INSIDE LINE

2010 SLP ZL575 Chevrolet Camaro SS Full Test and Video

Media Player

  • 2010 SLP ZL575 Chevrolet Camaro SS Full Test Video

    The 2010 SLP Zl575 Chevrolet Camaro SS Full Test Video showcases the best tuner Camaro that Inside Line has yet to test. | November 30, 2009

3 Videos , 23 Photos | See more photos in this gallery »

Road Test

2010 SLP ZL575 Chevrolet Camaro SS Full Test and Video

Is This the 2011 Chevy Camaro Z28 Hiding in Plain Sight?

    13 Ratings

    Yes, we have enjoyed a steady stream of modified 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS tuner cars. It's been a regular Camarogasm 'round these parts. Some have performed, others never showed up, and one that made at least 700 horsepower ate its clutch.

    First, we tested an HPE550 Camaro from Hennessey. Then we tested one from Vortech Engineering. Then we borrowed the Hennessey HPE700 LS9 Camaro. This year's SEMA show even provided a tasteless Camaro Hall of Shame.

    Yeah, we've seen an eyeful of Camaros, but the much-anticipated Camaro Z28 remains an on-again, off-again supposition. It sure would be nice for GM to have a weapon as lethal as the 540-hp Ford Shelby GT500.

    Maybe the 2010 SLP ZL575 Chevy Camaro SS is it.

    SLP: Not Just a Blowhard
    What we have yet to experience until now is an aftermarket-enhanced Camaro with the kind of complete performance and image enhancements with seamless integration, rock-steady performance, 50-state certification, and trustworthy warranty like SLP's ZL575 package for the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS.

    That's right. According to Street Legal Performance (SLP) in Tom's River, New Jersey, this supercharged 575-hp LS3 V8 for the 2010 Camaro SS not only makes the feds happy but also carries a 3-year/36,000-mile warranty covering all the company-installed modifications, and everything else on the car remains covered by a GM warranty. To maintain those warranties, you must order the ZL575 package through any Chevrolet dealer in the U.S. and Canada at the time you purchase a new Camaro SS. Orders outside the dealership network and installed by any outfit other than SLP carry a lesser warranty.

    Besides the 575-hp hardware, the ZL575 package ($22,995) includes a long list of dress-up items, including 1-inch-lower springs, 20-inch wheels and a high-rise hood, plus a long list of interior and exterior style items. SLP first made its name with the then little-known but now highly sought-after 1991 SLP Firehawk, a freer-breathing third-generation Pontiac Firebird. SLP has come a long way from there, though.

    We've tested several Camaro 2SS coupes with six-speed manual transmissions, and most have hovered around 5.0 seconds to 60 mph with 13.0-second quarter-miles at 110 mph. That's a good start, but shouldn't an SS be at least a little scary?

    Enter the 2010 SLP ZL575 Chevy Camaro SS, running to 60 mph from a standstill consistently in 4.2 seconds (3.9 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip) and shredding the quarter-mile in 12.2 seconds at 116.9 mph. Now that's more like it — and a little scary the way an SS (or Z28) should be. These runs came with Nitto 555R Extreme Drag rear tires (275/40R20 inflated to 24 psi), but the same-size Pirelli P Zero street tires were only 0.1 second slower, although far more difficult to launch consistently.

    What's the Diff?
    Nevertheless, the 2010 SLP ZL575 Chevy Camaro SS could've been quicker still. After running the quarter-mile course several times, we noticed that it was necessary to grab 4th gear before the finish line when usually a Camaro SS does it in 3rd. Our telemetry proved that the shift points for the first three gears came sooner during the run as well.

    We scooted under the car and found a genuine GM limited-slip differential, but its part number indicated it had a 3.70:1 final-drive ratio rather than the 3.45:1 ratio inside the SS's stock pumpkin. Turns out it's from the 2009 Pontiac GXP, and the ring-and-pinion gears are shot-peened and phosphate-coated for enhanced wear and durability. SLP tells us that it was unaware of this when GM handed over the Camaro SS to be modified for the SEMA show.

    If it is robust enough to handle the ZL575's enhanced output, we suspect the stock LSD would've actually served better, though. Seeing as how the ZL575 certainly is not lacking torque with more than 500 pound-feet at the wheels, it has no trouble turning the tires over at the launch, and it'd have no trouble whatsoever pushing the taller, stock gearing to negate the time-consuming extra shift. There's a quarter-mile run of 12-flat or better in this car, especially running on gasoline with higher octane than what's commonly available here in California.

    Bolt-ons
    The ZL575's additional 149 hp over the output of the stock LS3 V8 comes from an SLP-designed cold-air induction system, an SLP-branded Magnuson/Eaton TVS 2300 Roots-type supercharger (with a little electronic massage from a Diablosport Predator U7194 reflash), and SLP's own axle-back stainless-steel exhaust with a 4-inch diameter. The hardware integrates in such a sanitary fashion that the ZL575's engine bay looks like a factory-installed supercharging option.

    Though it sits atop an LS3 rather than an LS9 V8, the ZL575's forced-induction system is nearly identical to that found on the top-dog Corvette ZR1. This means the four-lobe rotor features a high-twist 160-degree helix that improves efficiency (less power to operate), offers cooler discharge temperatures and operates quietly, adding only 1 decibel to measured interior sound levels at idle, wide-open throttle and 70-mph cruise. Rest assured, however, the exhaust system is louder and sharper from behind the car.

    The ZL575 Camaro has this kind of yesteryear thrill-and-danger chromosome bred into it.

    We tested the output of the ZL575 package on MD Automotive's Dynojet. Engineering Editor Jason Kavanagh noted, "No fuss, very little variation, just clean and consistent pulls. The SLP just goes about kicking ass in a nonchalant, matter-of-fact way. And the shape of the stock torque curve remains remarkably intact, just lifted way, way up. When you consider drivetrain loss, the ZL575 is easily generating more than its 575-hp claim. SLP has been here, done this before."

    Even on 91-octane pump gas, the 2010 SLP ZL575 Chevy Camaro SS showed a solid 558 hp at 6,450 rpm and 513 lb-ft of torque at 4,200 rpm at the tires. It means the ZL575 upgrade is making somewhere in the range of 620-650 hp at the crankshaft.

    Brembo Spoken Here
    A stock Camaro SS stops from 60 mph in just 110 feet, though not 15 times in a row like the ZL575 did with its optional Brembo GT package ($5,495). The six-piston calipers squeeze two-piece cross-drilled vented 15-inch rotors up front, and four-piston rear calipers clamp similar rotors in the rear. The result is almost racecar levels of fade resistance and a vastly improved pedal feel. As an added little spiff, this brake package also means SLP will raise the car's speed limiter from 155 mph to 190 mph. But it's all big money.

    There's big money also in SLP's adjustable antiroll bar package ($795). Supplied by Eibach, there are a three-way adjustable front bar (29mm rather than the stock 23mm) and a two-way adjustable rear bar (no size change). We like the SL575's increased roll control and flatter cornering style, but they don't add up to improved performance in the slalom or on the skid pad, as we've clocked the stock Camaro SS at the same or better speed.

    Of course, when we were asked to do a few stunts, the SLP's chassis setup came into its own. It turns out the ZL575 has so much torque available at such a low engine speed that any corner becomes driftable. The only problem arrives when you run out of revs, as the engine will wind up with ease until it bangs off the rpm limiter.

    Road Time
    Two things come to mind when you drive the 2010 SLP ZL575 Chevy Camaro SS on the open road.

    First, the car feels like a factory-built hot rod that someone sneaked out the backdoor of the GM Tech Center. From the almost silent supercharger to absolutely ping-free roll-on acceleration in 6th gear, this car is as well-sorted as a German library. It sure looks, drives and sounds like the oft-rumored Chevy Camaro Z28, though an SLP spokesman denied it. No doubt there's been some give-and-take between SLP and GM on this "001 Pilot Car," which is right there for all to read on the dashboard and inside the trunk lid. The fact that it carries a mysterious (and durable) rear end is a clue, and we have to say that we've never driven an aftermarket offering as fundamentally sound as this one.

    The other trait the ZL575 possesses can be summed up in two words: Holy crap! Unlike the stock 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS, this car has just enough power on tap — in any gear and at any speed — to scare the bejiggers out of even the most seasoned muscle-car enthusiast. The SLP ZL575 recalls a time before steel-belted radials, seatbelts, ABS and stability control, when muscle cars were terrifying.

    Back in the day, 1960s muscle cars had far more power than poise. The rear end would twitch and squirm with each WOT upshift. The ZL575 has this kind of yesteryear thrill-and-danger chromosome bred into it. And it looks right. The badging and even the wheels somehow give it a genuine GM parts kind of look, too.

    Civil Disobedience
    The 2010 SLP ZL575 Chevy Camaro is civil enough to drive every day, subtle enough (minus the stripes) to maintain your neighborhood reputation, and earned 15 mpg during the 850-mile flogging we gave it. (Truth be told, our Editor in Chief Oldham managed a 9.9-mpg overnight average all by himself, so it ain't frugal if you drive like he does.) Sure, there's more power available from other tuners, but this amount (620-650 hp) seems to be a sweet spot, and you keep your warranty.

    A 12-flat quarter-mile is nothing to sneeze at, and it'll cost you $22,995 over the cost of a bone-stock Camaro SS, which in this case was a 2SS model that starts at $34,595, for a total of $57,590. Yes, our car also had the non-stock 3.70 limited-slip differential ($2,000 estimate) and the whole SEMA show catalog poured into it to the tune of $10 grand. So, our car's as-tested price of $67,105 is completely mental for a Camaro, even one as good as this one. But sticking to the bits that make the ZL575 what it is gets you that bonkers buzz that only a true muscle car can provide.

    Can't wait for the 2011 Chevrolet Camaro Z28, assuming there will be one? Then go to your nearest Chevy dealer and order a 2010 SLP ZL575 Chevy Camaro and consider it an act of civil disobedience.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds with this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Road Test

    Second Opinions

    Senior Editor Erin Riches says:
    A chorus of cheers interrupts the din of conversation and chrome in the Las Vegas Convention Center. It's 4 o'clock. The 2009 SEMA Show is over. The Teamsters begin rolling up the carpet and one worker is eager to get at the red velour underneath SLP's ZL575 Camaro. It's time to go.

    Driving a muscle car inside a building is everything I hoped it would be. There's the stress factor of possibly hitting a Teamster and the potential thrill of possibly hitting a Teamster. Visibility has never been worse from the Camaro's bunker, thanks to SLP's raised hood with its functional heat extractor. But the exhaust note sounds far better at 5 mph than on a stock SS — enough louder to make the car feel special. A voice from the crowd lobs a sour-lemons "That's her car?!" and I answer with more throttle.

    Outside the convention center, the DUB cars are disbanding, but phones come out to take pictures of the SLP Camaro. The 1-inch suspension drop on the ZL575 drastically improves the car's stance, and this is the first time showgoers have seen the red SLP car on the move. Soon I'm caught in a jam of Bigfoot knock-offs and winged Evos, but it's nothing to get upset about because the Tremec TR6060 gearbox's clutch and shifter are as friendly as they are in any other Camaro SS, and the slick iPod connectivity remains.

    The sun is low by the time we reach the Vegas Strip. The light changes at Flamingo; I shut off the stereo, floor the throttle and life gets a lot quicker. I hear the supercharger but I fixate on the exhaust, which grows deeper and louder as revs climb but settles down as we saunter up to the next light. This is a burping, farting Camaro that knows when to excuse itself. It's pretty quick, too — quick enough to busy up the tail as I merge onto Interstate 15 and quick enough to pick off every German car between here and L.A. And save for the usual terrible Camaro steering wheel, the ZL575 is comfortable for all 290 miles.

    When I park it for the night, I'm struck by how well everything works together on the ZL575. This doesn't feel like a Camaro with a bunch of aftermarket stuff on it. It feels like the Camaro that I wish Chevrolet could have built in the first place.

    Sort By:

    chopperx says:

    11:31 PM, 12/16/2009

    fixes all my visual beefs w/ the car and blows my mind with 575 hp!

    -now has a proper hood and hood scoop
    -great throwback rims - should be an option (the redline detail is great!)
    -plugged the mail slot hole
    -removed Chevy badging and added the iconic SS badges in its place
    -proper paint stripes
    -proper back matte finish between tail lights
    -proper size rear spoiler
    -chromed out vertical slats ahead of rear wheels

    KUDOS to SLP for doing the Camaro up better than GM!

    beermagazine says:

    01:41 PM, 12/15/2009

    I have ask why nobody has slapped a SC on the V6? 400hp V6 would be nice. Shouldn't be too hard, lots of FI options on the 350Z put the stock block up over 400hp with little effort.

    cah11705 says:

    06:30 PM, 12/14/2009

    It's about time someone gets rid of those goofy bowties and slaps on a proper SS badge.  It really does make it look better!

    lt1boy says:

    03:32 PM, 12/14/2009

    @wlm26.  What's wrong with a focus on straight line performance?  It's the best selling point for performance cars, and for a good reason.  Not everybody lives next door to a track and can beat the crap out of it every weekend.  And even if you did live next door to a track, can you afford several hundred dollars in track fees and tires to race there every month?  Didn't think so.  Driving fast in a straight line is what muscle cars are all about - corners be damned.  If you don't get it, then you're not a muscle car fan.

    And you also have to remember that the SLP Camaro is a tuner car, and not a factory car.  Tuner cars are almost always overpriced, so you can't really compare them to factory cars.  Having said that, if GM ever decides to come out with a Camaro Z28, it will almost certainly be priced to compete with the GT500 (around $47k) which is $10k cheaper than the SLP car, and will blow the doors off any car near its price range.

    alexdi says:

    01:00 PM, 12/14/2009

    500 HP at the crank seems to be the point of diminishing returns with these cars. Any more than that and you're just vaporizing the rear tires. I can't help but think the money would be a better-spent cutting weight from the base V8 Camaro.  

    stingray454 says:

    12:58 PM, 12/14/2009

    Hmm, you gotta be a diehard Camaro fan (and a little bit nuts) to spend that much on this car.  You could buy a CTS-V for the same price, which has almost as much HP, and a similar engine from the factory, and is almost as quick, yet it's a full blown luxury car with a much more sophisticated suspension, a better ride, a better warranty, and a lot more features.  

    Or, as someone has pointed out, a lightly used Z06 for the same price (or even a leftover discounted '09), would be an even better performer.  

    mckman says:

    11:15 AM, 12/14/2009

    A Kia Forte Koup??  Take a look at the test specs, it wouldn't even be close, curves in the road or not.  Slapping $20,000 worth of tuner parts on a Kia sounds like a great investment as well.  Now you "might" have a fast car that is worth less than what you paid for it, and no warranty.

    I wish the SLP had better handling and was a smaller package, but if that is what you want then get a deal on a one or two year old Z06.  This car would certainly be fun around town and on the weekends.  I have an STI, but smooth reliable V8 power (with a warranty) is impressive.

    wlm26 says:

    10:11 AM, 12/14/2009

    Are we going back to the days of huge horsepower and only straightline performance??  The little Kia Forte Koup would likely leave the Camaro in the dust on a windy road, which is sad.  Sure, burnouts are cool, but ummmm, what good are they in the end?  A car with that much power, couldn't they construct a suspension to make sure the power isn't robbed by wheel slip?  Seriously, $67K and no real handling.  No thank you.  For that kind of money, if I were in the market, I would go for a BMW M3 coup and leave the Camaro in the dust.  Or better yet, buy a Forte Koup for $20k, drop $20K in performance and leave the $7K to gloat with when I blow the Camaro away at the first turn.  

    wikiwiki says:

    08:07 AM, 12/14/2009

    Wow.  $67K for a Chevy.  LOL!!!  I think I'll pass.

    eventhorizon1 says:

    05:50 AM, 12/14/2009

    I agree Double_duece, as impressive as this is (and it is VERY impressive), I think a twin turbo six version would give great acceleration, but with much better handling numbers. I hope someone is working on such an offering.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2010 SLP ZL575 Chevrolet Camaro SS

    Base Price:

    $34,595

    Price as Tested:

    $67,105

    Engine:

    Supercharged 6.2-liter V8

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed manual

    Power:

    575 hp @ 6,500; 550 lb-ft of torque @ 3,650 rpm

    0-60 mph:

    4.2 seconds

    Fuel Economy:

    15 mpg average

    What Works (pros) :

    Feels like a factory-built high-output powertrain; body mods look right; will do burnouts until the cows come home — from New Jersey.

    What Needs Work (cons) :

    While they were at it, we wish SLP had addressed the Camaro SS's natural tendency to understeer.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2010
    MakeChevrolet
    ModelCamaro
    Style2SS + SLP ZL575 2dr Coupe (6.2L 8cyl 6M)
    Base MSRP$34,595
    Options on test vehicleZL575 Standard Equipment ($22,995 - includes high-output Eaton supercharger assembly, axle-back exhaust system, cold-air induction system, modified stock engine cover, sport suspension spring package, RTM Performance hood with functional heat extractor scoop and fascia closeout panel, rear spoiler painted body color, 20-inch five-spoke Red Line wheels with machined spoke face and ZL center caps, rear taillight panel painted in gloss black, rear quarter panel gill insert graphics in gloss black, "ZL575 Supercharged" fender and rear deck lid badges, logo-embroidered front floor mats, logo-embroidered headrests, logo car cover, sequentially numbered dash plaque (1) and key fobs (2) (1-250), faux leather-bound portfolio); Brembo GT Front Brake Package ($5,495 -- includes six-piston calipers and two-piece 15-inch front discs and top-speed limiter raised from 155 mph to 190 mph.); Pontiac G8 GXP 3.70:1 Differential ($2,000?); Rally-Style Dual-Painted Stripes in Black ($995); Adjustable Antiroll Bar Package ($795); Heritage-Style SS Badging for Grille and Rear Panel ($100); Grille Insert to Accept the SS Badge; ($100); Skip-Shift Eliminator ($30).
    As-tested MSRP$67,105
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeRear-wheel drive
    Engine typeSupercharged 90-degree V8
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)6,162cc (376 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainPushrod, two valves per cylinder
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.7:1
    Redline (rpm)6,600
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)575 @ 6,500 (558 @ 6,450 measured at the tires)
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)550 @ 3,650 (513 @ 4,200 measured at the tires)
    Transmission typeSix-speed manual
    Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)1st = 3.01; 2nd = 2.07; 3rd = 1.43; 4th = 1.00; 5th = 0.84; 6th = 0.57; R= 3.28; FD = 3.70
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent, struts, coil springs and three-position-adjustable stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent, multilink, coil springs and two-position-adjustable stabilizer bar
    Steering typeRack-and pinion with hydraulic assist
    Steering ratio (x:1)16.1:1
    Turning circle (ft.)37.7
    Tire brandPirelli (Nitto)
    Tire modelP Zero (555R Extreme Drag @ 24 psi)
    Tire typeSummer
    Tire size, frontP245/45ZR20 103Y (35 psi)
    Tire size, rearP275/40ZR20 106Y (35 psi)
    Wheel size20-by-8 inches front -- 20-by-9 inches rear
    Wheel materialAluminum alloy
    Brakes, front15-inch ventilated/cross-drilled discs, aluminum six-piston fixed calipers
    Brakes, rear14.4-inch ventilated/cross-drilled discs, aluminum four-piston fixed calipers
    Track Test Results
    0-45 mph (sec.)3.1 (2.9 with drag radials)
    0-60 mph (sec.)4.3 (4.2 with drag radials)
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)4.1 (3.9 with drag radials)
    0-75 mph (sec.)6.0 (5.8 with drag radials)
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)12.3 @ 116.8 (12.2 @ 116.9 with drag radials)
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)27
    60-0 mph (ft.)110
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)65.6 (ESP off), 66.0 (ESP competitive)
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.86 (ESP off); 0.87 (ESP competitive)
    Sound level @ idle (dB)53.1
    @ Full throttle (dB)83.0
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)68.1
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsTypical finicky Camaro launches (preferring slight bog to controlled wheelspin) made even more so with stock tires, taller 3.70:1 rear-end gear and additional sauce. I had to resort to low 2,500-rpm launch to maintain traction and pretend the proverbial egg was on the throttle pedal to keep from lighting the tires all the way through 1st gear. Still, it's not impossible to find an ideal launch. Repeating it, however, is the difficult part as the P Zeros lose grip with heat. Swapping the stock rear tires for Nitto 555R drag radials set to 24 psi made every launch easy and repeatable. Shift gate/linkage and clutch appear to be up to the task and show no signs of abuse or imminent failure. Scratched the tires at every upshift and the 3rd-4th shift -- unnecessary in the stock Camaro SS with a 3.45:1 diff -- is required to get across the finish line.
    Braking ratingVery Good
    Braking commentsFirst stop was best and matches stock SS for distance, but subsequent stops were dead reliable and absolutely fade-free. The Brembos reduce fade rather than stopping distance, with seven of 10 stops at or under 114 feet. Firm pedal from first to last stop with near-zero dive.
    Handling ratingGood
    Handling commentsSlalom: Unfortunately, the lowering springs and beefed-up antiroll bars didn't net a numerical gain in the slalom test. The ZL575 -- just like the stock SS --understeers through the slalom, making it push past the next cone the faster you go. Best run was slow-in/fast-out to minimize understeer. Also, the reduced ride height means less compliance available for the slight dip-hop at cone #3 which exacerbated the late arrival at cone #4. Skid pad: Typical challenging sight lines of the Camaro made even more so with the bulging hood. The understeer in the limit is easy to find and ride, and switching to competitive mode on the stability control this tendency only slightly.
    Testing Conditions
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)83.8
    Wind (mph, direction)2.5-mph headwind
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)16 city/24 highway/19 combined
    Edmunds observed (mpg)13.0 worst/17.6 best/15.3 average
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)19
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,849
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)3,932
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)54/46
    Length (in.)190.4
    Width (in.)75.5
    Height (in.)53.2
    Wheelbase (in.)112.3
    Track, front (in.)63.7
    Track, rear (in.)63.7
    Legroom, front (in.)42.4
    Legroom, rear (in.)29.9
    Headroom, front (in.)37.4
    Headroom, rear (in.)35.3
    Shoulder room, front (in.)56.9
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)42.5
    Seating capacity4
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)11.3
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)Not available
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain5 years/100,000 miles
    Corrosion6 years/100,000 miles
    Roadside assistance5 years/100,000 miles
    Free scheduled maintenanceNot available
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard dual front
    Head airbagsStandard front and rear
    Knee airbagsNot available
    Antilock brakesFour-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsElectronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    Rollover protectionNot available
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemStandard with location readout
    Emergency assistance systemOptional
    NHTSA crash test, driver4 stars
    NHTSA crash test, passenger4 stars
    NHTSA crash test, side front5 stars
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot tested
    NHTSA rollover resistance5 stars
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement