INSIDE LINE

GM Losing One of Its Last Old-School Engine Guys

Media Player

  • Tom Stephens Picture

    Tom Stephens Picture

    In 2003, Tom Stephens introduced the XV16, a flight-of-fancy V16 displacing 13.6 liters and intended for a yet-to-be-developed Cadillac über-luxury car. | January 18, 2012

News

GM Losing One of Its Last Old-School Engine Guys

    7 Ratings
    Just the Facts:
    • Vice Chairman and Chief Technology Officer Tom Stephens, a 43-year GM veteran with perhaps the company's deepest engine-development chops, is retiring in April.
    • Stephens' departure comes as rumors persist that GM management decided to cut back on upgrades for its next-gen V8.
    • Stephens is one of the last top-tier GM executives who was with the company prior to its 2009 bankruptcy and restructuring.

    DETROIT — General Motors announced over the weekend that Vice Chairman and Chief Technology Officer Tom Stephens will retire in April. But don't let his current banal title fool you: Stephens spent most of his time at GM engineering and hot-rodding engines and is one of the last of the remaining old-guard GM upper management qualified to lend "car-guy" support to Vice President and President of GM North America Mark Reuss.

    Stephens is most closely associated with GM's powertrain operations, where he served as a vice president and later, group vice president for global powertrain from 2001-'08. Stephens' gradual move away from powertrain development came as GM itself systematically incorporated powertrain engineering into its larger global product-development practices.

    In 1990, when GM Powertrain was formed by merging the Hydra-matic and Engine divisions, the unit was nearly as powerful as any of GM's carmaking divisions. But Powertrain's eventual absorption into the company's broad product-development processes, finalized with its joining of Global Product Operations in 2010, greatly reduced the influence of GM's engine-and transmission-engineering division and the individuals who shaped it.

    Stephens probably is best known as one of the primary engineers for GM's Northstar V8, the company's first contemporary overhead-cam V8 when it was launched in 1992, but he also held high-level engineering positions with GM's truck group and, more recently, as a vice president for global quality.

    The announcement of Stephens' retirement comes as talk in Detroit said GM upper management scuttled an investment in the company's next-generation small-block V8 and a fully developed "premium" V8 dubbed the UV8 remains on the shelf, perhaps never to be salvaged. The fifth-generation small-block will be upgraded with direct fuel injection, as GM confirmed late in 2010, but a high-tech valvetrain innovation long believed to be penned into the Gen V program reputedly was rejected as a bad investment as rigorous new Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards take hold beginning in 2016 and engine downsizing is rampant in the industry.

    If true, the move could signal GM plans for a future in which V8s will be offered only for pickup trucks and the Chevrolet Corvette, both of which have seen relatively drastic declines in demand in recent years. The company sold just 13,164 Corvettes in 2011. Although 2011 Corvette sales were up 4.3 percent compared with 2010, since the recession, the sports car has been enduring some of its worst sales years since the early 1960s.

    Sales of full-size pickups such as the Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra respectively were up 12.2 percent and 14.9 percent in 2011, but sales volumes in the pickup segment remain far off their historic highs and many analysts believe increasing CAFE and fuel-price pressures may mean full-size pickups never again reach their former sales glories, a possibility that may be shaping how GM is approaching its investment in the small-block V8.

    Inside Line says: Right or wrong, another of those who for decades helped shape GM is moving on.

    Sort By:

    throttle_poet says:

    02:26 PM, 02/25/2012

    @Zr1man wow no onder you are speakin positively, its the vette. Haha, I cant wait till I c u hate on ferraris and euro cars in the future, I will back up all the others commenting on your stupid, bias ,patriotic comments that actually make Americans seem stupid to the rest of the world. Which is really not the case. Please dude stop hatin on people. Its sad that the internet allows faceless characters to roam freely and say what ever they feel, its a pity i tell u.

    zero0 says:

    07:09 PM, 01/19/2012

    Personally, I think they can make V-8 that can gets 40 mpgs but they wont. With all the brillant minds out there where is this V-8?

    ed124c says:

    10:46 AM, 01/19/2012

    I know very little about V8s any more, but I think the writing is on the wall for them.  GM should be reacting to the tightening gas mileage mandates by bringing out a second version of the Corvette, designed along the idea of the upcoming Acura NSX.  It could be called the Stingray.  Sacrilege?  Not for the younger potential buyers.  The old farts will still get their V8 Corvette... for a few years, anyway.  But by then the old diehards will be, uh, gone.  And that includes me.

    Of course, the Camaro needs to slim down and get a smaller V8, or even a (shudder) turbo V6.  The times they are a changin'.  

    viss1 says:

    06:47 AM, 01/19/2012

    @hooklyn:
    It seems the only thing 50 years old is your information. There are aluminum variants of the LSx, and its design shares very little with the Gen I small block you're referring to.

    zr1man says:

    09:18 PM, 01/18/2012

    It is indeed sad to see one of the last of the  "old school" engine guys go. These people were hard working and dedicated. We can thank them for the outstanding performance of engines like the LS3 and LS9.

    It is good to know that GM plans to continue the powerful V8s in the Corvette.

    Tom Stephens enjoy your retirement.

    govmotorgm2008 says:

    08:48 PM, 01/18/2012

    So whats the big deal!  he is part of the problem!  he should have retired 41 years ago.  

    compressor says:

    07:14 PM, 01/18/2012

    hooklyn,
    Is your problem with the "old school" small block centered around the fact that, despite being "simple" it can be fuel efficient, reliable, and have  a great power to weight and power to size ratio?

    Your comment reads like one given by a person who loves a small relatively unpowerful engine just because of the "tech" it has while overlooking the "big" v8 that is light, simple, with tons more potential.

    smallfield says:

    06:02 PM, 01/18/2012

    I hate to see GM's power train guys go. Really that is the was/is the shining point of GM. GM scuttling the LSx series would be like Porsche canning the 911. Maybe they sell more Boxers and Cayennes but are those defining for the company?

    hooklyn says:

    01:15 PM, 01/18/2012

    Bye bye 50 year old iron block small block V8...

    hahahah....  Its about time for GM to say hello to 1985...

    stovt001 says:

    11:35 AM, 01/18/2012

    It seems like investing in a high-tech valvetrain innovation would be something that would help efficiency and therefore something you would want to do in the face of higher CAFE standards.

    You can't attribute lower Corvette sales only to fuel economy concerns. It is among the most fuel efficient sports cars out there, but the C6 is now 7 years old. It is in need of an update and the C7 can't come soon enough. I'm also skeptical the Camaro won't offer V8s. Ford's not even eliminating the Mustang's V8 in favor of their beloved ecoboost. Even if the majority of sales are V6 models, annoying the enthusiasts is a great way to kill brand appeal.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Advertisement