INSIDE LINE

Edmunds: "Start Over" on MPG Rating System

Media Player

  • 2009 Mini E Picture

    2009 Mini E Picture

    Edmunds says the Mini E's EPA rating of 99 mpg doesn't tell the whole story. Edmunds suggests the EPA reconfigure those new-car rating stickers to give actual monthly operating costs instead. | November 24, 2009

News

Edmunds: "Start Over" on MPG Rating System

    4 Ratings

    SANTA MONICA, California — The age of the alternative-energy vehicle has dawned, and Edmunds.com says fuel economy ratings deserve a fresh look. The consumer Web site, in an open letter to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Energy, says it's time to tear the outdated EPA mileage stickers off new vehicles and overhaul the way consumers are told about fuel economy.

    Edmunds CEO Jeremy Anwyl says the effort to convert various types of energy — hybrids, electric vehicles, and traditional internal combustion — to a single MPG standard is "missing the point" and can even be misleading. If the reason for those window stickers is to let consumers get "a sense of the relative cost of operating a vehicle on a day-to-day basis," he writes, it would be better to give a cost to operate the vehicle during a typical month.

    That's because a simple mpg or equivalent can look better on paper than it turns out to be on the road. The advantage of EVs over traditionally fueled vehicles, Edmunds says, is "nowhere near as great as the proposed EPA ratings would imply." For example, the 2009 Mini E, an all-electric vehicle, is rated by the EPA at 99 mpge (equivalent), and Edmunds estimates it costs $49.39 per month to operate. The Chevrolet Volt plug-in hybrid is rated at a much higher 230 mpg, but Edmunds estimates it will cost $53.55 per month to operate.

    Edmunds suggests that the EPA define a real-world "driving circuit" that covers a typical month, including commuting, errands, outings and the like. Charging and "other energy-specific assumptions" will need to be factored in, as will costs of various sources of energy. In the letter, Edmunds also urges the EPA to create ways to measure other "energy/environmental usage data points" for carbon usage, recyclability, and use of renewable energy as new technologies continue to proliferate.

    Inside Line says: An important idea, and if adopted, one that would help consumers compare apples to apples when deciding what kind of vehicle will work best for their needs. — Laura Sky Brown, Correspondent

    Sort By:

    scottyscooter says:

    11:13 AM, 11/25/2009

    I think they should just tell you the full charge range of the electric vehicle. I think the information people are looking for is how far they can drive before they need to recharge the car.

    Hybrids like the Volt should give two figures; the full charge range and a MPG figure for if you are driving with zero battery charge and running the gasoline generator.

    debo1091 says:

    12:28 PM, 11/24/2009

    I read in a Popular Mechanics magazine article "25 Bold Ideas the World Needs Right Now!" most find it easier to understand g/100Miles over MPG...although i dont think it would help with electric vehicles. I think it would be a much better system than MPG. It doesn't completely fix the problem but i think it could be useful. If you want to read it for yourself here is the address: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/transportation/4322287.html?series=82

    shaohsiin says:

    12:09 PM, 11/24/2009

    Fine idea, but probably means more authorities to be envolved, more cetificats to be issued, more test to be done by different orgnizations....not sure those are nessesary....

    iamz says:

    09:41 AM, 11/24/2009

    Makes sense to me. For vehicles that can be charged off the grid, an average cost per charge based on electric rates around the country seems in order. Then you could calculate the cost per mile based the vehicles range for different driving conditions.

    isend2c says:

    09:15 AM, 11/24/2009

    I agree with notabigdeal.  I personally drive about double what most do, at 24,000 miles a year.  This means that the EPA estimated "annual fuel cost" doesn't matter to me at all, which is similar to what you are suggesting.  I think that that should only be the case for alternative energy cars, not for petrol and diesel powered ones.

    notabigdeal says:

    08:21 AM, 11/24/2009

    This could be hard as some people drive more then others. Also, the fluctuations in energy prices will be very difficult to account for.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Advertisement