INSIDE LINE

2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport vs. 2009 BMW 550i Sport vs. 2010 Jaguar XF Premium

Media Player

  • 2009 BMW 5 Series Picture

    2009 BMW 5 Series Picture

    The 5 Series is a fine car for everyday driving, but it most loves the open road. | September 15, 2009

Comparison

2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport vs. 2009 BMW 550i Sport vs. 2010 Jaguar XF Premium

Searching for the Ideal European V8 Sedan

    9 Ratings

    Building an ideal executive-style luxury sedan is not an easy task for a carmaker. If the car turns out too soft and isolated, you lose enthusiasts who aren't quite ready to retire in a Lexus. Too complex or high-strung and you risk alienating your technology-challenged, soft-in-the-middle buyers who expect a measure of mindless comfort. Get the balance just right, and your five-passenger $60,000 midsize sedan will both impress with remarkable dynamics and indulge with palpable comfort.

    We've gathered three such vehicles for this comparison: the 2009 BMW 550i, 2010 Jaguar XF Premium and 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport.

    The 2009 BMW 550i is widely regarded as the benchmark among sporting luxury sedans with its imposing modern design, 360-horsepower 4.8-liter V8 and legendary sporting dynamics. For a car that's been around for five years, its reputation remains consistently impressive.

    All-new in '09, the Jaguar XF now is available in a midlevel model, and this Jaguar XF Premium includes not only a new 385-hp direct-injection 5.0-liter V8 but also more standard features. Riding a 1st-place finish from the last time we collected four similar cars in 2008, the Brit car should be taken seriously.

    The new-generation 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport stands a very good chance of improving on its previous 3rd-place finish. Sure, the 382-hp 5.5-liter V8 is a carryover item from the outgoing E-Class, yet Mercedes-Benz has spent a considerable sum to refine this ninth-generation E-Class into a car meant to define this segment of sedans.

    The Big Picture
    These three V8 sedans epitomize what their first-rate companies do best. The 550i, E550 Sport and XF Premium are not almost-there, entry-level luxury cars. Nor are they flamboyant accessories with dark-tinted windows, meant for cruising Sunset Boulevard. They aren't hard-core performance sedans, either.

    Instead these are meat-of-the-biscuit vehicles that BMW, Jaguar and Mercedes-Benz promote as symbols of everything they know. They're the right size, and when equipped with V8s, they've got the right amount of effortless performance. In relative terms, they provide a value commensurate with the asking price. Driving any one of these three announces that you know the price of quality and can justify paying for it. And clearly you're smart enough to resist overpaying for more than you require.

    Sure, there's a place for one-dimensional super-sport Nürburgring sport sedans. 500 hp? Check. Wide, grippy tires? Yep. Neck-snapping upshifts? Bam! Then you might be more interested in a comparison between the BMW M5, Cadillac CTS-V and Mercedes C63 AMG, and that's over here. Everyday drivability, ride comfort, freedom from gas-guzzler taxes, the latest infotainment features and optional equipment? Well, not so much.

    We're glad the 2009 BMW 550i, 2010 Jaguar XF Premium and 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport exist. This ideal trio goes 90 percent of the way to the M5, E63 AMG and XFR super sedans, yet they're 100 percent easier to live with and rewarding in ways the thoroughbreds are not.

    The Performance Concept
    In a three-wide quarter-mile drag race, the winner here will likely be decided by the driver who gets the jump or the one with the best available traction. From slowest to quickest, our results showed a difference of just 0.3 second and 1 mph. That's close.

    The Mercedes-Benz E550 is the quickest to 60 mph with a run of 5.3 seconds (5.1 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip) and its quarter-mile run of 13.6 seconds at 103.5 mph is also the best of the group. We suspect the explanation comes from the largest-displacement engine with the most torque that is connected to the only seven-speed transmission in the test. These items also probably serve to explain the fact that the E550 returns the best observed fuel economy in this comparison with 19.3 mpg, compared to the BMW's 16.9 mpg and the Jaguar's 16 mpg.

    Braking, on the other hand, is not the E550's best play, as it records a stop from 60 mph in 126 feet. The 2010 Jaguar XF's large, performance-compound tires and plus-size brake hardware bring it to a halt in just 106 feet. The BMW 550i neatly splits the two at 111 feet, but its average stopping distances aren't as consistent.

    Predictably, the 2009 BMW 550i does best in dynamic categories, clinging to the skid pad with a grip of 0.87g and weaving through the slalom at 64.9 mph. We think the reason probably lies with the car's $4,700 ZSP Sport option package, which includes 19-inch wheels, performance tires and a taut suspension. (But if you want shift paddles on the steering wheel and the quick-shift transmission programming, the 2TB option will cost you an additional $500.)

    Driving on the Test Track
    The BMW Sport package might be considered by some to be money well spent on a 550i because it also includes this test's highest-scoring front seats, which are otherwise a $1,200 stand-alone option. There's a trade-off in ride comfort, however, as we found on bumpy or undulating roads that the sport suspension has been tuned with so much rebound damping that it makes the car progressively pack itself down to the road. The impression is that its suspension action doesn't "breathe" as well as the others, especially the Mercedes-Benz with its air springs.

    Although the E550 Sport's suspension is tuned slightly firmer than an E550 Luxury model, it still rides like a Mercedes sport-luxury sedan should and far better than it did last year. Unfortunately, the Sport's standard 18-inch AMG wheels, while attractive, are surrounded by all-season tires, which relegates the car to the back of the pack in handling tests, where it posted 0.81g on the skid pad and 62.8 mph in the slalom.

    And a great big mea culpa is owed to Jaguar, which, after reading our post on Straightline that indicated the XF's overly aggressive stability control had limited the car to just 0.82g on the skid pad and 63.8 mph in the slalom, informed us that the XF's stability and traction controls are indeed truly defeatable, but only after holding the button down for at least 10 seconds.

    It's our standard procedure to run all tests with stability control on, off and in a performance mode (if so equipped), but we admit we pressed and held the XF's button only for as long as it takes you to read this sentence. Worse yet, we did not have access to the test track for a retest. Nevertheless, the XF's performance is nothing to be ashamed of, especially with stability control on the performance mode.

    How Most Cars Are Driven
    On our favorite mountain test loop and least favorite freeway slog, we discovered other distinguishing factors that were not revealed at the track.

    For instance, we're not sold on the BMW's steering effort, which we found to be too heavy, especially compared to the lightly weighted Jaguar and buttery Mercedes-Benz system. So syrupy and out of character does the 550i's steering seem that more than a couple drivers thought there might be something wrong with the car.

    Meanwhile, we were surprised by the early onset of understeer in the Jaguar, combined with a lifeless and vague feeling from the front tires. At a pace that we'd describe as spirited but less than the limit, the XF will wander unceremoniously to the outside of its lane even while we dial in increasing amounts of steering. On a straightaway, the 2010 Jaguar XF Premium feels controlled and well-mannered, yet the Jaguar's 20-inch tires, courtesy of the $4,000 Portfolio pack, so taint the freeway ride that the car feels like an SUV rollin' on aftermarket 24s. Every road impact reverberates throughout the cabin and sometimes causes stability to suffer as well.

    The opposite is true from behind the sculpted three-spoke wheel of the Mercedes, where we can quite literally feel our way around any curve or sharp corner and know precisely how much or how little grip is available. Midcorner adjustments can be made with either the throttle position or steering angle or a combination of the two. No drama and no fuss; just obedience and confidence. There seems to have been a major shift in philosophy in the ride-and-handling department in Stuttgart, because the E550 no longer is defined by wooden, disconnected steering and a floaty bargelike chassis.

    The E550 Sport is by far the most adaptable, rewarding and confident car on the widest variety of surfaces despite not being the outright best-handling car.

    Looking Good
    According to civilian observers, the 2010 Jaguar XF is the clear winner on style. Everywhere we drive it, people take notice. There's simply not a bad angle from which to view it, although its silhouette is a familiar one these days, as the Lexus GS confirms. Even so, we're still not enamored by Jaguar's use of the Leaper insignia on the trunk lid, a reversal of Jag's usual practice where the Leaper is on the hood and the Growler badge is on the trunk. The diagonal Leaper on the trunk just seems to hang there uncomfortably.

    The BMW 5 Series has aged well, and the aero tweaks of the 550i Sport make it look sharper and more menacing, like an M5. There isn't a misplaced line, proportion or gesture in the mix. In these ways, it reminds us of a well-tailored men's suit.

    The 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport draws mixed reviews. Those who like it say the new chiseled sheet metal makes it look like George Clooney. Those who don't like it say it looks like a chunky old S-Class. Nevertheless, we think it's fresh, attractive and unmistakably a Mercedes-Benz.

    Living Room
    The cabin of the XF Premium (with Portfolio pack) is quite handsome and cleverly designed. The unique starter button (which pulses with light in the rhythm of a heartbeat), rotary-knob gear selector, rotating HVAC vents and touch-sensitive map/dome lighting did not go unappreciated by us. At the same time, the touchscreen incorporates too many functions that might be better served by buttons, the Portfolio edition's front seats are too narrow, and while we appreciate the effort to create two different moods with the ambient lighting (sparkly day and backlit night), neither one is entirely successful.

    The 2009 BMW 550i's interior is de rigueur BMW, with one glaring fault. The pairing of the new-style iDrive 3.0 controller and shortcut keys to the same ol' iDrive 1.5 software didn't fool us one bit, and further muddled the operation of the electronics. Just when we had gotten used to the two different systems, BMW has unsuccessfully blended them. Meanwhile, the materials and the quality of their assembly were up to BMW's usual standard.

    The all-new interior in the 2010 Mercedes-Benz E-Class manages to blend old-world design (some said 1970s) with the careful craftsmanship you'd expect from a company that offers so many futuristic electronic features. It is the only car here that is universally regarded as comfortable and intuitive to operate from the moment you get behind the wheel. It manages to be warm and rich, well-equipped and well-planned, and high-tech and high-quality all at the same time.

    Equipment, Features and Value
    At this point it seems appropriate to lay some window stickers on the table, especially since price counts for 20 percent of the final score in this test.

    Base priced at $61,225 (including destination charge), our 2009 BMW 550i is also fitted with the Cold Weather package, the Sport package, Comfort Access (intelligent key), rear sunshades (including the rear side windows), iPod/USB adapter, navigation system (DVD-based), head-up display (reflected in front of the driver) and satellite radio (with one-year subscription) for a grand total of $72,345 test-topping dollars.

    The 2010 Jaguar XF Premium with its 5.0-liter V8 (the 4.2-liter V8 now belongs to the base XF and the supercharger goes to the XFR) is priced at $57,000 even. Adding the Portfolio pack (personalized interior trim/stitching, more leather, ultra-suede headliner, deep carpets and 20-inch wheels), adaptive cruise control and a 440-watt Bowers and Wilkins audio system brings the total to $65,075. Pretty good value, we'd say.

    Mercedes-Benz has announced pricing for the 2010 E-Class, but not its options. The base E550 Sport starts at $57,175, and using last year's option pricing, our test car barely breaks $60,000 even with the Premium 1 package. This package includes hard-drive-based navigation, rearview camera, Harman Kardon audio, iPod integration, satellite radio and ventilated front seats for a total outlay of $60,325, making it the least expensive car here.

    Have a look at the Top 15 Features matrix and explanation to get a better idea of where your money could be spent, but suffice it to say the Mercedes-Benz E550 and Jaguar XF Premium both offer value the 2009 BMW 550i can't touch.

    3rd Place
    The current E60-generation BMW 550i effectively has been around since 2004 and it has served the company well. We've come as close as one can to pronouncing it the best sport sedan on the planet.

    Problem is, it's gotten old and harsh, being outpaced everywhere but where the roads start to twist and turn. Its asking price is too dear and its electronics are due for replacement. Moreover, this segment of sedans is now crowded with equally talented but better-equipped cars for the same or less money. Has BMW over-BMWed the 2009 550i? We think so. We hope BMW has enough goodies in the pipeline for a thoroughly revamped 2011 5 Series.

    2nd Place
    The revisions to the 2010 Jaguar XF have been significant, just not as significant as those made to the 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550. The Jag's new sonorous 5.0-liter V8 is bright and vigorous. The six-speed automatic is extremely intelligent and its interface with the driver is (we'll say it) nifty.

    But the challenging yet compelling appearance of the XF might not be enough to overcome the car's design shortcomings. Big wheels sure do fill up wheelwells, but they also diminish any semblance of a supple ride. A great-looking interior sure makes for pretty pictures, but glossy bits reflect too much noontime sunlight (not a problem in Britain, apparently) and the touchscreen is at once overused and already outdated. And unless this car gets some sales traction in the market, it might prove to be forgettable, despite its styling.

    1st Place
    You know the feeling. You've just walked into the meeting or party or bar wearing an outfit that's just a little bit more handsome and cosmopolitan than everybody else's. It gives you an inner confidence and outward respect without your needing to utter a word. You feel effortlessly cool, controlled and more attractive. You think, "This is going to be my day. I own this room."

    That's how it feels to drive the new Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport. Like many before it, this Merc feels overbuilt, like it'll go down the road impervious to any exterior influences for the next 250,000 miles. But here's the difference: This time, it doesn't drive like a European taxi.

    Whatever Mercedes-Benz has done to the steering of this E-Class, it should do with every car in its portfolio. It's supple, friction-free, informative and predictable. And there's nothing wrong with the corporate V8 engine. Besides producing the best acceleration, it is also the most fuel-efficient of this trio, and not by a little bit.

    The 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport amounts to more than the sum of its parts. It's hard to describe, but there's an overall sense of satisfaction, competence and experience that's somehow baked into the fiber of this car. It drives like it knows where it's going. It looks like it knows where it's been. And it's priced as if it knows where we're all headed.

    The manufacturers provided Edmunds these vehicles for the purposes of evaluation.

    Comparison

    Second Opinion

    Senior Editor Erin Riches says:
    You've seen the finishing order for this comparison test, but if I'm spending my own money, I'm taking the BMW 550i. It's not a rational choice. I like the way this sedan feels. The driving position, seats and (firm) suspension damping all feel right to me every time I get behind the wheel. I also enjoy the 550i's normally aspirated 4.8-liter V8, even if it has been made obsolete by BMW's twin-turbo inline-6. Low-end torque is in short supply, but like the company's inline-6, the 4.8-liter is free-revving and has a more interesting power band than the Mercedes-Benz E550's torque-rich 5.5-liter V8.

    But siding with the 5 Series forces me to put up with a slow-shifting six-speed automatic (because no one in the real world is buying this car with a six-speed manual and you know it), plus there's the rarely straightforward iDrive version 1.5 interface to contend with, and in these moments of annoyance, I can't deny that the 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 is the better overall luxury sedan. The E-Class is never going to pretend it's a sport sedan (certainly not with these all-season tires), but it's a pleasant and refined car to drive in any other context. It also has a better transmission, with noticeably quickened shifts in Sport mode. Inside, the latest version of COMAND lords over audio, navigation and Bluetooth functions with all the same authority as iDrive, but I don't mind. COMAND works well, you see, and I genuinely believe it's making my life easier.

    Why, then, wouldn't I just buy a 2010 E550 and save a few grand? Ah, because I can't accept that a midsize luxury sedan is just a luxury sedan. I want the one that plays like it's all sporty on a back road, even if I never drive it on one. So I'll take the Bimmer. You take the Benz.

    Comparison

    Top 15 Features

    Unlike the performance-at-all-costs comparison among the BMW M5, Cadillac CTS-V and Mercedes-Benz C63 that we conducted a few months back, the three cars in this comparison of V8 sedans try to entice buyers not just with speed but instead with high-tech features, luxury amenities and convenience features. So we've selected quite a long list of standard, optional and available items to reveal where your money goes.

    Since the cars are identically equipped in many ways, thereby canceling any advantage or disadvantage, we didn't include shared features such as:

    • Bi-xenon headlamps (though BMW's articulate with the steering wheel to effectively look around corners)
    • Bluetooth
    • Drive/Sport Drive/Manual modes available with automatic transmission
    • iPod/aux/USB capabilities
    • Moonroof
    • Multistage ESP that allows various levels of electronic intervention
    • Rear sunshade
    • Spare tire (all are space-saver-size)

    It's also worth mentioning that none of these three cars is available with a performance-enhancing limited-slip differential. You must graduate to the BMW M5, Jaguar XFR or Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG to get the LSD.

    Features
      2009 BMW 550i 2010 Jaguar XF Premium 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport
    Adaptive cruise control O* O O*
    Blind-spot warning N/A S O*
    Cooled (ventilated) front seats N/A S O
    Driver-selectable suspension settings N/A N/A S
    Emergency assistance S N/A S
    Hard drive nav/music server N/A N/A O
    Head-up display O N/A N/A
    Heated front seats O S S
    Heated rear seats O* N/A N/A
    Intelligent key O S O*
    Night-vision display O* N/A O*
    Rearview camera N/A S O
    Shift paddles O* S S
    Split-fold rear seats O* S O*
    Upgraded sport seat O O O*

    Key:
    S: Standard equipment
    O: Optional and included on this test vehicle
    O*: Optional but not included on this test vehicle (fewer points awarded)
    N/A: Not Available

    Adaptive cruise control: We don't know about you, but this one always makes us more nervous than confident. Variously using short-, medium- and long-range radar, adaptive cruise control acts like a science-fiction "tractor beam," matching the speed of your car to the one directly in front of yours at a fixed distance up to the limit you have preset, even applying brakes as needed. More advanced systems can even be used in bumper-to-bumper traffic, bringing the car to a halt and back up to highway speeds without your needing to touch a pedal. Optional on all three vehicles, but present only on the Jaguar.

    Blind-spot warning: Once a bit of a novelty, these systems are gaining popularity and use either videolike cameras or short-range sonar to detect vehicles (and motorcycles) in the space beside/behind yours. Standard on the Jaguar, optional on the Mercedes and not available on the BMW.

    Cooled (ventilated) front seats: You know, to discourage the sweaty-back syndrome common to areas where the relative humidity readings often match the ambient temperature; standard on the Jaguar XF Premium, optional (and present within the Premium 1 Package) on the E550 Sport, and not available on the BMW 550i.

    Driver-selectable suspension settings: While it may be true that a BMW M5 and Jaguar XFR offer the option of selecting various suspension settings, these systems are not available in either the 550i or XF Premium. Once a high-end S-Class feature, Mercedes-Benz's Airmatic suspension is standard on the E550 Sport.

    Emergency assistance: We've experienced firsthand the impressive range of BMW Assist's built-in souped-up cell phone when we used it to call for help after a fellow motorist went end-over-end several times on a very rural road where our handheld cell phones failed. Standard on the 5 Series and E550 (called TeleAid), not available on the Jaguar XF.

    Hard drive nav/music server: Once you've used a hard-drive-based system, you'll think everything else is an antique. It's funny how quickly electronics become obsolete. Optional on the Mercedes-Benz and not (yet) available on the BMW 5 Series or Jaguar XF.

    Head-up display: While our staff is divided on the usefulness of HUDs, everybody can agree that fighter pilots find them extremely important. Maybe we should, too. Our BMW 550i was equipped with one for $1,200. Not available on either the Jag or Merc.

    Heated front seats: You know, to warm your backside on chilly mornings; standard on the Jaguar XF Premium and E550 Sport, optional (and present within the Cold Weather package) on the BMW 550i.

    Heated rear seats: Warming the bums of your rear passengers will cost you $350 in the BMW 550i (but you must also order the $750 Cold Weather package) to do so. Unfortunately, the rear seats in both the Jaguar XF Premium and Mercedes-Benz E550 will leave them cold. At least they might be entertained in the E550 with its optional rear-seat entertainment system.

    Intelligent key: BMW calls it Comfort Access, Mercedes-Benz calls it Keyless Go and Jaguar calls it Smart Key, but from the linty depths of your pocket or purse, these intelligent keys communicate with the car to allow you to unlock/lock and even start the car without the uncomfortable excavation ritual. Standard on the XF Premium, optional (and present) on the 550i, optional (and absent) on the E550 Sport.

    Night-vision display: Sure, the BMW can't look behind itself to park, but for $2,200 it can peer into the spooky darkness beyond where the headlamps shine. Also available on the E550, but a price has not yet been set. Not available on the Jaguar.

    Rearview camera: Allows you to gaze at the dashboard while sideswiping the post you could've seen with the side mirror. These are becoming rather ubiquitous, included in many navigation systems since the screen is already there, but a camera is mysteriously absent from the BMW's list of available features. Standard on the Jaguar XF Premium and within the E550 Sport's Premium 1 pack.

    Shift paddles: You'd think BMW's $4,700 ZSP Sport package with six-speed automatic transmission would include shift paddles on the steering wheel, but you must further order the 2TB Sport automatic transmission with shift paddles. Spending the extra $500 not only gets you the paddles, but also Manual-mode upshifts are quicker and downshifts are automatically rev-matched for quicker gear selection. Standard fare on Jaguar (including matched-rev downshifts) as well as on the E550 Sport (though without matched-rev downshifts).

    Split-fold rear seats: Folding rear seats effectively make your sedan into a wagon, and so long as your cargo is long and flat (like you'd find at a flat-pack furniture store), there's no home-improvement errand that you can't do; optional on both the BMW and Mercedes, standard on the Jaguar.

    Upgraded sport seat: Both the BMW and Jaguar earned points for driver comfort and driving position due to their optional front seats. The BMW's multicontour seats are exceptional in this regard, while some felt the Jaguar Portfolio Package seat bottoms were too narrow. There are optional seats for the E550 Sport, but we felt the standard seats were not lacking in either comfort or support.

    Comparison

    Data and Charts

    Dimensions
    Engine & Transmission Specifications
    Warranty Information
    Performance Information


    Dimensions
    Exterior Dimensions & Capacities
      2009 BMW 550i 2010 Jaguar XF Premium 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport
    Length, in. 191.1 195.3 191.7
    Width, in. 72.7 73.9 75.9
    Height, in. 57.8 57.5 57.2
    Wheelbase, in. 113.7 114.5 113.1
    As tested curb weight, lb. 3,988 4,185 4,079
    Turning Circle, ft. 37.4 37.7 36.2


    Interior Dimensions
      2009 BMW 550i 2010 Jaguar XF Premium 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport
    Front headroom, in. 39.1 39.0 37.9
    Rear headroom, in. 38.1 37.6 38.2
    Front shoulder room, in. 57.3 56.8 57.8
    Rear shoulder room, in. 57.2 56.3 56.9
    Front legroom, in. 41.5 41.5 41.3
    Rear legroom, in. 36.0 36.6 35.8
    Cargo volume, (DIN) cu-ft.18.417.719.0


    Engine & Transmission Specifications
    Engine & Transmission
      2009 BMW 550i 2010 Jaguar XF Premium 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport
    Displacement
    (cc / cu-in):
    4800 (293) 5000 (305) 5500 (336)
    Engine Type DOHC V8 DOHC V8 DOHC V8
    Horsepower (SAE) @ rpm 360 @ 6,300 385 @ 6,500 382 @ 6,000
    Max. Torque, lb-ft @ rpm 360 @ 3,400 380 @ 3,500 391 @ 2,800
    Transmission 6-speed auto 6-speed auto 7-speed auto
    EPA Fuel Economy City, mpg 15.0 16.0 14.0
    EPA Fuel Economy Hwy, mpg 22.0 23.0 20.0
    Observed Fuel Economy combined, mpg 16.9 16.0 19.3


    Warranty
    Warranty Information
      2009 BMW 550i 2010 Jaguar XF Premium 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport
    Basic Warranty 4 years/50,000 miles 4 years/50,000 miles 4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain 4 years/50,000 miles 4 years/50,000 miles 4 years/50,000 miles
    Roadside Assistance 4 years/50,000 miles 4 years/50,000 miles 4 years/Unlimited miles
    Corrosion Protection 12 years/Unlimited miles 6 years/Unlimited miles 4 years/50,000 miles
    Free scheduled maintenance 4 years/50,000 miles 1 year/15,000 miles First oil service


    Performance
    Performance Information
      2009 BMW 550i 2010 Jaguar XF Premium 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport
    0-60 mph acceleration, sec. 5.5 5.7 5.3
    Quarter-mile acceleration, sec. 13.7 13.9 13.6
    Quarter-mile speed, mph 102.7 102.5 103.5
    60-0-mph braking, feet 111 106 126
    Lateral Acceleration, g 0.87 0.82 0.81
    600-ft slalom, mph 64.9 63.8 62.8

    Comparison

    Final Rankings and Scoring Explanation

    Final Rankings
    Item Weight 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Sport 2010 Jaguar XF Premium 2009 BMW 550i
    Personal Rating 2.5% 88.9 33.3 77.8
    Recommended Rating 2.5% 100.0 33.3 66.7
    Evaluation Score 25% 80.1 75.3 80.6
    Feature Content 25% 53.3 55.6 35.6
    Performance 25% 87.8 91.1 95.6
    Fuel Consumption 0% 88.2 100.0 94.4
    Price 20% 100.0 92.1 80.1
           
    Total Score 100.0% 80.0 75.6 72.6
    Final Ranking   1 2 3


    Personal Rating (2.5%): Purely subjective. After the test, each participating editor was asked to rank the vehicles in order of preference based on which he or she would buy if money were no object.

    Recommended Rating (2.5%): After the test, each participating editor was asked to rank the vehicles in order of preference based on which he or she thought would be best for the average consumer shopping in this segment, including that car-savvy relative or family friend who has our number on speed dial. We get this all the time.

    28-Point Evaluation (25%): Each participating editor ranked every vehicle based on a comprehensive 28-point evaluation. The evaluation covered everything from exterior design to transmission performance to button wobble/stability. Things like ride comfort and rear-seat comfort/access as well as audio system layout are included in this overall score. Calculated on a point system, the scores listed are averages based on all test participants' evaluations of all the cars' qualities/mistakes.

    Feature Content (25%): For this category, the editors picked the top 15 features they thought would be most beneficial to the consumer shopping in the sport/luxe sedan segment. For each vehicle, the score was based on the number of features it had as standard equipment (earning 3 points), optional and present on our test vehicle (2 points), optional but not included (1 point) or not available (0 points) on our test vehicles.

    Performance Testing (25%): For this particular comparison, we've weighted the vehicles' track performances greater than one for, say, minivans. Flat-out acceleration, braking and handling tests were performed in a controlled environment by the same driver on the same day.

    Fuel Consumption (0%): Normally, we'd assign a weight for the cars' EPA combined fuel economy ratings, appropriate to the segment in which these sport/luxe sedans play, but official figures have yet to be released on two of the entrants. As a consequence, fuel economy did not figure into the scoring. Besides, if all goes as to the manufacturers' projections, the combined fuel economy figures among the three sedans will vary from worst to best by just 2 mpg.

    Price (20%): The numbers listed were the result of a simple percentage calculation based on the least expensive vehicle in the comparison test. Using the "as tested" prices of the actual evaluation vehicles, the least expensive vehicle received a score of 100, with the remaining vehicles receiving lesser scores based on how much each one costs.

    Sort By:

    tenta20 says:

    09:18 AM, 04/05/2010

    Mercedes E-class for the win!

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2010
    MakeMercedes-Benz
    ModelE-Class
    StyleE550 4dr Sedan (5.5L 8cyl 7A)
    Base MSRP$57,175
    Options on test vehiclePremium 1 Package (COMAND hard-drive navigation system, rearview camera, Harman Kardon Logic 7 sound, iPod integration, Sirius Satellite Radio and ventilated seats).
    As-tested MSRP$60,235 (estimated)
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeRear-wheel drive
    Engine type90-degree V8
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)5,461cc (333 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder, variable intake and exhaust valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.7:1
    Redline (rpm)6,750
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)382 @ 6,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)391 @ 2,800
    Transmission type7-speed automatic
    Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)I = 4.38, II = 2.86, III = 1.92, IV = 1.37, V = 1.00, VI = 0.82, VII = 0.73, FD = 2.47, R = 3.42 (2.23 comfort mode)
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent, MacPherson struts, air springs, adaptive dampers, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent, multilink, air springs, adaptive dampers, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeSpeed-proportional rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)17.0:1
    Turning circle (ft.)36.2
    Tire brandContinental
    Tire modelContiProContact
    Tire typeAll-season
    Tire size, front245/40R18 97V
    Tire size, rear265/35R18 97V
    Wheel size18-by-8.5 inches front -- 18-by-9 inches rear
    Wheel materialAluminum alloy
    Brakes, front13.5-inch ventilated disc with four-piston fixed caliper
    Brakes, rear12.6-inch ventilated disc with single-piston sliding caliper
    Track Test Results
    0-45 mph (sec.)3.6 (3.7 traction control on)
    0-60 mph (sec.)5.3 (5.4 traction control on)
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)5.1 (5.1 traction control on)
    0-75 mph (sec.)7.7 (7.7 traction control on)
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)13.6 @ 103.5 (13.6 @ 103.7 traction control on)
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)33
    60-0 mph (ft.)126
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)62.8 (60.5 traction/stability control on)
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.81 (0.80 traction/stability control on)
    Sound level @ idle (dB)43.8
    @ Full throttle (dB)74.4
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)66.9
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsEasy to break tires loose with stability control turned off, and it doesn't seem to hurt acceleration much. Quick upshifts are smooth and at redline. Auto upshift in temporary "manual" mode.
    Braking ratingAverage
    Braking commentsGravelly tire noises indicate all-season level of tire grip. PreSafe tightens belts. Good fade resistance but poor stopping distance for an E550 "Sport." Excellent feel otherwise. Pedal got a little soft after five stops.
    Handling ratingGood
    Handling commentsSkid pad: Stability control not truly off; in fact, it's not much different either way. Steering remains on the light side and offers little feel. Slalom: Doesn't like to be tossed around -- prefers as little upset as possible. Pushed too hard, it's "pushy-loose." Kept tidy to the cones, it feels much more composed. Steering is fine and precise-feeling. Good in transitions.
    Testing Conditions
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)76.6
    Wind (mph, direction)3.8 (Headwind)
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)14 city/20 highway/17 combined (estimated)
    Edmunds observed (mpg)14.4 worst/23.1 best/19.3 average (over 1,335 miles)
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)21.1
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,812
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)4,079
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)51/49
    Length (in.)191.7
    Width (in.)75.9
    Height (in.)57.2
    Wheelbase (in.)112.4
    Track, front (in.)62.2
    Track, rear (in.)62.5
    Legroom, front (in.)41.3
    Legroom, rear (in.)35.8
    Headroom, front (in.)37.9
    Headroom, rear (in.)38.2
    Shoulder room, front (in.)57.8
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)56.9
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)19.0
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)Folding rear seats are optional, no data available
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain4 years/50,000 miles
    Corrosion4 years/50,000 miles
    Roadside assistanceUnlimited mileage
    Free scheduled maintenanceFirst oil service provided free of charge (at or before 5,000 miles)
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard dual front and dual rear
    Head airbagsStandard front and rear
    Knee airbagsStandard driver only
    Antilock brakesFour-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsBraking assist, electronic brakeforce distribution, stoplight/hill hold
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    Rollover protectionStandard
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemStandard individual tire-pressure monitoring
    Emergency assistance systemAttention Assist driver drowsiness monitoring system, PreSafe pre-collision safety system
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot available
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot available
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot available
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot available
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot available
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2010
    MakeJaguar
    ModelXF-Series
    StyleXF Premium 4dr Sedan (5.0L 8cyl 6A)
    Base MSRP$57,000
    Options on test vehiclePortfolio Pack, Adaptive Cruise Control, Bowers and Wilkins 440-Watt Package.
    As-tested MSRP$65,075
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeRear-wheel drive
    Engine type90-degree direct-injection V8
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)5,000cc (305 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder with variable intake/exhaust valve timing and lift
    Compression ratio (x:1)11.5
    Redline (rpm)6,800
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)385 @ 6,500
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)380 @ 3,500
    Transmission typeSix-speed automatic
    Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)I = 4.17, II = 2.34, III = 1.52, IV = 1.14, V = 0.87, VI = 0.69, FD = 3.31, R = 3.40
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent, double wishbones, coil springs and stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent, multilink, coil springs and stabilizer bar
    Steering typeSpeed-proportional rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)Being researched
    Turning circle (ft.)37.7
    Tire brandDunlop
    Tire modelSP Sport Maxx J
    Tire typeDirectional, summer/performance
    Tire size, front255/35R20 97Y
    Tire size, rear255/35R20 97Y
    Wheel size20-by-8.5 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialAluminum alloy
    Brakes, front14-inch ventilated disc with two-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rear12.8-inch ventilated disc with single-piston sliding calipers
    Track Test Results
    0-45 mph (sec.)3.9 (4.0 with traction control on)
    0-60 mph (sec.)5.7 (6.0 with traction control on)
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)5.4 (5.7 with traction control on)
    0-75 mph (sec.)8.2 (8.7 with traction control on)
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)13.9 @ 102.5 (14.2 @ 100.7 with traction control on)
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)28
    60-0 mph (ft.)106
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)63.8 (electronically limited -- see Handling comments below)
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.82 (electronically limited -- see Handling comments below)
    Sound level @ idle (dB)47.1
    @ Full throttle (dB)73.5
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)71.1
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsTried everything possible to get some wheelspin but to no avail: Drive, Sport, the little flag that indicates Dynamic mode with manual shifts, TRAC DSC, etc. Wide/sticky tires. Crispest upshifts in Sport mode, but not manual. Nice color-shift upshift indicator, but it's too conservative, indicating upshifts a few tenths of a second or a few hundred rpm shy of redline. Great V8 sounds!
    Braking ratingExcellent
    Braking commentsTremendously powerful brakes that are virtually fade-free. Hard pedal from start to finish. Little dive and no squirm.
    Handling ratingGood
    Handling commentsSkid pad: Unable to shut off DSC completely. There's a wider envelope within to drive with TRAC DSC which begins with breathing the throttle, then gentle braking. Steering gets only a little heavier, but the car tracks well. Eventually held my foot to the floor with DSC on. Slalom: Hard to predict DSC -- even in the TRAC DSC mode. Grip feels trustworthy, then a brake clamps down to mitigate understeer. Good steering response, but doesn't care much for quick transitions. Driver's note: We found out a day too late that DSC is defeatable, but you must hold the DSC button for at least 10 seconds. We'll retest when we can arrange a new loan.
    Testing Conditions
    Temperature (°F)76.3
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)16 city/23 highway/19 combined
    Edmunds observed (mpg)11.2 worst/18.5 best/16.0 average (over 993 miles)
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)18.4
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)4,067
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)4,185
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)52/48
    Length (in.)195.3
    Width (in.)73.9
    Height (in.)57.5
    Wheelbase (in.)114.5
    Track, front (in.)61.4
    Track, rear (in.)63.2
    Legroom, front (in.)41.5
    Legroom, rear (in.)36.6
    Headroom, front (in.)39.0
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.6
    Shoulder room, front (in.)56.8
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)56.3
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)17.7
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)Standard 60/40 split-fold rear seats; No data provided
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain4 years/50,000 miles
    Corrosion6 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance4 years/50,000 miles
    Free scheduled maintenanceFree first scheduled maintenance at or before 1 year/15,000 miles
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard dual front
    Head airbagsStandard front and rear
    Knee airbagsNot available
    Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsBraking assist, electronic brakeforce distribution
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    Rollover protectionStandard
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemStandard global tire-pressure monitoring
    Emergency assistance systemOptional blind spot warning, front-collision warning
    NHTSA crash test, driverNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, passengerNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot Tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot Tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot Tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2009
    MakeBMW
    Model5 Series
    Style550i 4dr Sedan (4.8L 8cyl 6A)
    Base MSRP$61,225
    Options on test vehicleNavigation System, Head-Up Display, Sirius Satellite Radio (first year subscription included), iPod and USB Adapter, Cold Weather Package, Sport Package, Six-Speed Steptronic Automatic Transmission (N/C), Comfort Access System, Power Rear Sunshade With Manual Rear Side Window Shades.
    As-tested MSRP$72,345
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeRear-wheel drive
    Engine type90-degree V8
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)4,799cc (293 cu-in)
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder, variable intake/exhaust valve timing and lift
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.5:1
    Redline (rpm)7,000 indicated
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)360 @ 6,300
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)360 @ 3,400
    Transmission typeSix-speed automatic
    Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)I = 4.171, II = 2.34, III = 1.521, IV = 1.143, V = 0.867, VI = 0.691, FD = 3.38, R= 3.403
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent, MacPherson struts, coil springs and self-adjusting stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent, multilink, coil springs and self-adjusting stabilizer bar
    Steering typeSpeed-proportional rack-and-pinion power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)13.7:1
    Turning circle (ft.)37.4
    Tire brandContinental
    Tire modelSport Contact 2
    Tire typeSummer Performance
    Tire size, front245/35R19 93Y
    Tire size, rear275/30R19 96Y
    Wheel size19-by-8 inches front -- 19-by-9.5 inches rear
    Wheel materialAluminum alloy
    Brakes, front13.7-inch ventilated disc with two-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rear13.6-inch ventilated disc with single-piston fixed calipers
    Track Test Results
    0-45 mph (sec.)3.7 (3.9 with traction control on)
    0-60 mph (sec.)5.5 (5.6 with traction control on)
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)5.2 (5.3 with traction control on)
    0-75 mph (sec.)8.0 (8.1 with traction control on)
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)13.7 @ 102.7 (13.8 @ 102.6 with traction control on)
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)28
    60-0 mph (ft.)111
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)64.9 (63.0 with stability control on)
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.87 (0.86 with stability control on)
    Sound level @ idle (dB)47.9
    @ Full throttle (dB)70.8
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)66.3
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsCould muster only a little tire scratch, and this engine doesn't have much grunt down low. Upshifts are very smooth and not especially quick.
    Braking ratingVery Good
    Braking commentsReliable feel and distances. No fade or squirm. Little dive.
    Handling ratingVery Good
    Handling commentsSlalom: Steering feels unnecessarily, unnaturally heavy, but yaw response is very good and the car responds well. This car likes to be chucked around. The active antiroll bars are obviously helping, but are not otherwise intrusive or awkward. Skid pad: Excellent balance between understeer and oversteer, easy to find limit and keep it there with throttle input. Steering feel was so-so -- a little heavy.
    Testing Conditions
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)73.8
    Wind (mph, direction)4.8mph (Headwind)
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)15 city/22 highway/18 combined
    Edmunds observed (mpg)14.2 worst/18.9 best/16.9 average (over 1,098 miles)
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)18.5
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,946
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)3,988
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)51/49
    Length (in.)191.1
    Width (in.)72.7
    Height (in.)57.8
    Wheelbase (in.)113.7
    Track, front (in.)61.3
    Track, rear (in.)62.2
    Legroom, front (in.)41.5
    Legroom, rear (in.)36.0
    Headroom, front (in.)39.1
    Headroom, rear (in.)38.1
    Shoulder room, front (in.)57.3
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)57.2
    Seating capacity5
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)18.4
    Max. cargo volume, seats folded (cu-ft)Folding rear seats optional; No data available
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain4 years/50,000 miles
    Corrosion12 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance4 years/Unlimited miles
    Free scheduled maintenance4 years/50,000 miles
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard dual front
    Head airbagsStandard front and rear
    Knee airbagsNot available
    Antilock brakes4-wheel ABS
    Electronic brake enhancementsBraking assist, electronic brakeforce distribution, fade compensation, brake drying, brake standby, hill hold, graduated pressure stopping
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    Rollover protectionStandard
    Tire-pressure monitoring systemStandard global tire-pressure monitoring
    Emergency assistance systemNot available
    NHTSA crash test, driver3 stars
    NHTSA crash test, passenger5 stars
    NHTSA crash test, side front5 stars
    NHTSA crash test, side rear5 stars
    NHTSA rollover resistance4 stars
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement