INSIDE LINE

2013 Chevrolet Colorado First Drive

Media Player

  • 2013 Chevrolet Colorado Picture

    2013 Chevrolet Colorado Picture

    There's more than a little Malibu in the design of the new Colorado. Thankfully the bulging hood adds a little bulk to the carlike design. | October 19, 2011

Road Test

2013 Chevrolet Colorado First Drive

The Midsize Truck Built for Every Corner of the Globe

    49 Ratings

    Why did General Motors launch the new 2013 Chevrolet Colorado Pickup in Thailand before it comes to the U.S. next year?

    Pretty simple, really. Thailand is the biggest market in the world for midsize trucks. So big, in fact, that GM has a plant in Thailand's Rayong province that churns out tens of thousands of Colorado trucks a year for local and export markets.

    When the U.S. version arrives in 2012, it won't come from the Rayong factory, though, it will be built in the U.S. Chevrolet hasn't said much about what we can expect from that truck, but we had a chance to drive the local market version here in Thailand to get an idea what to expect.

    The New Look of the Colorado
    When Chevrolet launched the first-generation Colorado, it gave the midsize pickup a macho face to portray its work truck intentions. The prominent front end, signed off with the signature horizontal chrome slab running the total width of the front, effectively matched the brand's "Like a Rock" slogan. It helped the Colorado stand out in pickup markets like Thailand where its Isuzu D-Max cousin had a stronger presence.

    Fast-forward to 2011 and the new Colorado has a whole new look. This time around, the design surgeons have employed a slightly different methodology regarding the Colorado's appearance. Yes, the all-new Colorado reverts to the same in-yer-face look, albeit in a slightly more subtle manner.

    Chevrolet executives conceded that many customers, particularly those in Thailand, want pickups that look a little more like passenger cars. That explains the Colorado's visual similarities with the Cruze and Malibu sedans. Sounds a bit counterintuitive maybe, but local buyers use their pickups as their primary vehicle so it's not as odd as it sounds.

    GM spent roughly $2B on the development of the Colorado's new body-on-frame platform.

    Still a Midsizer
    Anyone hoping for a return to a truly compact pickup will be disappointed. The 2013 Chevrolet Colorado is still very much a midsizer, as many of its dimensions are marginally bigger than the previous model. The overall length of our extended-cab tester measures 210.5 inches, or about 3 inches longer than a current extended cab. It's also significantly wider at 74.1 inches, although some of that is owed to the flares that come on the Z71 model. The only noticeably smaller measurement is the wheelbase, which measures just 121.9 inches versus the current truck's 126-inch wheelbase.

    Interior room doesn't feel all that compromised even though front legroom is down by 2 inches. There are no official figures on the rear-seat space, as there aren't any real seats. Expect to see a slightly different setup in the U. S. version that features at least some kind of jump seat.

    In terms of perceived quality, the 2013 Chevrolet Colorado doesn't genuinely represent a huge step forward. Although the interior feels well bolted together, it's still filled with hard and tacky plastics. Fine for a base truck maybe, but we expected a little more from a loaded LTZ.

    Diesel Only for This Market
    In terms of engines, the Asian-market Colorado isn't likely to share much with the U.S.-bound version. There are only two options available outside the U.S., both of them four-cylinder Duramax diesels.

    The base engine displaces 2.5 liters and generates 150 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque. Then there's an optional 2.8-liter version of the same engine rated at 180 hp and 346 lb-ft of torque. In addition to the extra power, the 2.8-liter engine also gets a new six-speed automatic transmission. A five-speed manual is the only other transmission offered, in this market at least.

    Compared with the first-gen Colorado, the new truck's power is impressive. There's more than enough punch in real-world driving, be it under acceleration from a standstill or when overtaking others on the highway. It's not overwhelming power, though, certainly not the kind of kick you might expect from a midsize truck with 346 lb-ft of torque on tap. According to Chevrolet engineers, the final-drive ratio could have been geared more toward performance, but they feared it would have backfired when it came to fuel economy.

    Regulations in Thailand don't require fuel economy numbers, so there's no word yet on how efficient the new engines are on the road. There's no talk of using them in the U.S. trucks yet, so don't get your hopes up.

    A More Refined Colorado
    Not surprisingly, the 2013 Chevrolet Colorado shows a noticeable improvement in driving dynamics. GM spent roughly $2B on the development of the Colorado's new body-on-frame platform, so considerable research and development time went into getting it just right.

    Handling is much better than before, thanks to a stiffer body, more direct steering and wider tracks front and rear. There's less bounce, too, even though it still uses a traditional leaf spring setup in back. As refined as it has become, the majority of users in this market still expect it to function as a proper work truck, so Chevrolet could only go so far when it came to balancing ride quality and capability.

    Like any truck with a stiff rear end, grip can be lacking on less tractable roads or when you get aggressive with the gas pedal. Electronic traction and stability control rein it in for the most part, though, so it's not much of an issue.

    Better Value Than Ever
    Prices of the Colorado in Thailand start around the equivalent of $15,000 for the most basic model and rise to as much as $30,000 for the top-of-the-line crew cab 4x4 LTZ with the 2.8-liter engine. This is the normal range for midsize pickups in the area, so we don't expect Chevrolet to deviate much from that spread.

    With that in mind there's no doubt that this Colorado is a much better buy than before. In fact, the improvements it has received have now put the vehicle at the same level — if a tad higher in some respects — as the leading players in the segment like the Toyota Hilux.

    Chevrolet has more or less achieved its mission of making the Colorado quite carlike while retaining its ability to work hard like a truck. At this point, the only thing holding it back is the competition. New versions of the Ford Ranger, Isuzu D-Max and Mazda BT-50 are all on their way, so the 2013 Chevrolet Colorado has much to prove.

    So far, it looks like it has what it takes, at least for the Southeast Asian market. The U.S. will be another story entirely, so expect some interesting changes before it lands Stateside next year. Maybe those diesels will make the trip after all.

    Edmunds attended a manufacturer-sponsored event, to which selected members of the press were invited, to facilitate this report.

    Sort By:

    arthurbishop says:

    01:46 PM, 11/01/2011

    Well if they're gonna offer a diesel in the Cruze, how hard would it be to offer one in the new Colorado?  Although I don't think the Cruze deisel is the same engine family, if they can certify one I'm sure they can certify another for North America.  I won't be surprised if it's announced a deisel will be in the next colorado.

    buzzerd03 says:

    01:12 PM, 10/30/2011

    If they give it a decent sized box, 61/2 foot, I would be interested. But I bet they don't. It has to haul a motorcycle or forget it.

    joe_scuba says:

    11:36 AM, 10/26/2011

    It is just butt ugly

    09zx6 says:

    11:37 AM, 10/21/2011

    No towing numbers? I'm thinking this will be my track day transportation next year!

    bodyblue says:

    10:49 AM, 10/21/2011

    "its a lie that diesels are so expensive to develop and manufacture."

    "its a lie that no business case can be made for small diesels in the usa. fuel economy is driving sales and diesels are king in this regard."

    "its a lie they cant justify the diesel investment due to lack of volume"

    ANY new engine is expensive to design and build...

    Diesel fuel economy is not as good as it used to be now that diesels have to be much cleaner.  They spew far more particulates in the air and it would not be a good thing to have a bunch more diesels on the road in that regard.  Americans are not that familiar with diesels because they have not been jammed down our throats because of massive taxation on gasoline like Europe.  So in these tough times it is a big risk to spend the money on a new engine that Americans probably wont buy in huge numbers.  There is no conspiracy regarding diesel engines...it is economics pure and simple.  I hope there is not a huge move to diesel just for the pollution issue.  Here is a great article on the gas vs diesel question.

    http://www.grinningplanet.com/2005/04-12/diesel-vs-gasoline-article.htm

    Diesels are not the answer....they are a small part of the market that have their place some cars and trucks....but not everything.

    bombonyou says:

    08:47 AM, 10/21/2011

    one seriously ugly p.o.s.

    jscion says:

    05:13 AM, 10/21/2011

    I see alot of Nissan Frontier in the new Colorado from many different angles.  The Chevy Traverse front end does NOTHING other than make the truck look awkward.  A more boxed off design similar to the Silverado would've been alot more flattering on a pickup truck.  The interior looks to be an "effort" but not much of one.  The materials look cheap and the design layout looks half done.  I'd rather see a column shifter in a pickup truck.  Overall, I think GM will make several of these changes to the Colorado before it comes to the U.S. otherwise it will disappoint!

    damaje says:

    10:44 PM, 10/20/2011

    You know what, my mother-in-law still has the original v10 Toureg Diesel, loves that thing, since she bought it she is in her 3rd new sedan, she switched from Audi A8s to the new hybrid 7 series, but she still loves the VW best.  Every 20,000 miles she reports better fuel economy and you can not find anything that comes close to it in power and fuel economy both.  Her last roadtrip she got 26 mpg from NYC to Boston.

    Diesels are good vehicles and they do tend to get better mileage after they are broken in which comes 100,000 miles after a gasoline engine is broken in, it is a shame GM won't go throught he expense of cleaning up the emissions and getting the diesels in the foreign colorado certified for US duty.  There are plenty of truck buyers who use their trucks as daily drivers, and still more that keep them for years after their warranty expire as a workhorse, a workhorse that would be great to have in a diesel.

    jnchevy says:

    07:40 PM, 10/20/2011

    Looks really cheap and silly with Malibu/Equinox front, can't believe GM would build such a ugly vehicle .  

    miamifan1 says:

    06:03 PM, 10/20/2011

    great editorial, and mirrors my thoughts exactly:
    http://www.autoobserver.com/2011/10/gm-do-the-right-thing-for-colorado.html

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2013 Chevrolet Colorado

    Base Price:

    N/A

    Engine:

    2.8-liter diesel

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed automatic

    Power:

    180 hp @ 3,800 rpm, 346 lb-ft @ 2,000

    EPA Rating:

    N/A

    On Sale:

    Fall 2012

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2013 Chevrolet Colorado LTZ 4dr Ext. Cab 4WD SB (2.8L 4cyl 6A)
    Vehicle Type4WD 4dr 2-passenger Extended-Cab Pickup
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationLongitudinal, front-engine, four-wheel drive
    Engine typeTurbocharged, port-injected, inline-4, diesel
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2,776/169
    Compression ratio (x:1)16.0
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)180 @ 3,800
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)346 @ 2,000
    Fuel typeLow-sulfur diesel
    Transmission typeSix-speed automatic with floor shifter
    Transmission ratios (x:1)1st = 4.065; 2nd = 2.371; 3rd = 1.551; 4th = 1.157; 5th = 0.853; 6th = 0.647
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)3.42
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent double-wishbones, coil springs
    Suspension, rearSolid axle, leaf spring
    Steering typeRack-and-pinion steering
    Turning circle (ft.)41.3
    Tire typeAll-season front and rear
    Wheel size16-by-6.5 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialAlloy
    Brakes, front11.8-inch ventilated steel discs
    Brakes, rear11.6-inch drums
    Fuel Consumption
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)20.1
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Length (in.)210.5
    Width (in.)74.1
    Height (in.)7.1
    Wheelbase (in.)121.9
    Legroom, front (in.)42.0
    Headroom, front (in.)39.6
    Shoulder room, front (in.)57.1
    Seating capacity6
    GVWR (lbs.)6,834
    Ground clearance (in.)10.6
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years/100,000 miles
    Corrosion6 years/100,000 miles
    Roadside assistance5 years/100,000 miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement