INSIDE LINE

2011 BMW 550i vs. 2011 Infiniti M56 Comparison Test

Media Player

  • 2011 Infiniti M56 vs. 2011 BMW 550i Comparison Test

    Inside Line puts the 2011 BMW 550i and the 2011 Infiniti M56 in a head to head comparison test of performance luxury sedans. | December 27, 2010

1 Video , 58 Photos | See more photos in this gallery »

Comparison

2011 BMW 550i vs. 2011 Infiniti M56 Comparison Test

BMW's Velvety New 550i Takes on Infiniti's Macho M56

    167 Ratings

    When it comes to respectability in the midsize sport sedan segment, all roads lead through BMW's 5 Series. It's been ruling this class for decades now, and for good reason. It has the uncanny ability to satisfy both driving enthusiasts and buyers who are simply looking for a luxury sedan with German cachet.

    Now that the all-new twin-turbo 2011 BMW 550i is here, it was time to see just how well it stacks up against its newest competitors. But instead of going toe-to-toe with a classic European rival, we figured a match-up with the latest from Japan would be more interesting. For that we turned to the all-new 2011 Infiniti M56, a thoroughly redesigned sedan that is once again aiming for the Germans. It has all the makings of a worthy competitor, but how does it hold up on the road?

    How They Stack Up
    Not surprisingly, the 2011 BMW 550i and 2011 Infiniti M56 have plenty of similarities. Both are rear-drive sedans powered by sizable V8s. In this case, both are hooked to automatic transmissions, a seven-speed in the Infiniti and an eight-speed in the BMW.

    To make sure no one whines about "stacking the deck" in one car's favor, both the 550i and the M56 were outfitted with Sport packages. The Infiniti's $3,650 option adds a stiffer suspension with upgraded springs and shocks, larger brakes, Bridgestone Potenza RE050A summer performance tires on 20-inch alloy wheels, four-wheel active steer, paddle shifters, sport seats and a unique steering wheel and shift knob.

    The BMW 550i had the benefit of both a Dynamic Handling package, which includes electronic damping control, active roll stabilization (active antiroll bars) and Adaptive Drive (allowing for specific chassis/drivetrain settings) for $2,700, as well as a $2,200 Sport package, which adds a sportier leather steering wheel, multicontour seats, special exterior trim, an increased top speed (limited to 150 mph) and — surprisingly — 19-inch Goodyear Excellence run-flat all-season tires.

    Technology and luxury abound in these cars, the kind of niceties that make your drive safer (the BMW's standard adaptive cornering headlights) and more relaxing (Infiniti's standard heated and cooled front seats). Differences come in the form of which features each manufacturer supplies standard, and which ones they make you pay extra for — as an example, you can get those adaptive headlights on the Infiniti, but it'll cost $3,000 as part of the Technology package; conversely, neither heated nor cooled front seats come standard in the BMW — heated seats cost $500 (or could be part of a package), while seat cooling tacks on another $1,950-$2,950 depending on the package.

    As you might have guessed, these are expensive sedans. The M56 starts at $58,765 with an as-tested price of $67,130, while the BMW is a few grand more. The 550i starts at $60,575 and our tester topped $70K with options.

    What's the Motivation Here?
    Turbocharged engines are quickly becoming the norm at BMW, and now the 550i is on board. Its direct-injected 4.4-liter twin-turbo V8 produces 400 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 450 pound-feet of torque from 1,750-4,500 rpm. Yes, that's a massive torque curve, but it comes at the expense of the old V8's rumbling exhaust. Now there's little more than a muted growl, and you can't even hear the turbos working their magic.

    The Infiniti sounds more like a sport sedan than the BMW, especially when it approaches redline.

    The 2011 Infiniti M56 uses cubic inches and plenty of revs to achieve its power. Its 5.6-liter V8 is good for 420 hp at 6,000 rpm and 417 lb-ft of torque at 4,400. It's no dinosaur, also utilizing direct-injection and variable valve timing and valve lift for a smooth, reasonably efficient power plant.

    A little more driver involvement is required to get the most out of the M56's V8, though, as its power is concentrated at higher engine speeds. The Infiniti sounds more like a sport sedan than the BMW, especially when it approaches the 6,700-rpm redline.

    By the Numbers
    At our test track, the M56 was slightly quicker to 60 mph than the 550i, 5.0 to 5.2 seconds, respectively (4.7 and 4.9 seconds with a 1-foot rollout, as on a drag strip). So the BMW is slower, despite the fact that it's capable of getting a near-perfect amount of wheelspin off the line thanks to power-braking, something the Infiniti's brake-override system won't allow.

    So how come the BMW is slower? Might have something to do with the extra 287 pounds of ballast the 4,380-pound 550i carries versus the M56. Seriously, what's a 5 Series doing weighing nearly 4,400 pounds? This is "EfficientDynamics?"

    Weight aside, by the time the 550i hits the quarter-mile, its twin-turbo V8 inches the BMW ahead by 0.1 second (13.2 vs. 13.3); it's also traveling a lot faster at this point — 108.3 mph against the Infiniti's 106.7.

    A Shifty Pair
    The BMW 550i comes standard with a six-speed manual transmission, but our test car was fitted with the no-cost-option eight-speed automatic. BMW says this new tranny's two additional ratios (over the old six-speed auto) come with no increase in size or weight.

    It's a smooth operator in full automatic mode and easy to shift when you want to take control of the gears yourself. Not only does it shift in our preferred pattern (forward for downshifts, back for upshifts), it also blips the throttle when you grab a lower gear to match revs. It's not actually a true full manual mode, though, as a stomp on the gas will call up a multigear downshift. It doesn't hold gears either. If you hit the redline, you get the next cog whether you like it or not.

    Infiniti offers just one transmission in the M56, a seven-speed automatic with four driver-controlled modes that affect transmission and throttle mappings. As with the BMW, leaving the center console shifter in "D" gives supremely smooth automatic shifting. But moving the center console lever toward the driver puts it in Manual mode, bringing the optional leather-covered, steering-column-mounted magnesium paddle shifters into play. The control is fully with the driver at this point, as the transmission will neither shift up nor down without consent from the paddle shifters. Downshift under braking and it rev matches, too.

    These Are Sport Sedans, After All
    With all of the BMW's high-techery, you'd think it would easily handle the Infiniti when the going gets twisty. Not so, especially in terms of instrumented testing. The M56 bested the 550i by 1.2 mph through the slalom (66.7 vs. 65.5 mph, respectively) while generating 0.89g around the skid pad against the BMW's so-so 0.84g.

    The blame for the 550i's less-than-stellar performance doesn't lie purely with its all-season tires either, as they provided enough grip for it to stop almost as well as the M56 — just 1 foot longer from both 30 and 60 mph. The BMW's pedal felt stronger at the test track, but when pushing hard on back roads the Infiniti's optional ($370) high-friction brake pads felt more consistent.

    More than anything, the 550i is simply too heavy and softly sprung for aggressive back-road driving. Even with the suspension at its stiffest setting, the 550i exhibited a surprising amount of understeer, while the 5's electric power steering feels artificial. You can still flog the 550i, but you won't feel completely in touch with the car.

    The Infiniti isn't spot-on either. Its variable-assist steering, combined with the optional four-wheel active steering (the rear wheels are turned in phase with the front wheels, depending on vehicle speed and steering angle), makes for overly quick turn-in at low to medium speeds, alarmingly so at times.

    But it's clear the driver seat of the Infiniti is the place to be when you pick up the pace on any kind of curvy road. The M56's steering becomes more and more natural as speeds increase, while the stiff suspension soaks up turns, if not bumps, with ease. The whole M56 experience, from its quick steering to its stiff suspension, is a bit on the frenetic side, but it's more engaging than the vague BMW.

    There is one area where the BMW trumps the Infiniti on the fun scale — powerslides. Now, the average enthusiast may not find this very relevant, but in the right hands the BMW's electronic limited-slip rear differential does allows you to utilize the twin-turbo V8's prodigious low-end torque to induce some wicked corner exits. And that's all we'll say about that.

    When You're Not Laying Rubber
    Our enthusiasm for the Infiniti drops slightly the moment the road gets bumpy, or basically any time you're just driving from A to B. The M56's stiff, nonadjustable suspension makes the average commute tiresome and unnecessarily jumpy. The tire and road noise is also a bit much for a luxury sedan, too. Basically, this car reminds you that you bought the Sport package every time you drive it.

    The BMW, on the other hand, is always plush and serene. The same sedan that can execute tire-smoking powerslides can also tame mangled city streets. We would still prefer more steering feedback, but the trade-off is slightly less sawing at the wheel during normal driving. It's still a sport sedan, but one you can live with.

    No Cabin Fever Here
    When you pay around $70,000 for a luxury sport sedan, you expect to be coddled, and neither car disappoints. Both are extremely comfortable places to spend time, the BMW's front seats getting the nod for their width and comfort, the Infiniti's for lateral support.

    The M56's rear seat is more plush, while the BMW has more headroom. Fine leather and wood abound, as do such niceties as power rear window shades and excellent navigation systems, the BMW in particular boasting an impressive 10.2-inch transreflective screen that becomes easier to see in direct sunlight — the exact opposite of many systems.

    In general the BMW's controls have better detents and are more ergonomic, while the Infiniti's are easier to decipher from the moment you sit in the car. And yes, iDrive Version 4 can still be a bit nonintuitive.

    When it comes to interior design, though, the Infiniti has a more interesting take on luxury. The mix of materials in the M56 is more modern and stylish without looking overdone. The 550i has plenty of high-quality stuff; it's just on the sterile side.

    And the Winner Is...
    As athletic and well-mannered as the Infiniti is on back roads, the BMW 550i squeezed out a win by 2.2 points. Why?

    The BMW 550i is simply a better all-around sedan. Infiniti may have figured out the sport sedan piece of the formula, but BMW is better at making a sport sedan that you can live with. We like a tightly wound sedan as much as the next enthusiast, but we don't want to be reminded of the car's capabilities every time we head to the office. It's a fine line for sure, but one the Infiniti still needs to work on.

    With the 550i, you get the refined driving experience along with plenty of sport sedan capability. Should it weigh less? Yes. Would we prefer more precise steering? Yes again. The new 5 Series is by no means perfect, but it still puts all the pieces together in a way that makes it feel like a proper luxury sport sedan. The Infiniti is close, but the BMW is already there.

    The manufacturers provided Edmunds these vehicles for the purposes of evaluation.

    Comparison

    Top 7 Features

    You'd think any luxury/sport sedan starting at around $60,000 would come with a plethora of the latest features to both coddle you and make your driving experience more fun. But as the list below shows, BMW and Infiniti have widely differing views on what should come standard and what the customer should have to cough up extra coin for. A critical miscue by Infiniti is the lack of a limited-slip differential, even as an option. Here's our list of features that we think a sport sedan in this category should have.

    Features
      BMW 550i Infiniti M56
    Adaptive cornering headlights S O*
    Adaptive suspension damping O N/A
    Cooled front seats O* S
    Heated front seats O S
    Limited-slip differential S N/A
    Paddle shifters O* O
    Rear-wheel steering O* O


    Key:
    S: Standard
    O: Optional
    N/A: Not Available

    Adaptive cornering headlights: Anyone who drives on curvy roads at night will find much joy in "cornering" headlights, which are standard equipment on the BMW 550i. BMW's system decides how much the lights, which look through the turns, should move based on steering, yaw rate and vehicle speed.

    Adaptive suspension damping: The 550i's optional Driving Dynamics Control lets the driver choose among four different settings for its electromagnetic shocks, allowing you to cruise comfortably on the highway, or stiffen things up for back-road duty. Adjustable suspension isn't even optional on the Infiniti.

    Cooled front seats: No one likes showing up to a meeting with a sweaty backside on a stifling hot summer day. Luckily, more and more carmakers have been making seat cooling available — better yet, it's standard equipment on the M56.

    Heated front seats: "Bun warmers" have become pretty much standard fare on luxury cars these days. Yet BMW still makes you pay for that toasty feeling in its 5 Series.

    Limited-slip differential: There's nothing quite like powering out of a turn, only to have the inside rear wheel spin uselessly, as on the Infiniti. The BMW 550i's electronic limited-slip diff simulates a traditional mechanical diff by adding brakes individually to the rear wheels — only when DSC is deactivated.

    Paddle shifters: Paddle shifters bring some of the driver interaction lost through an automatic transmission back to the driver. They're optional on both cars, but only the Infiniti was equipped as such for this test — nice, big steering-column-mounted, leather-covered magnesium versions.

    Rear-wheel steering: Infiniti's four-wheel active steer comes with the M56's $3,650 Sport package, and it's part of the reason the M56 has such crazy-quick turn-in at low-to-medium speeds. But that ultra-quick steering can also be a bit disconcerting and unnatural-feeling, so this is an acquired taste.

    Comparison

    Data and Charts

    Dimensions
    Engine & Transmission Specifications
    Warranty Information
    Performance Information


    Dimensions
    Exterior Dimensions & Capacities
      BMW 550i Infiniti M56
    Length, in. 193.1 194.7
    Width, in. 73.2 72.6
    Height, in. 57.6 59.1
    Wheelbase, in. 116.9 114.2
    As Tested Curb Weight, lb. 4,380 4,093
    Turning Circle, ft.    


    Interior Dimensions
      BMW 550i Infiniti M56
    Front headroom, in. 40.5 39.1
    Rear headroom, in. 38.3 37.7
    Front shoulder room, in. 58.3 58.4
    Rear shoulder room, in. 56.2 56.7
    Front legroom, in. 41.4 44.0
    Rear legroom, in. 36.1 36.2
    Cargo volume, cu-ft. 18.4 14.9
    Max cargo volume, cu-ft.    


    Engine & Transmission Specifications
    Engine & Transmission
      BMW 550i Infiniti M56
    Displacement
    (cc / cu-in):
    4400 (269) 5600 (342)
    Engine Type V8 V8
    Horsepower (SAE) @ rpm 400 @ 5,500 420 @ 6,000
    Max. Torque, lb-ft @ rpm 450 @ 1,750 417 @ 4,400
    Transmission 8-speed automatic 7-speed automatic
    EPA Fuel Economy City, mpg 15.0 16.0
    EPA Fuel Economy Hwy, mpg 22.0 25.0
    Observed Fuel Economy combined, mpg 18.6 18.0


    Warranty
    Warranty Information
      BMW 550i Infiniti M56
    Basic Warranty 4 years/50,000 miles 4 years/60,000 miles
    Powertrain 4 years/50,000 miles 6 years/70,000 miles
    Roadside Assistance 4 years/Unlimited miles 4 years/60,000 miles
    Corrosion Protection 12 years/Unlimited miles 7 years/Unlimited miles


    Performance
    Performance Information
      BMW 550i Infiniti M56
    0-60 mph acceleration, sec. 5.2 5.0
    Quarter-mile acceleration, sec. 13.2 13.3
    Quarter-mile speed, mph 108.3 106.7
    60-0-mph braking, feet 114 113
    Lateral Acceleration, g 0.84 0.89
    600-ft slalom, mph 65.5 66.7

    Comparison

    Editors' Evaluations

    Evaluation - Drive
    Evaluation - Ride
    Evaluation - Design
    Evaluation - Function

    Evaluation - Drive

    Overall Dynamics
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.5 2
    Infiniti M56 7.5 1

    Engine Performance
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 8.0 1
    Infiniti M56 8.0 1

    Transmission Performance
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 8.0 1
    Infiniti M56 7.5 2

    Brake Performance
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.0 2
    Infiniti M56 8.0 1

    Steering Performance
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.3 1
    Infiniti M56 6.3 2

    Handling
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.5 1
    Infiniti M56 7.5 1

    Fun to Drive
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.0 2
    Infiniti M56 7.5 1

    Evaluation - Ride

    Overall Comfort
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 8.2 1
    Infiniti M56 7.3 2

    Ride Comfort
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 8.8 1
    Infiniti M56 6.3 2

    Wind Noise
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 8.0 1
    Infiniti M56 8.0 1

    Road Noise
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 8.0 1
    Infiniti M56 6.3 2

    Front Seat Comfort/Space/Access
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 8.8 1
    Infiniti M56 7.5 2

    Rear Seat Comfort/Space/Access
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.5 2
    Infiniti M56 8.0 1

    Driving Position
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 8.0 1
    Infiniti M56 7.5 2

    Evaluation - Design

    Overall Design & Build Quality
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.7 1
    Infiniti M56 7.4 2

    Exterior Design
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.8 1
    Infiniti M56 7.0 2

    Interior Design
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.5 2
    Infiniti M56 8.0 1

    Interior Materials
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.5 2
    Infiniti M56 8.0 1

    Interior Control Tactile Feel
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 8.3 1
    Infiniti M56 7.0 2

    Squeaks & Rattles
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.5 1
    Infiniti M56 7.0 2

    Panel Fitment & Gaps
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.5 1
    Infiniti M56 7.5 1


    Evaluation - Function

    Overall Function
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.6 1
    Infiniti M56 7.3 2

    Headlamp Illumination
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 9.0 1
    Infiniti M56 8.0 2

    Visibility
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.0 1
    Infiniti M56 7.0 1

    Instrument Panel (IP) Layout
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.5 1
    Infiniti M56 7.5 1

    Climate Control Layout
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 8.0 1
    Infiniti M56 7.0 2

    Audio System Layout
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.0 2
    Infiniti M56 7.8 1

    Secondary Control Layout
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.5 1
    Infiniti M56 7.0 2

    Interior Storage
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.3 2
    Infiniti M56 7.8 1

    Cupholders
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.8 1
    Infiniti M56 6.5 2

    Standard Cargo / Trunk Space
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 7.0 2
    Infiniti M56 8.0 1

    Maximum Cargo Space
    Vehicle Score Rank
    BMW 550i 9.0 1
    Infiniti M56 7.0 2

    Comparison

    Final Rankings and Scoring Explanation

    Final Rankings
      Item Weight BMW 550i Infiniti M56
    Personal Rating 2.5% 75.0 75.0
    Recommended Rating 2.5% 100.0 50.0
    Evaluation Score 20% 77.1 73.5
    Feature Content 20% 61.9 52.4
    Performance 25% 94.3 98.3
    Fuel Consumption 10% 100.0 97.3
    Price 20% 95.1 100.0
           
    Total Score 100.0% 84.8 82.6
    Final Ranking   1 2


    Personal Rating (2.5%): Purely subjective. After the test, each participating editor was asked to rank the sedans in order of preference based on which he or she would buy if money were no object.

    Recommended Rating (2.5%): After the test, each participating editor was asked to rank the sedans in order of preference based on which he or she thinks would be best for the typical midsize luxury sedan buyer.

    28-Point Evaluation Score (20%): Each participating editor scored each vehicle based on a comprehensive 28-point evaluation. The evaluation covered everything from control feel to cupholders. Scoring is calculated on a point system, and the scores listed are averages based on all test participants' evaluations.

    Feature Content (20%): Features are a big deal in midsize luxury sedans, and you can expect to find leading-edge technology in both of these cars. We've picked seven key features that we thought were essential in a luxury sport sedan. For each sedan, the score is based on the number of actual features it has versus the total possible (seven). Standard and optional equipment were taken into consideration.

    Performance (25%): Each vehicle is run through Inside Line's regimen of standardized instrumented tests: acceleration (0-60 and quarter-mile), braking (60-0), 600-foot slalom and 200-foot-diameter skid pad. Points are awarded as a percentage of the best overall performance in each test. Note that we've weighted performance a hefty 25 percent, given our feeling that if you're looking at V8-equipped premium sedans, performance is clearly a big factor for you.

    Fuel Consumption (10%): The scores listed are the result of a simple percentage calculation based on the car with the highest EPA combined fuel economy rating (55 percent city plus 45 percent highway).

    Price (20%): The numbers listed are the result of a simple percentage calculation based on the less expensive of the two sedans in this comparison test. Using the "as tested" prices of the actual evaluation vehicles, the lower-priced Infiniti M56 received a score of 100, with the BMW 550i receiving a proportionally lesser score.

    Sort By:

    m3winsagain says:

    12:56 PM, 07/10/2011

    i mean the steering is worse

    m3winsagain says:

    05:42 PM, 07/02/2011

    The new 5 series is not a bad handling car, it not the best but it beats most cars. I ve driven both and the m56 is really detached from you when the 5 series really is not. The reason is the electronic aids it felt wierd. The new a6 isnt impressive either the steering is better but the understeer is rediculous, the nose heavyness pushes it like crazy. The merc e550 is even more soft and mushy and has the most comfort. thats whey i purchased the 5 series over the competition. Also for people who say bmw isnt reliable ive owned 3 bmws with minimal problems, i think because i do the oil change every 7500 miles not 15000.

    yellowmiata says:

    05:01 PM, 05/23/2011

    Sad - IL again proves itself as a biased reporting organization.  Despite losing at handling, the ultimate driving machine still wins?  

    IL, you've lost some respect.  Please read your past years' of comparisons as to why BMW constantly "won."

    Why don't you re-run the test with a new editor and see how it fares?

    - Kevin

    bruceleroy81 says:

    08:35 PM, 04/27/2011

    The M56 has just as much safety features as 550i plus a feature that the new 5-series doesn't have. A worlds first Blind-spot monitoring system. I've sat in both cars and the Infiniti is every bit as luxury as the 5-series. Their styles are just different.

    Both V-8's pumpin 400 horses only the Infiniti out-handled it with a better sounding V-8 and exhaust note. It makes much more sense to get the car that gives you the most for your money.

    Too bad Insideline can't call a spade a spade.

    q_bmw says:

    04:13 PM, 03/27/2011

    First of all I want say that I'm station in Germany since 2006. We need to understand that every region in the world build a car in according to their roads demand. In Germany there is an Authoban, where you can drive from town to town without speed limit, where you can fully test and enjoy your car. BMW is made thinking in power, safety, luxury and comfort. BMW is a very respectful car where ever you drive to. The M56 has more power and less weight and BMW still beat him in a quarter mile, so I don't want see how shameful M56 will be in a race from Wuzburg to Frankfurt on A3 against this new beasty so called 550I.

    tonkatoytruck says:

    09:06 AM, 01/09/2011

    I think many of you miss a very important point. The German cars are FULL of safety features, options, and technology. The same could not be said for Japanese and American cars and yet they way almost as much. You can tell by the comments that most of the people here have never owned or maybe even driven a German luxury car. You pay for all those options. You pay for the added safety features. The Japanese and American cars have the out of sight, out of mind attitude. It seems to work based on the comments here. But, I am here to tell you, you can not compare German luxury cars to any American or Japanese designed vehicle. They may be the same weight, handle the same, and accelerate the same, but the luxury of the German cars combined with their safety features makes them the vehicle designs to strive for by the rest of the world.

    It would be great if the reliability was the same as the Japanese cars and that is an important consideration. If you can do without all the luxury items and safety features, then maybe a Japanese design is for you. But, to claim they are better cars is just nonsense. Load up an Infinity M56 with PreSAFE systems, and all the options available on an MB, and I guarantee you the Japanese and American cars are going to way much closer to 5000 pounds!

    It is what you can't see in a German vehicle that makes it heads and shoulders better than its American and Japanese designs.

    vikasdesai says:

    08:31 PM, 01/08/2011

    the m56 is the muscle car, the bmw is the luxury car, bmw has forsaken its roots in order to compete with the mercedes E, it will do a good job catering to high net worth individuals who have no cares for cost and will option up these cars to exponential levels just to sell it 3 years for 40% of the cost after the "full maintenance" warranty runs out, bmw's are bought by people who drive them for 3 years, they are more refined than the japanese, but god help you when you want to fix a bimmer with 80000 miles especially one with a twin turbo v-8 that appears to be underperforming, i'll take the infiniti anyday, because it's a car that's built with higher levels of quality control for people who truly want to own their cars not just rent them for 40,000 dollars of depreciation just to trade it in, you can stick your nose at us because you think you have the better product(i'm an m56 owner) but i buy cars for the long haul, and frankly this new porker of a 5 series is a slouch as far as i'm concerned, it barely beat the m56 despite the fact that m56 had the 20 inch rims, i'm sure the regular m56 would have matched up better.

    m56s says:

    12:25 AM, 01/08/2011

    I just purchased 2011 Infiniti M56 S, Silver color with black interior.
    My first impression is that this car is the most fun for the money. I love the front end, but can't say the same about the back end. I am comparing this car to the following cars I owned.
    INFINITI FX 50 S
    INFINITI G35 S
    BMW 335I
    BMW X5 4.8IS
    BMW X5 4.6IS
    BMW 545
    LEXUS GS 300

    theinsurgent says:

    07:15 PM, 01/06/2011

    I own a 2011 550i with all the tricks, minus the sport package.  It has been about two months now serving as my daily commuter from a small town to a highway into the suburbs.

    Going from an entry level 2004 325i with a 5 speed and sport package, I was looking for something bigger, more comfortable, and didn't require seat belts to stay in the seat on aging American roads.

    I tested the 535i first and was impressed, good pick up, very comfortable.  The test drive of the 550i I bought was outstanding...biblical power.

    Make no mistake, the 5 series is BIG.  

    It is not a 3 series and will never be capable of the handling of the 3 series I had.  I was in the market for a luxury sedan that would be capable of reaching air craft take off speeds in short order, and it fit the bill perfectly.

    The 8 speed gear box is quick and smooth.  It is very quiet, unless your foot is buried in the carpet, but that never lasts long.  With all the power, you find yourself traveling at speeds that will result in mandatory arrest in most states.  Passing is effortless.

    The twin turbo V8 will consume all the gas you give it, so those moments of full throttle will cost you at the pump.  When I resist temptation, I get a mpg in the low 20's.  Average fuel range so far is about 400 miles to the tank.  I get about 350 miles to tank with excessive "robust" driving excursions.

    The only regret is not having the automatic trunk close button, like on our X5.  That option is very convenient.

    On my previous 3 series I did sport tires in the summer and winter tires for the ice and snow.  Passing SUV's in all year long was easy.  With the all-season tires on the RWD 550i I have, snow and ice conditions have not been a problem.  It is not as secure and stable as the all-wheel drive of the X5 in slick conditions, but that is just the laws of physics at work.  I will not miss swapping tires twice a year.

    Getting use to an automatic took a while, and I find the brakes a bit grabby around town.  The "brake generator" I believe is the culprit, and I find myself wondering if there is a way to turn it off.  With the robust power and grabby brakes, I find myself having to work on a smooth heal / toe in bumper traffic.

    I have never driven a previous model 5 series, and keep in mind I am just not interested in a sport model or M5 version.  As a luxury sedan, it is doing its job perfectly.  I hope the future of the 550i is as trouble free as my previous 3 series...time will tell.

    chief_chirpa says:

    07:04 PM, 01/03/2011

    I appreciate most of the car tests and reviews here but this one is so pointless. This review wouldn't have bothered me if Mike Monticello omitted "sport sedan." What do you look for in a sport sedan?

    I have a BMW and I like it for what it is but I think in this review, the Infiniti should have won. In almost all technical and performance aspects from engine, handling, track performance, interior, value, exhaust note, it beats the BMW yet it loses due to one point, the car being stiff. In your review you could have given the Inifiniti the win and just pointed out the suspension as being stiff and should be expected for a sport sedan.

    There are more pros than cons with the Infiniti for being a sport sedan. The BMW has more cons than pro for this segment, The handling even loses to the previous generation, seriously. I would think non sport sedan enthusiast would consider a Benz E550 or Lexus GS460 for something that is comfortable when daily driven.

    As a buyer, if I don't like a stiff car, I won't buy a sports sedan. Period. I expect a sports sedan to be a compromise between a sports car and a family sedan, obviously there would compromises on the suspension/ride stiffness. The ride is something to take into account especially if daily driven.

    Would this review's result be different if BMW had the M56's traits? And vice versa?

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    1st Place: 2011 BMW 550i

    From its lag-free twin-turbo V8 to its slick eight-speed automatic and adaptive suspension, the new 550i is a smooth operator. It's also gained about 400 pounds, and as such has lost a share of its handling edge.

    2nd Place: 2011 Infiniti M56

    Infiniti paints the M56 as a serious sport sedan, and it definitely has the handling numbers to back up its intentions. The M56's modern interior is fancy, but the stiff suspension grows tiresome.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2011 BMW 5 Series 550i 4dr Sedan (4.4L 8cyl Turbo 8A)
    Vehicle TypeRWD 4dr 5-passenger Sedan
    Base MSRP$60,575
    Options on test vehicleTitanium Silver Metallic (no charge); Premium Package 2 ($2,800 -- includes rearview camera; power rear window shade and manual rear side window shades; heated front seats with three levels of heat intensity; Sirius Satellite Radio, including a 1-year subscription to Sirius Satellite service; 16-neodymium-speaker audio system with 600-watt, 9-channel amplifier and vehicle speed-dependent equalization; iPod and USB adapter); Dynamic Handling Package ($2,700 -- includes Dynamic Damper Control variable rate electromagnetic shock absorbers; Active Roll Stabilization [ARS] hydroelectrically actuated stabilizer bars); Sport Package ($2,200 -- includes sports leather steering wheel; 19-by-8.5-inch front and 19-by-9-inch rear W-spoke [style 332] alloy wheels with 245/40R19 front and 275/35R19 rear run-flat performance tires; increased top speed limiter; multicontour 20-way [14-way power adjustments, two-way power headrests and four-way power lumbar support] front power seats; active head restraints for the front seats; memory settings for the front passenger seat; Shadowline exterior window trim); Convenience Package ($1,700 -- includes power tailgate; Comfort Access keyless entry; soft-close automatic doors); Split-Fold-Down Rear Seat ($475); Steptronic Automatic Transmission ($0 -- includes eight-speed Steptronic automatic transmission).
    As-tested MSRP$70,450
    Assembly locationDingolfing, Germany
    North American parts content (%)5
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationLongitudinal, front-engine, rear-wheel drive
    Engine typeTwin-turbocharged direct-injected V8, gasoline
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)4,395cc (268 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum, aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder, variable intake + exhaust-valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.0
    Redline, indicated (rpm)6,750
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)400 @ 5,500
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)450 @ 1,750
    Fuel typePremium unleaded (required)
    Transmission typeEight-speed automatic with console shifter with sport/competition modes
    Transmission ratios (x:1)1st = 4.714, 2nd = 3.143, 3rd = 2.106, 4th = 1.667, 5th = 1.285, 6th = 1.000, 7th = 0.839, 8th = 0.667
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)2,.813
    Differential(s)Electronic limited-slip rear differential
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent multilink, coil springs, self-adjusting variable dampers, lower control arms, self-adjusting, active, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent multilink, coil springs, self-adjusting variable dampers, self-adjusting, active, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeElectric speed-proportional power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)17.1
    Turning circle (ft.)39.2
    Tire make and modelGoodyear Excellence
    Tire typeAll-season front and rear
    Tire size, frontP245/40R19 94Y
    Tire size, rearP275/35R19 96Y
    Wheel size, front19-by-8.5 inches
    Wheel size, rear19-by-9 inches
    Wheel materialAlloy
    Brakes, front14.7-inch ventilated steel discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rear14.6-inch ventilated steel discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)2.1
    0-45 mph (sec.)3.5
    0-60 mph (sec.)5.2
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)4.9
    0-75 mph (sec.)7.1
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)13.2 @ 108.3
    0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.)2.3
    0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.)3.7
    0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.)5.5
    0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)5.0
    0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.)7.5
    1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph)13.4 @ 106.5
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)28
    60-0 mph (ft.)114
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)65.5
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON62.6
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.84
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON0.84
    Sound level @ idle (dB)35.8
    @ Full throttle (dB)74.3
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)64.5
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)2,200
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsConsidering that the BMW 550i weighs almost 4,400 pounds, it gets off the line well. But it really came alive when power braking with stability and traction control turned off, allowing for a near-perfect amount of wheelspin. The third run overall (first with power braking) was quickest, but the final (sixth) run was barely any slower, showing good aversion to heat soak.
    Braking commentsAlthough braking distances varied by several feet with each run, randomly longer and shorter over the first five stops, the BMW's pedal travel barely changed and its feel remained very solid, while control under panic braking was always stable.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: The BMW's all-season run-flat tires did the best they could around the skid pad, hampered by the car's soft suspension and hefty curb weight. Attitude is steady-state understeer. It was possible to circle at nearly full throttle with the stability system turned on, the computer cutting power to keep the car from straying off line. Slalom: Not easy due to slow-reacting, lackluster-feeling electric steering, but the chassis offers decent feedback. The stability system wasn't overly intrusive when it came on, but you can go faster without it.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date10/26/2010
    Test locationCalifornia Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)58.4
    Relative humidity (%)72.7
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)28.8
    Wind (mph, direction)0.6, head/crosswind
    Odometer (mi.)3,875
    Fuel used for test91-octane gasoline
    As-tested tire pressures, f/r (psi)35/38
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)17 city/25 highway/20 combined
    Edmunds observed (mpg)18.6
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)18.5
    Driving range (mi.)463
    Audio and Advanced Technology
    Stereo description16 neodymium speaker audio system with 600-watt, 9-channel amplifier and vehicle speed-dependent equalization; iPod and USB adapter.
    iPod/digital media compatibilityOptional iPod via propietary cable USB stick
    Satellite radioOptional Sirius
    Hard-drive music storage capacity (Gb)Not available
    Rear seat video and entertainmentOptional
    Bluetooth phone connectivityStandard
    Navigation systemStandard hard drive
    Telematics (OnStar, etc.)Standard 48 months trial subscription
    Smart entry/StartOptional -- ignition, doors, trunk
    Parking aidsOptional back-up camera and automated self-parking system
    Blind-spot detectionOptional
    Adaptive cruise controlOptional
    Lane-departure monitoringOptional departure warning
    Collision warning/avoidanceOptional
    Night VisionOptional
    Driver coaching displayStandard current mpg display
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)4,343
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)4,380
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)52/48
    Length (in.)193.1
    Width (in.)73.2
    Height (in.)57.6
    Wheelbase (in.)116.9
    Track, front (in.)63.0
    Track, rear (in.)64.1
    Legroom, front (in.)41.4
    Legroom, rear (in.)36.1
    Headroom, front (in.)40.5
    Headroom, rear (in.)38.3
    Shoulder room, front (in.)58.3
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)56.2
    Seating capacity5
    Step-in height, measured (in.)15.8
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)18.4
    Cargo loading height, measured (in.)27.0
    GVWR (lbs.)5,423
    Payload, mfr. max claim (lbs.)1,036
    Tow capacity, mfr. claim (lbs.)Not Published
    Ground clearance (in.)5.6
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain4 years/50,000 miles
    Corrosion12 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance4 years/Unlimited miles
    Free scheduled maintenance4 years/50,000 miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2011 Infiniti M56 4dr Sedan (5.6L 8cyl 7A)
    Vehicle TypeRWD 4dr 5-passenger Sedan
    Base MSRP$58,765
    Options on test vehicleMoonlight White; Sport Package ($3,650 -- includes 20-by-9-inch split five-spoke aluminum-alloy wheels with 245/40R20W-rated summer performance tires; sport-tuned suspension with upgraded springs and double-piston shock absorbers; sport brakes with aluminum four-piston opposed front calipers/two-piston opposed rear calipers; four-wheel active steer; solid magnesium paddle shifters; sport seat with enhanced bolstering; aluminum pedal accents; premium stitched meter hood; sport steering wheel and shift knob; unique front fascia; dark front grille and headlamp housing); Sport Touring Package ($2,000 -- includes Bose studio surround-sound system with digital 5.1-channel decoding, 16 speakers, Forest Air system with advanced auto recirculation, Breeze mode, Plasmacluster air purifier and grape polyphenol filter, power rear sunshade); Aerodynamic Package ($1,995); R Spec High-Friction Brake Pads ($370); Illuminated Kick Plates ($350).
    As-tested MSRP$67,130
    Assembly locationTochigi, Japan
    North American parts content (%)0%
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationLongitudinal, front-engine, rear-wheel drive
    Engine typeNaturally aspirated, direct-injected gasoline V8
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)5,552cc (339 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder, variable intake + exhaust-valve timing and lift
    Compression ratio (x:1)11.5
    Redline, indicated (rpm)6,700
    Fuel cutoff/rev limiter (rpm)6,750
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)420 @ 6,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)417 @ 4,400
    Fuel typePremium unleaded (required)
    Transmission typeSeven-speed automatic with console shifter and column-mounted paddles with sport/competition modes
    Transmission ratios (x:1)1st = 4.783, 2nd = 3.103, 3rd = 1.984, 4th = 1.371, 5th = 1.000, 6th = 0.871, 7th = 0.776
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)2.611
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent double-wishbones, coil springs, monotube dampers, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent multilink, coil springs, monotube dampers, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeHydraulic-assist, speed-proportional rack-and-pinion power steering with active rear-steer
    Steering ratio (x:1)16.9
    Turning circle (ft.)36.7
    Tire make and modelBridgestone Potenza RE050A
    Tire typeAsymmetrical summer high-performance (33 psi cold front; 33 psi cold rear)
    Tire sizeP245/40R20 95W
    Wheel size20-by-9 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialCast aluminum
    Brakes, front14-inch one-piece ventilated steel discs with four-piston fixed calipers
    Brakes, rear13.8-inch one-piece ventilated steel discs with two-piston fixed calipers
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)2.2
    0-45 mph (sec.)3.4
    0-60 mph (sec.)5.0
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)4.7
    0-75 mph (sec.)7.2
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)13.3 @ 106.7
    0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.)2.5
    0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.)3.7
    0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.)5.3
    0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)4.9
    0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.)7.6
    1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph)13.5 @ 105.8
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)29
    60-0 mph (ft.)113
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)66.7
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON64.9
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.89
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON0.83
    Sound level @ idle (dB)34.1
    @ Full throttle (dB)80.3
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)67.7
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)1,750
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsTurning the stability control system off made no difference in the way the M56 launched. But power braking did affect numbers, despite the fact that the system would only allow about 1,600 rpm. Regardless, we never got any wheelspin at the drag strip. Although the M56 would start a bit sluggishly off the line, its naturally aspirated V8 revved very hard once under way.
    Braking commentsVery good brake performance in terms of stopping distances, lack of fade and pedal feel. The pedal actually got less spongy the more stops we did; the optional R Spec high-friction brake pads probably help here.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: The Infiniti is very sensitive to throttle input. Its line around the skid pad is therefore very correctable, but if you get too aggressive with drop-throttle to tighten the line, it will oversteer and ruin the run. Slalom: The Infiniti's steering is quick, a bit more so than you'd expect in a car of this size. But it hustles around the slalom cones pretty quickly with ESC off. ESC on allows a fair amount of oversteer before it starts adding brakes to the wheels -- but it's abrupt and speed-sapping when it does.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date10/26/2010
    Test locationCalifornia Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)57.9
    Relative humidity (%)75.4
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)28.8
    Wind (mph, direction)3.5, head/cross wind
    Odometer (mi.)3,550
    Fuel used for test91-octane gasoline
    As-tested tire pressures, f/r (psi)33/33
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)16 city/25 highway/19 combined
    Edmunds observed (mpg)18.0
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)20.0
    Driving range (mi.)500
    Audio and Advanced Technology
    Stereo descriptionBose Studio Surround with digital 5.1-channel decoding, 16 speakers
    iPod/digital media compatibilityStandard iPod via USB jack
    Satellite radioStandard XM
    Hard-drive music storage capacity (Gb)Standard 9.3GB music storage capacity
    Rear seat video and entertainmentNot available
    Bluetooth phone connectivityStandard (includes music streaming)
    Navigation systemStandard hard drive with XM traffic, 8.0-inch VGA touchscreen display
    Telematics (OnStar, etc.)None
    Smart entry/StartStandard ignition/doors
    Parking aidsStandard back-up camera
    Blind-spot detectionOptional
    Adaptive cruise controlOptional
    Lane-departure monitoringOptional lane departure warning
    Collision warning/avoidanceOptional
    Night VisionNot available
    Driver coaching displayStandard throttle pedal feedback in "Eco" mode, current/average mpg display
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)4,028
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)4,093
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)55/45
    Length (in.)194.7
    Width (in.)72.6
    Height (in.)59.1
    Wheelbase (in.)114.2
    Track, front (in.)62.0
    Track, rear (in.)61.8
    Legroom, front (in.)44.0
    Legroom, rear (in.)36.2
    Headroom, front (in.)39.1
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.7
    Shoulder room, front (in.)58.4
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)56.7
    Seating capacity5
    Step-in height, measured (in.)16.0
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)14.9
    Cargo loading height, measured (in.)28.8
    GVWR (lbs.)5,143
    Ground clearance (in.)5.9
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/60,000 miles
    Powertrain6 years/70,000 miles
    Corrosion7 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance4 years/60,000 miles
    Free scheduled maintenanceNot available
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement