ARLINGTON, Virginia — Flying cars soon may not only be a figment of an imaginative Jetsons mindset now that the U.S. military has announced a program it's calling "Transformer." The Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) research group will host a workshop on January 14 to familiarize companies with and start brainstorming ideas for the program.
DARPA says that "the objective of the Transformer (TX) program is to demonstrate a one-to-four-person transportation vehicle that can drive and fly, thus enabling the war fighter to avoid water, difficult terrain and road obstructions as well as IED and ambush threats. The vehicle will be capable of driving on prepared surface and light off-road conditions, while flight functionality will require Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL)."
The problem with the current Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles is that they have trouble safely traversing demanding battlefields like Afghanistan with such variable landscapes. A flying car would allow the military to dominate in an asymmetric warfare environment — they would have the ability to vertically take off and land anywhere as well as go over varying terrain with very few hiccups in altitude or velocity.
DARPA is looking to do three things with this program: develop a "robust vehicle design that maximizes military utility" at a low cost, determine and develop the necessary technology to make this flying car possible and, finally, build a single prototype that can go through several ground and flight tests. Some of the technology looking to be matured includes adaptive wing structures, ducted fan propulsion, composite materials, hybrid electric drive and advanced batteries.
Some companies have attempted to build flying cars; few have succeeded. Perhaps the most famous example is Moller's SkyCar, which was looked at over the summer by the military for potential use. Other attempts include the Massachusetts-based Terrafugia's street-legal "Transition" vehicle with foldable wings, but even that won't be ready to go until 2011, and it costs an expensive $194,000. Jeff Allen Case is just behind Moller and Terrafugia with his "Hammerhead" prototype that is expected to have a top speed of 250 mph at 8,000 feet.
The DARPA meeting kicks off on January 14, so those interested should make sure to register by January 7. See DARPA's announcement for more information.
Inside Line says: It would only make sense to dub the first prototype vehicle Optimus Prime when — and if — DARPA gets there. — Mike Lysaght, Correspondent

Add A Comment »
atenza94546 says:
10:06 AM, 01/04/2010
Are they going to test Hybrid on this !!!!????
majormajor42 says:
06:17 PM, 12/31/2009
The DARPA challenge was all about solving a problem that does exist - loosing lives to IEDs in Iraq. Just a few years ago, truck drivers driving up the roads from Kuwait to our bases in Iraq were taking tremendous risks. Fortunately, as far as I know from the news, those type of IED attacks on the supply trucks have diminished.
So when the DARPA challenge was taking place, there was much talk about having autonomous vehicles in a supply convey making the journey instead. And this problem long outdates our current conflict. take a look at WWII:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Ball_Express
"The biggest problems facing the Express were maintenance, finding enough drivers, and lack of sleep for overworked truckers."
So, will the technologies developed by these teams, such as the Stanford team that won, make it into a real vehicle supplying our troops in Asia? It might take some googling on someone's part here to find out to what degree progress to that goal is being made.
And I'm all for this new endeavor. If it saves lives or gives us a new tactical advantage, great!
blueguydotcom says:
04:19 PM, 12/31/2009
The DARPA challenges didn't really cost the government much but they got a whole bunch of various groups to spend money and time trying to figure out a solution to a problem we don't really have.
Invention is the mother of necessity. You didn't know you "needed" all of your CDs with you until someone began pimping a device called the iPod. Who knew the map was so bad before personal GPS? Do we all really need to be in contact with people 24/7 via phone/email/web?
firstclass says:
11:21 PM, 12/30/2009
I like the idea but these DARPA challenges never seem to go anywhere and waste a lot of money. How long have they been trying to make a car that drive itself when they know a computer will never replace a human driver. (There are just too many variables that a computer can't do) Will the car drive off when it hits someone. This flying car idea peeks my interest and is much more realistic then a computer driven car but is it just another waste of time? I've seen videos of actual Military jet packs and flying saucers that failed as well.