INSIDE LINE

2011 BMW 1 Series M Coupe Full Test and Video

Media Player

  • 2011 BMW 1 Series M Coupe Road Test

    We test the latest M car form BMW, the 2011 BMW 1 Series M Coupe | May 27, 2011

1 Video , 28 Photos | See more photos in this gallery »

Road Test

2011 BMW 1 Series M Coupe Full Test and Video

Is 1 Greater than 3? Maybe Just This Once

    49 Ratings

    It's here, on Willow Springs Raceway, the self-proclaimed "Fastest Road in the West," that our mind begins to wander. Even though we're ripping through Turn 8 at 121 mph in the 2011 BMW 1 Series M Coupe, it's hard to concentrate.

    "Are these wheels forged?"

    "Did I lock the house this morning?

    "Only one day until the rapture? Really?"

    "Man, this thing has a lot of grip."

    The last thought hangs around for awhile, mainly because it's this car's grip — more than any other M car — that defines it. We're not surprised, as it wears the same set of Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 tires included in the M3's Competition package. More importantly, those four generously sized contact patches support only 3,346 pounds, about 210 fewer than an M3 Coupe.

    BMW says the M3 represents everything the company understands about driving dynamics. But the 1 Series M Coupe is half M3 — utilizing not only its tires but also its suspension hardware, brakes, steering rack and more.

    Its attitude, however, is different. Still, this is a proper M car.

    Subjective Feel
    By now you probably know the 2011 BMW 1 Series M Coupe shares its engine with the Z4 sDrive35is convertible — a machine so poorly named we often forget it exists. But the engine's source and origins are far less important than its numbers and its influence over the M's chassis.

    Here the 3.0-liter twin-turbo inline-6 is rated at 335 horsepower and 332 pound-feet of torque, which is sent through a six-speed manual transmission only. Also, because big surges of torque are quite enjoyable, the M-specific engine calibration allows a 5-7-second overboost. Our own internal testing shows it's quite effective.

    The question, given the numbers at hand and the hardware at work, isn't whether the 1 Series M Coupe is a proper M car, but rather how does it stack up against the M car — the current-generation M3? When it comes to sheer perception, the littlest M gives up nothing.

    In fact, some purists — particularly those who have been whining about the M3's curb weight since it first hit Internet forums — will likely find the M Coupe to be the perfect compromise. Driving the two cars back to back on the 2.5-mile Willow Springs road course, there's little difference in peak speeds on the circuit's front straight.

    M3 Heart
    Although the 2011 BMW 1 Series M Coupe utilizes the M3's aluminum subframes, control arms and links, it lacks that car's Electronic Damping Control. In its place are conventional (aluminum) dampers. BMW, however, refuses to release any information about the M Coupe's spring rates or additional chassis stiffness. There are new gussets surrounding the shock towers under the hood, and the lack of a sunroof no doubt stiffens its chassis relative to the standard 1 Series cars, where it's standard equipment.

    This isn't the raw, instant, shrill explosion of sound and revs we've become accustomed to from BMW M cars. But it gets the job done.

    The 1M also shares the M3's steering rack, which at 12.5:1 is among the quickest-ratio racks on any production car today. Combine that with the M Coupe's 104.7-inch wheelbase (4 inches shorter than the M3) and this car is, well, lively. And by lively we mean reactive, snappy, punchy and fun. There's even an "M" button on the steering wheel, but on the Coupe it only bumps up throttle response.

    It's a concentrated dose of M3. Drink plenty of water.

    A Unique Machine
    Driving the M Coupe on one of the country's fastest road courses didn't tell us much about its best properties. Those we discovered later, as they're best explored below 80 mph.

    This car's explosiveness out of low-speed corners is as fun as it is frantic. It leaps from tight-radius bends as violently as any two-wheel-drive car we've ever driven. It's very controllable, but it's not for beginners. This coupe reacts quickly.

    It's the only car that's ever made us want to autocross. With all its wide-bodied, fat-tired, short-wheelbase torquey-ness, the 1M is perfectly suited to slipping between cones on the clock. It might even make that lame form of parking lot racing fun.

    Objective Data
    At the track, our subjective impressions are rapidly verified as the M brand's little hammer pumps out big numbers. Sixty mph disappears in 4.6 seconds (4.4 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like at a drag strip) and the quarter-mile is gone in 13.0 seconds at 107.7 mph. That's identical to the last M3 Coupe we tested to 60 mph and only two-tenths slower in the quarter-mile.

    But the real story, the one that should make you plead for this car, is the way it handles. It's the kind of intuitive-feedback, butt-connected-to-the-contact patch sort of feeling we wish were available in everything we drive. And it's immensely fun.

    Given the N54's propensity to pump out huge waves of torque, the relatively short wheelbase and the M3's viscous limited-slip differential, there's a sense of necessary hoonery built into the 1M.

    Around the skid pad, this means there's no problem steering with the throttle. And the gap between the limit of grip and limit of control is a big one. Go ahead, slide it all you want; that's what it's for. Keep the rear wheels behind the fronts and it will produce an impressive 0.96g — better than the M3 (0.95g). Slalom speed, at 71.4 mph is similarly impressive, although not quite as good as the M3 (73.3).

    Braking from 60 to zero, given the M Coupe's M3 brakes (14.2-inch two-piece rotors and huge sliding calipers up front) is an effortless endeavor. Heat capacity and feel are appropriate for a genuine performance car. Oh, and it stops in only 106 feet — a foot shorter than the M3.

    Other Details
    BMW has figured out the key to making a relatively Spartan interior look appropriately unique. A large part of the secret is the utter lack of reflective materials. Yes, there's a satin-finish bezel here and there but this is largely a matte-finish interior. The special part comes from Alcantara suede on the shifter and parking brake boots as well as on the doors, dash insert and instrument panel shade.

    Black Boston leather is the only finish available on the 14-way adjustable seats, which along with the Alcantara bits are stitched in orange — a small detail that is tastefully striking. There's also a thick-rimmed, leather-covered steering wheel that seems perfect for directing this angry little pug.

    The Deal
    BMW tells us it plans to sell only 1,000 M Coupes in the U.S. this year. It's likely there will never be more. They start at $47,010 including destination fees, which might seem steep until one realizes that it offers performance on par with an M3 for about $10 grand less. Our test car, fitted with heated seats, Valencia Orange paint and the $2,400 Premium package, rings up a $49,585 bill.

    Gripes? There are few. The engine lacks the character of most M cars. Yes, it's powerful and amply responsive and probably telling of the powertrains to come in future M vehicles. Still, this isn't the raw, instant, shrill explosion of sound and revs we've become accustomed to from BMW M cars. But it certainly gets the job done.

    The 2011 BMW 1 Series M Coupe is what purist drivers want: predictable, responsive, powerful and lighter than the only car it was benchmarked against: the M3.

    And after 33 laps at Willow and 350 street miles, our wandering mind has reached the following conclusions: The M Coupe's wheels are not forged, we locked the house and the whole idea of the rapture is ridiculous.

    Oh, and the M Coupe's grip? Yes, it has more than we ever imagined. And it is good.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Sort By:

    twistedmetal says:

    12:08 PM, 07/21/2011

    I've seen some comments about the production of these vehicles, which makes them very hard to get at this time.. It's interesting when folks get upset over limited production.  I think it makes it that much more special and if I was ready wouldn't wait for the next guy to get in front of me!
    The limited production reminds me of the M1 back in '78 when BMW put out 450 units - 400 production and 50 for race. This was the requirement to get this car on the international racing circuit. Which could be the reason here again..

    evocat70 says:

    10:12 PM, 06/30/2011

    ummm 135i and a jb4?  maybe a downpipe and intake?

    dman says:

    03:42 PM, 06/16/2011

    Pretty much the same engine in the M1 vs. a 135i?  It sounds like if you spend enough $$ on a 135i you can turn it into an M1.  M cars usually had their own unique engines but not this time?  I don't think you could turn a 335 into an M3 without replacing the entire engine.

    raylo993 says:

    02:18 PM, 06/02/2011

    Come to think of it, when Ford raced Mustang 302s back in '70s...M3s didn't even exist. Maybe you are right, 302s have a better racing heritage. LOL, Bimmer fanboy!!

    raylo993 says:

    02:11 PM, 06/02/2011

    OMG!! Please read my post carefully...not M3, it's 1M coupe I was referring to, man!!
    Do you know how to read English?? LMFAO
    Another Bimmer fanboy??

    vpfree1 says:

    01:56 PM, 06/02/2011

    @raylo993

    "Boss 302... has a better racing heritage" than the M3.  ROTFL!

    raylo993 says:

    12:46 PM, 06/02/2011

    @badlt335,

    The Boss 302 is a special Mustang, it offers almost track car performance and heritage. Its production serial #0001 was auctioned off in six-figure amount recently. Most dealers ask for a premium over the sticker price. It is faster than your BMW M3 on Laguna Seca...since M3 should be a bit faster than the 1M coupe, so that means Boss 302 would kick your 1M coupe's butt. Not to mention that it has a better looking body and racing heritage.

    When you began your post by asking that absurd question, I could only ask you the same question. Have you sat or drove in both of the Boss 302 and the 1M coupe?? I would doubt that, so your own opinions of the cars were also based on car reviews like IL's and your subjective views...

    It seems to me that you are a Bimmer fanboy and that's fine with me, but you need to open up your small world and respect what are out there. I'm a life long Porsche fan and have owned many Porsches...944 Turbo, 911 Turbo, 968, 928, Boxster and 993s. I still own and keep a NSX and my fave 993 now. I have driven many BMW cars before, all 3 series, Z3, Z3M, Z4 and M3s. My fave is the '88 E30 M3. Yet I still respect and love other honestly good sports cars like the Mustang GT 5.0, Boss 302 and C6 Corvette....just to name a few among others.

    For almost $50K, there are better buys than your beloved 1M coupe. The Boss 302 is just one of the options in my opinion.    

    iskch says:

    09:07 AM, 06/02/2011

    Wonder if a Mitsu Evo X GSR w/leather (heck I don't know the model denomination) will be a better option.  

    1000 models only?  That is why the price is high on the BMW M UNO.

    mortal says:

    07:47 PM, 06/01/2011

    FYI it was abc nightline that did a story on the hpfp, not 60 minutes.

    http://abcnews.go.com/watch/nightline/SH5584743/VD5593671/nightline-charlie-sheen-

    It's in the middle of the episode.

    Also

    http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/bmw-admits-fuel-pump-flaw-turbo-cars/story?id=11968495

    My thanks to e90post.com

    http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=447592

    dmpete says:

    03:16 PM, 06/01/2011

    Pick a suspension any suspension, and you could blow the doors off this thing for way less than 50K, I realize it has M bits and pieces, what I am saying is I can build a one off cheaper, It would be more reliable and much much faster, I know what I am talking about. I have been researching M's for about 15 years. The E46 is the best M car they have made, and honestly it still had it's problems mechanically speaking, the electronics were for crap, to maintain it one had to sell a kidney, but I guess that goes for most BMW's too, they are great cars, the engines are superb, but they fall short in a few other areas. All I'm saying....And I wouldn't spend 50K on the 1 series M.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2011 BMW 1 Series M Coupe

    Base Price:

    $47,010

    Price as Tested:

    $49,585

    Engine:

    3.0-liter turbocharged inline-6

    Gearbox:

    Six-speed manual

    Power:

    335 hp @ 5,900 rpm

    0-60 mph:

    4.6 seconds

    Fuel Mileage:

    20.3 combined

    What Works (pros):

    Purposeful looks, purposeful hardware, purposeful performance.

    What Needs Work (cons):

    Engine lacks the personality of those in other M products.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2011 BMW 1 Series M 2dr Coupe (3.0L 6cyl Turbo 6M)
    Vehicle TypeRear-wheel drive
    Base MSRP$47,010
    Options on test vehicleValencia Orange ($550); Premium Package ($2,400 -- includes auto-dimming inside rearview mirror, auto-dimming power-folding exterior mirrors, eight-way power-adjustable front seats with power-adjustable lumbar support and two-way manually adjustable headrests, two-position memory for the driver seat and exterior mirrors, ambience lighting that is sourced from the exterior door handles and illuminates the area near the doors when the doors are unlocked, BMW Assist with Bluetooth. iPod and USB adapter); Heated Front Seats ($500 -- includes heated front seats with three levels of heat intensity)
    As-tested MSRP$49,585
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationLongitudinal, front-engine, rear-wheel drive
    Engine typeTwin-turbocharged, direct-injected, inline-6, gasoline
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2,979/182
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder, variable intake-valve timing
    Compression ratio (x:1)10.2
    Redline, indicated (rpm)7,000
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)335 @ 5,900
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)332 @ 1,500
    Fuel type91-octane required
    Transmission typeSix-speed manual
    Transmission ratios (x:1)I = 4.11, II = 2.31, III = 1.54, IV = 1.17, V = 1.00, VI = 0.85
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)3.154
    Differential(s)Viscous limited slip
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent MacPherson struts, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent multilink, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeSpeed-proportional power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)12.5
    Turning circle (ft.)37.7
    Tire make and modelMichelin Pilot Sport PS2
    Tire typeAsymmetrical summer, high-performance
    Tire size, front245/35ZR19 93Y
    Tire size, rear265/35ZR19 98Y
    Wheel size, front19-by-9 inches
    Wheel size, rear19-by-10 inches
    Wheel materialAlloy
    Brakes, front14.2-inch ventilated two-piece rotors with sliding calipers
    Brakes, rearVentilated disc
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)1.9
    0-45 mph (sec.)3.3
    0-60 mph (sec.)4.6
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)4.4
    0-75 mph (sec.)6.7
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)13.0 @ 107.7
    0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.)2.2
    0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.)3.7
    0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.)5.1
    0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)4.8
    0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.)7.3
    1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph)13.3 @ 107.4
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)26
    60-0 mph (ft.)106
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)71.4
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON69.2
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.96
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON0.96
    Sound level @ idle (dB)48.2
    @ Full throttle (dB)77.5
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)71.5
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)2,250
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsWith traction control on and a quick clutch uptake, the car bogs heavily, so I had to feather the clutch on for a decent launch. With T/C off, the opposite is true: It'll boil the tires with ease. It's one of those cars that likes a little bit of initial wheelspin, but going to WOT too soon ends up blowing the run. So, a 2,750-rpm quick clutch, but then patience/prudence is required to maintain ideal traction all the way to the middle/top of 1st gear. Power seems to fade near redline, and short shifting seemed to help rather than hurt quarter-mile time and trap.
    Braking commentsBrakes are nearly fade-free, only varying 2 feet over six stops from 60 mph. Pedal feel is solid and dead consistent; minimal dive and zero wiggle or wander. Noticed some steering wheel shake on the run up to 65 mph, but not under braking. Missing a wheel weight, perhaps?
    Handling comments"Skid pad: (DSC Off) If I only had feel to go by instead of the electronic timer, I would've guessed about 0.85-0.90g, so imagine my surprise when it posted a 0.96. At this speed, the 1M gently understeers, and trying to kick the tail out with a couple throttle jabs only makes it go wide. While there's no question that the steering precision is there and the weight is appropriate, "feel" is sadly lacking. I never quite know what the front tires are enduring down there and they don't make much noise either. With DSC on MDM, it was actually easier to keep the car nailed to the painted line all the way around.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date5/24/2011
    Test locationCalifornia Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)61.9
    Relative humidity (%)52.1
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)28.9
    Wind (mph, direction)3.0
    Odometer (mi.)3,043
    Fuel used for test91-octane gasoline
    As-tested tire pressures, f/r (psi)35/35
    Fuel Consumption
    Edmunds observed (mpg)20.3 combined
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)14.0
    Driving range (mi.)0
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,362
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)3,346
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)51.6/48.4
    Length (in.)172.2
    Width (in.)71.0
    Height (in.)55.9
    Wheelbase (in.)104.7
    Track, front (in.)60.7
    Track, rear (in.)60.7
    Legroom, front (in.)41.5
    Legroom, rear (in.)32.1
    Headroom, front (in.)37.9
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.1
    Shoulder room, front (in.)54.0
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)53.4
    Seating capacity2
    GVWR (lbs.)4,255
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain4 years/50,000 miles
    Corrosion12 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance4 years/Unlimited miles
    Free scheduled maintenance4 years/50,000 miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement