"Remember: This 2010 Chevrolet Equinox LT2's competitors are the Honda CR-V and Nissan Rogue," he tells us.
We kept repeating the words of the Chevrolet spokesman like a mantra while we were driving this compact crossover. We had a couple of good reasons.
First, the compact 2010 Equinox looks and feels as if it actually belongs in the same segment as larger, better-equipped SUVs. Second, this 2010 Chevrolet Equinox LT2's frugal 2.4-liter inline-4 engine was adequate for driving slowly on city streets or cruising at a steady speed on the highway, but it kept trying to get our attention in an annoying way despite its nifty noise-canceling loop built in to the vehicle's audio system.
We also kept saying the mantra to ourselves because the 2010 Chevy Equinox is better than the Honda CR-V and Nissan Rogue in so many ways.
Nice Package
Packaging for a midsize SUV is typically less fraught with compromises in budget or real estate compared to the thrifty compacts. So when we first took inventory of the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox LT2, we were pleased to find that it presented a different, better class of SUV. It offers many standard and optional features that aren't available for most of its direct competition.
Most important, we weren't unhappy with the reedy song of the Equinox LT2's 2.4-liter direct-injection Ecotec inline-4 as it approaches its peak output of 182 horsepower at 6,700 rpm, nor with its ability to run at wide-open throttle to 60 mph in 9.3 seconds (9.0 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip). Even so, we had to remind ourselves that it takes patience and anticipation in traffic, because there's a fraction-of-a-second delay after you put your foot down before this 3,783-pound Equinox makes its move.
That said, when you drive a 166-hp CR-V or 170-hp Rogue, there's no doubt there's a high-revving four-banger working hard to merge onto the freeway, pass on a two-lane or simply haul itself up a steep grade. The Equinox LT2 is no better (or worse) in this regard, but there's a reason this otherwise competent SUV is available with an optional ($1,500), 264-hp 3.0-liter V6.
Lost in Transmission
The Equinox four-cylinder's "do more with less" dynamic is compromised by a six-speed transmission that's been optimized for fuel economy rather than for strong response. Chevrolet does not stand alone in the spotlight of criticism here. Practically every new vehicle we've driven with an automatic in the past year or so, including the all-new Cadillac SRX V6 (the Equinox's stablemate), has felt as reluctant to cooperate.
Most of the time, we circumvent the default transmission programming by pressing a sport button. Only the Equinox doesn't have a sport button and instead has an "Eco" button, which engages even more extreme fuel-economy programming that is meant to improve fuel economy by 1 mpg, but also makes the transmission even more stubborn about responding to your demands.
Presumably, the upside to downsizing an engine and slowing the transmission's responses is improved fuel economy. According to the EPA's estimates, this front-drive 2010 Equinox LT2 with its four-cylinder engine should earn top-of-its-class mileage — 22 mpg city/32 mpg highway and 26 mpg combined. That's pretty impressive, even for a compact SUV.
Yet our testing didn't come close to achieving these numbers, even though we're usually within 1 mpg of the EPA combined number. In this case, 21 mpg was the best we achieved. For comparison's sake, a 2009 Honda CR-V (FWD) earns a 23 mpg combined rating, and a front-wheel drive 2009 Nissan Rogue S earns 24 mpg.
Feature Presentation
But what makes the Equinox so good and so unique in the compact SUV category has nothing to do with its engine, nor its transmission programming and the resulting EPA rating. No, it's the Equinox's styling, design and features that make it a standout.
"It's the Equinox's styling, design and features that make it a standout."
The list of features on our LT2 with a base MSRP of $26,190 is too long to list here, but an abridged directory of top-shelf standard items includes six airbags, stability/traction control, cast-aluminum wheels, auto headlamps, foglights, remote entry/remote start, rearview camera, eight-way power driver seat, sliding rear seats with 60/40-split and three-position recline angles, auto climate control, leather-wrapped tilt-telescoping steering wheel with audio and cruise controls, one year of OnStar's Safe and Sound with crash notification, Bluetooth for phone and a USB/aux jack.
Our tester added a Chrome Appearance package that also included rear parking sonar ($695), leather seats with heated front buckets ($1,050), a power liftgate ($495) and metallic paint ($195) for a total of price of $28,625. A power moonroof, a hard-drive-based navigation system and DVD rear-entertainment system are available.
But the thing that can't be itemized, categorized and monetized is how well designed and presented it all is. Even with our Equinox's somber jet-black interior (the two-tone treatment is more attractive), we couldn't ignore the obvious attention to design, build quality and superior content. Soft where it should be, modeled with the appropriate amount of texture and handsomely stitched where it ought to be, the Equinox's interior is vastly superior to that of any current compact SUV, save burgeoning premium compacts like the Audi Q5.
The Equinox's seating matches its premium style. The driver seat is eight-way power adjustable with lumbar adjustment, which is uncommon for its class. The rear seats offer between 1.5 inches more rear legroom than a CR-V and 4.6 inches more than a Rogue. The Chevy's 60/40-split fold seats also slide fore/aft and recline in three fixed positions. Luggage room with all seats occupied is about average at 31.4 cubic feet, and maximum cargo room behind the front seats is also about average at 63.7 cubic feet.
Pick of the Litter
In terms of exterior styling, we feel the Chevy plays the best riff on GM's compact SUV platform. Unlike the forced styling of the 2010 Cadillac SRX, the "I'm a truck, really I am" 2010 GMC Terrain, and the recently departed Saturn Vue, all of which are essentially the same unibody chassis with different wrappers, the Equinox looks appropriately scaled, detailed and thankfully restrained.
Though out on the highway, some observed a brittle quality to the Equinox's ride. Most likely caused by a combination of the 35 psi inflation for the P225/65R17 tires (a fuel-saving practice) and compression damping that's a little too harsh, the Equinox slaps its tires on seats between concrete slabs on the freeway. Rebound damping, however, is quite good, providing a gentle return to an otherwise smooth and controlled ride.
Electric-assisted power steering (EPS) — another fuel-saving measure — seems to be an elusive art to the engineers at GM. It can be done properly, as Mazda and Mini have proven, yet the Chevy Equinox has steering that feels like a driving simulator, and not a very good one at that. Sure the Equinox has light steering effort a low speed so it's easy to park, and some people might prefer its isolation from the bumps and thumps of the road surface, but it doesn't make for great driving.
Of course great driving is apparently not the mission here, as the Equinox circles the skid pad with 0.78g of grip and then weaves through the slalom at just 60. 2 mph. At least it comes to a halt from 60 mph in 132 feet.
Another Reason To Consider GM
Despite its few dynamic idiosyncrasies, we feel the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox LT2 represents a yet another clear example of what GM can accomplish.
It appears that the General's got some new orders. We trace the beginning of this resurgence from the 2008 Cadillac CTS right up to the 2010 Buick LaCrosse that managed to outshine a Lexus ES 350 in a recent comparison test. The mandate has changed from "Good enough is good enough" to a more courageous, "Don't just make it competitive; make it better."
From its contemporary styling and class-leading features to its competitive pricing and miserly fuel economy, the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is the right SUV for the times, and not a minute too soon for GM.
The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.
Add A Comment »
tuxedo123 says:
09:03 AM, 03/06/2011
I don't see much discussion on the front wheel drive vs. the AWD. I've been told (even by the sales staff) that the front wheel drive is all that's needed with the 4 cyl engine. But I live in DC, and have seen my fair share of cars unable to make it up our cul-de-sac hill in winter. For the AWD, the price difference is $2K, not mentioning the reduction in gas mileage. Advice?
We have a Tahoe and are used to 4-wheel drive option, but are hoping to not spend the extra $$$, expecially with the hours I spend in the car daily.
Thanks!
lawboy26 says:
08:51 PM, 02/26/2010
A very popular ride but once you drive it...you'll see why.
cwalton1 says:
09:26 AM, 01/11/2010
@misterfusion: Thanks for the heads up. I believe the numbers were preliminary at the time of posting -- and are now accurate to EPA estimates.
-Chris Walton
my2ndequinox says:
06:09 PM, 10/26/2009
I bought the 2005 Equinox LT when they first came out. LOVED IT. So I just bought the 2010 Equinox LT 4cyl mostly for the gas mileage. The AWD does not get the 32mpg they claim. I'm only averaging 25mpg. Now less than month old and less than 3,000 miles, I've started experiencing some, what I think is, transmission problems. Today was the worst episode. Traveling on pretty level road, doing approx 53mph with traffic, maintaining speed (not accelerating) the vehicle suddenly felt like it shifted into 2nd, lunged/jerked like it down shifted and the RPMs revved up to about 5-6. It felt like something had taken over my vehicle. Lost speed but only lasted about 5 seconds. I immediately took it to the dealer (was very near/close by) where they scanned/scoped it and they found nothing. This is about the 3rd or 4th time it has happened but, this one was the worst one.
misterfusion says:
01:51 PM, 10/02/2009
Either the article or the spec sheet has a typo regarding the EPA mileage figures, since they are completely different. The numbers in the article match what I've seen everywhere else, so I don't know where the EPA numbers in the specs came from.
BTW, I love that we can now leave comments on the articles! Nice job on the site redesign.
wrinklebump says:
07:40 AM, 10/02/2009
I think it's physically impossible for a crossover to look good on the outside but the Malibu nose certainly does work for it.
Still, the lines could be smoother.
rocket_ says:
11:20 PM, 10/01/2009
digging the new site design.
the equinocks looks pretty solid, too. The exterior design is ok, but the interior really shines. a good review, guys.
and congrats on the new site!
jacarig says:
06:11 PM, 10/01/2009
The Equinox is a nice car...I've seen three in my area already.