INSIDE LINE

2010 Callaway Cars SC572 Camaro SS LS3 Full Test

Media Player

  • 2010 Callaway SC572 Camaro SS LS3 Track Video

    Inside Line's testing team runs Callaway's SC572 Camaro SS LS3 at the track. | July 09, 2010

1 Video , 23 Photos | See more photos in this gallery »

Road Test

2010 Callaway Cars SC572 Camaro SS LS3 Full Test

American Motor, Euro Driving

    22 Ratings

    When you're driving along in the 2010 Callaway Cars SC572 Camaro SS LS3, it's easy to spot the truck drivers who are car enthusiasts. From the vantage point of a big rig's cab, you have a clear view of the Callaway Camaro's chrome supercharger basking under a glass skylight in the hood, the whole picture framed by an immaculate carbon-fiber outline.

    If we'd been given a buck for every thumb we saw raised in response, why, we'd have enough for a couple of Subway foot-longs by now.

    Not that the supercharger is the only clue to this Callaway Camaro's identity. The 19-inch Callaway wheels for this Camaro SS hint at aftermarket alchemy as well, as does the car's lower ride height. But in fact, the Eaton TVS2300 supercharger itself is relatively anonymous until it's working hard. In the Callaway SC572 with its Chevy LS3 V8 and six-speed manual transmission, there is virtually no supercharger sound at lower engine speeds and none at idle.

    Without the hood window to give the game away, one could hide the existence of the blower completely. Callaway's integrated blower/intercooler assembly is low enough not to require a power bulge, and could easily hide under stock bodywork. That way, the only time anyone outside would know the 2010 Callaway Cars SC572 Camaro SS LS3 had been endowed with huge horsepower from its forced-induction pump, free-flowing intake and exhaust plumbing and tweaked engine-control electronics, would be when the car blew their doors off.

    Track Duty
    Like all of the current hot-rod Camaros, the 2010 Callaway Camaro SC572 struggles to get under 4 seconds in the sprint to 60 mph. It's all about the launch, and in this case the car manages 4.4 seconds to 60 mph from a standstill (4.1 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip). The Callaway Cars Camaro L99 with its slightly less powerful V8 and automatic transmission is actually a tenth quicker, which shows you that wheelspin is your enemy.

    In comparison, the 603-horsepower 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS Supercharged by Vortech Engineering maximizes its automatic transmission and cheater Nitto drag tires to get to 60 mph in 4.1 seconds (3.8 seconds with 1 foot of rollout), while the 562-hp 2010 Hennessey HPE550 Chevy Camaro SS gets to 60 mph from a standstill in 4.3 seconds (4.0 seconds with 1 foot of rollout).

    As we've learned with various supercharged Camaros, power is nothing unless you can get it hooked up.

    These two rivals also manage to outpace the Callaway Camaro SC572 through the quarter-mile. The Callaway Camaro runs the quarter in 12.4 seconds at 113.9 mph, while the Vortech Camaro does 12.2 seconds at 115.7 mph and the Hennessey Camaro does 12.2 seconds at 120.1 mph.

    It Ain't All About Racing
    Callaway Cars has been building specialty cars since 1977. Founder Reeves Callaway likes to remind us that buyers of these cars love having the extra power in reserve, and they enjoy opening the beasts up for an occasional burst. But mainly they drive around in their comfort zone, and comfort is the operative word. So a Callaway is set up to provide a sweet spot that embraces normal, everyday driving.

    Even so, Callaway's cars offer significant amounts of thrust. In fact, you could even say way too much thrust, depending on your frame of reference. The first time you get on the throttle pedal hard in 1st gear — even after a moderate launch — the rear end will break loose as the blower starts to deliver significant boost. That's right. You can't go to full throttle in the middle of 1st gear without smoking the rear P Zeros.

    Second gear doesn't feel much weaker, and the rush is almost dizzying as the car gains speed. Yes, we know the Bugatti Veyron has 1,000 hp, and you're probably accustomed to seeing big numbers bandied about. But we're talking almost 600 hp here, and if you haven't tried that yet, we're here to tell you that it's almost immoral in a world of high-priced gas and low-slung speed limits.

    It's very nearly 300 hp per passenger, and that ought to do it, right? And while we agree that it's important to know which of the aftermarket Camaros is fastest, we'd like to point out that it takes considerable skill from experienced practitioners just to uncover those differences. Most of all, we'd like to suggest that a civilized combination of power, handling and refinement might be a better measure of the contest.

    Numbers Don't Reveal All
    As far as handling goes, the slalom numbers don't provide a compelling argument on behalf of any of the aforementioned contenders in the Camaro wars. The Callaway car is a tenth slower through the cones at 68.1 mph, but might have done better with the double-adjustable dampers we tried recently on the Callaway SC572 Camaro L99, the company's pumped-up version of the Camaro with an automatic transmission, which ran 68.4 mph.

    How about sound levels, then? That might be a measure of the differing degrees of refinement (or its absence). Here we find the Callaway registering substantially lower numbers on the decibel meter than the Hennessey car, recording just 80.8 dBA to the HPE's 88.5. (Just 3 dBA represents a doubling of sound pressure.)

    So, yes, the Callaway car retains much of the stock Camaro's refinement. This is actually pretty good, courtesy of a stiff structure and GM's relentless pursuit of reductions on the noise, vibration and harshness front. In the case of this Callaway SC572 with a six-speed manual transmission, even the supercharger sound holds off until the V8 is pumping good and hard, at which point the whoosh you hear inside the car is entirely appropriate to the experience.

    With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility
    As we've learned time and again with various supercharged Camaros, power is nothing unless you can get it hooked up with the pavement.

    Pete Callaway, the general manager of Callaway Cars West, has developed a suspension package for the Camaro SC572 that is meant to do the job. The Pro-Street S package for this car features stainless-steel gas-charged dampers with damping rates developed by Callaway to reflect his preferences in both low- and high-speed damping action, and the overall damping curves are quite different from the stock dampers.

    Progressive-rate Eibach springs have been used, and the adjustable spring perches on the dampers deliver a ride height that's 1 inch lower than stock. Nevertheless, there's more overall suspension travel, while the springs are noticeably softer in initial rate and stiffer in final rate. Meanwhile the two-position front antiroll bar is 262 percent stiffer than stock, while the three-position rear bar is 174 percent stiffer than stock.

    Both Grip and Steering
    If you look at the numbers, you can't help but think that the Callaway Camaro has been set up with a soft, street-friendly ride and more understeer, and it does feel friendly, even on the freeway. But as soon as you get serious, the Camaro gets serious, too, something we noticed in the slalom.

    The car is poised and unflustered by bumps, yet there's surprisingly little body roll. You can actually steer the car on the throttle, adjusting the cornering line with the pedal as the rear steps out with more power and the nose tucks in with less.

    The same sensitivity to throttle control applies on the skid pad. The ride gets a little choppier as the g-load increases, which is something we've noticed before with progressive springs, yet the bottom line is 0.91g. This is a big change from the stock Camaro, which defaults to a mild but irresistible push in every situation.

    A Different Idea
    The 2010 Callaway Cars SC572 Camaro SS LS3 is a different sort of pumped-up Camaro. It has the supercharged 572-hp V8 and the short-shift transmission kit, the sort of thing that a street racer's dreams are made of. Yet it delivers extreme performance in a way that doesn't keep you from enjoying the experience. You can tell the car has been developed as a complete package, and it makes this car something you can drive every day, which is not something we can say about the other hot-rod Camaros that have been through here.

    And the Callaway Cars idea gets even better, because this is a car you can buy at a Chevrolet dealer with a full warranty of three years/36,000 miles on the powertrain in addition to the continuation of the Chevrolet warranty on the rest of the vehicle, plus all the usual financing options you get from a Chevrolet dealer. It all starts at $51,585. We think you've really got to have the optional $3,950 Powerwindow so you can see the supercharger, no matter what.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Sort By:

    margod117 says:

    05:04 PM, 07/13/2010

    GM can make some cool cars....its just why can't they do a NICE INTERIOR!!!!!! Really why????? They can make amazing cars under the hood and outside appearance so why not just top it off and make a nice interior????

    yellowmiata says:

    07:21 PM, 07/12/2010

    Is this Camero only a 2 seater?  "It's very nearly 300 hp per passenger..."

    If so - finally!  A modern pony car with the appropriate number of seats!

    lt1boy says:

    07:10 PM, 07/12/2010

    Oh, and $17,000 for a super charger and installation is overpriced, IMO.  

    Anybody who's into performance cars is NOT going to go out and buy an aftermarket Camaro - so why bother writing about them?  

    Nobody cares about the Callaway, Vortech, or Hennessey Camaro, seriously.  Nobody cares...

    lt1boy says:

    07:00 PM, 07/12/2010

    Your numbers are messed up.  In the article you state that the Callaway Camaro runs the quarter in 12.4 @ 113.9, but in your specs and performance numbers, you state that it runs the quarter in 12.3 @ 118.4.

    empire713 says:

    03:14 PM, 07/12/2010

    $63,170 i will have to decline i could get a good used German car and have some change left over

    kosmo69 says:

    07:59 AM, 07/12/2010

    better tuned than others.  Callaways have always managed to do that.
    still , despite all that HP, can't outperform a 911 and even the Vette.  

    ed124c says:

    07:43 AM, 07/12/2010

    This car has a "skylight" for the supercharger (huh?) but not one for actual humans.

    This is obviously a slow news day.

    camaro84 says:

    06:14 AM, 07/12/2010

    Once again as a 1SS owner, I see NO beneifits in turbos or superchargers for this car. It's not EARTH shattering differences between the 2 based on the cost invovled as well. The ONLY thing worth doing to this car is dropping it an inch by throwing on a less understear prone suspension, that's about it.

    Anyone who wants the slight increase in power and HOPEFULLY weight distribution might as well wait for the Z28 to come out, at least that will have factory backed warranty and durability.

    Lastly, the Camaro is a fine car, a little too smooth feeling rather than a brute but I'm not complaining. I'm sure the next gen will be lighter/smaller.

    lmbvette says:

    04:47 AM, 07/12/2010

    Nice car, but I'll stick with the CTS-V, thanks!

    sportyaccordy says:

    04:21 AM, 07/12/2010

    63K is steep... as others said we are talking used 997 Carrera S money, or new M3 money... both of which outhandle this car and weigh less than this car by wide margins

    And of course there's the C6

    IDK I feel like GM really could have shrunk this car down a bit.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2010 Callaway Cars SC572 Camaro SS LS3

    Base Price:

    $51,585

    Price as Tested:

    $63,170

    Engine:

    Supercharged 6.2-liter V8

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed manual

    Power:

    572 hp @ 6,400 rpm; 541 lb-ft of torque @ 4,000 rpm

    0-60 mph:

    4.4 seconds

    Fuel Mileage:

    N/A

    What Works (pros):

    Supercharged engine; short-shift kit; supple ride with responsive steering.

    What Needs Work (cons):

    Interior might be too plain for such a remarkable car.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2010 Callaway Cars SC572 Camaro SS (6.2L 8cyl S/C 6M)
    Vehicle TypeRWD two-door coupe
    Base MSRP$34,595
    Options on test vehicleCallaway Camaro SC572 Package ($16,990 -- includes supercharged LS3 V8 with Eaton TVS2300 supercharger, water-to-air intercooler, high-flow fuel injectors, intake system, exhaust system, embroidered floor mats and headrests, door sill panels); Chrome Coat Supercharger Finish ($1,100); Powerwindow hood ($3,950); Coil-Over Suspension System ($2,990); Callaway Wheels ($2,995); Short-Throw Shift Kit ($450)
    As-tested MSRP$63,170
    Assembly locationCorona, California
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationLongitudinal, front-engine, rear-wheel drive
    Engine typeSupercharged, port-injected V8
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)6,162cc/372 cu-in
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainPushrod, two valves per cylinder
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.7
    Redline, indicated (rpm)6,250
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)572 @ 6,400
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)541 @ 4,000
    Transmission typeSix-speed manual with console shifter
    Transmission ratios (x:1)I=3.01; II=2.07; III=1.43; IV=1.00; V=0.84; VI=0.57; Reverse=3.28
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)3.45
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent double-wishbones, coil springs, driver-adjustable dampers, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent multilink, coil springs, driver-adjustable variable dampers, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeHydraulic-assist variable-ratio rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)16.1
    Turning circle (ft.)37.3
    Tire make and modelPirelli P Zero
    Tire typeAsymmetrical+Directional summer
    Tire size, front245/45ZR20 103Y
    Tire size, rear275/40ZR20 106Y
    Wheel size, front20-by-8 inches
    Wheel size, rear20-by-9 inches
    Wheel materialCast aluminum
    Brakes, front14-inch ventilated steel discs with 4-piston fixed calipers
    Brakes, rear14.4-inch ventilated steel discs with 4-piston fixed calipers
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)2.2
    0-45 mph (sec.)3.1
    0-60 mph (sec.)4.4
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)4.1
    0-75 mph (sec.)5.7
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)12.3 @ 118.4
    0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.)2.2
    0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.)3.2
    0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.)4.6
    0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)4.2
    0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.)5.9
    1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph)12.4 @ 117.1
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)27
    60-0 mph (ft.)109
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)68.1
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON68.0
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.91
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON0.90
    Sound level @ idle (dB)54.1
    @ Full throttle (dB)80.8
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)69.7
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)1,600
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsTricky to launch without either bogging engine or spinning tires, but not impossible to find the sweet spot between. First throw to 2nd gear I thought I had missed a gear but hadn't -- it was the short-throw shift linkage (nice). Had to be gentle on the throttle until midway through 1st gear. Strong engine pull all the way up to indicated redline with mostly linear acceleration.
    Braking commentsInconsistent distances and mostly different from 30 mph to zero. Fade isn't an issue, but perhaps worn tires and soft bushings affected performance.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: Can detect progressive springs here as car gets choppier as g-load increases. Car remains poised and body remains level, however, and can be steered on the throttle. Slalom: Unlike stock Camaro chassis, this one will respond to throttle lift to minimize understeer at each cone, then going back on throttle to squirt to the next cone. Only slightly does this car acknowledge bumps and dips in the pavement. Slight delay in response to steering input.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date4/6/2010
    Test locationCalifornia Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)59
    Relative humidity (%)43
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)29.01
    Wind (mph, direction)4.6
    Fuel used for test91 octane
    As-tested tire pressures, f/r (psi)36/36
    Fuel Consumption
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)19.0
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,849
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)3,883
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)53.2/46.8
    Length (in.)190.4
    Width (in.)75.5
    Height (in.)54.2
    Wheelbase (in.)112.3
    Track, front (in.)63.7
    Track, rear (in.)63.7
    Legroom, front (in.)42.4
    Legroom, rear (in.)29.9
    Headroom, front (in.)37.4
    Headroom, rear (in.)35.3
    Shoulder room, front (in.)56.9
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)42.5
    Seating capacity4
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)11.3
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper3 years/36,000 miles
    Powertrain3 years/36,000 miles
    Corrosion6 years/100,000 miles
    Roadside assistance5 years/100,000 miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement