INSIDE LINE

2012 Buick Regal GS First Look

Media Player

  • 2012 Buick Regal GS Picture

    2012 Buick Regal GS Picture

    2012 Buick Regal GS. | November 04, 2010

Feature

2012 Buick Regal GS First Look

The Bad Buick Is Back, and It Looks Good

    40 Ratings

    From its beginnings as a concept car at the 2010 Detroit Auto Show, the 2012 Buick Regal GS has held the automotive world captive. It's a turbo Buick Regal, and that brings to mind the old G-body Regals with its big turbo, rear-wheel drive and box-it-came-in styling.

    But the 2012 Regal GS is also a thoroughly modern, turbocharged Buick with a 255-horsepower, 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine with direct injection, variable valve timing, a six-speed manual transmission and straight-off-the-boat European looks that should get every red-blooded car guy, for perhaps the first time in his life, to take a serious look at Buick.

    And that's exactly the point.

    Building a Better (Handling) Buick
    We could mention here that the 2012 Buick Regal GS is showing up with a knife to a gunfight. That the 2011 Hyundai Sonata 2.0T comes with a turbo, not to mention 25 more horsepower in a package some 300 pounds lighter. That the Regal, at 3,710 pounds and 255 hp is another bloated Buick.

    But that would be ignoring a little thing called control. If you're in this fight, do you want the gun without a handle, or a firm grasp on the knife?

    The 2012 Buick Regal GS will be available only with a six-speed manual transmission when it arrives in the second half of 2011. A six-speed Aisin automatic will be available later, but when the fever is hottest for this new Buick, the only model squatting low over its 19- or 20-inch wheels will have three metal-covered sport pedals.

    Opting for those 20-inch wheels gets the discerning Buick driver 255/35 Pirelli P Zero high-performance tires, while 19s receive 245/40 Goodyear Eagle RSAs. And whichever alloy rim you opt for, they'll be encircling 14-inch ventilated disc brakes with four-piston fixed Brembo calipers in the front and 12.4-inch ventilated discs with single-piston sliding calipers in the rear.

    It's got the right transmission, wheels and brakes, so there was no way Buick would fit a Sunnyside Acres Retirement Villa-spec suspension on the new Regal. Right? Right.

    Up front are MacPherson struts, coil springs, a direct-acting stabilizer bar and hydraulic ride bushings. Out back is a multilink independent setup with stabilizer bar. The Regal GS — and other Regals with the turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-4 — is equipped with Buick's Interactive Drive Control System (IDCS). This is a fancy name for driver-adjustable damping and steering assist. The latter of which is (shock!) hydraulically actuated.

    More often we're seeing these variable-effort steering units with electric assist, as it creates less drag on the engine and thus, better fuel economy. But with estimated EPA economy of 19 city/29 highway mpg with the six-speed manual transmission, we're excited that Buick has stuck with a hydraulic setup, giving up the percent-of-a-percent increase in return for increased feel through the special flat-bottomed steering wheel. Even though other 2.0-liter turbo Buicks will have IDCS, only the GS will have the optional GS drive mode. This mode tightens the suspension and steering response beyond even Sport mode.

    Is a high-tech, thoroughly modern, elegantly styled performance Buick at least enough to stop the grandpa jokes?

    Beyond the Turbo
    Ignoring the GNX, the 255-hp 2012 Buick Regal GS is the most powerful turbo Buick to come out of GM. And it starts with an inline-4, not a V6.

    The engine powering this Opel in Buick clothes is a 2.0-liter Ecotec four-cylinder. It's got direct fuel injection, variable valve timing on intake and exhaust and a redline of 6,350 rpm. This is good for 255 hp at 5,300 rpm and 295 pound-feet of torque at 2,500-4,000 rpm. Thanks to a 3-inch exhaust, higher boost and a tune, this is 35 hp more than the same engine sitting in the Regal CXL.

    Mike Anderson, Ecotec global chief engineer and program manager, compared this engine favorably to larger V6 power plants. "We've been combining direct injection and variable valve timing with boosted engines since 2006, and there's no question the Regal GS turbo has the responsiveness and acceleration of a 3.5-liter V6, while delivering the fuel economy of a 2.0-liter four."

    A Better Turbo Buick
    The old turbo Buicks stole a bit of whiny political banter and turned it into a catchphrase. "Unsafe at any speed" became "sideways at any speed" and a classic was instantly born.

    For better or worse, a monster like that just can't exist in 2012. Not with stability control legislation the way it is. Not with vehicle preference the way it is. Buyers today, they don't want the boost to spike, fry the rears and have the car pirouette gracefully off the highway. And that's probably for the best.

    The 2012 turbo Buick isn't going to boil its tires at the Friday-night drags, but with a 0-60 time of under 7 seconds and that manual tranny, it's not an un-fun proposition. Instead, GM has redefined the bad-boy Buick. With a unique front fascia, complete with grille and air intakes, a unique rear with trapezoidal exhaust outlets, a body kit and a lower ride on its 107.8-inch wheelbase, the Regal GS stands out against the Acura TSX and the Audi A4, the key competitors, according to Buick.

    The Ts are all crossed and the Is are all dotted (except for the uppercase ones), so the 2012 Buick Regal GS should have the competition on edge.

    This car could stand as a bellwether for Buick: It's hot, it's quick and it's packed with features, tech and power. If this isn't enough to get 30-somethings out of their Acuras and try to remember where exactly it was that Granddad got that Buick that one time, what is? Or if not, is it at least enough to stop the grandpa jokes?

    Sort By:

    flybender says:

    10:18 AM, 06/08/2011

    The car looks great but only 255 horsepower?   The 3.7 liter V6 Mustang makes 305 hp on 87 octane and gets 31 on the highway.   The defunct Pontiac Solstice turbo had 260 horses.  Torque is limited to 295?  Seems that they could afford a tougher transmission for car in this price range.  Go for more boost or use a larger displacement version of this motor.  300 horse is the minimum to make me serious about purchasing this car.      

    blouis says:

    03:24 PM, 03/26/2011

    There's only two problems with the Buick GS. No matter how much the US media hype it, it is too heavy, too slow (under 7 sec.s is not fast). I bet it will also be over-priced. Hyundai has more horsepoweer, less weight, and a lower price in the Sonata turbo!

    blouis says:

    12:45 PM, 02/17/2011

    Come on! Trade an Acura for a Buick??? You have to be kidding.

    I'd trade this Buick for a Hyundai Sonata. Sonatas have more power, better performance, better proven reliability, better styling, and are at least $5000 cheaper than the Buick Regal GS! Why would anyone pick the Buick?

    frank908 says:

    06:51 AM, 11/21/2010

    I'm all for Buick transforming themeselves, and I'm not sure who took the photos provided above, but was it supposed to be some sort of underlying joke to take pictures with Miami as the background setting rather than some gentrified neighborhood in a trendy city of urbanites that still needs a car and have a little more money to burn?

    A picture speaks a thousand words and I think the writing is on the wall with the ones above.

    I, as a GM supporter, am somewhat disappointed with the end result of the Regal as it still seems to have a whif of the old GM gaurd radiating from it. To be fair, it was designed pre-bailout so.......

    break80 says:

    10:45 AM, 11/18/2010

    HOW DEPRESSING....I GUESS I CAN STOP HOLDING MY BREATH. A USED 3SERIES WITH 25K MILES CAN BE HAD FOR ~ $30K..THAT'S A MUCH BETTER VALUE

    john1168 says:

    05:32 PM, 11/12/2010

    Why is this car going to be so slow (0-60 in under 7 sec.).  An Audi A4 Avant is said to go 0-60 in six and a half (about).  The Audi weighs about the same as this.  The Audi has all wheel drive which increases traction but increases weight and drivetrain friction.  What did they do to the internals with the Buick, polish them with 20 grit sandpaper or something?  Is the gearing that much different or something?  I don't think that there is more than a 100-200 lb difference between the two.  I still believe that this GS will do 0-60 in the low 6 second range.  Does'nt it have to with 295 lb/ft of torque at a low rpm with a manual?

    lexuslvr says:

    08:06 AM, 11/11/2010

    Just read on Insideline's own website:

    "The five-door Evoque has the same 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine as the coupe, making 240 horsepower and getting the vehicle from 0 to 60 mph in 7.1 seconds. It also offers electric power-assisted steering, adaptive dynamics with MagneRide dampers..."

    No way!

    zoolander1 says:

    01:53 AM, 11/11/2010

    5309xyz: You are correct, in a way. And I say in a way because there are car companies that have taken the 'good enough' approach and have been mildly successful or at least not out business e.g. ACURA. Acura, the so called techy/performance division of Honda, was off to a good start 20 something years ago and has lost enthusiast throughout the years because of this approach (no RWD or AWD, no V8's).
    Did Buick miss the a good chance here? Maybe. I want to be fair with Buick. I'll give you an example, the Lexus IS250 outsells the IS350 in a 1:5 ratio. Option packages can climb up the price up to $10k but a vast majority of their customers opt for a $3k package, which ever it is. Why do they have the bigger engine and the endless available options? Bragging rights, show of force. Statistics show that MOST customers will opt for smaller engines, basic packages and such but Lexus still wants to offer them; good job Lexus.
    What we have here is a good vehicle, not a great vehicle. IMO.

    5309xyz says:

    06:10 PM, 11/10/2010

    1487 is completely numb to any comments here, responds with rhetoric that does not answer questions, clearly does not understand why people are upset and is plugging GM for their foolishness.  Sounds like he works for GM.

    (in a top tier small batch high performance model people WANT AWD and performance as they advertised.....whether you can get performance from 150hp and 100lb ft or 400hp and 400lb ft from a V6, I4, I2 or V12 who cares, we want performance, not "good enough for me" attitude)

    john1168 says:

    06:51 AM, 11/10/2010

    GM made $1.96 billion... BILLION dollars last quarter.  They also said that they would make a little less next quarter because of development costs and new vehicles coming out like the Cruze and Volt.  They did say though that had they elected to put all wheel drive in the Regal GS that they would lose money next quarter and possibly go out of business.  I'm just kidding on that last part:)

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Advertisement