Nothing says "I've still got sack" like a 100-foot burnout in a supercharged, pushrod-powered American wagon loaded with a toddler, a stroller, a case of Huggies pull-ups and 2 gallons of organic reduced-fat milk. This, friends, is the 2011 Cadillac CTS-V Wagon. It's a machine built for the unemasculated American male who still makes a nod to utility. And we want one. Badly.
Honestly, we're not certain who the customers are for Cadillac's wild crossbreed of speed and function. The investment banker family man with the need to carry the occasional ladder, maybe? Or, perhaps, the successful mortgage broker whose midlife crisis involves wholesome burnouts with two kids and a dog in the back?
We don't know. And, frankly, neither does Cadillac. Best of all, it doesn't really matter. Why? Because Cadillac only has to sell 37 CTS-V wagons — the third V-series car in the CTS line — to break even on the project.
And if that's not a testament to economies of scale, we don't know what is.
Wagoning the CTS-V
Talk to Don Butler, vice president of Cadillac marketing, and you begin to get an idea why this is the case. "There's not a lot different on the wagon," Butler says. "Really, it was just a matter of making certain the wagon could live up to the standard of V-branded products."
We can verify that it does. Our mother-in-law nearly slapped us silly the first time we ran the big Caddy up on the torque converter, released the brake and pinned her freshly styled locks into the leather headrests. Wagons, at least in her day, never performed such feats.
But the 2011 Cadillac CTS-V Wagon is happy to oblige. After all, it's endowed with all the trickery of other Cadillac V cars — supercharging, two-mode magnetic ride control suspension, Brembo brakes and huge, sticky Michelins. Sure, there were small compromises to keep the budget down — like the fact that this car shares its rear fascia and exhaust outlets with the standard CTS Sport Wagon while other V products get proprietary rear bumpers and exhaust outlets. But the wagon's only real compromises come in the form of additional weight and reduced rigidity.
You Can't Tell
According to Ed Piatek, CTS-V Wagon program engineering manager, the wagon is 8 percent less rigid than the sedan in bending rigidity and 3.8 percent less rigid than the sedan in torsional rigidity. However, it speaks highly of the wagon's body structure that the development team didn't feel the need to add any additional bracing over that of the standard CTS Sport Wagon.
Thanks to a heavier body structure and glass, the 2011 Cadillac CTS-V Wagon is about 154 pounds heavier than the sedan, depending on equipment. This brought the total weight of our tester to 4,485 pounds.
We'll admit to not having back-to-back drives in both the sedan and wagon, but if you're not in this game for ultimate performance, then those differences matter little. This is a fast, fun machine that just happens to offer real utility in addition to its stunning speed.
And About That Speed...
Of course, under the wagon's hood resides the same 556-horsepower 6.2-liter supercharged V8 we're now accustomed to seeing in all über-quick Cadillacs. Our test car was fitted with the six-speed automatic transmission with steering-wheel-mounted shift buttons. And if you want an exceptionally rare machine, the wagon is available with a six-speed manual transmission.
But like all CTS-Vs, this one plain stomps when it's asked to. It banged out a 12.7-second quarter-mile pass at 113.4 mph. That's 0.3 second and 1 mph off the pace of the last CTS-V Sedan we tested. Sixty miles per hour arrives in 4.7 seconds (4.4 seconds with a 1-foot rollout like at a drag strip). Again, a few clicks off the pace of the sedan (4.4 seconds), but not a deal-breaker — at least not for us.
It transforms from docile mommy mobile to ass-tearing thunder truck in one stomp of the pedal.
Braking, as produced by the CTS-V's six-piston front calipers and two-piece 15-inch front rotors required 111 feet to stop from 60 mph. The two-piece rotors were aftermarket parts fitted to our car for track use during its press launch. They cost $1,295 and will be available soon from the GM Performance Parts catalog. A rear differential cooler was also fitted. It hasn't been priced yet but is estimated to cost $1,995 and is available from Cadillac dealers.
In our handling tests the wagon danced through the slalom at 68.9 mph and held on around the skid pad at a 0.88g average. That's imperceptibly less speed between the cones than the CTS-V Sedan (69.2 mph) and only marginally less grip, too (0.89g).
A CTS-V All Its Own
Still, what the numbers won't tell you is the effect a 2011 Cadillac CTS-V Wagon has on those with whom it shares the road. And that, at least in our experience, is exactly no effect at all. With the exception of one interested panhandler in the Central Valley, we drove the wagon half the length of California and then some — more than 900 miles in total — without so much as a lifted eyebrow.
This is both good and bad. For us and anyone else who prefers to slide past unnoticed, it's very good. That said, there's a certain subtlety, a slight, unheroic attitude that can only come from a car with this much power and function. Like Clint Eastwood, it makes a statement by how little it says.
It's a theme that carries through to its driver. We found ourselves doddling — driving with little intent to reach our destination. Until, like a cat who must suddenly be in another room, we'd give it all the beans to shake traffic in one deliberate move.
And shake traffic this Caddy will. Like the hell spawn of GM, the wagon transforms from docile mommy mobile to ass-tearing thunder truck in one stomp of the pedal. And it will do it with a kid and a load of lawn fertilizer in the back.
It's this car's combination of stunning feedback, massive power and high limits coupled with the ability to, say, make a Home Depot run, that makes it truly unique and immeasurably more fun than others of its ilk.
It's for Real Inside
Flop down the wagon's rear seats and there's enough room for a medium-size person to sleep — 58 cubic feet in total. And the pass-through center armrest allows you to carry long items without even folding the seats. There's even a tie-down track system behind the rear seats to help you lock your heavy items to the floor in the event that hauling ass and hauling cargo should coincide. Sure, it's not a massive wagon, but there's far more utility here than in the sedan.
Otherwise, this is the same interior we've come to appreciate in other CTS-V styles. Our tester was fitted with the optional Recaro thrones that suit those of all statures. Snug yet highly adjustable, these seats incorporate every feature we could ever want in a place to put our behind while driving — heating, ventilation and 14-way adjustability.
There's also dual-zone climate control, a rearview camera and a 300-watt 10-speaker Bose audio system with 40 gigabytes of built-in hard drive memory. What else could you really need?
Empty Your Wallet Here
All variants of the 2011 Cadillac CTS-V start at $62,990 including destination fees. But our tester, loaded with nearly every option — Recaro seats, Sapele wood trim, Thunder Grey paint, sunroof and the automatic transmission — rings up at a hefty $76,325 estimated price. Included in that figure are the two-piece rotors and rear differential cooler mentioned above.
No doubt, that's a lot of money for a wagon of any kind. Maybe this will help: Don't think of it as an $80,000 wagon. Rather, consider it a machine dedicated to your family's needs which just happens to double as a high-cost insurance policy for your masculinity.
The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.
Add A Comment »
blackadder5639 says:
11:50 AM, 01/04/2011
I want one! With 6-spd manual transmission!!!! :-)
paulvincent1 says:
08:54 PM, 12/30/2010
Face it, it's nice that GM has brought a wagon with this level of performance to market. And yes, I wish it were cheaper.
charlesb says:
08:27 PM, 12/30/2010
This thing won't sell worth a sack of...
bestjinjo says:
05:03 PM, 12/21/2010
For people who need greater utility than a sedan offers, while still getting a car that's both good looking, fun to drive, and has class this makes a lot of sense (even in non CTS-V form). What doesn't make sense are the hundreds of thousands of people who don't actually need a Ford F-150s, Silverados, Dodge Rams, Durangos, Denalis, Ford Explorers, Grand Cherokees, etc. but buy them for daily commute (esp. a lot of American women tend to like these larger SUVs because I suppose they feel safer in them).
How in the world can anyone enjoy driving these ^^^ cars which have cheap quality interiors, no handling abilities whatsoever, no sportiness about them at all and no class whatsoever? For the 3 times a year when I actually need to haul furniture, I'll gladly rent a U-Haul for $600! I can understand how someone who uses their truck a lot has a justification for a Ford-150/Dodge Ram. The other 362 days a year, you could have a car that is quiet and drives smoothly on the road and would look perfectly normal on the streets of Chicago as it would in Detroit, Michigan - plus the added bonus is that hardly anyone would own it - and there is something to be said about exclusivity when spending $75k+.
rlyon says:
01:54 PM, 12/21/2010
WTF does "I've still got sack" mean? Is that a typo and should read "I've still got *a* sack"?
mfennell says:
07:55 PM, 12/18/2010
jazzor says:
"Yeah, it's a 75 [actually 63...] thousand dollars wagon... you can buy most wagons in the market for half that price... this car doesn't make any sense, no matter how you look at it"
And an M5 is 90k. You can buy most sedans in the market for one THIRD that price! It just doesn't make any sense!
Of course it makes no sense. That's the whole friggin point. I built a Factory Five Cobra. It doesn't have a TOP. How much sense does that make? A 550hp Baby Haulin' station wagon makes all the sense in the world to me (with a 19 mo old daughter) simply because it's so ridiculous. The closest thing to a direct competitor, the E63 Mercedes wagon, was last available in 2009 and had a base price of 85k. It's hard to criticize Cadillac on value here.
Sorry to accuse you of buying an outlander or whatever it is (I had to look it up -had no idea). Easy mistake to make reading the thread.
lt1boy says:
03:12 PM, 12/17/2010
To the people who say that this wagon is ugly, I say, "Looks are subjective."
Having said that, this car looks like a BEAST!
It's every red blooded man's dream car! Good looks + utility + over-the-top power = CTS-V Wagon!
The few metrosexual guys who don't like this car are probably all vegans and drive Toyota Prius's.
gibbp says:
01:51 PM, 12/17/2010
I just can't wait for one with a six speed manual to come off lease...it's mine!
Let me tell you who would have had the first one....Paul Newman. I'll bet he's laughing his 'ss off somewhere. He could have finally gotten rid of his Volvo. Who would have thought that GM would finally make a wagon with a "stonkin" V8. Fast wagons are absolutely the best cars for avoiding tickets and still getting from point A to B quickly.
I REALLY want one.
overbrook says:
12:57 PM, 12/17/2010
Per IL's test of the X5M it did 0-60 in 4.5secs which is likely due to AWD. 1/4 mile in 12.8@108mph, slalom was 63mph and base price was $86k+. The gap isnt $27k as I said, its only $23k. I think the X6M is slightly more expensive than the X5M however. Skippad drip was slightly higher but braking was worse than the V wagon.
overbrook says:
12:50 PM, 12/17/2010
This isnt a sports car, its a wagon that handles almost as well as a sports car and outruns most sports cars. If you are looking at this you probably arent considering a Z06 or GTR. I would rather own this than the GTR since it probably feels like a car as opposed to a 3900lb driving simulator- its also looks better than the GTR.
I dont get the point of folks claiming nonexistent Euro wagons are better than this car. There is no Rs5 or M5 wagon in the states. I'm not even sure if the E63 is sold as a wagon. That being the case its hard to claim that the CTS-V is outclassed by those pricey Euro wagons.
I'm also not sure why someone said the X5M is faster. No its not. Best times for that X5M are in the 4.4-4.5sec range which is slightly slower than this car per test results from C&D and MT. The cadillac will murder the X5M in the quarter mile due to its weight advatantage and its about $27k cheaper. No way in hell I would get the BMW over this if I really needed speed and utility.