INSIDE LINE

Long-Term Test: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS

Media Player

  • 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS Picture

    2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS Picture

    We bought our 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS for $42,192 more than 18 months ago. | November 03, 2010

Road Test

Long-Term Test: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS

Wrap-Up

    16 Ratings

    We limped our 15,000-mile Camaro to Santa Monica Chevrolet early that April morning.

    "I don't care how hard you drive; this tranny should be able to take it. That's what the Camaro SS is made for. This just should not happen," proclaimed our Chevrolet service advisor, having witnessed the defeated condition of our new Camaro's transmission. We left our 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS with him. Not 30 minutes passed before he called with an update. "GM doesn't want us touching your tranny. They're sending out a replacement under warranty. I will call you in a few days when parts arrive."

    Our test of the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS was not without hiccups.

    Why We Bought It
    The Mustang was back. The Challenger was back. When Chevy announced that the Camaro was also back, we had to have one. Just in case the all-new 2010 Chevy Camaro nameplate wasn't motivation enough, Chevy threw in two letters of encouragement: SS.

    Chevrolet bolted the 6.2-liter LS3 engine from the Corvette into the Camaro SS. The result was 426 horsepower and 420 pound-feet of torque for 35 grand. Pass the tissues. This was enough to bring a tear to a grown man's eye. A Tremec TR6060 six-speed manual gearbox would manage the torque and 20-inch Pirelli P Zero summer tires would put it to the ground. The table was set. We needed just to sit down and dig in.

    So we bought a 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS and promised to wring it within an inch of its life for the next 12 months and 20,000 miles. All the while, we'd track our progress on the long-term blog pages.

    Durability
    We found the Camaro's driving manners polarizing. Some found the burnout capability of its V8, the comfortable driver seat and reasonable highway ride were enough to forgive the size and heft of the SS. Others felt this Camaro missed the mark. Executive Editor Michael Jordan voiced this opinion: "The American GT car is my favorite ride, a perfect mix of power, weight and handling. But the guys who put the new Camaro together seem never to have driven any kind of car at all, much less any Camaro or Firebird. This car is a kind of stunt, a strange kind of genetic experiment gone horribly wrong. The right guys had this project to start with, but it seems to have fallen into the wrong hands somewhere along the line."

    Once we focused on the cabin, we could finally agree. Both the steering wheel and the shift knob were so ergonomically challenged that they compromised our driving experience. (Several of us noted that they were made for people with "Lego hands.") Although everyone acclaimed the retro authenticity of the instruments, we found them flawed functionally. These issues and others explained the Camaro's quick decline in popularity among the staff.

    And we agreed on at least one redeeming quality, a kickass stereo. Associate Editor Mark Takahashi echoed our sentiment: "This is a good stereo. The nine-speaker Boston Acoustics system is quite impressive. Hefty, clear bass and clean tones in the upper registers had me looking forward to 'Goin' Back to Cali.'" The Camaro's iPod interface was another positive and thankfully left us with more options than Cool James.

    Our trip down Camaro Lane wasn't without speed bumps. The warranty covered items like tightening the loose rear spoiler, addressing an intermittent airbag warning light and soldering the loose wires that rendered its center gauge cluster inoperable.

    But there was one more item. Vehicle Testing Manager Mike Schmidt recounted, "With the radio up, it's possible I wouldn't have heard the chatter coming from the driveline. It may have even masked the characteristic racket of an aged throw-out bearing. But even with the speakers at full capacity I couldn't miss the massive clunk into 2nd gear. No matter how slow or deliberate the shift. CLUNK. Something was wrong." That's when we first feared the transmission in our 2010 Chevrolet Camaro was toast. After 22 days on the operating table and a new 2nd gear, the Chevy was back on the road. We experienced no further transmission problems following the rebuild. It was as strong as ever.

    Total Body Repair Costs: None
    Total Routine Maintenance Costs (over 12 months): $73.70
    Additional Maintenance Costs: $49 to install the front license plate and bracket
    Warranty Repairs: Transmission rebuild, remedy intermittent airbag warning light, tighten loose rear spoiler, remedy inoperable center gauge cluster lights
    Non-Warranty Repairs: None
    Scheduled Dealer Visits: 2
    Unscheduled Dealer Visits: 1, for a transmission rebuild
    Days Out of Service: 22, all for transmission repair
    Breakdowns Stranding Driver: None

    Performance and Fuel Economy
    When we first track tested the Camaro at 1,000 miles it left a positive impression. When we retested at 20,000 miles its mold was permanently cast in our minds. Performance had improved across the board by the conclusion of our test.

    Skeptics within our ranks vocalized their doubts that the transmission rebuild would survive another round of instrumented testing. But they soon recanted such Camaro blasphemy. Its 20,000-mile test showed the 6.2-liter LS3 was faster than ever. Acceleration to 60 mph from a standstill was almost a half-second quicker, at 4.7 seconds (with 1 foot of rollout). Trap speed was up and quarter-mile time down, to the tune of 13.1 seconds at 110.8 mph. Even the stopping distance from 60 mph shortened to 109 feet. Slalom speed matched its 66 mph baseline, while lateral-g production around the skid pad grew ever so slightly, to 0.86g.

    In addition to stout performance on the track, the LS3 delivered decent fuel economy. Our best single tank was over 23 mpg, though our average dipped to 16 mpg over the lifetime of the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro. What did you expect? With 426 hp and 420 lb-ft of torque at our disposal we didn't spend much time in the EPA-friendly ranges of the tach. Our worst tank dipped into the single-digit range, securing the Camaro's muscle car respectability. Don't forget. All of these figures came on the cheap sauce, 87-octane.

    Best Fuel Economy: 23.1 mpg
    Worst Fuel Economy: 9.4 mpg
    Average Fuel Economy: 16.5 mpg

    Retained Value
    We expected a slam dunk when it came time to sell the Camaro. Our closest point of reference was our long-term Challenger which sold at an incredible 79 percent of its original value. MSRP on the Camaro was $35,425 when we bought it a year ago. And according to Edmunds TMV® Calculator it was still worth $32,442, or 92 percent of MSRP when the time came to sell. But we didn't buy at MSRP. After paying homage to the dealer, government and capitalism, we had spent $42,192 for our SS. We also didn't sell for TMV.

    When the dust settled our 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS sold for $28,000. This price reflected depreciation of 34 percent over 18 months of ownership. Our SS retained just 66 percent of its original purchase value. Advantage goes to the Mopar in this category.

    True Market Value at service end: $32,442
    What it sold for: $28,000
    Depreciation: $14,192 or 34% of original paid price
    Final Odometer Reading: 22,746

    Summing Up
    From full test to comparison test to burnout contest, the Camaro reigned supreme. Even on the dyno it ranked as a top performer in its class.

    But performance figures don't offer the complete story. In an effort to maximize retro styling this Camaro lost some of the fun-to-drive character of generations past. The design also challenged the balance between form and function. It was an aesthetic success but as such suffered certain ergonomic lapses in the cabin. Still, we learned a lot from 18 months of Camaro ownership.

    If you want to be the first kid on your block with the new Camaro SS, it won't be cheap. We were the first. We paid a premium for the designation knowing full well that it promised substantial depreciation by test-end. When you're the first with a new Camaro you're also first to experience the recalls and repairs. We did those, too. And though it took some time to replace, once the tranny was back together the Camaro went right back to punishing pavement.

    There is something to be said for the resilience of this Camaro. It was not without its problems. But once repaired the Camaro was back to its original form. We hope the next owner experiences the same level of durability, and fun, as we did.

    Edmunds purchased this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Road Test

    Introduction

    Every Camaro has a story, and we expect this 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS will be no different. When you're around a Camaro, things happen.

    Just like we remember the time when Betty was sitting at the top of the grandstand at the drag strip and looking idly into the night sky when Billy began desperately trying to get her attention from the driver seat. He's next up, and the staging box is being hosed down while the V8 in his Camaro lopes like an unbalanced dryer. She finally gets with the program, turns her head toward the track in time to see the first red light in the Christmas tree flash on. Then two red lights. Then three. And green!

    Billy drops the clutch. The tires, still sticky from a pretty epic burnout, hook up hard and there's no wheelspin. Then the rear end grenades. Billy coasts to a stop 700 feet from the tree. We spend the next few hours under Billy's car repairing what we can; we've gotta get home somehow. Betty watches from afar.

    This was our first Camaro story, and we've found that everyone who's ever been around one of Chevy's pony cars has some kind of story to tell, too. Now that we've bought a 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS and started another 12-month/20,000-mile long-term road test, we expect that everyone here will soon have a new Camaro story of some sort to tell.

    What We Got
    No good Camaro story has ever started with, "Well, I got the V6 because...." If you're expecting some kind of story to happen to you, then your Camaro needs a V8. A big one. (Note: A Camaro story is perfectly acceptable if it has a V8 but the car is only running on six cylinders.)

    Our 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS has got a pretty big one, a 6.2-liter V8 with more ponies than a horse farm — some 426 horsepower to be exact, all of which is available at 5,900 rpm. As for twist, 420 pound-feet of torque at 4,600 rpm does the trick. And thanks to giant leaps in the engineering of large-displacement engines with simple pushrod-operated valves (not to mention optimal gearing in this car's six-speed manual transmission), this 3,864-pound pony car is rated by the EPA at a not-so-terrible 16 mpg city/24 mpg highway, with 19 mpg combined. Actually using the aforementioned horsepower, however, will net significantly lower numbers, as we've discovered.

    The 2010 Chevy Camaro SS is fairly well appointed from the factory with a full complement of airbags (front, side and head curtain), a limited-slip differential, Brembo brakes, halogen headlights, a tilt-telescoping steering wheel and a nine-speaker Boston Acoustics stereo with aux input. Naturally we wanted even more, so we're happy to have the 2SS trim level, which adds leather-upholstered seats (heated in the front), Bluetooth capability (a necessity here in California to abide by the law against cell phone use while driving), the auxiliary four-gauge instrument cluster and a USB port that can handle an iPod.

    We didn't necessarily want the RS package, but our 2010 Camaro SS certainly has it. This means 20-by-8-inch front and 20-by-9-inch rear cast-aluminum wheels that are painted, not chromed (welcome to the new century, Chevy), and 245/45ZR front and 275/40ZR20 rear Pirelli P Zero tires. Then there are HID lights with halo rings and RS taillights. The RS package adds $1,200 to the bottom line of our new Camaro, and while it's stuff we could live without, we had a hard enough time finding a relatively plainly equipped 2010 Chevy Camaro to buy on any dealership lot in Los Angeles.

    In fact, it would appear that from a supply/demand perspective that Chevy is possibly the most brilliant financial strategist in the automotive marketplace. Back in 2002, Chevy cleverly anticipated the forthcoming collapse of the economy and discontinued its Camaro, leaving the Ford Mustang to carry on the whole rear-wheel-drive pony car thing. (We'll forget all about the Pontiac GTO episode, which didn't work out for Pontiac, GM or anyone, really.) Mullets shook with anger when this happened, but few others noticed.

    Until that is, the Camaro concept car appeared at the 2006 Detroit Auto Show, and then some Hollywood guy, Mike Bay, saw it and thought it might fit the movie he was making about warring robots. The hype machine chugged, churned and spewed for more than three years. Take away what people want and then give it back a few years later at a premium. It was a bold strategy for sure.

    So when examples of the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro hit dealership lots, man, they went fast. Real fast. Camaros with a manual transmission were completely sold out almost overnight. According to one dealer, ordering a Camaro with a manual transmission would net us a car in seven months. Then he told us that he had a buyer who had pre-ordered a Camaro but had backed out. It was going to show up in a couple of days and we were welcome to it — if we wanted an automatic transmission. We did not, but we decided that we'd call every Chevy dealer in Los Angeles, hoping to find another pre-ordered Camaro abandoned by its prospective owner and then buy the one with the lowest markup.

    Weeks of searching finally netted a hit at M.K. Smith Chevy in Chino, California. We hoped to pay MSRP, but this one was silver (no way we'd take yellow), had the leather interior and was available the same day. Dealer markup? About 2,500 bucks. Seems fair. With tax, title, license, doc-prep and everything else signed and done, the total tab for our 2010 Chevy Camaro SS came to $42,192.

    Why We Got It
    Well, it's an American icon, isn't it? Actually it's an American icon for two different subcultures in our national automotive life, those with mullets and a set of cinder blocks to use as jack stands who don't want some kind of Cash for Clunkers mpg machine, and regular guys looking for high-speed hi-jinks who are smart enough to keep the cost down.

    There's a little bit of both groups in those of us here, but we're probably most interested in the speed thing. Either way, the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS has us covered. It looks like the kind of car you wanted when you were 12, and it's got stupid power under the hood with the 426-hp V8.

    The Christmas Tree Goes Green
    We don't know where the road will lead our 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS, but we only have 12 months to explore it. Some things to expect in our long-term blog about this car:

    • New rear tires
    • Poor fuel economy
    • Grudge night at Irwindale Speedway's drag strip
    • Pointless reminiscences about the 1960s
    • Dismay that significant others don't like the Camaro as much as Betty did
    • Complaints that a Camaro has never been great to sleep in

    But maybe we're speculating too much. Maybe for this test we'll just sit back, let the back of our hair grow out and relax. We've got 12 months and 20,000 miles to find out what kind of stories are going to happen to us.

    Current Odometer: 1,636 miles
    Best Fuel Economy: 20.9 mpg
    Worst Fuel Economy: 15.6 mpg
    Average Fuel Economy (over the life of the vehicle): 17.3 mpg

    Edmunds purchased this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Sort By:

    thegripper says:

    06:21 PM, 11/14/2010

    Well they really captured that retro GM vibe....Stickin' it to the consumer with another hyped POS!

    brettjr25 says:

    07:09 PM, 11/12/2010

    Whoa! Holy crap, I hope no one buys these cars used when they're not in warranty.

    alpine6speed says:

    12:43 PM, 11/12/2010

    666 I have driven both thank you

    lt1boy says:

    06:21 PM, 11/10/2010

    Case in point:

    If IL had bought the Camaro SS for $100k (even though it's only worth $35k) and tried to sell it, do you think anyone would be stupid enough to buy it for $66k, which is 66% of the original paid price?  Heck no.  It would still sell for $28k.

    lt1boy says:

    06:08 PM, 11/10/2010

    It's not the market's fault IL bought the Camaro for $42k.  If they had waited it out and played the cards right, they could have boughten one for MSRP at $35k.

    And you can't pay $7k over sticker for a car, and then sell it and expect the buyer to also pay over sticker for your mistake.  That's just stupid, sloppy salesmanship.

    theodore2 says:

    04:06 PM, 11/09/2010

    It1boy %79 would be accurate if they paid $35 but when you paid $40 plus not true!

    vantageman says:

    10:22 AM, 11/09/2010

    Whats interesting is the again nonsense edmunds puts out about these cars, this car can still be sold for over $32,000 if ou would have paid MSRP that is a very high resale valure for the car, so as usual instead of publishing correct numbers you blast the car with incorrect nonsense. FOr the person that isnt dum enough to pay $10,000 more for a car the will have high resale yet you dont include that.....edmunds is turning into motortrend....

    cdyer says:

    09:34 AM, 11/09/2010

    With so many outside influences on used car sales, how can you objectively evaluate depreciation on 2 cars you're comparing when they aren't bought and sold at the exact same time? Unless you're taking data from aggregate sources, it doesn't make sense to compare 2 individual cars over separate periods.

    theodore2 says:

    09:16 AM, 11/09/2010

    I just have one question why didn't you retest the Challenger Rt before you sold it? Also the Challenger Rt made more torque than the 6.2 Camaro! The Rt should get kudo's on top of three more miles per gallon best mileage besides the fact way less depreciation!!!

    s197gt says:

    06:13 AM, 11/09/2010

    gmt450,

    camaro sales were down 38% in october to 5013.  

    hardly 9k/mo.

    mustang was up 11% to 5317.

    challenger was up 33% to 3182.

    http://blogs.motortrend.com/october-sales-look-better-than-democratic-party%e2%80%99s-election-day-5738.html

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Advertisement