistor (TFT) display, and you'll be able to get an optional audio-navigation system with an 8.4-inch touchscreen. The list of available safety features rivals some luxury cars, as Dodge will offer driver and front-passenger knee airbags, blind-spot monitoring and a back-up camera with cross-traffic alerts. You'll be able to get HID headlights on some models, as well as a heated steering wheel and a keyless ignition.
Inside Line says: Dodge doesn't just need a hit, it needs to be able to go head-to-head with the Civic and Elantra in the compact-car class. The Dart looks solid on paper, and we hope the driving experience will back that up when we get behind the wheel later this spring.
Add A Comment »
adukes_007 says:
03:30 PM, 01/23/2012
The torque figure for the 2.4 is wrong in this article. The correct number is 170ft/lbs. As far as the weight.....the added heft should keep it from flexing like an Elantra around curves. That car feels like it wants to tear apart.
Dodge Dart World www.dodge-dartworld.com
dbzimp says:
09:50 AM, 01/23/2012
All of that poundage comes from all of the mandatory active/passive safety devices imposed by the gov't. social engineers. They have everyone brainwashed with all of the crash survivor propaganda.Why don't 'Mericans learn how to actualy drive instead of just operating a vehicle?
icemilkcoffee says:
11:24 PM, 01/19/2012
Looks great to me. They just need to do soomething about that 3211lb weight. How on earth could a front drive with a 1.4 turbo engine, weigh as much as an AWD WRX with a 2.5 turbo engine?
wikiwiki says:
10:58 AM, 01/19/2012
As long as they stick to what they are known for. Reliable, quality cars that are well engineered and get great MPGs, I am all in. They are known for their superior engines too. Oh wait. Sorry. I thought I was on the Honda page.
jimmytheg says:
03:39 PM, 01/11/2012
Dodge Don't.
wyrmdog says:
11:38 AM, 01/11/2012
Call me when the SRT lands. Gilles makes me excited for cars I couldn't otherwise spare a second glance for. That said, is it just me or is that curb weight number a bit high for the class? Or are they all getting there and I just haven't noticed?
At any rate, I find it odd that when I look at the interior, it looks to be terribly cheap and really cool all at the same time. I'm not sure how they pulled that off, but they did. The TFT gauge cluster makes me giddy and I like the nav screen, too. They seem to have managed a really simple yet effective layout there. I just can't quite decide what I think of it all.
driver33 says:
05:45 PM, 01/10/2012
It appears you are in the minority...
says:
04:23 PM, 01/10/2012
I really feel so bad for Americans. Do you guys really like the design? It is an Alien looking ugly car. I love Chevy doing good with Camaro design cues, and Ford with Focus like designs, but Chrysler Dart? The Dart simply looks uglier than a real Dart. If you have Alfa Romeo just bring them in to the US, what makes you think American like this one over $17,000 Alfa Romeo Giulietta? If I had 17grand, I will go for Alfa. The Dart, this is really ugly. I understand all that Patriotism matters, but this isn't the design that one can buy even with Patriotism.
vikasdesai says:
05:19 AM, 01/10/2012
too much dodge, not enough alfa, they should have kept the design the way it was or at least make a fiat variant with the cooler italian design. The tragedy of appealing to the general american public=making the cars bigger and more boring, still infinitely better than the calibur
garrym says:
07:55 PM, 01/09/2012
Wow, better than I expected in styling and interior execution. Pass on having an automatic. I'm not impressed with some of the dual-clutch autos I've driven. An SRT4 version could be a lot of fun, hopefully such a version is coming.
All the best Chrysler, you need some strong Dart sales to offset all those Fiat 500s sitting on dealer lots.