INSIDE LINE

2011 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 SLP Full Test

Media Player

  • 2011 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 SLP Picture

    2011 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 SLP Picture

    The ZL1 SLP's natural state is doing a burnout. It's practically an arsonist. | August 02, 2011

Road Test

2011 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 SLP Full Test

One Mean 750-Horsepower Beast

    41 Ratings

    There's a word for any driver who thinks he's in charge when behind the wheel of the 2011 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 SLP: delusional.

    This is not just a muscle car, it's a one-car biker gang — hell on four wheels, packing a supercharged 750-horsepower 7.0-liter V8 and six forward gears. This thing is always traction-limited. Its massive rear tires turn to jelly at quarter-throttle. Even with the bolognas lit, it explodes from point to some other random point.

    And you'd better be ready to grab some gears. Everything happens so quickly in the 2011 Chevy Camaro ZL1 it's impossible for your mind, your hands, your feet or your respiratory system to keep up. And it sounds like war.

    We may have just found the perfect Camaro.

    The $80,000 Heart Transplant
    This is not the GM-made LSA-powered Camaro ZL1 that's due in 2012. Until December 31, 2011, SLP Performance of Toms River, New Jersey, has the rights to the ZL1 name and it's making the most of it.

    The company, which has been souping up GM's pony cars since the early 1990s, charges $80,000 to convert a manual-transmission-equipped Camaro SS into a ZL1. Yeah, that's $80K plus the cost of a Camaro SS — base price, $32,750. Assuming no discounts, that's $112,750 minimum. Not cheap. But practically no one ordering one of the 69 ZL1s SLP is building this year is likely to stay at the minimum.

    That 69-unit production run commemorates, duh, the 69 ZL1 Camaros Chevrolet built during the 1969 model year. And like those cars, SLP's new ZL1 is powered by an all-aluminum 427-cubic-inch (7.0-liter) V8. This one isn't a Chevy big block, however, but an SLP-assembled variation on the LS7 that's installed in the track-ready Z06 version of the Corvette.

    The ZL1 isn't just a bunch of stickers spread over a Camaro with a bolt-on supercharger.

    To build the ZL1 engine, SLP stuffs the LS7 block with a forged chromoly crank, SLP-specific cam and hard-core forged rods and pistons. Then it caps everything with lower-compression LS3 heads running premium valvetrain elements. Throw in high-performance versions of ancillary components and the result is a voracious/insatiable/wicked/blistering engine.

    The Z06's LS7 runs a thick 11.0:1 compression ratio and, without the help of forced induction, is SAE net-rated at 505 hp on premium-grade fuel. SLP's 7.0-liter only runs at 10.3:1 compression but is boosted by an Eaton TVS 2300 blower — that company's latest variation on the classic Roots-style supercharger with four-lobed rotors on 160-degree twists. Heaving in 10 psi of boost and aided by SLP's "Blackwing" cold-air induction system, SLP fabricated headers and an SLP-built exhaust system, the company says it's good for 750 hp. There's reason to believe them.

    Dyno Test
    Inside Line had both a ZL1 coupe and convertible to test. Recently Engineering Editor Jason Kavanagh put the convertible on the chassis dyno at MD Automotive. Exactly why Jay is dressed like Che Guevara in this video is open to speculation.

    Inside Line tests in California, and considering the 91-octane swill available here, that 617-hp performance at the wheels is mighty indeed. With the better fuel available in other parts of the country, 750 ponies at the flywheel before parasitic drivetrain losses is plausible.

    Also consider the ZL1's near-flat torque curve that shows more than 550 pound-feet of twist down around 2,400 rpm, a 610 lb-ft peak at 4,200 rpm and production of more than 500 lb-ft even as the fuel cutoff hits at 6,300 rpm. If you want more low-end thrust than that, go rip off a GE90 turbofan from under the wing of a 777.

    SLP hasn't certified the ZL1 for sale in the People's Republic of California, anyhow. If we won't feed it a high-protein diet, we don't deserve it.

    Fortified to Excess
    To put SLP's supercharged engine in an unfortified Camaro would be dangerous. To put it in a Camaro that's not redecorated to attract attention would be bad marketing.

    The Tremec six-speed manual transmission (versions of which have been used in the Dodge Viper) is left pretty much alone and treated to an SLP short-throw shifter. A Corvette ZR1 clutch assembly and SLP flywheel make sure the power makes it to the transmission at all. In back, SLP-made heavy-duty half-shafts are fortified for extreme abuse.

    And trust us, this car can take abuse.

    While the basic geometry of the Camaro's suspension remains, SLP adjustable coil-over shocks and oversize anti-sway bars increase roll stiffness and bring the car down to the ground.

    Brembo brakes are used all around — 16-inch vented rotors up front clamped by six-piston calipers and 15-inchers in back with four pistons squeezing down. Outboard of those are 20-by-9-inch front and 20-by-10.5-inch rear SLP lightweight forged alloy wheels. The tires are Michelin Pilot Sport PS2s with 245/45R20s in front and 295/35R20s in back.

    Dressed to Excess
    Distinguishing SLP's ZL1 handiwork from mere Camaros are a special front fascia, a front splitter with a "carbon-fiber finish," a true carbon-fiber hood, a rear deck lid finished to look like it's carbon fiber, a rear spoiler that has the sneaky carbon-fiber finish, a blacked-out rear tail panel and a carbon-look rear diffuser.

    Thankfully the ZL1 was painted low-key gray. A brighter color would have had it looking like a calliope heading a circus parade. As it is, however, it just looks hungry: ready to consume continents in big honking chomps.

    Inside there's the expected embroidered floor mats and so many logos and dash plaques that SLP may have drained the world's supply of Zs, Ls and 1s dry. The best interior element, however, is the houndstooth cloth seat inserts that seem lifted straight out of a '69 Camaro. The rest of the seats may be covered in soft Katzkin leather, but it's the houndstooth that will attract attention.

    High Drama
    The ZL1's front splitter scrapes when it runs over gum wrappers and, as with other Camaro coupes, its outward visibility is lousy. But those are just inconveniences and anyone can live with some inconvenience. It's the momentous challenge of herding the ZL1's horses that's staggering.

    Dip into the ZL1's throttle and you may as well just slam the pedal to the firewall. It's not that the throttle lacks progressivity, but that the engine sound is so intoxicating that the temptation to wood it is irresistible. And once you give in to the urge, you're hooked like a junkie.

    Then there are the staccato rumbles, spits and barks the engine makes once the driver lets off the throttle. Even when cruising at 30 mph, lifting off the throttle to turn into a CVS parking lot, the ZL1 sounds as if it's pulling into the pits for a driver change at the 24 Hours of Daytona.

    Real Speed
    Launching the 2011 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 takes a very particular technique. The trick is finding the precise rate at which the throttle can be applied without overwhelming the rear tires. So after a clutch dump at 2,500 rpm, the driver needs to gently roll into the throttle maybe a quarter-inch per second. And even with that tenderness, the tires will still haze up and fry.

    With the traction control off, the best 0-60-mph time achieved with the 3,900-pound ZL1 coupe was a disappointing 4.3 seconds (4.2 with 1 foot of rollout as on a drag strip). Some decent fuel and more work on the launch would drop that time down into the high 3-second range. A set of drag slicks could knock that to the low 3s. The 4,168-pound ZL1 convertible, using the identical launch technique, also did the 0-60 deed in 4.3 seconds.

    Over the quarter-mile, the ZL1 coupe went through the traps in 12.1 seconds at 120.9 mph. The convertible did it in 12.2 seconds at 117.2 mph.

    In comparison, the 3,366-pound, 638-hp 2010 Corvette ZR1 runs from zero to 60 in 3.9 seconds and blows through the quarter-mile in 11.7 seconds at 126.7 mph. Weighing 534 pounds less than the ZL1 and not spinning its much wider 335/25R20 rear tires all the way down the length of the track are, it turns out, advantages.

    The heavy ZL1 coupe's 110-foot stopping distance is impressive, and its big Brembo discs are designed for fade resistance. This Camaro could perform back-to-back panic stops for a week without much deterioration in performance.

    Excessively Sticky
    Oversteer-on-demand is the only way we can describe the ZL1's handling. Its steering wheel isn't irrelevant, but it's close. It's not that the front tires don't bite, it's just that whatever happens up front is easily overwhelmed by applying power.

    Brake into a corner and the ZL1's nose will push gently. A talented driver will recognize the moment the car has hit understeer, apply some throttle and let the car rotate around the front tires. The big challenge is not over-applying the throttle and spinning your $113,000 toy off the road backward. On fire.

    If you have the touch, the ZL1 is otherworldly through the corners. If you don't have that touch, leave the traction control on and indulge in the sights and sounds that make the ZL1 such a high-drama spectacle.

    On the skid pad the ZL1 orbited at 0.90g whether or not the traction control system was engaged. The PS2s have gentle breakaway at their limits, but it's not easy to sneak up on those limits with a car this powerful. The knife-edge balance between power and adhesion was even more of a challenge in the slalom, where the ZL1 swung through at 70.1 mph on one perfect run. The last stock Camaro SS we tested managed a 68.2-mph run.

    Compared to a standard Camaro SS, the ZL1 coupe rides significantly stiffer, and the shocks seem to rebound more suddenly over bumps. It's not uncomfortable for the committed enthusiast, but his relatives may complain.

    High Impact
    SLP has always been more ambitious than most tuners. Back in the '90s its Pontiac Firebird-based Firehawk models featured shockingly powerful, specially assembled small-block V8s and aggressively tuned suspensions when many shops were trying to pawn off cat-back exhaust systems as "tuning." The ZL1 isn't just a bunch of stickers spread over a Camaro with a bolt-on supercharger.

    But the best thing of all is that this car speaks to the primal instincts of automotive enthusiasm. You don't need to know anything about cars to know the moment you see, hear and feel the 2011 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 approaching that it's something special.

    Yup, we may have just found the perfect Camaro.

    SLP Performance Parts, Inc. provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Sort By:

    wuzzzzaaaaup says:

    10:42 PM, 09/27/2011

    LAIRRRRRRRRRRRS WHY THE HECK WOULD YOU PUT 91 OCTAIN AND NOT USE 93 WHEN DYNOING A CAR IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. SLP MUST'VE PAID YOU GUYS ALOT TO LIE FOR THEM

    modestlyfrugal says:

    06:13 PM, 08/05/2011

    the bottom line is, the people who are complaining are the people who can't afford it.  simple as that.  i don't care if it's a foreign car or a domestic, who care!! if you don't like it, fine...someone else does...and if they got the dough to buy it, so what!! it's their money!!  who cares!!  why are people so obsess and concerns with what people like and what the other persons doesn't like?  it's your freaking $$$, do whatever the hell you want with it, but....don't tell someone else what to do with their money or dog them because YOU don't like it.

    coolb944 says:

    01:20 PM, 08/05/2011

    "ghetto-redneck"
    - Two words I would not have associated with each other or put together, lmao!

    For some of you posters, get the f-ing story straight...Chevrolet does NOT make this car. This is a TUNED, non-factory Camaro by SLP Performance. To get the actual GM-made, warranted, factory effort ZL1, you'll have to wait until NEXT year. And that car will assuredly run better numbers than this for about 1/2 the price.

    Yadda yadda, this car and that car are faster for the money. Blah blah blah, any intelligent reader knows that. Why point it out? For us dummies who think this is the only car at or around or under $112,000 that has performance credentials? It still isn't going to stop the person who really wants this car from buying it, and telling them how stupid they are really doesn't change the fact that they have the money to spend and you don't, and they'll spend it however they like.

    I celebrate the fact that SLP exists, and that they offer just another performance car choice amongst many, as well as different performance options to suit each person's allotted budget. Would I buy this car per se...No, for the money it's just not my taste. But it is someone's taste, poor or not, and if they can afford it, then buy the damn thing if you want to. It's your choice, and how great that you have that choice.

    For my money and that price, I'd probably go for a Maserati GranTurismo Cabriolet Sport, or maybe an Audi R8 or Aston Martin V8 Vantage. Heck, if I had THAT much money to drop on a tuned Camaro of this ilk, I doubt it'd be my only car, so I'd have all three of the aforementioned in my custom-built 20 car garage, haha!

    burnoutsaregay says:

    03:10 PM, 08/04/2011

    This is one of the worst cars currently in production. It redefines turd.


    1) It is absolutely incapable of using its power. This is actually a car with an error happening. Engineers who designed it were idiots. In corners, it will only use 40% of the engine when dry. When wet, it will use 20%. All what's above will be either blocked by traction/stability control or will crash the car. For comparison, an Audi RS3, which costs half a much and more practical, can use 100% of its power. Anywhere. Anytime.


    2) Because of poor engineering, it humiliates itself in straight line. Everything from its price range with performance in mind kills it even in this aspect. The mentioned Audi RS3 will destroy it. Even the Audi S4 (chiptuned for $3) will. The Nissan GT-R will make this Chevy evaporate. In the rear view mirror.


    3) It looks exactly like the 20-some bucks Camaro with some ghetto-redneck treatment.


    4) A Chevy for 100k USD, only because someone attached a fan to its engine? LOL. Will it accelerate faster than its residual vaue will fall? Look at what can be had for 100k and put this clown next to it. Buying this car is probably the best way to look like a true tool.


    5) It was built for desperate, cheap press attention. With faint hope that some add-driven websites for children wasting their life on the net will start doing dumb, wastefull burnouts (while other cars do perfect launches). It was built for dipshits.

    modestlyfrugal says:

    10:03 PM, 08/03/2011

    If I had the money, or won the lottery...this is the first car I would get along with the new Dodge Charger SRT8, Challenger SRT8, Ford Mustang Cobra SVT, Dodge Viper and a Vette.  That would almost complete my love for Modern American Muscle.

    higgsboson says:

    08:16 PM, 08/03/2011

    Sweet merciful crap!

    krankshafted says:

    05:18 PM, 08/03/2011

    ...no. Just no.

    toxic_science says:

    04:31 PM, 08/03/2011

    Well said sddoc07 "But on second thought, let's not get all indignant and proclaim what we'd would do with our cash b/c you don't have it and neither do I."  

    a1c_scg says:

    03:14 PM, 08/03/2011

    Wow, going through these posts, I can't ever recall seeing so much disdain unanimously for a car. Bravo, you group of car enthusiasts, bravo.


    * that is 150% seriousness *

    4everrs says:

    03:01 PM, 08/03/2011

    geez, you can get an '03 audi RS6 for under 25k, spend about 3k more on a good tune, and other bits, and still go this fast. I drive one every day. But, god forbid, I can't do a brakelock! Otherwise almost the same #'s. Low 12's quarter, and low 4's to 60. You can comfortably drive well into the triple digits and feel like nothings happening. Trying to max mine out one day, I put the pedal down and just went. Everything was smooth and stable, then I looked down and saw 160, still climbing nice, and I got scared. Not because of instability, because I never saw that much on a speedo before.

    The only thing outragous about this ZL1 is the price.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2011 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 SLP

    Base Price:

    $112,750

    Price as Tested:

    $112,750

    Engine:

    7.0-liter supercharged V8

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed manual

    Power:

    750 hp at 5,800 rpm; 728 lb-ft at 3,950 rpm

    0-60 mph:

    4.3 seconds

    What Works (pros):

    Ridiculous power, well-sorted suspension, built to handle abuse

    What Needs Work (cons):

    Not enough traction to make use of all that power, a tad expensive for your average Camaro enthusiast

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2011 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 SLP 2dr Coupe (7.0L 8cyl 6M)
    Vehicle TypeRWD 2dr 2-passenger Coupe
    Base MSRP$112,750
    Options on test vehicleNo options available beyond SLP ZL1 package
    As-tested MSRP$112,750
    Assembly locationOshawa, Ontario, Toms River, New Jersey and Troy, Michigan
    North American parts content (%)60
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationLongitudinal, front-engine, rear-wheel drive
    Engine typeSupercharged, port-injected V8, gasoline
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)7,008/427
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainOverhead valve
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.3
    Redline, indicated (rpm)6,800
    Fuel cutoff/rev limiter (rpm)6,300
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)750 @ 5,800
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)728 @ 3,950
    Fuel typePremium unleaded (recommended)
    Transmission typeSix-speed manual
    Transmission ratios (x:1)I=3.01,II=2.07, III=1.43, IV=1.00,V= 0.84,VI=,0.57. R=3.28
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)3.45:1
    Differential(s)Limited-slip
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontMacPherson strut
    Suspension, rearMultilink
    Steering typeSpeed-proportional power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)16.1
    Turning circle (ft.)37.7
    Tire make and modelMichelin Pilot Sport PS2
    Tire typeUltra-high performance front and rear
    Tire size, frontP245/45R20 103Y
    Tire size, rearP295/35R20 106Y
    Wheel size, front20-by-9 inches
    Wheel size, rear20-by-10.5 inches
    Wheel materialPolished alloy
    Brakes, front16-inch ventilated disc with six-piston calipers
    Brakes, rear15-inch ventilated disc with four-piston calipers
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)2
    0-45 mph (sec.)3
    0-60 mph (sec.)4.3
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)4.0
    0-75 mph (sec.)5.8
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)12.1 @ 120.9
    0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.)2.2
    0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.)3.4
    0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.)4.5
    0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)4.2
    0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.)5.9
    1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph)12.2 @ 121.1
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)28
    60-0 mph (ft.)110
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)70.1
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON68.8
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.9
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON0.9
    Sound level @ idle (dB)60.5
    @ Full throttle (dB)87.2
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)73.2
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)N/A
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsThe trick to getting the most from this car is to find exactly the allowable rate of throttle application that the tires can manage, at launch (2,600 rpm) and thereafter. This car's 0-60 time is severely restricted by the amount of grip the tires can provide -- can't go to WOT until 1-2 gearchange. Shifter requires deliberate (but not ham-fisted) effort. Rev limiter is punishingly abrupt. I was expecting a much higher trap speed from "750 hp." Still, this car sounds absolutely magnificent.
    Braking commentsFirst stop was shortest by 4 or 5 feet, then every stop was absolutely fade-free and dead straight with no drama whatsoever. Pedal feel is solid and dead consistent. Felt like it would do the same stop all day long.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: With ESC off, the car feels well balanced and begins a mild understeer condition that only requires throttle steering -- I never moved my hands at all. With ESC in Comp Mode (dyn), it allowed the same amount of understeer without intruding. Slalom: With ESC off, the car is limited by front grip, where understeer begins to creep in subtly but consistently from cone to cone. The trick becomes (as with all Camaros) attempting rotation with lift-throttle without murdering cones because it's next to impossible to spot them at the front or run over them with the rear tires. The Coupe didn't acknowledge the dip/hop at cone #3, but the Convertible was tossed off-course, making me late for for cone #4. Overall the suspension setup works very well in a track situation with predictable behavior at, or even slightly beyond, the limits set by the tires. The tires are excellent (predictable breakaway) and allow the chassis to perform at its best.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date6/28/2011
    Test locationCalifornia Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,277
    Temperature (°F)85.2
    Relative humidity (%)32.4
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)28.7
    Wind (mph, direction)3.6 crosswind
    Odometer (mi.)1691
    Fuel used for test91 octane
    As-tested tire pressures, f/r (psi)36/36
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)16 city/24 highway/19 combined
    Edmunds observed (mpg)N/A
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)19
    Driving range (mi.)N/A
    Edmunds estimated monthly fuel cost ($)N/A
    Audio and Advanced Technology
    Stereo descriptionAM/FM/CD/Bluetooth
    iPod/digital media compatibilityStandard
    Satellite radioAvailable
    Hard-drive music storage capacity (Gb)None
    Rear seat video and entertainmentNone
    Bluetooth phone connectivityYes
    Navigation systemOnStar navigation
    Telematics (OnStar, etc.)OnStar
    Smart entry/StartNone
    Parking aidsNone
    Blind-spot detectionNone
    Adaptive cruise controlNone
    Lane-departure monitoringNone
    Collision warning/avoidanceNone
    Night VisionNone
    Driver coaching displayNone
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)N/A
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)3,900
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)53.8/46.2
    Length (in.)190.4
    Width (in.)75.5
    Height (in.)54.2
    Wheelbase (in.)112.3
    Track, front (in.)63.7
    Track, rear (in.)63.7
    Legroom, front (in.)42.4
    Legroom, rear (in.)29.9
    Headroom, front (in.)37.4
    Headroom, rear (in.)35.3
    Shoulder room, front (in.)56.9
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)50.4
    Seating capacity4
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)11.3
    GVWR (lbs.)3,900
    Tow capacity, mfr. claim (lbs.)1,000
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain3 years/36,000 miles
    Corrosion6 years/100,000 miles
    Roadside assistance5 years/100,000 miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement